NLUD student here. About 40 out of a pool of 50 students got jobs before graduating. Just wait and watch for this year's placements - they are going to be great. For last year CAM is showing only 3 because those were all PPOs as CAM did not come for Day Z last year. This time things are looking good, as usual

The answer to your last question is no. It never has been, considering that NLUD's placement scene has never been as thriving as even NLUJ or GNLU earlier, let alone NALSAR and NUJS. GNLU of course has improved by leaps and bounds and its domestic placement scene is currently as good as NUJS, arguably the best of all Indian law schools.

Please name criminal litigation boutique firms in Delhi that hire non-NLUs with a decent CV and payroll and also offer good learning exposure.

I graduated in July 2024. What should my subject line be—an assessment internship application or an associate trainee application if I haven't interned before in the firm?

[If you can name more than 10 firms, I will be very grateful.]

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-imposes-rs2-lakh-cost-on-iim-rohtak-for-withholding-illegally-result-of-student-for-4-yrs-drastic-impact-on-career-of-young-student-265381

This went to the court. How many get abandoned or "settled"?

Kid than ask your government to subsidise the education at those so called elite institutions as they do for IITs.

And all this lack of money is an excuse for your incompetence. I too was poor, living in a t-2 city with my father earning 25K PM in a family of 4 with me and younger brother. I didn't take any coaching studied on my own, got into a T-1 NLU after failing to get any NLU once, got means based scholarship and took a loan to fund my studies. Toiled for 5 years, and got a PPO at a tier-1. During internships in Delhi, I used to stay with some relative or other to save costs and skipped lunches because I couldn't afford them then.

And I am not the only one to do this, there are far many who might me poorer than me, but they all worked hard and didn't not make hue and cry.

Is it so hard to understand? NLUs don't matter and they are NOT part of the national narrative. They are not important. No one cares about state universities, and they provide the best punching bags. Not a single NLU VC dares even to speak up, and the so-called "Roads" scholars are irrelevant.

That directly translates to "money is directly proportional to your standing in this field". People from less expensive law clgs cannot compete with elite NLUs and jindal due to lack of those resources so thats kinda money and power game my dear, it has nothing to do with actual skills or knowledge.

Yeah, he is in induslaw, and he is ace at finding solutions, if you like Abhimanyu then you should apply for Rajiv Mohan law office, rajiv sir was a partner with Abhimanyu sir, but 1 thing work hours are one of a kind day starts with the courtroom and end at 11 or midnight in office but will get best work experience in trial courts lots of associate who are nice and helpful. go for this office if you live around Gulmohar Park. you will get a hell of exposure

How many stupid rules do you want the admin to make? And how much time should they waste? They have better work to do - actually resolving student issues. Instead of getting the admin to waste time on this shit, why not just do what many of the best universities in the world do? The a priori assumption behind their accounting systems is that the student is paying. If the parent pays, the record shows the account the payment came from (for refund or other questions), but also corresponds in such a way as to show that the student has paid, because the student (or whoever is paying on their behalf) is asked to supply a key piece of information which helps track the payment to that particular student's record. I would be very surprised indeed if Jindal (and frankly most unis in India) didn't do things in a similar way. But the way their thinking is different from the thinking of the type of unis I am talking about is that those unis don't treat students as children, they treat them as adults; if the student, whoever is paying on their behalf or their official scholarship sponsor doesn't pay by the deadline, it's the student who has to take the heat for it. Having been to an elite university abroad, I can tell you specifically that my institution's residential contract (and those of other institutions similar to my own) had a clause stating that they don't act in loco parentis - a clear sign that they don't waste their time by bothering about such things as students making out. Are you really telling me that you want the job of a university administration - some aspects of which academics may do - to include looking into this nonsense? You want them wasting their time looking into bank statements and things like that for something which isn't even criminal - students expressing their love for each other? Alright, look into that stuff for AML checks because you need to, but for daily things?

If you are so concerned about classrooms, alright, lock them up if you must (even universities abroad do that). In my view, a much more effective and ethical way than using cameras of persuading students not to use these spaces for lovemaking after hours is to explain that laws around occupiers' liability wouldn't apply to them, as they would be (i) either trespassers, as they had permission to be there for only a certain number of hours; or (ii) not using the infra for its intended purpose, meaning that if anything happened to them (somebody broke a kneecap falling downstairs or something), admin wouldn't take any responsibility.

Your way of thinking, if put into practical operation, would just result in a uni admin tilting at windmills.

Finally some sense has prevail and he got bai: https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/delhi-coaching-centre-deaths-court-grants-bail-to-suv-driver-265363