SAM's Deepto Roy scores Uber mandate opposite AZB for Tata JV

Specially financed cars for Uber drivers with Tata now
Specially financed cars for Uber drivers with Tata now

Taxi aggregator Uber started a joint venture with Tata Motors, which envisages Uber drivers buying Tata cars financed via Tata Capital Financial Services and Tata Motors Finance loans with insurance from Tata AIG, according to reports.

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas acted for Uber, led by partner Deepto Roy, with partners Ashni Roy, Abhay Sharma, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Manika Brar.

According to a Shardul Amarchand press release their team also included principal associates Anuj Bhasme, Oscar D’sa, principal associate designate Ankit Guha, senior associates Rohan Arora and associate Akshay Kumar Sharma.

AZB & Partners acted for the Tata companies, according to a press release from the firm, with partners Ashwin Ramanathan and Nilang Desai, with consultant Nils Vernooij, senior associate Noshir Vania and associate Tvisha Sharma.

Ernst & Young was tax adviser to Uber.

The deal was signed on 31 March 2016 and closed on 16 June 2016.

Uber’s legal director Mohit Abraham has been a long-time colleague of Roy’s, including at their start-up PXV Partners and Khaitan & Co where they joined before Abraham moved to Uber and Roy moved to Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas in 2015.

Khaitan & Co has also historically been working with Uber.

Photo by Mark Werner.

Comments

Anons 21 Jun 2016, 13:44
+0 -0
GC of Uber is former partner of Deepto..
KKCCO 22 Jun 2016, 02:31
+3 -1
Kco ki jalli.. Uber gaya haath se..
Kco 23 Jun 2016, 04:39
+0 -1
Why would that be? I am sure Uber works with more than one firm
Moral of the story 23 Jun 2016, 10:46
+1 -2
Be careful KCO of whom you hire...
Chill 22 Jun 2016, 05:16
+3 -0
Punchline "Khaitan & Co has also historically been working with Uber" will do the trick, trolls invited
Done 22 Jun 2016, 07:24
+0 -0
Have been a while since KCO transaction has been reported? What is happening?
kianganz 22 Jun 2016, 07:29
+3 -1
There haven't been a few press releases for a week or so, but I'm sure they're still doing deals.

According to their most recent press releases they recently acted for Tech Mahindra, Meidensha Corporation, IOCL, and Wockhardt...

By the way, on that note, we are considering changing the way we cover deals a little bit, potentially. As it is now, we don't get to cover all deals (particularly many of the ones where a law firm doesn't confirm the other party to a deal, as in the case of AZB, for instance).

Would you be interested in us also publishing live deals as soon as press releases come in, even if they don't include all advisers? It would be useful market intelligence and we can also do interesting things with such data...
anon!! 22 Jun 2016, 15:55
+0 -0
Always....
Trueblood 22 Jun 2016, 12:18
+0 -0
Lull before the storm, my friend.
Kabali da 22 Jun 2016, 08:20
+3 -1
Rather, my suggestion is that you don't publish deals where contributions of Associates/PAs are not mentioned. Insecure partners, who are hungry for credit even where is is not due, issue press releases thumping their chests and pontificating about the deal, without acknowledging contributions of the voiceless Associates and Principal Associates. Such partners should really be cut down to size.
kianganz 22 Jun 2016, 08:29
+1 -0
Haha, interesting. Not sure we can single-handedly effect such a sea change though.

And if there is a big deal, it's hard for us to ignore it when PAs/associates aren't mentioned.

Being completely honest, as we currently operate, our main focus is on law firm partners, whether they join, leave, get promoted, do something amazing or stupid, or do deals, etc...

We tend not to focus on the next level so much right now and I am also not sure it's fair to put the spotlight on SAs/PAs too much either, as it would also bring more scrutiny which is perhaps unfair since the buck is supposed to stop at partner at the end of the day (even if in many cases partners may do very little work :).

Happy to hear counterpoints or disagreements though, we're wide open to figuring out how to improve deals coverage...
Londoner 22 Jun 2016, 11:53
+2 -0
Hi Kian, to answer your question above, yes definitely interested in details of deals as soon as press releases come in, ideally if they do but if not, even if they don't include all advisers. Don't care much about PAs and SAs etc. They will get due publicity as they move up the ranks. Thanks.
@ Kabali da 23 Jun 2016, 07:45
+0 -0
We, the readers, mostly want information on deals. It often does not matter to us which lawyers closed the deal. In other words, while your suggestion is an absolutely well-meaning one, implementing it would mean loss of information for readers.

It is the law firm partners who need to grow up and give credit to the lawyers on the deal. In any event, when the associates make partner, they will get their share of credit - one can only hope that they will be better than their senior generation and give credit to their young associates.

I think the best way to get firms to report contribution of lawyers fairly is to name and shame them for not doing so (even anonymously). What do you think?

Cheers :)
po 22 Jun 2016, 18:06
+3 -4
this is a vanilla deal. why do u even need a partner for this? any junior lawyer with half a brain can draft these documents.
Cowboy 24 Jun 2016, 17:47
+0 -1
Deepto is a star. Young cool lawyers league