We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Also it's ipr focused, quantity of work is really less and not good.
Also what are other major companies or law firms which hire from lower ranked nlus?:)
-A victim A0 who got no choice but to become a paper pusher at office of younger Cyril brother. :) (if you can help me find a litigator who can give 50% of my current salary, I will put in my papers to join them.)
Please note UGC guidelines to have multidisciplinary but not limiting one.
mark my words, after his retirement, he will go to harvard as something emeritus & will preach daily about morality.
That youāll have to do on your own. So while you have a job, use that leverage to reach out to folks and ask for an opening in their team in different practice area.
Seniors tell me if I want to switch, I should now only because 1 year down I will be too deep into my current work. However others suggest that I spend at least 1 year at the firm to make myself more marketable to say recruiters etc.
What advice is actually good? I am looking to switch IMMEDIATELY.
The work there is a barren wasteland of unending monotony, stripping away every bit of intellectual engagement and joy. You'll be engulfed in a relentless cycle of third rate template-driven drudgery, surrounded by a sea of despondent colleagues who have long surrendered to a grim existence at the mercy of their overlords. The psychological toll is severe, leading to a profound loss of personal identity and well-being. The bleakness and soul-sapping nature of the work management makes this team a nightmare from which you should flee at the earliest opportunity and thank you stars with profound sense of absolute gratitude each day, each minute, that you don't work there.
Run.
I sincerely wish getting a job at BCG was as easy as being on the recruitment committee and pulling strings. It does not look good on anyone to reduce someone's work, as done here. I could understand if this was a generic statement about placements, but no, this is equivalent to outing someone's work for what it wasn't. Regards, ex nalsarite
we are the ipad
We aren't exactly asked to lower out marks, but maintain a curve. So very low students should score very high marks and very low marks. Absolute shitty system, but it is what it is.
(i) Shri S. Dwarakanath
(ii) Ms. Archana Pathak Dave
(iii) Shri Satya Darshi Sanjay
(iv) Shri Brijender Chahar
(v) Shri Raghavendra P. Shankar
What is their background and the core areas of matters they appear in?
(vi) Shri Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare (Raja Thakare)