AZB catches up to Amarchand, Luthra in Q3 M&A rankings as US firms lead over UK abroad

Amarchand Mangaldas maintained its top spot in intelligence provider mergermarket’s M&A league rankings this quarter. The firm continued reporting both the biggest value and the largest number of M&As this quarter as it did in the first half year of 2014.

AZB & Partners recovered from its deal value slip in seventh rank at the half-year point, to climb back to fourth spot, having acted on M&As worth over $4bn by the end of the third quarter this year.

In the top 10 firms by deal count, Vaish Associates exchanged places with S&R Associates to send it to rank 13, while all the others stood ground with minor shuffling in the ranks.

Domestic deal value

Amarchand improved overall deal value by over $1.3bn to $9.6bn by acting on 8 more M&As since the half-year.

AZB’s improvement was better with 10 M&As of over $1.5bn in value. Lanco’s $1bn Udupi Power Station sale was the biggest M&A on which the firm acted this quarter.

JSA and Nishith Desai Associates slipped off the league and DSK Legal and Wadia Ghandy climbed in instead.

RankFirmValue ($m)Deal Count
1Amarchand Mangaldas965228
2Luthra & Luthra492911
3S&R Associates48384
4AZB & Partners411527
5PH Bathiya & Associates39677
5Crawford Bayley & Co39671
7Platinum Partners31401
8Trilegal163313
9Khaitan & Co138018
10Vaish Associates10055
11DSK Legal7739
12Wadia Ghandy & Co6393

Domestic deal volume

The two league front runners alone raked in over 50 M&As this quarter. Amarchand, AZB, Desai & Diwanji, Khaitan & Co, and Luthra & Luthra stuck to their half-yearly ranks.

Desai & Diwanji managed to close 19 deals at an average value of only $11m, while Amarchand’s average was $344m over 28 deals, and AZB’s $152m in 27.

Khaitan’s average deal size came in at $76m over 18 deals, while Trilegal came fifth, and Luthra and JSA tied for sixth with 11 deals. However, Luthra’s average deal size was $448m, while Trilegal and JSA had average accounted deal sizes of $125m and $52m respectively.

MNK Law offices, Wadia Ghandy and Rajani Singhania & Partners were the new entrants on the volume table this quarter as Crawford Bayley and K Law slipped off.

RankHouseValue ($m)Deal Count
1Amarchand Mangaldas965228
2AZB & Partners411527
3Desai & Diwanji21619
4Khaitan & Co138018
5Trilegal163313
6Luthra & Luthra492911
6J Sagar Associates57811
8DSK Legal7739
9P. H. Bathiya & Associates39677
10Vaish Associates10055
10Nishith Desai Associates5175
10BMR Legal965
13S&R Associates48384
14Wadia Ghandy & Co6393
14MNK Law Offices783
14Tatva Legal373
14Rajani, Singhania & Partners123

Foreign firms by value

Davis Polk & Wardwell continued heading up deal counts and values amongst foreign firms, having been involved in five deals worth more than $6bn, followed by White & Case and Shearman & Sterling, reprising their top three positions from the first half of the year.

Both Davis Polk and White & Case added one deal to their tally from last half-year, with White & Case overtaking Shearman & Sterling by a whisker, coming in at second place with deals worth $4.3bn.

The UK’s magic circle was represented only by Allen & Overy and Slaughter and May, alongside Herbert Smith Freehills as the other large UK-headquartered international firm.

Linklaters did make it into the volume charts, however, with three deals that were worth $483m.

RankHouseValue ($m)Deal Count
1Davis Polk & Wardwell 60335
2White & Case 42524
3Shearman & Sterling 42273
4Sullivan & Cromwell 39671
4Weil Gotshal & Manges 39671
6Slaughter and May31401
7Herbert Smith Freehills10874
8Allen & Overy 10382
9ENSafrica 6761
10Allegro Advisors Pvt6231
11Morrison Cohen 6101
11Paul Hastings 6101

Foreign firms by deal count

RankHouseValue ($m)Deal Count
1Davis Polk & Wardwell 60335
2White & Case 42524
2Herbert Smith Freehills10874
2Latham & Watkins 10564
5Shearman & Sterling 42273
5Linklaters4833
7Allen & Overy 10382

