Q1 2015 M&A league table sees massive uptick in work as pre-split Amarchand grabs top spot with AZB

M&A: The pie is getting bigger for law firms again
M&A: The pie is getting bigger for law firms again

In what will possibly have been its last quarter of existing as a single firm, Amarchand Mangaldas, which topped the the mergermarket M&A league tables in 2014, again acted on the most valuable M&A deals though AZB & Partners emerged as the firm with the largest number of recorded transactions.

AZB, with 15 deals came third in the ranking by the value of deals recorded at $1.7bn, which is less than half of Amarchand’s $5.2bn aggregated from 11 deals.

However, deal value runner up PH Bathiya & Associates with 5 deals, was marginally behind Amarchand’s total deal size. Amarchand and PH Bathiya both acted on the Rs 1,800 crore ($333m) investment into Suzlon by Dilip Shanghvi in March, which also includes a possible Rs 3,800 crore of security by Shanghvi.

AZB, which for the past two years has replaced the previous habitual deal count topper Desai & Diwanji (now on 6 deals in third place), led the volume table in this quarter too.

Luthra & Luthra, J Sagar Associates (JSA) and Trilegal also make an appearance in value and volume charts this quarter.

The market looked up since last year with the top 15 law firms having already closed 20 more deals than in Q1 2014 and the total deal value advised on by the top 15 already being almost three times the Q1 2014 total.

Deal sizes

Amarchand did 11 M&As worth $5.2bn while PH Bathiya did five worth $3.2bn.

AZB with its 15 M&As worth $1.7bn was the only other firm to break the billion dollar barrier last quarter.

Luthra, Vaish Associates, Trilegal, JSA, Khaitan & Co, Crawford Bayley and Krishnamurthy & Co were also in the top 10 deal volume leaders.

Deal count

AZB and Amarchand were the only double-figure deal makers this quarter, in terms of deal count, but in Q1 2014 there were none.

AZB’s 15 deals are more than double the leading deal count in Q1 of 2014, then won by Amarchand.

However Luthra, JSA and Khaitan did fewer but bigger deals than what they had managed this time last year.

Trilegal did four deals, two more since Q1 2014, but Vaish closed just one $842m deal compared to its $632 raked in from two deals in Q1 2014.

Amongst international law firm, Spanish firm Gomez Acebo, with US firms Morrison & Foerster and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe topped the value table with a single $2.5bn deal.

DLA Piper, Linklaters and Weil Gotshal & Manges all acted on a $878m deal.

Covington & Burling bagged two deals aggregating to $850m, while Cravath Swaine & Moore acted on one worth $750m.

League Table Based on Value

RankHouseValue (US$m)Deal Count
1Amarchand Mangaldas5,23911
2P. H. Bathiya & Associates3,1565
3AZB & Partners1,75315
4Luthra & Luthra9235
5Vaish Associates8421
6Trilegal5953
7J Sagar Associates4524
8Khaitan & Co3992
9Crawford Bayley & Co3492
10Krishnamurthy & Co3391
11Desai & Diwanji2906
12Tatva Legal2185
13S&R Associates1131
14Nishith Desai Associates501
14Platinum Partners501

League Table Based on Deal Count

RankHouseValue (US$m)Deal Count
1AZB & Partners1,75315
2Amarchand Mangaldas5,23911
3Desai & Diwanji2906
4P. H. Bathiya & Associates3,1565
5Luthra & Luthra9235
6Tatva Legal2185
7J Sagar Associates4524
8Trilegal5953
9Khaitan & Co3992
10Crawford Bayley & Co3492
11Majmudar & Partners142
12Vaish Associates8421
13Krishnamurthy & Co3391
14S&R Associates1131
15Nishith Desai Associates501

International firms India deals: By volume

RankHouseValue (US$m)Deal Count
1Gomez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados2,5001
1Morrison & Foerster2,5001
1Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe2,5001
4DLA Piper8783
4Linklaters8781
4Weil Gotshal & Manges8781
7Covington & Burling8502
8Cravath, Swaine & Moore7501
9Simpson Thacher & Bartlett5751
10Herbert Smith Freehills3392
11Desai & Diwanji2906
12Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian2302
13Kirkland & Ellis2002
14Debevoise & Plimpton1351
15Goodwin Procter501
16Baker & McKenzie352

