We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
if VC would have gone to boys hostel without the notice would it be that problematic as this one?
so, are you saying women are lower then men and cant be put on equal footing as that of men?
do you think women are not independent and strong enough to handle that? why the special cater?
also, just wondering if the same uproar would have been caused if a women VC would have entered boys hostel.
women need to chill out
------------------------
Leadership is about listening to your people. If someone vying for a leadership position is only interested in their own ideas, I think itβs safe to say theyβre not ready to take charge. So much about being a good leader, I think, involves humility: Do you actively listen to your team? Do you actually let them talk instead of interrupting them? Do you take their ideas and feedback seriously? Do you hire people who are good at what they do and then trust them to do the job (ideally, better than you could)? There is no place for ego at the topβitβs lonely enough up there already.
-
Rejecting feedback
-------------------
If someone is unwilling to solicit and embrace constructive feedback, then that person is not ready to lead others. One of the most important jobs of a leader is to enable the team to deliver the best possible outcomes by creating a culture of trust and collaboration. Many people attribute the success of NASAβs first landing on the moon to a mission-first attitudeβteams that feel safe to openly discuss issues, regardless of organizational politics or roles, are better able to identify and fix minor problems before they become major ones. It takes humility to admit that you donβt have all the answers but that dedication to outcomes over ego is essential to complex problem-solving. Itβs incredibly difficult to innovate or lead successfully without it.
-
Know-it-all
-----------
Early in my career at the Brooklyn DAβs office, I heard from the head of homicide, a figure I deeply admired. This was my dream job, the type of case I aspired to prosecute. However, as I listened to this individual speak, I realized they were a βknow-it-all.β They exuded an air of absolute authority, convinced they knew everything about everything.
At that moment, I understood this wasnβt true expertise but a facade. No one knows everything. This type of inflated ego, believing in oneβs infallibility, doesnβt belong in leadership. It stifles growth, prevents collaboration, and ultimately hinders the leaderβs and teamβs success.
A βknow-it-allβ leader, blinded by their perceived omniscience, fails to recognize their limitations. This lack of self-awareness is detrimental to both the leader and their team. A leader who believes they possess all the answers stifles growth and innovation. They are unwilling to seek input from others, missing out on valuable perspectives and expertise.
Effective leadership requires a willingness to learn and adapt. A humble leader understands that they donβt have all the answers and surrounds themselves with a capable team. They foster an environment where diverse viewpoints are welcomed and collaboration is encouraged. This approach allows the team to leverage each memberβs strengths, leading to greater success than any individual could achieve alone.
By recognizing and embracing their own limitations, leaders open the door to personal and collective growth. They create a culture of learning where everyone feels empowered to contribute their unique skills and knowledge.
Then litigation is stressful and Law firms create unnecessary pressure on young students to perform like robots and they themselves lack any work-life balance.
I really dont think it is the university atmosphere alone. It is WE as a legal fraternity that is responsible.
It is important for all of us to create safe spaces within our student groups and interact with faculty who are approachable and willing.
Law in itself is a serious study and one normal case can have different impact on different people.
Another observation is that Emotional intelligence and Academic intelligence both need an emphasis now.
Bar Council of India and UGC should
1. Make attendance flexible.
2. Not impose terrible credit requirements and hours of teaching making universities struggle to keep up the number of hours and subjects.
3. Soon faculty members will also fall to stress. Cuttack incident is a call that faculty needs support too.
I am already thinking of the plight of faculty at NLU delhi who would be consoling students while themselves struggling to cope up with loss. Noone i say noone wants to harm and see their children, students or friends take this step.
Job, marks and competiton seems to be making people forget that we work to live and not live to work. Please take care of each other and I for one feel that harsh comments on nlud would now again put pressure on students who would feel more stressed as to the image of the place they have joined.
NluD and other law school students bashing each other on this forum itself shows we all as a community are only trying to win arguments than making all law schools a better community as a whole. Please take this as a wake up call.
Administration alone can do nothing. Students, teachers and parents have to together try to build a healthy future.
I am shocked to see not a single junior showing me quality at what is supposed to be their main job. I don't see anyone being able to sit on their laptops for hours even if the deadline's literally the next day. Things are might appear stale on the outside, but inside its now rotten to the core.
