We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Vendetta to rahega hi na...
Firstly, you're at the advantage of being at your home so you're gonna save a lot on rent and other expenses. Plus, your circle is probably wider and you are much more familiar with the way things work vis-a-vis say Mumbai or Delhi;
Secondly, Mumbai and Delhi are way too overcrowded with much supply of competent junior lawyers waiting to get a cut. Competition too fierce, rents too high and uncertainty of making it big in litigation- too much.
Better start out at Calcutta itself, don't restrict yourself only to the High Court but also gain experience in the subordinate courts as well. After let's say 4-5 years with a good mix of trial and Appellate experience, you may approach a SA in Delhi or Bombay, former being the better options due to lower costs of living and plethora of forums available. By that time you'll have a much better idea of what you want, a fresh graduate right outta law school is susceptible to making horrible decisions, so better take them when you're more mature.
All the best.
You have my sincere apologies for such a long post and my general incompetence with the English language; however, I shall remain highly grateful to any response that could possibly offer me insight (even trollish or satirical ones, for I believe such responses can consist of the greatest wisdom:) into this question.
On a bare reading, this provision would apply to law firms (including offices of foreign law firms), private universities like Jindal and think tanks and NGOs like Vidhi. But perhaps not very small law firms, NGOs or chambers of advocates, as they will have less than 20 people. But one grey area is whether staff like peons, drivers etc are included in the figure of 20, or whether it applies only to managerial staff.
Anyway, letβs wait for the bill to be published and for discussions on the bill to take place. As it is a private bill, there is no party whip and both NDA and INDIA MPs can vote for or against it, as well as non-aligned parties like the BJD and YSRCP.
https://www.business-standard.com/amp/india-news/chandra-shekhar-azad-introduces-bill-asking-pvt-sector-quota-for-sc-st-obc-124072601497_1.html
Only meritocracy amongst big law firms
It has its flaws, but it has managed to keep its senior partner flock together
Even a small competitive advantage when consistently compounded over the years can have huge effect like this
When I used to work there they had just 140 lawyers across 3 main offices. Quite some growth here.
it helps that all the other big law firms are antiquated, centralised and super scared of losing business to partners who leave, while trilegal has perfected its partnership model over the years
JSA could be competition but its run by a committee and everyone is risk averse
induslaw is one to watch out for after Trilegal
Also they don't need linkedin to land the jobs they want to land
Its more important for tier-2 kids with fewer placement options
Maybe they don't update their LinkedIn profile so actively? There is a taboo with showing off in NLS which is why people usually don't want to disclose their internships/publications. It's the case with most of my batchmates and my seniors as well. T2 NLU students rely on LinkedIn for getting internships which is why they are very active on LinkedIn, that's not the case with NLS students.
WTH is this? Am I missing smthg? Hardly found one 5th year student with more than two good internships. And funnily enough most of them were educational mentors/ clat mentors/ working at IDIA/ founder of smthg/ working at other nlsiu student's startup.
Please someone explain or give yr views on this cause this is supposed to be the best law college of India!?!?
Contrary to what people might claim, T1 Law firm salaries pretty much match other industries if not crossing, at Senior PA/ SP level in a good practice. Heck even in T2 probably. With good investment strategies, and living a frugal life for 10 years, working with good ratings in a GC/ B&F practice at SAM/ Tri/ KCO, you can definitely get rich. Ofcourse if your benchmark for rich is Investment Banking Director at JPM rich, no. But you can probably try moving to US Biglaw to get that level of rich, they pay exceptionally well. US not UK. And in Dallas and Texas not NYC.
Medical batchmates some in 2 or 3 year and most not earning.
Many people did grad from DU and preparing for CSE or goverment exams.
There were a few smart ones who made it to IIT but they are too joining consultant roles and earning the same 1.5-2 lpm to start off.
I studied in an average school and my classmates didn't go abroad to Oxfords and MITs for their grads so my view is based off my peers, which is also most average peers around India I feel. Ofcourse if you had the kind of support to study abroad then even 3 lpm salary in India seems less.
