2014 M&A league tables: Combined Amarchand had double deal values of closest rival in 2014 league table, AZB topped by volume

M&A
M&A
Amarchand maintained its standing as India’s clear M&A leader topping the annual chart for the third year in a row.

Amarchand Mangaldas maintained its standing as India’s clear M&A leader by far, topping data provider Mergermarket’s annual chart for the third year in a row, aggregating almost double the deal value docketed by runners up AZB & Partners and not slipping off the top rank in any quarter of 2014.

Amarchand, which is likely to break into two firms 1 April, closed the biggest deals but they were marginally fewer in number than second-ranking AZB – the firm that led the rankings in terms of deal volume. AZB topped the volume table for the second year in a row after replacing three-time leader Desai & Diwanji last year.

Luthra & Luthra made a comeback into the league this year while 2013 high rankers DSK Legal and Kochhar & Co slipped off the rankings.

S&R Associates, PH Bathiya & Associates and Crawford Bayley were the other Indian law firms in the top 10 global firms which closed the biggest Indian M&As. Platinum Partners, Vaish Associates and J Sagar Associates were in the top 15.

Trilegal, Khaitan & Co, Desai & Diwanji and Induslaw were also among the 13 top Indian advisors on the biggest Indian M&As

Values

Amarchand closed 42 deals worth $14.9bn, up from its 38 deals worth $10bn in 2013 but still not able to bounce back up to its 2012 high of $20bn from 39 deals.

The firm’s biggest M&As this year was the $3.9bn Sun Pharma-Ranbaxy deal, which also managed to get Luthra the third rank by value and put Crawford Bayley and PH Bathiya amongst the toppers. The Sun Pharma deal – the biggest deal of 2014 – also helped the pharma sector replace construction M&A as the most active sector of 2014 with a market share of 15.7 per cent, according to mergermarket.

Other giant M&As by Amarchand this year were the $2.6bn ING Vysya-Kotak Mahindra deal, the $1.6bn Himachal Baspa-JPVL deal and the $1.5bn Vodafone-Piramal deal.

AZB & Partners was involved in two more deals than Amarchand yet aggregated only $7.9bn. Luthra’s 15 deals were worth $5.3bn.

Platinum Partners was in the league on the strength of its only reported deal this year – the 3.14bn United Spirits-Diageo merger.

Volumes

45 more deals were reported since last year with AZB, Amarchand and JSA trumping Desai & Diwanji – the firm that used to be the regular deal count-leader until 2013.

JSA raked in 38 M&As - more than double the number of deals it closed in 2013 but Khaitan’s deal count score of 24 was three M&As lesser than last year.

Overall M&A activity

India’s M&A activity was on a rebound in 2014 after 2013 became the lowest valued year since 2007, according to Mergermarket.

Not only were there more deals, there were bigger deals for Indian firms in 2014. The sum of 14 deals valued above $500m touched $19.5bn - the highest number on record and up 86.3 per cent by value compared to 2013’s combined total (six deals worth $10.5bn). As a result, the average deal size in 2014 increased 31.4 per cent from 2013 ($116m) to $153m.

The Pharma sector was the most active, followed by the technology sector and private equity in 2014. The value of exits hit a three-year high and increased 8.4% above 2013 with deals worth $1.8bn. The Technology sector was also the most active in exit activity in 2014 with deals worth $627m, accounting for a 34.3 per cent market share by value.

Ranking by value

RankingFirm Name20142013 valuey-o-y change %
20142013Value ($bn)Volume
11Amarchand Mangaldas14.8954210.61440.3%
24AZB & Partners7.865444.85362.1%
349Luthra & Luthra5.280150.3611362.6%
427S&R Associates4.83841.491224.5%
5-P. H. Bathiya & Associates4.09512--
6-Crawford Bayley & Co3.9672--
718Platinum Partners3.14011.68486.5%
835Vaish Associates2.57660.639303.1%
928J Sagar Associates2.147381.19979.1%
1034Trilegal1.790160.697156.8%
1111Khaitan & Co1.728242.611-33.8%
1232Desai & Diwanji1.104310.83532.2%
1375IndusLaw0.91350.101804.0%

