AZB-A&O, Links-TTA share BP’s inbound up to $20bn RIL buy

Oil Industry.
Oil Industry.

AZB & Partners, Talwar Thakore & Associates, Allen & Overy (A&O), Linklaters and Vinson & Elkins have advised on oil major British Petroleum’s (BP) record acquisition of 30 per cent of 23 oil and gas production sharing contracts (including the KG D6 block) operated by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) for a consideration of $7.2bn (Rs 32,500 crore).

AZB & Partners, A&O and Vinson & Elkins acted for Reliance while Linklaters with best friend Talwar Thakore & Associates led for BP.

AZB partner Shuva Mandal, with A&O oil and gas partners John Geraghty and Paul Griffin were drafted in for RIL.

Geraghty told The Lawyer magazine in the UK: “This is a landmark transaction by any measure and strategically important for Reliance. We have a much-valued relationship with Reliance and it is fantastic that we’ve been able to continue to develop that relationship by advising them in relation to this deal.”

AZB stated in a release that it rendered legal advice on documentation and negotiation of the joint venture agreements and the sale and purchase agreements apart from helping on regulatory issues.

Linklaters corporate partner and India head Sandeep Katwala with corporate partner Stephen Griffin, advised the world’s second largest publicly traded oil firm BP, which is a long-standing client of the firm.

The deal entails formation of a 50:50 joint venture between the two companies for the sourcing and marketing of gas in India aiming to accelerate the creation of infrastructure for receiving, transporting and marketing of natural gas in the country.

According to media reports the transaction could lead to the largest-ever inflow of FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) into India, with an immediate consideration of $7.2bn, with another $1.8bn contingent on performance and with a combined investment that could eventually amount to $20bn.

Comments

Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 19:08
+0 -0
Wasn't Reliance AMSS's "Preferred Client"?
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 19:17
+0 -0
AZB again ! AZB advised Vedanta and now reliance and both in the oil and gas sector. What is happening to the other Indian firms. How come AZB is in every big Indian m&a deal. - London lawyer
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 19:23
+0 -0
Quite telling that CC was not on a single one of AZBs big M&As and is not on this one either. Even Allen & Overy's corporate practice seems to have made better headway in India by getting this mandate from RIL.

Unlucky for A&O though that Trilegal is not big enough yet in corporate to handle this sort of thing.
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 19:57
+0 -0
No 3, Trilegal was conflicted on this matter.
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 20:20
+0 -0
@4: considering the structuring by Trilegal of vodafone, why would anyone want to hire them for big tickit M&A and end up paying billions in tax
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 20:44
+0 -0
So if Trilegal did not have the conflict Reliance would have gone to Trilegal over AZB?? Considering the relationship Zia has with RIL I find this hard to believe.

Or Trilegal is doing better than people give it credit for.
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 20:46
+0 -0
Despite legallyindia having reported this deal to show leadership position of Indian law fimrs on this transaction, the fact is that this Indian deal was primarily done by two MC firms. I am sure that Links and A&O would have bagged the biggest share of total legal spend, though every firm having any minor role on this deal is entitled to claim that they worked on it.

Question is is this the sign of times to come?
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 20:51
+0 -0
No 5, Trilegal didn't do the tax structuring of Vodafone, Thakur Talwar did. Trilegal advised on only on Telecom issues of that deal. In any case, the tax demand was a first of its kind so even TTA could not have predicted what was going to happen.

No 6, You may well be right. Trilegal may not have been hired even if they did not have a conflict owing to Zia's relationship but there is no way to know either way.
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 20:59
+0 -0
No 7 - I don't get it - a&o had 2 partners - AZB had 1 partner. Links had a 2 member team. All offices have multiple back office lawyers.
Anonymous guest 22 Feb 2011, 23:05
+0 -0
Trilegal was conflicted all right - conflicted whether they have the expertise for this
Anonymous guest 23 Feb 2011, 07:45
+0 -0
After all the euphoria subsides and the fat legal fees are collected, I do hope there is enough oil to pump out. And unlike their rigs, BP does stay afloat.

BTW, where did LI get the figure of 20 billion? Ah, "eventually"....eventually, I do hope a poor sod like me does get to make his millions.

And, isn't Posco's investment for a greenfield iron & steel plant worth USD 12 billion? I thought that qualified it as the largest ever inflow of FDI into India. That project has been cleared with a slew of riders.

