i got 2 T1 internships because thankfully the partners were kind enough to read the mails for just 10 seconds, which included the work and area very closely related to the one done by the team, in essence making their lives easier(in case they are hiring). I can assure you the candidates in your mails are as good as (if not better) than the interns you get only through filtering applications based on CGPA.

NLS has struggled to get an additional 15 acres since 2020, when the Expansion Plan was announced. Sudhir did a webinar with the students to show how the existing campus would be expanded by 15 acres, but BU refused and asked for a 50% domicile reservation. Now, we are getting 7 acres for 10 extra seats. The number of seats for non-Karnataka students is not reducing; they are increasing the total number of seats to accommodate them.

I don't know why so many people in the comments are treating this as a 'gotcha' moment saying this shows nls is going downhill. If anything, it is really unfortunate and shows how badly NLUs have to struggle for some extra funding and for infrastructure development. Most of NLS's recent infra is due to donations from private bodies like Infosys Foundation, JSW, Luthra, Thakur Foundation and so on. Still, it has to have these quid pro quo negotiations with the State Government for some extra resources.

If I was Sudhir, I would have proposed this compromise solution:

- 100% Karnataka reservation in SC/ST/OBC quota, across BALLB, LLB, LLM and MPP

- 50% Karnataka reservation in EWS quota, across all courses.

- No reservation in merit list.

Such a formula would have balanced meritocracy with political compulsions.

Karnataka High Court
--------------------

Master Balachandar Krishnan vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 September, 2020
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

### Bench: B.V.Nagarathna, Ravi V Hosmani

“111. As a sequitur, it is inferred that the respondent/Law School is not akin to a State University established by the State Government. In fact, on a reading of the scheme of the Act, it is clear that the State Legislature was mindful of the fact that it was establishing a national-level institution in the State of Karnataka and that its powers under the Act was minimal. It is also not on par with the other national law schools in the country. It may be that the respondent/Law School is a part of the Consortium along with other National Law Schools for the purpose of participating in CLAT. But, the respondent/Law School cannot be compared with other Law Schools nor is on par, for the reason that the incorporation and establishment of the respondent/Law School is unique; it is the product of an experiment made by the BCI to set up a model law college in India for the promotion of the legal education, which would be a national-level institution. -: 159 :- Hence, the respondent/Law School is a unique national- level institution and cannot be construed to be a State University. It may be that the establishment of the respondent/Law School is by a legislation just as other law schools have been set up in various States of the country but, the similarity ends there. In all other respects, the respondent/Law University is a stand-alone Law School and University of India. It has its own distinctive features and therefore, must function as such so as to achieve the objects for which it has been set up.”

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170946768/

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Remember that Sudhir and alumni argued before the Karnataka HC that other NLUs are not national, only NLSIU is national. Remember that NLSIU students declined to join efforts by students of other NLUs to jointly campaign for NLU nationalisation.

Karma is a bitch.

Ha, ha, ha........the plight of NLS. For just 7 acres of land, this much humiliation. Karnataka Govt is taking its pound of flesh. It has NLS by the scruff of its neck - extracting every drop of juice. Where are the clowns who desperately wanted NLS to be given the national university status? This further reinforces that NLS was, is, and will remain a state university in perpetuity (with its quality going down every year). The VC is a mute spectator.

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/bangalore/nlsiu-agrees-to-reserve-10-additional-seats-for-karnataka-students-9654995/?ref=latestnews_hp

Hi all, fourth year nlu student here. So I had been trying to get an internship at Trilegal for jan 2025 since june. After multiple followups, I received the assessment links like most of us did but now I've been told by the hr post the assessments that the slots for jan 2025 are all filled and they can only offer me an internship march onwards. The thing is, my uni gives the internship break only in jan-feb and july. I planned to intern at trilegal in jan and then wished to secure a call back for july so that there could be some scope for a ppo, but that looks unlikely to me as I can only intern there in july 2025 now :(

What should be my possible plan of action here if I still want to try for a ppo from this internship?

LoL, seems like their new HR is quite active on LI now. It's baffling how hard ICUL is trying to market their toxic work culture and hide the recent mass exits from the firm.

Although, I have to admit their fund setup practice is one of the best (in terms of quantity) in India.

Other than that, Saturdays are mostly working, one Saturday every month is officially working.

And the work culture is toxic half the time (I hear daily about the work culture from one of my flatmates).

Everyone remaining is in their own bubble criticizing KCo and Trilegal, as to how bad they are. Which shows how insecure they are. But that's okay considering that they're trying to retain their workers.

Anyway, TC is a growth oriented leader, I have respect for him. I think they'll eventually realise what they're doing wrong and do well in the future.

