India tops global projects ranking, Amarchand retains lead on Luthra, AZB enters fray in third

India sees largest project finance pool
India sees largest project finance pool

Amarchand Mangaldas solidified its lead in the Indian project finance league tables (see below) ahead of Luthra & Luthra, as AZB & Partners pushed its way into the top three.

The half-year project finance league tables by analytics company dealogic, show Amarchand having acted on 19 project finance deals worth $8.5bn, nearly doubling its 2013 first quarter tally of 11 deals worth $4.9bn.

Luthra did not report any additional project deals in the last quarter to dealogic and remained at $3bn from four deals.

AZB, however, landed in third spot with two deals also worth $3bn, displacing SJ Law, Khaitan Sud & Partners and Link Legal down the list.

Hemant Sahai Associates entered the rankings in tenth place with $393m of deals just behind Clasis Law.

India tops world volumes

Amarchand also topped the Asia Pacific league table with its project financings, ahead of Clifford Chance (with $4.2bn worth of deals), Hogan Lovells and Allen & Overy. Luthra and AZB came sixth and seventh on that table.

India, meanwhile, topped the global project finance league tables with 7 per cent year-on-year growth and $26bn worth of recorded deals, ahead of the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia and the UK (see table above). The United States project aggregate value increased by 28 per cent, however.

State Bank of India was also the Asia Pacific region’s most prolific project finance lender with 29 deals worth nearly $8bn.

Pos.Legal AdviserAmount($m.)No.%share
1Amarchand Mangaldas8,5031937.3
2Luthra & Luthra3,078413.5
3AZB & Partners3,046213.4
4SJ Law Advocates & Solicitors2,267610.0
5Khaitan Sud & Partners1,61187.1
6Reed Smith LLP77013.4
7White & Case LLP67633.0
8Link Legal47032.1
9Clasis Law41641.8
10Hemant Sahai Associates Advocates39371.7
Total22,77760100.0

Source: dealogic

Note: The rankings are prepared by dealogic, which uses the following methodology:

  • There must be a clearly defined project or portfolio of projects, long term assets, dependency on cash flows and commercial bank lending
  • All PPPs/PFIs (excluding service contracts) are included.
  • Tables cover privately (co-) funded projects.

Exclusions

  • Real Estate (Except PFI / PPP deals);
  • Shipping or Aircraft financing where not tied to a specific project;
  • Equipment financing (when not related to a specific project);
  • Agriculture;
  • Manufacturing.

Comments

Scooter 25 Jul 2013, 12:50
+0 -0
What does "Amarchand retains Luthra lead" mean?
kianganz 25 Jul 2013, 12:54
+2 -0
You're right, it didn't mean what it was supposed to mean... Have corrected, thanks for pointing out...
Another point 25 Jul 2013, 14:12
+0 -1
Isn't a table by "deal count" usual? It makes it easy to spot which firms are doing more deals, although that is clear from the "deal value" table. It is interesting to note that a few small firms have done a lot of deals, albeit of lesser value.
incorrect 26 Jul 2013, 01:40
+0 -0
[quote name="Another point"]Isn't a table by "deal count" usual? It makes it easy to spot which firms are doing more deals, although that is clear from the "deal value" table. It is
interesting to note that a few small firms have done a lot of deals, albeit of lesser value.[/quote]

I disagree. the deals table are usually formulated on the basis of the value of the deals and not the number of deals. Check dealogic or other similar survey websites.
Anon 25 Jul 2013, 13:37
+1 -2
Deal data has consistently confirmed that as full service law firms, there are 5 firms in the country that matter (in no particular order): AMSS, AZB, KCo, Luthra and JSA. For certain clients/sectors firms such as Platinum, TTA, Tuli's remain influential. The rest are basically contenders or pretenders!!
Wait a minute 25 Jul 2013, 14:18
+3 -0
You refer to Tuli, of all firms, and club it with TTA and Platinum? But not top firms like Trilegal, S&R, etc.! You also think that the Mumbai heavyweights like NDA, WG, etc. are not influential?

I think you need to refresh your understanding and think again. No offense.
Scooter 25 Jul 2013, 15:07
+3 -0
Trilegal not even in top 10 !!! A&O break-up taking toll already.....
Mechanic 26 Jul 2013, 05:03
+1 -1
I think Trilegal wasn't in top 10 for Project Finance ever. If you see last year's H1 ranking, Trilegal wasn't in top 10 even then. See http://www.legallyindia.com/201207202970/Projects/link-legal-tops-h1-2012-project-finance-league-table-ahead-of-amarchand-luthra-clasis. So, the logic of linking it with A&O is fallacious, but we do it anyway. Good old Schadenfreude ;)
The Real Scooter 26 Jul 2013, 09:24
+0 -0
Again!
Half full 26 Jul 2013, 04:28
+0 -1
How is AZB full service? They do tax, IP, cap marks etc since when? Honestly, some of the full service firms, like Khaitan and Luthra, are hardly in the same league (in terms of quality and client rating) with some smaller firms that focus on a few practice areas and enjoy better rating.

