We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
As a student do you find it demeaning traveling by train?
Vivek Pareek
Navomi Koshy
Abir Lal Dey
Satadru Goswami
Kunal Satyadarshi
The SRP team under her is a failed attempt by the CM practice head at breaking into the Securities practice. Her team hasnโt done significant work apart from the (failed) representation during the PNBHFL SEBI/SAT matter a few years back and the current representation in the PAYTM matter.
On the contrary, Yogesh Chande's securities practice is much more successful and less toxic. Yogesh advises on much more varied matters and is an old hand. In contrast, Manjiri is a CM lawyer masquerading as a securities lawyer, and Prashant is only qualified in English law (or so he claims).
If possible, apply to YCs team.
Hope this helps!
Itโs a difficult path to decide to take.
Plus- even if you donโt end up getting H1B post a top US MBA, most likely your company would be willing to transfer you to Canada/UK/Europe/Middle East. Whereas, for JD, skills are not as transferable geographically.
Is this a revival of HNLU?
NLSIU
NALSAR
NLU Delhi
2. Harvard
3. Oxford
The query is based on the background that I keep reading teams having a senior partner and 5-6 or even more partners. This is not about firms but a particular team within a firm. Also, wondering does it make sense at mid senior level to stick in a team which already has these many partners if the aim is to move to partnership eventually.
See... you can't even get ad hominem right. I'll bet you anything you like that if my name (let us call me 'X' for now) became known as being that of someone who defends Sudhir on here or who agrees/expresses agreement with those who do, Sudhir will ask, 'Who on earth is this nobody of a graduate student in London?', and will happily produce bank statements/other documentation constituting a paper trail proving that he has nothing to do with me (and I will be happy to do likewise). So unless you are suggesting that somehow both of us have enough money at our personal disposal to open secret accounts in the sorts of places where they don't ask questions and just care about the money flowing into the account, you will really have to reconsider your ideas, and come up with a more plausible (false) accusation/line of attack.
Partner can say no but then there is risk of client to engage another law firm for next assignment. Law firm loses business which impacts profitability and as a result less increment/bonus. Will junior associates be fine with that?
Other option is to hire 3 lawyers instead of 1 and divide the workload. This will also mean salary being 1/3rd of what currently the 1 lawyer earns. Again, will junior associates be fine with that?
By the time the SA/PA get a hang of things, everything is delayed and required on short notice
Brain fried, fucked life
How would I even know if they have vacancy or their office is not toxic?