Ranking by volume

RankingCompany Name20142013 volumey-o-y change
20142013Value ($bn)Deal count
11AZB & Partners7.8654448-4
22Amarchand Mangaldas14.89542420
35J Sagar Associates2.147382216
44Desai & Diwanji1.10431247
53Khaitan & Co1.7282428-4
66Trilegal1.7901622-6
711Luthra & Luthra5.2801587
8-P. H. Bathiya & Associates4.09512--
910DSK Legal0.5261192
1042Krishnamurthy & Co0.177835
1171Economic Laws Practice (ELP)0.046817
1239BMR Legal0.128734
1313Vaish Associates2.576660
1485IndusLaw0.913514
159Nishith Desai Associates0.517512-7
1619S&R Associates4.83845-1
1737Majmudar & Partners0.135431

Comments

DBS 16 Feb 2015, 16:42
+3 -1
good to see Crawford in the top 10 !
SR 17 Feb 2015, 05:25
+1 -1
SKA is in action...
DBS 17 Feb 2015, 07:18
+1 -1
true!
check 16 Feb 2015, 18:12
+1 -1
hey...are the tables even correct? the 2nd one has 2 deal count columns...I guess one should be value...also...how can there be so many deals?!!! I guess the headings have to be switched between value and count in both tables...
kianganz 16 Feb 2015, 18:15
+2 -2
Thanks for pointing out - one of the table rows had shifted to the left by one.

Anyone who's ever worked in HTML tables will sympathise. Should now be fixed, I think.
Interesting 17 Feb 2015, 00:12
+1 -0
Kian, since you have captioned the article as 'combined' Amarchand, wouldn't it be interesting to know how many of the deals are from the Mumbai & Delhi offices respectively.

If you could find out and share with your readers, I am sure it would be of interest to all, what say?

The 4 giant M&A deals of Amarchand you have covered seem from the Mumbai office. I stand corrected, hence also the curiosity !!
kianganz 17 Feb 2015, 07:30
+0 -0
Thanks, indeed, interesting - the data isn't readily available, so we will try do some number crunching...
observer 17 Feb 2015, 03:37
+1 -1
Deal table by value is not a true picture how busy a firm has been in M&A. Firms doesnt get paid by dela value but by hours in each deal. Thats why ranking by deal number is a better ranking.
Observed 17 Feb 2015, 05:39
+4 -0
Deal volume is purely a factor of headcount. How do 15 Plantinum/TT&A lawyers compete on volume with 700 AMSS lawyers?
Samurai 17 Feb 2015, 06:20
+2 -2
[quote name="Observed"]Deal volume is purely a factor of headcount. How do 15 Plantinum/TT&A lawyers compete on volume with 700 AMSS lawyers?[/quote]

The same way as 40-50 lawyers from Desai & Diwanji (assuming you are counting the total number of lawyers in the firm rather than those who work in the M&A team) compete on volume with 700 lawyers of AMSS (as per your figure, assuming all 700 work on M&A!), 300 odd lawyers from AZB, 300 lawyers from JSA and 100-200 lawyers from Luthra & Luthra / Trilegal. Stop cribbing on LI and go close some deal to increase your firms tally!
kianganz 17 Feb 2015, 05:58
+2 -0
Interesting discussion.

Deal values often demonstrate how 'good' a firm's reputation is in M&A.

I.e., if a firm has high deal value, it generally means that they can get the real marquee deals that are so big and valuable that the clients will be happy to pay top rates to ensure that they get the best legal advice available.

If a firm has 40 deals of Rs 50 lakh each, they'll be busy, but in a Rs 50 lakh deal, no one will spend more than a few lakh on legal fees, the target will generally be smaller, due diligence and structuring work will be less complex, and billing will therefore be less.

But yes, it's a combination and arguably headcounts should be taken into account too.

Deal values divided by number of lawyers at the firm could be an interesting metric, no?
Huh? 17 Feb 2015, 07:45
+0 -1
Deal value is not a function of headcount, but because a firm "can get the real marquee deals that are so big and valuable that the clients will be happy to pay top rates to ensure that they get the best legal advice available", according to you.

How then is deal value divided by number of lawyers meaningful?

If anything, deal count/number of lawyers will be more meaningful than just deal count.