Source: mergermarket

Comments

Khacchar..!! 13 Apr 2015, 16:27
+12 -1
My firm brokered 100 leases... This year alone
ThePhantom 13 Apr 2015, 22:27
+2 -0
[quote name="Khacchar..!!"]My firm brokered 100 leases... This year alone[/quote]

Ohho.. your details? Might be helpful ;)
Khacchar continued 14 Apr 2015, 09:02
+2 -2
and opened outlets i.e. offices in Blah Blah Blah...like mushrooms growing in the forests...
gabbar is back 14 Apr 2015, 13:26
+3 -1
deal 2 (do)...league position 9 (nau) partners sau (100)...bahut na insafi hai re...
International law firm? 13 Apr 2015, 17:59
+6 -1
Since when did Desai & Diwanji become an 'international law firm' - referring to the merger market table at the bottom.
ThePhantom 13 Apr 2015, 22:31
+1 -3
[quote name="International law firm?"]Since when did Desai & Diwanji become an 'international law firm' - referring to the merger market table at the bottom.[/quote]

Lol.. your comment is funny for sure!! Do not underestimate Desai Diwanji. They might have a foreign entity/ partnership too!

I am kidding, before you people backlash and fire me for being "ignorant" as some GLC and some pravin gandhi named college have been doing recently....
vantage 13 Apr 2015, 18:04
+2 -0
Crawford Bayley is not to be forgotten!
ThePhantom 13 Apr 2015, 22:32
+1 -3
[quote name="vantage"]Crawford Bayley is not to be forgotten![/quote]

What Crawford Bayley??
vantage 14 Apr 2015, 09:27
+0 -1
the forgotten firm!
Random 13 Apr 2015, 19:10
+2 -0
I recognize that this is only one quarter, but I am curious whether this level of deal flow will be enough to justify foreign law firms opening offices in India, if that is indeed how things shake out in the next year or two? Thoughts anyone? Let's say each foreign firm does one big M&A deal per quarter (about average as per the above) - I'm not sure the legal fees earned would justify all of the overhead associated with keeping an office up and running.
Cuteya & Smartya 13 Apr 2015, 20:02
+3 -0
Please forgive my ignorance but I have never heard the name of P. H. Bathiya & Associates...what are its antecedents?
ThePhantom 13 Apr 2015, 22:36
+0 -3
[quote name="Cuteya & Smartya"]Please forgive my ignorance but I have never heard the name of P. H. Bathiya & Associates...what are its antecedents?[/quote]

You missed an "H" between the "C" and "U" of your name in the title... Well..that apart..Your ignorance may be forgiven. But P.H. Bathiya is doing very well in the M&A market since few years. If it is not a top law firm does not mean it cannot be in the table...
2 Minutes 14 Apr 2015, 06:38
+4 -0
[quote name="ThePhantom"][quote name="Cuteya & Smartya"]Please forgive my ignorance but I have never heard the name of P. H. Bathiya & Associates...what are its antecedents?[/quote]

You missed an "H" between the "C" and "U" of your name in the title... Well..that apart..Your ignorance may be forgiven. But P.H. Bathiya is doing very well in the M&A market since few years. If it is not a top law firm does not mean it cannot be in the table...[/quote]

You need this:
http://www.tolearnenglish.com/exercises/exercise-english-2/exercise-english-3647.php
ThePhantom 14 Apr 2015, 21:37
+0 -1
[quote name="2 Minutes"][quote name="ThePhantom"][quote name="Cuteya & Smartya"]Please forgive my ignorance but I have never heard the name of P. H. Bathiya & Associates...what are its antecedents?[/quote]

You missed an "H" between the "C" and "U" of your name in the title... Well..that apart..Your ignorance may be forgiven. But P.H. Bathiya is doing very well in the M&A market since few years. If it is not a top law firm does not mean it cannot be in the table...[/quote]