At the place I am currently, I am paid well but the environment is not sustainable in the long term. However, the new place pays around 40K less than the current place. How do i ask them to match up? Please advise (I am afraid they wonβt consider me if I put it outrightly)
any views?
better than slaves at mumbai
at least there is work life balance
it does not do shit. partners don't care about moot - ask me, i've done some great ones and performed well at them.
The kind of law school whose name, when uttered, makes us sit up and take notice is willing to put a shit tonne of money into research in the type of areas you so glibly look down upon. You don't even need to do GBP-INR converting on oanda.com or using the UK foreign ministry (FCDO) exchange rate, the CER, to know how much money is being put into this. Tell me, would a law school of world-wide repute be willing to put the amounts you are proposing if this learning was so useless? And note, this is a law school well known for commercial law, not legal philosophy.
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study-legacy/funding/yeoh-tiong-lay-centre-for-politics-philosophy-and-law-phd-studentship#maincontent
Is it moots, is it research papers, is it skills listed or something else?
βThis is regarding visa and tax violations concerns regarding the business practices of Netflix in India,β wrote Indian official Deepak Yadav from the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) of the home ministry in New Delhi.
βWe have received certain details in this regard w.r.t (with respect to) the stated companyβs conduct, visa violation, illegal structures, tax evasion and other malpractices including incidents of racial discrimination that company has been engaged in while conducting its business in India,β he added.
In an emailed statement, Mehta said she is pursuing a lawsuit in US against Netflix for alleged wrongful termination as well as racial and gender discrimination β charges the company denies.
β¦
In 2021, Mehta sued Netflix in Los Angeles County Superior Court in California for alleged wrongful termination and racial and gender discrimination, among other things, U.S. court filings show.
Netflix has in U.S. court denied βeach and every allegationβ and said in its statement that Mehta was fired for repeatedly using her corporate credit card for tens of thousands of dollars in personal expenses.
Mehta said she will βcontinue to fight for justice.β Her case is set for a status hearing on Monday in Los Angeles.
https://indianexpress.com/article/business/india-probing-netflix-for-visa-violations-racial-discrimination-email-shows-9583610/lite/
After 3 years of my college life I have realised that from a corporate law POV I have acheived nothing except one Tier 2 Corp internship. Not a single moot or research paper. And regarding grades, marks are in 50-60 range for most exams, with around 3 supplementary papers (1 of them is a law subject) in total.Partly it's because atmosphere was not at all competitive and college itself does not emphasize stress on studies, but mostly its because of my laziness.
I seek redemption ! I have already registered for a couple of legal events but deep down I highly doubt whether I could get a good corporate law job.
Do you suggest that I give CLAT once again at this stage of my life? Or should I give NLSAT after completing this course in 2026 ? Or are there any other solutions?
Please advice me on this. Legal proffesionals, academics and students alike are welcome to provide your valuable opinions.
Iykyk
he is living his life
Any other methods would be appreciated including the foreign LLM or BCL way. I need a roadmap if someone is knowledgeable enough
What things should I focus on to have the best shot at making the most of it and landing a good job?
which partner does good commerical litigation and arbitration? and may also be open to hiring? SP? RG?
Thatβs how you gotta hustle in India and why simple people like us lose out π
Extract from Boy β Tales of Childhood by Roald Dahl:
The next day, we were allowed to inspect the appendix itself in a glass bottle. It was a
longish black wormy-looking thing, and I said, βDo I have one of those inside me, Nanny?β
βEveryone has one,β Nanny answered.
βWhatβs it for?β I asked her.
βGod works in mysterious ways,β she said, which was her stock reply whenever she
didnβt know the answer.
βWhat makes it go bad?β I asked her.
βToothbrush bristles,β she answered, this time with no hesitation at all.
βToothbrush bristles?β I cried. βHow can toothbrush bristles make your appendix go
bad?β Nanny, who in my eyes was filled with more wisdom than Solomon, replied, βWhenever
a bristle comes out of your toothbrush and you swallow it, it sticks in your appendix and turns
rotten. In the war,β she went on, βthe German spies used to sneak box loads of loose-bristled toothbrushes into our shops and millions of our soldiers got appendicitis.β
βHonestly, Nanny?β I cried. βIs that honestly true?β
βI never lie to you, child,β she answered. βSo let that be a lesson to you never to use an
old toothbrush.β
For years after that, I used to get nervous whenever I found a toothbrush bristle on
my tongue.
Money is scarce. Expect something between 6-8 LPA. Lit and corporate sits together. HR will sit on your head and micromanager things. Pretty much like an average T3-T4 firm.