Deal value divided by number of deals would also be good to see who is getting the marquee deals
kianganz 17 Feb 2015, 07:59
+1 -0
It'd be not about value being a function of headcount, so much as a very rough estimate of the profitability of a firm as well as the importance of M&A within it.

If a firm has a large headcount, its cost base is high, so it needs more marquee deals to survive.

I have a feeling the niche and small M&A shops like Platinum, would perform rather well under this analysis, for instance...

Deal count / number of lawyers would also be interesting, though that's more likely to tell you which firm is busy, and this wouldn't distinguish between low-margin work and the bigger stuff...
Guest 18 Feb 2015, 12:27
+0 -0
Is there a minimum deal size threshold to qualify for the tables?
Untrue 17 Feb 2015, 03:44
+4 -3
Cant believe there is no lexygen.
truth 18 Feb 2015, 03:44
+0 -0
Cant agree more.
Guest 17 Feb 2015, 04:34
+5 -1
Kian can we have as story focusing away from your "corporate" perspective and comparing teaching and research at NLUs? You never always report how XYZ firm has poached this lawyer, but very few reports on how NLUs are working on interesting projects, gaining faculty/losing faculty etc.
Anon 17 Feb 2015, 09:01
+7 -0
Kian, wasn't the Diageo deal already included last year in the Mergermarket survey?
Guest 17 Feb 2015, 09:25
+0 -4
Kian, heard from peers that Themis Associates has been doing quite many deals and their associates are all gaga over it. Can you get an insight to us on Themis Associates (history, work, etc.)
i am sure people wouldn't mind knowing the reality..
Guest 17 Feb 2015, 17:46
+1 -1
Where is HSA.
Really? 18 Feb 2015, 21:50
+0 -0
[quote name="Guest"]Where is HSA.[/quote]

They do have offices in Mumbai and Delhi!! Not aware of any other offices :/
Confused 18 Feb 2015, 05:02
+1 -0
Kian, are you sure that the value is '$bn' and not '$mn'? Because 14895 $bn amounts to 89370000 crore INR which is completely absurd!!
kianganz 18 Feb 2015, 05:08
+0 -1
Thank you, you're right - have put the decimal point in the right place now! Thanks,
Kian
WTF 18 Feb 2015, 06:27
+5 -0
Who or what is P H Bathiya?
Ravi 19 Feb 2015, 06:21
+0 -1
It is a low-profile firm but focusses on pure M&A. It has featured consistently in league tables in value and volume for last 3 years.
Indian 18 Feb 2015, 07:57
+2 -0
Kian, It will be nice to know who is this P H Bathiya?
ath 18 Feb 2015, 14:49
+0 -0
kian is doing his research
kianganz 18 Feb 2015, 14:57
+1 -0
Heh, not sure actually. Google shows that it's run by Pankaj Bathiya, and its website claims offices in Mumbai, Kandivli, Thane, Baroda, Bangalore and Ahmedabad.

Don't know anything else, really...
AAPNAB 18 Feb 2015, 18:59
+1 -0
But the nation wants to know who is this Bathiya?? Who is working for him? and how did he come out from no where?
Really? 18 Feb 2015, 21:54
+0 -0
[quote name="AAPNAB"]But the nation wants to know who is this Bathiya?? Who is working for him? and how did he come out from no where?[/quote]

Modi beta Modi.. He has been ModiFyed!! Uske acche din aa gaye..
Really? 18 Feb 2015, 21:53
+0 -0
[quote name="kianganz"]Heh, not sure actually. Google shows that it's run by Pankaj Bathiya, and its website claims offices in Mumbai, Kandivli, Thane, Baroda, Bangalore and Ahmedabad.

Don't know anything else, really...[/quote]

Ya Kandivali is a big business hub. Some from Malad and Borivali have been acquiring in Kandivali. No doubt Mr. Bathiya is on so many deals. Must be a big shot.
Roy 19 Feb 2015, 04:36
+0 -0
Kian, Venture Intelligence too also come up with their league tables. Coverage?
kianganz 19 Feb 2015, 04:46
+0 -0
The M&A ones look a bit more rubbish than the mergermarket ones (seem to capture far fewer deals).

The PE ones could be interesting though, but I'm never sure about their methodology. Anyone?