We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Trolls stay away please!!
it's okay billy, not everyone has to understand everything, but don't speak loud and out you failed at something.
These are routine things in the life of a Senior Advocate or law firm owner, but menial labourers like us are also experiencing some of it, as we gradually climb up the ladder. So what are some of the good things you have got a taste of?
I don't know what has happened to this firm.
Giving internship to anyone and everyone.
No work given, nothing
Just for the sake of certificate do it.
It will not add any value to your cv
But I am scared if it's the right decision, bottom line is that I am not happy right now, but then I see people jobless and everything. So please suggest, what should be my next step.
- An SOP saying that he/she/ze wishes to specialise in human rights and return to India after finishing his/her/zer course
- Some sort of focus on gender intersectionality: e.g. Judicial reforms and gender; Naxalism in Chhattisgarh and gender; Right to food and gender etc.
- Membership of the college Human Rights Society, or Public Law Society (if no such society exists, then the Legal Aid Society)
- An internship with at least one of these organisations:
a) One of these news outlets (in 1st year): The Hindu, The Hindustan Times, The Wire, Newslaundry, Scroll, Alt News
b) One of these think-tanks/NGOs (in 2nd or 3rd year): CPR, Vidhi, Centre for Internet & Society, Alternative Law Forum, Lawyers Collective
c) One of these advocates (in 3rd of 4th year): Menaka Guruswamy, Karuna Nundy, Vrinda Grover, Arundhati Katju, Gopal Subramaniam, Aditya Sondhi, Sanjoy Ghose, Rebecca John, Meenakshi Arora.
Having 2.5 yr. PQE in Corporate, I'm looking for a career switch. Either really good work or even better pay. Suggestions are welcome.
1. Is it mandatory to do verification during the ongoing verification process? I was enrolled in 2016. Haven't been to courts in the last 2 years.
2. Is there an introduction of proximity cards in the Delhi High Court also like the Supreme Court?
Everything else - there is no infra on campus. Overall not much of a culture, many people are nerds who don't step outside hostel-library-academic block. Those who play have a good community.
In any case the disqualification only applies where a law graduate seeks to enrol as an advocate. It is no ground for withholding a degree. Education cannot be withheld to anyone interested irrespective of their criminal status - many individuals in jail in fact undertake educational courses through distance learning as part of their reformation. This circular is wholly illegal.
Biometric attendance, CCTV surveillance etc will fail the test of proportionality under the Puttaswamy judgment on at least two grounds: there is no legal authorisation, and therefore no legitimate purpose (Advocates Act only authorises BCI to maintain "standards of legal education" which is a far stretch); and these are not the least invasive alternatives available to maintain attendance (or prevent fraud).
The truth remains, the EPs have built their ivory towers on top of multiple sacrifices by their associates. And yes, such sacrifices include ones life. From Bengaluru to Delhi, associates have already laid down their lives.
Yet, the top of the pyramid remains flooded with resources and the bottom of the pyramid, as always, remains significantly divided.
Few of the BigLaw firms have already faced the same situation EY is facing today.
From 2015 onwards atleast 4-5 associates have passed away due to questionable circumstances. And yet, nothing has changed.
Even recently a tier-2 firm lost one of its senior associates in mumbai. No one will ever speak up.
Get back to work now!
Elections? Maybe not.Kaafi log pehle se line mein hote hain. Multi generational politically connected, asset rich people who are clamouring for a ticket. Unless you have found the limelight at the national level (good or bad reasons), or are a washing machine for the party, or above all, are a phenomenal speaker, political entry is difficult. Yes, your role will teach you the unwritten rules. But maybe temper your ambitions, and truly be in the game for the people, and a ticket might be possible in a decade or two.
*I have not done a single Tier 1( sadly didn't made the cut).
*Should I take this opportunity for beginning my journey into tier 1 firms?