Agreed. In the long term, there is not much personal growth. ICUL Funds team plays a volume game, churning out drafts of documents like an assembly line but the bigger and more challenging mandates don't go to them. So ya, best to use it as a stepping stone to move to either KCO or Trilegal.

He's going to get an extension of at least six months even if a new guy has to be appointed. That's the bare minimum for search committee to be appointed, applications sought and interviews held. The state government through its reps is going to decide, Chancellor is not going to do squat to change anything. SJA is going to remain part of the spectators from the sidelines, that's all. Someone dubious like the VCs of other state universities in Bengal is going to be appointed, with CU background, and finally drive the nail on the institutional coffin. Serves all the students, faculty and alumni right for being enablers of the corrupt, inefficient and unscrupulous regime and admin.

Bro people with some sort of social marginalization be it caste, religion, or gender are treated better than supposedly "non-ultra left UC Hindus". So yeah you'll be pretty safe and won't face much discrimination. Believe me if someone ever discriminates against you, that person will be ostracized to such a level in college that he will not be able to have a decent social life after being called out

Have seen it happen the other way around, but you'll need some pull with the senior partners and its tricky to 1) not piss off your current partner while switching and 2) finding a partner who'd be willing to take you without it straining their relationship with your current partner

Kamala Harris wasn't an Ivy League grad, JD Vance and Trump are.

KH grew up in a poor black neighbourhood. Trump was rich from birth.

Orry the nepo rich brat who gets paid for being a poser voted for Trump. Indian elite people like him all go abroad to study and grab foreign citizenship before returning home. They are not in the NLUs. They are not the common people but they are also not the people in charge of the country.

The NLS faculty has several kind, brilliant human beings on it. You may want to assess your idea of moral corruption. You should read MO's book again and watch her interviews. The worst thing we can do to ourselves is get trapped in our bitterness and resentment. I also didn't have the same privileges as everyone else and I resented unfairness, held grudges and assumed things that prevented me from asking for help. Human beings are complicated. But if you don't give them a chance, you will feel helpless and never get anywhere. Learn to move on after feeling bad. Remember no one is perfect and no one has a life without their own problems. Often giving your professors a chance is giving yourself a bigger chance.

I just don't know what to say. Good law schools all over the common law world, including the best ones in the entire world - Oxford and Cambridge - have always had a tutorial system (in Cambridge they call them "supervisions"). Those people are a thousand times the lawyers that you grifters and scroungers will ever be. But don't worry, at least NLS now has good academic standards, which means outsiders (and alumni) have a way to distinguish the grifters from the workers. I must say, Legally India has done a remarkable job of helping you ensure you don't mistakenly out yourselves.

Can you provide the citation to that publication please?

Also, when you say "highly ranked", I am sorry, but if it is a student law journal, unless you published in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal or the McGill Law Journal, that is quite a loaded claim to make. People would be much more willing to take your claim at face value and operate on a "trust but verify" principle if you'd published in a proper journal like Public Law, Current Legal Problems, Law Quarterly Review, Indian Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Cambridge Law Journal, Industrial Law journal or some similar academic journal with a high quality peer review process.

wow, there jurispere AI guys don't do business clean. first they make their entire site by ripping off jhana.ai and making a worse version of jhana.ai ! then they spent so much time spamming legallyindia.com pretending to be real commenters !! OP tell your boss that we can tell when u fake posts like this

anyway, my recommendation is use jhana.ai. i've tried Casemine, jurisphere, etc and have claude pro account - but these all have hallucinations when I ask questions with precedent needed

A0 here, recently joined. While assessing the transactions for notifiability, I understand we look at the turnover/revenue and asset values provided in the financials. Only doubt is - when to look at “revenue from operations” and when “total revenue”? Or we look only at revenue from operations? TIA.

P.s. would’ve asked my senior here, but they recently explained and I still have the doubt, so response would be v helpful, thanks

It doesn't matter much if you are working from the office or home because the amount of work you'll get is approx equal because if you are in office they'll call you for a task or msg you and in WFH they again can call you on your mobile or assign you the work on email. They need you to get the work done within the timeline no matter the working mode and yes it can get hectic it depends on the timeline and type of work.

It's the other way around actually. 3 days WFO and 2 days WFH. I interned there in July. Understand you are exhausted but trust me when I tell you how important it is as an intern to be present all days of the week and to visibilise the work you will anyway be grinding away at, at home.

Seems a totally extreme reaction by boomers IMO. No such law exists in the world. You are denying children access to a tool that can help them keep in touch with friends and also serve as an educational tool. At least the age cap can be lowered to 11. Ate the age of 12/13 you are mature enough.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/australia-proposes-ban-social-media-those-under-16-2024-11-06/