Big 4 consultant gobbles up LPO giant Pangea3: Luthra, CAM act for EY on buy from Thomson Reuters

EY scales up legal offerings in India with acquisition (though probably not yet for Indians, at least with this buy)
EY scales up legal offerings in India with acquisition (though probably not yet for Indians, at least with this buy)

In a major move by consultancies in the global legal markets, Big 4 consultant EY has gobbled up legal process outsourcer (LPO) Pangea3 from Thomson Reuters, which had bought the then-India-headquartered LPO in 2010 for up to $40m from its founders.

While Pangea3 did not (and still does not, to the best of our knowledge) offer Indian law advice and it has significant US operations, the majority of its legal workforce is probably still based in India, having made it a major recruiter of Indian law graduates. The acquisition will, at the very least, give EY a major platform to compete on costs with global international law firms (whose lunch the Big 4 accountancy firms have been eating for a while now, with footprints big enough to compete with global law firms on size alone).

And while the buzz of the early days around LPOs has died down, that’s primarily so because LPO and captive LPOs owned by global law firms, have become such a routine part of global legal services now.

International Big Law should be worried, argued AboveTheLaw. And perhaps, Indian law firm lawyers are too, judging by the Silf complaint against the Big 4.

That said, at least for the time being, the Big 4 are still using law firms in their corporate expansion plans rather than each other.

L&L Partners, in this case, advised EY led by a team of partners William Vivian John and Lokesh Shah, managing associate Mayank Aggarwal, senior associate Rishabh Shah, associates Tanaya Sanyal and Gayatri Loomba; partner Gunjan Mishra advised on STPI and indirect tax matters.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP advised EY.

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Thomson Reuters.

Latham Watkins was global legal counsel for Thomson Reuters.

2019-04-03

Deal value: Confidential

{incomplete}

Photo by Mark Anderson.

Comments

MCT 24 May 2019, 14:57
+7 -0
I do not know if work in LPO is challenging or not but the salaries are just about ok.
More than half a decade back, few of my friends joined LPO's , they made around 15-20k per month, not sure how much is the pay for freshers now. I'm assuming Pangea3 being market leader pays much more!
Guest 24 May 2019, 16:17
+5 -0
Same as most tier 2 firms at least on 2018, when a few people I know had joined.
Pangea 25 May 2019, 01:50
+6 -0
I have worked with pangea in 2010 while waiting for my call from ome of the big four. Back they they paid 25000 to me on training period. And then it was takem ober by thomson reuters. Salaries went down soon. I ledt them after four months as work is routine and u dont need to know law to do this. any diligent guy having eye for details can do it..
Guest 25 May 2019, 05:38
+4 -1
They made an offer of 9 lakh p.a. though to a fresher last year. Not sure whether that's the standard now or an outlier.
Panga ji 25 May 2019, 08:48
+5 -0
While money is important, career growth - especially for the first few years after college - is far more crucial. Not sure how much growth LPO offers.
stradale 25 May 2019, 11:21
+7 -0
career growth- that's exactly the point.
after working in an LPO for say 5yrs, what next? They won't be making you the CEO some day for sure!!
Guest 25 May 2019, 12:48
+4 -4
Luthra doing some big deals now. Congrats to the team.
? 26 May 2019, 14:11
+5 -1
L&L definitely does high ticket deals, but this particular one probably is in the double digit millions and is a very small deal, did HR put you up to this again?
Guest 26 May 2019, 18:12
+1 -3
Your inveterate hostility seems to have clouded your interpretative ability. 'Big deals' was not just referring to the deal amount of the present deal. Also, perhaps you are either too used to being promoted by your HR or just cynical. Cheer up!
Guest 27 May 2019, 03:29
+5 -0
Still!? Really!? A big deal!? This deal!?
? 27 May 2019, 07:03
+4 -0
Using "inveterate" in a sentence doesn't make you right. By no means is this acquisition a "big deal". Even the partner who worked on this wouldn't call it a "big deal". It is objectively a mid-ticket deal [i]at best[/i]. Looks like your inveterate hostility has clouded your interpretative ability.
FrankGarrett 27 May 2019, 15:06
+0 -0
Damn, never knew there was a partner who specialized in STPI work. Very useful to know.