In conclusion, comparing the amount of effort I put in competitive exams and law school along with the fun (yes dating too) and exposure I gained in law school. I cannot thank God's enough to start off at a 15 lpa most of which is in hand. I know work hours are tough but again compare with medical people and be happy. You'll be rich eventually if you're honest with work. Invest wisely but don't become a nerd who listens to finflucners only. Enjoy life. Work hard. Find the perfect someone to spend your life with. If you eventually find a decent team to work this profession will not keep you starving for money and even luxuries in later half. Upskill, devote time and balance it for family and friends. Goodluck.
Wish I had this perspective from first year to be grateful for the field I chose rather than cursing myself basis the stuff I've been reading over li. In firms many people are content if not happy. You'll barely sense the kind of depression you see here.
[PS: GNLU online PR army can cry me a river]
https://telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/policy/neeraj-mittal-inaugurates-coe-on-classical-and-quantum-communications-for-6g/111875774
CoE on Telecom Security at NFSU
https://www.instagram.com/p/C95XWI8spRM/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
1. CGPA
2. internships
Everything else is just a talking point on your CV that a recruiter may want to discuss (unless you've won Jessup or been published in the HLR). Don't think participation in moots or writing blog posts is going to matter to recruiters much.
If there is a base - max 5-7 hours
So the answer is that it be can be annoying and suck up all he/she wants, but at the end of the day what matters is if you are a nice person and kind to others.
Idk much about the firm but it has to be said that such companies have somehow managed to get classified as tier 1 and have no qualms about telling the world that their workplace environment is not human life friendly. Itβs insane that this is now the norm and no one is raising a concern against such explorative behaviour.
Should I switch to M&A just for the money even if I enjoy the work involved in capmarks (don't judge me lol).
Anyway, no way I am ordering this sh*t to office now!!
https://curlytales.com/flurys-launches-its-1st-tearoom-outside-kolkata-near-gateway-of-india-mumbai-psst-it-has-great-sea-views/
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/west/story/excise-department-crackdown-a-dampener-for-mumbai-rum-cake-lovers-125380-2012-12-25#
I still don't understand, what exactly is one needed to write in an answer to get the maximum marks possible?
Let's take an example. Say the subject is property law, and the hypothetical question of 10 marks is on the topic of adverse possession. In short the hypo is a mix of facts from various real judgements on adverse possession.
Now, it's obvious you have to write the cases, based on the facts and precedents of which the hypo was created. But I know at this point that writing the relevant cases and laws only gets you 5-6 marks. What did the top scorer write to get a 9 or even 10 on that?
Do i need to pick up a commentary on property law, and mug up as much as I can on adverse possession, and dump that info on the paper? Do I need to write many more cases, which even the professor has not taught? Do I need to remember the citation numbers?
Any help would be appreciated.
Regarding the millions of children point, why not tell the terrorists to return the hostages immediately and unconditionally, stop behaving like children and recognise the State of Israel? Terrorism has stopped in other places this way, and it could as easily stop in the Middle East, too. Any solution that doesn't recognise the right of the Jews to inhabit part of that area and have it for themselves is no solution at all, and anyone articulating any such solution is a charlatan and a fraud; yes, I am happy to argue about where the borders should be etc. and even support the Israelis being given a bit of a scolding if they ask for too much, but the slogan you quoted is a terrorist chant, and should be treated as such. I am also happy to argue about Arabs being given more rights and so on, but the world needs a Jewish state; the way they have been treated in the past (unending discrimination, humiliation, pogroms, holocaust etc.) entitles them to demand at least this from the rest of the world - to have a state for themselves.
I am a 2023 law graduate from the University of Calcutta with a CGPA of 8 out of 10. Currently, I am working in Delhi as a Junior Advocate at a small chamber, where my pay scale is 20k. I also have a very small corporate work experience.
I am aiming to work in a corporate law firm where I truly believe I can excel. However, despite numerous attempts through emails and messaging partners on LinkedIn, I have not received any reverts on my applications.
Can anyone help me understand how I should proceed to improve my chances of landing a position in a corporate law firm?
Thank you in advance for your guidance and support. (ONLY GENUINE ANSWERS, NO TROLLING PLEASE)
PS: the numbers for 2024 batch looks good because of the people itself. The Internship and placement committee did not do anything.
Please!