You need this:
http://www.tolearnenglish.com/exercises/exercise-english-2/exercise-english-3647.php[/quote]

Did you just fail it?
2 Minutes 15 Apr 2015, 17:12
+1 -0
Yes :( You also? But I've been speaking English only since few months, so I hope to learn soon. Since how many years have you been speaking?
anon 14 Apr 2015, 07:42
+0 -0
You are frustrated and demeaning in your comments. You do little to put factual figures to back your belittling claims. I don't understand your negativity and joy in putting people down. Care to elaborate your achievemens before you even try to belittle wadia, desai diwanji and the likes. Don't form conclusions/opinions on hearsay.
Cuteya & Smartya 14 Apr 2015, 13:53
+2 -0
When you wear your undies outside of your attire...you start fumbling with alphabets...O masked one! No hard feelings, just an old jungle saying. Don't get your knickers in a twist over this.
really? 13 Apr 2015, 20:19
+4 -1
As per my information Platinum Partners has done way more deals than the one recorded here and for much higher values. Kian, please can you seek confirmation on such deals and not report incomplete parts.

I know that platinum follows an express policy of not reporting any of its deals but it can be found out if you dig a little. Same goes for a lot of other firms which don't have the same marketing enthusiasm of some other firms.
ThePhantom 13 Apr 2015, 21:18
+0 -0
[quote name="really?"]As per my information Platinum Partners has done way more deals than the one recorded here and for much higher values. Kian, please can you seek confirmation on such deals and not report incomplete parts.

I know that platinum follows an express policy of not reporting any of its deals but it can be found out if you dig a little. Same goes for a lot of other firms which don't have the same marketing enthusiasm of some other firms.[/quote]

Well, Kian has just reported on the basis of mergermarket's report. A lot of firms do not give details to a particular survey. There is another entity keeping track of transactions (I cannot remember the name), and it might be possible Platinum Partners provided details there. Some firms do not like advertising or providing details of firms there. You seem to be a junior at Platinum, an intern or someone who is a fresher due to join. If a firm does not provide details does not make it lesser of a good firm. They are just bothered with work than advertising. Also, Platinum Partners may be working on deals, but are you sure all of them have been signed/ closed to be reported?

I do not think Kian or LI has the time to dig into 50-100 firms and their deals. He has only referred to Merger market and their report. I guess you tell mergermarket to "dig a little" for your satisfaction.
Yes really ! 14 Apr 2015, 08:04
+1 -0
Doesn't matter what policy Platinum or for that matter any other law firm follows.

If any firm has done deals, such agencies like mergermarket etc, pick them up, know of it, whether you bring to their notice or not! So many sources,bankers, other law firms, company announcements, media, their own research etc

One doesn't need marketing enthusiasm only, you need to do the deals first, second ensure it fulfils deal criteria, then only you get doughnuts. For all you know that deals are not being done, but folks would like to see their names here. Convenient aint it?
ying yang 14 Apr 2015, 10:18
+0 -0
@ really - why are you so worried about deals being reported to MM / LI or not. Its just a quarter reporting and most deals are in the works. In any case, it is the law firms choice to report or not. A policy not to report is an internal matter.

@ Phantom - fully agree with you, legallyindia only reported from MM, and they should not be obliged to dig anywhere.

@ yes really - why so serious. i dont think what you are saying is correct. There are several instances where law firm names for deals are not picked up. But i will admit, this is when the law firms seriously practices its policy not to disclose. The deals are being done and the doughnuts are being eaten, just that the neighbours are not invited for the show. Even more convenient.
Plato Naam 14 Apr 2015, 12:25
+1 -0
Yes there are a lot of firms (Platinum, TTA, Pheonix for eg) who have deals reported on legallyindia or barandbench, but have not appeared here. Nothing sinister - they may not have submitted these deals to MM.
ThePhantom 14 Apr 2015, 21:40
+0 -0
[quote name="Plato Naam"]Yes there are a lot of firms (Platinum, TTA, Pheonix for eg) who have deals reported on legallyindia or barandbench, but have not appeared here. Nothing sinister - they may not have submitted these deals to MM.[/quote]

True... some people just do not get it!! TTA or Tatva for that matter too!
ThePhantom 14 Apr 2015, 21:39
+0 -0
[quote name="Yes really !"]Doesn't matter what policy Platinum or for that matter any other law firm follows.