Far better than exporting 100 million tonnes of high-grade iron ore to China. Glad J Ramesh got that finally.
Anonymous guest 23 Feb 2011, 18:39
+0 -0
its V&E who have done all the work. the deal earlier was with amarchand but went into a limbo for a while at around the time BP the 20$ billion setback coz of the damages it had to pay for the US oil spill.

When the deal was back on track, RIL decided to change their advisors (a lot of structuring had already been done by that time!)
Anonymous guest 23 Feb 2011, 20:44
+0 -0
#4, #8 and #12 jealous of AZB. Get a life.
Anonymous guest 23 Feb 2011, 21:27
+0 -0
Ril never uses and will not use amss given that Cyril s represented Anil during the family dispute. It's publicly known that RIL feels cheated by amss when it sided with Anil Ambani. Hats off to AZB for having tata, bharti, Vedanta and reliance in it's client list. Clearly they are the m&a lawyers of India. - London - anon
Anonymous guest 23 Feb 2011, 23:27
+0 -0
AZB rocks! people commenting here cant reach that stature!
Anonymous guest 24 Feb 2011, 05:15
+0 -0
@#14- RIL and Vedanta should top the [...] list if ever made. [...] of the highest order.

Also, I think you work on the assumption that M&A is the only kind of deals which happen in India!!

On mukesh feeling cheated- Im sure RIL is not AMSS's wife and Anil AMSS's mistress! firms which are not on retainer basis are free to represent whoever they want till it is not a situation of a conflict, in which case, due permission is requested from the counterparty. Only on receipt of such consent, can a firm work for anyone against the other.

#13- i agree with 12 as this is also what i have heard! If what 12 says is true, is it not possible that RIL engaged AMSS and then replaced them so that they are conflicted in the deal????
Anonymous guest 24 Feb 2011, 17:41
+0 -0
@kian- come on man....you needed to censor those words?? scared RIL/Vedanta will shut down the website?? well blame it on me!
Anonymous guest 24 Feb 2011, 21:52
+0 -0
#12 is clearly has his/her facts right. particularly that on the RIL side it was predominantly V&E's efforts. obviously 13, 14 and 15 are big AZB fans, but sometimes it doesn't hurt to check what the truth is before commenting.
Anonymous guest 24 Feb 2011, 23:15
+0 -0
£ 12 is correct. Please check with the members of the negotiating teams, whichever side and they will tell you the very limited role and participation of AZB in the negotiations. Maybe they worked in the background, without even A&O and V&E coming to know. I know this will hurt, but the fact is that this Indian deal was done by non-Indian law firms.
Anonymous guest 25 Feb 2011, 05:59
+0 -0
weird but the general tenor is to run azb down ! I have noticed this trend in many upstart Indian law firms, where they cannot handle the success of the likes of amss and azb. Its a bitter campaign to to say whats wrong with them. Its like a bunch of folks from Somalia saying whats wrong with the US !. Anyone can read Chambers, Legal 500 and decide what clients have to say about these law firms and their lawyers.
Anonymous guest 25 Feb 2011, 06:16
+0 -0
I AM AWARE AZB ADVISED RIL ON THE SUPREME COURT LITIGATION AGAINST RIL. READERS WILL RE-COLLECT HOW ONE JUDGE RECUSED ITSELF MID-WAY BECAUSE OF AZB. IT WOULD BE FAIR TO THINK THAT AZB IS DEEPLY INVOLVED IN THE GAS ISSUES ON RIL. LOOKS LIKE BP WOULD HAVE USED T&T TO EXAMINE THE SC LITIGATION. PEOPLE ARE FORGETTING THAT THIS DEAL INVOLVED SALE OF INTERESTS UNDER PSC AND NOT A SHARE SALE DEAL WHERE UK LAWYERS COULD ADVISE.
Anonymous guest 25 Feb 2011, 07:11
+0 -0
Fantastic Mr. O&G Lawyer just the tiny bit about the dispute between the Ambanis having been settled long time back...

Maybe you should also note that the lawyers representing Ambanis and BP were all London based 'real' Oil and Gas lawyers and though it is not relevant but for those who are less exposed to what corporate lawyers do this deal was most probably done through share in SPV's owning the stake..