Source: customised data from mergermarket Q3 deal rankings (PDF)

Methodology: Based on announced deals, including lapsed and withdrawn bids Based on dominant geography of target, bidder or seller company being India Data correct as of 29-09-2014 Data run from 01-01-2014 to 30-09-2014 Includes all deals valued over USD 5m. Where deal value not disclosed, deal has been entered based on turnover of target exceeding USD 10m Activities excluded from table include property transactions and restructurings where the ultimate shareholders’ interests are not changed

Comments

What? 9 Oct 2014, 05:49
+5 -0
No JSA, NDA and Lexygen?
Indian Lawyer Ex Luthra 9 Oct 2014, 06:09
+10 -7
Well done Luthra! Mohit's strategy of focusing on less but high end work paying off...perhaps a good time for all the critics to eat their words..
In Luthra 9 Oct 2014, 08:40
+9 -8
Its not his strategy.. its the effect of the BIG HAND back in action and taking charge again. That so called strategy of his fell flat on its face what with all the departures and negative sentiment about his policies, high handedness and reliance on insecure advisors.

Your attempt is commendable though! I hope it goes noticed and he takes you back!
Indian Lawyer Ex Luthra 9 Oct 2014, 11:53
+2 -2
:-)
Oxygen 9 Oct 2014, 07:51
+6 -0
No Lexygen? Shocking..,
Hydrogen 9 Oct 2014, 11:16
+5 -0
Maybe they are involved on more private equity deals...
HK Lawyer 9 Oct 2014, 14:37
+3 -4
Its amazing to see that Amarchand is still the go to law firm for most clients. They do most of the deals, almost all the big deals & for sure also the best deals India has to offer.

They seem to pull it off everytime, year after year. No comparison for the top slot.
Disagree 9 Oct 2014, 18:06
+3 -2
I think otherwise. Heres why: These league-tables, or call them what you may, evidently suggest that S&R and Platinum are the go-to law firms for complex and high-value deals. On an average, it is these two firms that are handling deals, each of which are way above the industry-average. As for the one or two deals that go to the Khaitan's, Mody's, Shroff's and the likes, I say that they are the exceptions that go on to make the rule.

[quote name="HK Lawyer"]Its amazing to see that Amarchand is still the go to law firm for most clients. They do most of the deals, almost all the big deals & for sure also the best deals India has to offer.

They seem to pull it off everytime, year after year. No comparison for the top slot.[/quote]
Scooter- 10 Oct 2014, 09:16
+2 -2
there are no go to firms. THere are firms and their clients. So if a firms client is doing a high value deal, they continue with the firm. Unless of course of the firm is small/not-capable for a big matter. what will make more sense than just numbers is to see how many of these deals are with which client. if firm X has Y client and Y client does 3 deals a year, then it doesnt become a go to client for everyone. It just remains a go to firm for Y. The number of deals are also determine the general reputation of the firm as well as comfort of the larger market as a whole. something which is important to determine a marker leader.
Scootty Doesnt Know 10 Oct 2014, 19:38
+2 -1
Dear Scooty, I like your point for the logic and sense it presents - though incorrect. It is my observation (and , I am a keen and patient observer) that there are ample examples of big-ticket investment-firms, corporates, etc. - both domestic and foreign - that avail similar services from various RSG Top 20 firms. Here are two fresh examples that come to my mind: Barring Asset Management and Lanco. Here are some more commonly known names that are known to engage more than one "Tier 1 Corporate Law Firm" ([i]double quotes indicate sarcasm[/i]) for their work- DLF (they have engaged nearly everybody that has mattered until date), Kotak Mahindra Bank, Vodafone.


[quote name="Scooter-"]there are no go to firms. THere are firms and their clients. So if a firms client is doing a high value deal, they continue with the firm. Unless of course of the firm is small/not-capable for a big matter. what will make more sense than just numbers is to see how many of these deals are with which client. if firm X has Y client and Y client does 3 deals a year, then it doesnt become a go to client for everyone. It just remains a go to firm for Y. The number of deals are also determine the general reputation of the firm as well as comfort of the larger market as a whole. something which is important to determine a marker leader.[/quote]