If any firm has done deals, such agencies like mergermarket etc, pick them up, know of it, whether you bring to their notice or not! So many sources,bankers, other law firms, company announcements, media, their own research etc

One doesn't need marketing enthusiasm only, you need to do the deals first, second ensure it fulfils deal criteria, then only you get doughnuts. For all you know that deals are not being done, but folks would like to see their names here. Convenient aint it?[/quote]

I do not think you know how it works. Control your enthusiasm! You are free to suggest to mergermarket on how they should be going about their business...
well-wisher 13 Apr 2015, 22:46
+1 -1
Go K Law!
hindi-chini bai bai 14 Apr 2015, 06:20
+2 -0
[quote name="well-wisher"]Go K Law![/quote]


where to go??? China
bhai - behan 16 Apr 2015, 05:41
+2 -0
[quote name="hindi-chini bai bai"][quote name="well-wisher"]Go K Law![/quote]


where to go??? China[/quote]

This brother-sister duo is seriously kicking some ass in the market!!

May be a tad late, but this firm has been inching to the top gradually. With 12 partners across board, what a growth in the last 5 years! Guess moving out of Bangalore and setting up shop in Mumbai is richly paying off for Naina. Also, K Law finally seems to have found a way to hire and retain talent for the long term. Good to see that.

All the best, Naina & Nikhil!!
Missing?! 14 Apr 2015, 04:32
+1 -0
Kian, weren't Wadia Ghandy and DSK a regular feature of the M&A table? How come they aren't there now?
anon 14 Apr 2015, 07:38
+2 -0
It's a foregone fact that wadia doesn't advertise it's deal. Few of the other reasons are it hasn't closed it's big ticket deals yet so wait for the report of following quarters. It's the same trend wherein wadia is nowhere to be seen in the first quarter and somehow manages to feature in the table in following quarters. (You can verify the same from past reports from ll archives itself). I really don't understand why only m&a deals are reported. If real estate projects were to be reported than wadia, federal rashmikant, dsk wouldn't cut a sorry figure as it's been made to look (meaning: isn't it unfair to judge a firm based on its performance only in one practice area)
As for wadia: while majority have been relishing the erroneous conclusion that it's end of an era and what not,one should not ignore that 1. Real estate & litigation is strong as ever. 2. While it's reeling from big ticket attrition from corporate and litigation department the new lateral (partner designate ) hires (from almt and likes have not been reported) 3. Pay scales are on upward revision once again. 4. Bengaluru office is about to reopen as against what it was reported before.
And their litigation practice is extremely strong so the thought of an end of an era is laughable at the very best. It's going through a tough time following the death of anand bhatt in terrorist attacks and few big ticket attrition but it's far from over.
RIP 14 Apr 2015, 12:29
+0 -1
26/11 was in 2008. The tough time cannot have been continuing since 2008!! Then its more than just a tough time.
ThePhantom 14 Apr 2015, 21:42
+0 -0
[quote name="anon"]It's a foregone fact that wadia doesn't advertise it's deal. Few of the other reasons are it hasn't closed it's big ticket deals yet so wait for the report of following quarters. It's the same trend wherein wadia is nowhere to be seen in the first quarter and somehow manages to feature in the table in following quarters. (You can verify the same from past reports from ll archives itself). I really don't understand why only m&a deals are reported. If real estate projects were to be reported than wadia, federal rashmikant, dsk wouldn't cut a sorry figure as it's been made to look (meaning: isn't it unfair to judge a firm based on its performance only in one practice area)
As for wadia: while majority have been relishing the erroneous conclusion that it's end of an era and what not,one should not ignore that 1. Real estate & litigation is strong as ever. 2. While it's reeling from big ticket attrition from corporate and litigation department the new lateral (partner designate ) hires (from almt and likes have not been reported) 3. Pay scales are on upward revision once again. 4. Bengaluru office is about to reopen as against what it was reported before.
And their litigation practice is extremely strong so the thought of an end of an era is laughable at the very best. It's going through a tough time following the death of anand bhatt in terrorist attacks and few big ticket attrition but it's far from over.[/quote]


