We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Also is there any other way to try applying apart from personal contacts and linkedin cold messaging.
i’ll be privy to national politics and could potentially start my own chambers after 5 years of being a junior. Also, I could potentially contests LS & RS elections in 2029 & 2031, provided that I be an asset to the party.
PS: The party in question is a State level party.
However, you guys want to continue living in your own echochamber? Carry on!
Income Tax Act is a vast ocean, and Section 80 is but a tiny portion of it.
And if you've read VSV Scheme, to resolve the disputed, you have to pay 100% of the disputed tax anyways (minus penalty and Interest). If you have a strong case, it makes no sense to avail this.
Linkedin community is very strong and it will definitely result in some strong damage to that chamber, even other advocates may also take up your case to punish that animal.
1. Prepare an answer to 'tell me something about yourself' - make it holistic - family background, schooling, hobbies interests and then why b&f.
2. Cover everything on your CV to beginning with - past internships, articles etc.
3. Basisc of contract act - indemnity guarantee bailment pledge - difference between bailment, pledge, hypothecation and mortgages
4. Basics of companies act - public & private companies, doctrines (indoor management, corporate veil, ultra vires, etc.), types of resolutions, and other basics you must've been taught
5. Basics of IBC - Operational creditors, financial creditors, operational debt, financial debt, CIRP, Difference b/w section 7 and 9 proceedings, etc
6. Transfer of Property Act - kinds of mortgages, difference between mortgage and hypothecation
7. Any recent developments relevant to your cv and work done previously
8. Sections 42, 71, 180, 185, 186, 188 and related rules
9. SEBI NCS Regulations, DT regulations, LODR and related Master Circulars
But largely it may revolve around your existing CV and work you've done.
All the best
Time to start an association of law firm employees
It’s like asking ki Mukesh Ambani Reliance mai naukri lagva dega.
Don’t the BCI rules give the bar council power to make sure convicted criminals shouldn’t be lawyers ? Depending on nature of offence and whether a sentence has been served ? Shouldn’t law be one of those professions where a criminal record should disqualify you from at least representing other people ? Kind of like if you are a drug user maybe you shouldn’t be a doctor ? And if you’re a pedophile maybe we shouldn’t give you certification to be a school teacher ? Lawyers are officers of the court no ? How can the BCI allow people to register who might have criminal proceedings against them? The BCI is supposed to check for this anyway- they’re simply passing the work on to universities so they’re able to do it more efficiently. Exactly what is wrong with that ?
One of my friends studied in a fancy university abroad when her classmate was caught plagiarising a weekly assignment . The professor and the university were so offended they called all the state bar councils to make sure the plagiarist didn’t get a license. If they can set those standards for themselves why shouldn’t we ?
Biometric attendance and cctv - I mean no one is really going to check all this data to persecute people. This is something they’re doing in schools and board exams now to ensure that teachers are doing their job and no one is cheating.
If it’s political retribution and free speech once is worried about - it’s easy enough to record video without audio ?
It seems to me rooting out fraud in university legal education would fall within the bar councils purview no ? You already give your biometric to Aadhar and a whole host of other things. There’s barely any part of Bangalore or Bombay that’s not covered by cctv. School boards have used cctv to make sure there’s no cheating in examinations ( and it’s worked !). If we’re so upset and outraged by failing standards of legal education - why are we outraged when universities are asked by regulators to use updated technology to reduce fraud ?
Commenters here saying : oh BCI should start with non nlus where standards are terrible. They are ! That’s who these rules are meant for! Not NLUs where rates of fraud are relatively low anyway. But you cannot make rules for one uni and not another.
And oh BCI should do random spot checks - honestly that’s a really bad way to ensure we’re preventing fraud and a really good way to allow BCI guys to charge bribes for unseeing violations. That’s basically the system we have now and it doesn’t work. Maybe tech driven record keeping that is hard to fudge might actually bring some honesty back.
And those saying teaching faculty should have to clock in and out : yes. Why not ? Too many professors cancel classes for half of the term and barely teach for the other half. Maybe they need to worry that someone is looking over their shoulder a bit. Too many VCs don’t do their jobs- maybe a basic check on hours in office / on official business is actually not a bad idea. Maybe performance reviews aren’t a bad idea. VCs act like they’re kings without any accountability and spend their time in office looking for their next job or trying to pocket money. I don’t trust them as far as I could throw them. Best case - they treat it like a vacation, a pre retirement retirement . I don’t want my fees to pay for someone’s lavish vacation type lifestyle. You get pensions at the end of your tenure if you’ve earned them but we already have too little money in higher ed to spend it on big salaries for VCs and (some) deans and emeritus faculty who don’t do much. I’d rather these people be held accountable and be made to do work. And if they fail- I’d rather that money go to funding legal education for poor students.
Who knows i might even do so one day.
In your opinion, detention of the boy had nothing to do with his saddening affairs of the university and the fate of him. God bless you. You need to go through Internal mails circulated.
Really scary! We see people in their 30s and 40s getting heart attacks and dropping dead like flies these days. Though they say that it's because Indians have bad genes and are more exposed to pollutants in the air and stress compared to Western nations, my own guess is that it may be a side-effect of having Covid, because there is probably at least a 40 to 50% chance that Covid was a bioweapon leaked from a lab.
Anyway, probably best to give up smoking, alcohol, sugar and fatty foods entirely.