Please.. we all know the state Wadia is in right now.. Their M&A practice is no where even comparable... I am not talking about real estate etc... They are doing okish in Real Estate and Litigation.. but M&A.. please.. wake up...
wg article 16 Apr 2015, 11:05
+1 -0
Care to elaborate how do you conclude that it's m&a practice is not comparable (assuming not all deals are reported and there is simply not ENOUGH material to draw a conclusion as to which firm fares how except for few advertised reports. Secondly you mention it's real estate practice is 'okayish' please explain how do you conclude that and what material do you rely on while making that conclusion on their real estate practice. And good that you missed out on commenting on their litigation practice!
Bengaluru 14 Apr 2015, 06:46
+3 -0
No Induslaw and lexygen? Shocking..
Interesting 14 Apr 2015, 08:15
+4 -0
The avg deal size of Amarchand is USD 476.27 million, just goes to say they land up doing by far all the blue chip deals India has to offer. Kian,would there be anyway that you can find out how many of these 11 deals belong to which offices of Amarchand(read as Delhi & Mumbai).

AZB seems more in the volume game as opposed to value, 15 deals great but all smaller deals of about USD 100 million odd or abouts.

KCo so low in the food chain, and claims to be a tier 1 firm in India, just a scam, as always and only they marketing gimmick. Facts like these give a better picture to one and all !

Good to see firms like PH Bhatiya & Tatva Legal here, they must be doing somethings right for sure.

There is clear blue ocean divide, with Amarchand & AZB and the rest of the law firms, would be interesting to see, how it plays out once the former becomes 2 firms in India in due course!
kianganz 14 Apr 2015, 08:46
+0 -0
This earlier column on how league tables work might be useful:
http://www.legallyindia.com/201402034307/Legal-opinions/law-firm-league-tables-explained
ek vakil 14 Apr 2015, 09:07
+10 -2
Main ek wakil hoon...aur ye meri aatm katha hai

pata nahi kis manhoos ki nazar pad gayee hai.. pichle do mahine se tabiyat kharaab rehta hai..bahut saare karan hai kabhi Client se peetai..kabhi biwi ki chik chik..bas ye hi ek matra jagah hai jahan dil ko tasalli aur mann ko shanti milti hai. jab bhi main legally India pe aisey rang birangee pie-charts aur Venn Diagrams dekhta hoon to ek baar fir dil jeeney ko karta hai.. lagta hai ummid ab bhi baanki hai. main sochta hoon ki ekdin mere law practice ki bhi aisey pie-charts banengey..aur mere baare mein bhi log farratey-dar angrezi mein galli gallouj karenge.. uss din mere jeevan mein jhil mil sitaroon ka aangan hoga aur rimjhim barasta sawan hoga..
Why 14 Apr 2015, 09:46
+1 -0
Phoenix legal is useless./?
Why ? 14 Apr 2015, 11:31
+1 -0
What ever happened to SNR !!
SnotR 14 Apr 2015, 12:31
+0 -0
They changed the N to & and all went out for a drink?
vanquish 14 Apr 2015, 16:45
+6 -0
P. H. Bathiya & Associates is the 'Rahul Dravid' of Law Firms!
Guest 15 Apr 2015, 07:23
+0 -0
Elegant, retired and difficult to get out?
Project Finance 21 Apr 2015, 05:19
+1 -0
Kiran....What about Dealogic Project Finance Q1 2015
Santa 25 Apr 2015, 04:53
+0 -0
[quote name="Jingle Bells"]No Project Finance on mind[/quote]

Check league tables anywhere, why depend on Kian if he has missed PF will pick up again 2 years, put PF on mind then[quote name="Project Finance"]Kiran....What about Dealogic Project Finance Q1 2015[/quote]

Patience, let Christmas come
Jingle Bells 23 Apr 2015, 16:07
+0 -0
No Project Finance on mind