It is fallacious to look at the Indian market and import Western concepts like full service, accountability, lockstep and equity.
Mechanic 26 Jul 2013, 05:03
+0 -0
These rankings do not reflect the practice or standing. For example, some small firms like HSA, Link Legal, Khaitan Sud, etc. are doing a lot of PF deals, but it does not show anything about their quality or clients. These deals cannot justify big fees. Also, take Luthra. They have one of the best Project Finance teams, but they have been surviving on this league table on the basis of a few ongoing mega deals.
Anon 25 Jul 2013, 17:09
+2 -0
Considering that Amarchand also top the mergers and acquisition and capital market tables they are now really firing on all engines. Because of their lead in m and a they also top competition and merger control work. What a fantastic position to be in ! Bravo Amarchand. For all the jealousy and criticism. You get , performance speaks. Clients know best ! This should shut up the critics. Beat that !
bling!!! 25 Jul 2013, 19:20
+1 -0
Amarchand PR machine bot!!! This is what they pay [...] for
Vada PAv 25 Jul 2013, 17:10
+3 -0
The projects performance is mostly Mumbai office . Delhi has no real team on financing . Though they try hard.
xyz 26 Jul 2013, 12:10
+0 -0
i heard that the Delhi team does do a lot of real estate finance work?
Bindaas 25 Jul 2013, 17:15
+1 -3
It's an exaggeration to say five firms matter. Azb is basically a corporate boutique. Not a full service firm they have no litigation , capital markets or projects. To speak of. It's a joke to call them full service . Khaitan is non existent in projects or capital markets . Only amss is a true full service firm. The rest are pretenders.
Non existent??? 26 Jul 2013, 06:52
+1 -0
Khaitan & Co is not non existent in project (infra) or cap markets. KCO once had a long client list, a 32 member strong infra team with some 6-7 partners and the cap marks was so large that it had to be split into 2 separate teams. It may have off-late taken a little bit of a back seat, due to recession and not because of their quality of work (which is in no manner abysmal), as result of which their their infra team has been reduced to 10 lawyers (with 4-5 partners) and cap marks to around about the same, and even smaller client list, but they will rally soon. They will be reporting deals after deals once the markets recover.
ANP 25 Jul 2013, 19:43
+0 -0
Where is my Trilegal in this list?
Janta Dal 25 Jul 2013, 20:22
+4 -1
Lexygen?
Creep 26 Jul 2013, 21:54
+3 -0
Lexygen is busy
Well wisher 26 Jul 2013, 10:42
+2 -0
As far as I know HSA is not a small firm. It has 15 partners and around 60 lawyers. In the projects and project finance space they are well know and have a good team led by Hemant. Most of the large PPP/PFI projects are done by them.
@ Well wisher 26 Jul 2013, 12:28
+2 -1
You must be "family" to be so blinded by love and wishes. Most large deals are done by HSA is the joke of the century. They have done 7 deals worth USD 393 million. Compare with the firms who do the real big deals like Luthra - 4 deals worth USD 3,078 million, and AZB - 2 deals worth USD 3,046 million. Calculate the average deal size and you'll know that HSA does anything but big deals.
Well wisher 29 Jul 2013, 05:11
+0 -0
I do not think you understand the term PPP/PFI. Please read properly - "Most of the large PPP/PFI projects are done by them." It did not say PF deals!!!!!!
@ Well wisher 1 Aug 2013, 06:00
+0 -0
I agree, I failed to note PFI/PPP. Be that as it may, my comment still stands. Most of the large PFI/PPP deals - ranging from advising the government and private sector on UMPPs like Sasan to Model Concessions to advising the GMRs of the world - are done by Luthra and Amarchand. If there are any mega deals that HSA has advised on as the lead counsel, please post details. Would be interesting to know.
Point of Information 2 Aug 2013, 10:32
+0 -0
Based on public information, some of the projects that HSA handles include :
~ABB, Sweden on its + 800 kV, 6000 MW HVDC MULTI TERMINAL SYSTEM PACKAGE transmission project in India - world's largest transmission project with total investment to the tune of about US$ 3 billion
~Navi Mumbai Greenfield airport - world's largest Greenfield airport - USD 1 Billion project
~Mumbai Transharbour Sea Link - world's 7th longest sea bridge - USD 2 Billion project
~Ministry of Railways and the Mumbai Rail Vikas Corporation Limited on the development and finance of the proposed 60 km Elevated Rail Corridor for the Churchgate-Virar section - one of the world's largest infrastructure projects - USD 5 Billion project
~Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor - world's largest urbanisation project - USD 90 Billion to be invested upfront and in excess of USD 1 Trillion over the next 15-20 years.
~Two of the PPP projects handled by HSA have recently been ranked amongst the top 40 PPP projects of the world by World Bank/IFC. The Bhutan Education City and the Gandhinagar roof top solar project.
~HSA has acted as lead international counsel to several infra projects outside India - Mauritius wind project, Bhutan Education City, Bangladesh health, hydro in Nepal, several oil and gas M&A deals in West Africa, Australia and middle east.
Scooter 29 Jul 2013, 06:36
+0 -0
I think one needs to also evaluate the value of being lender's counsel v. borrower's counsel in PF deals. AZB's involvement in one of the deals (out of the two) which AZB has acted in was in the capacity of a Borrower's counsel. I have also gotten to know the the Partner on that deal was not generally do financing.
Guest 29 Jul 2013, 00:11
+0 -0
These rankings are wholly undependable. The only thing that is certain is that AMSS has the largest project finance though not the best. Deals that are reported have many flaws such as

>> not including many 'sensitive' deals

>> including many cross border deals where the firm has a negligible role

>> including extension of existing deals meaning reporting is done twice

>> many firms not taking the effort to report deals or not being aware

The people who compile these 'league' and 'deal' tables are mostly ignorant of ground realities so it is easy for firms to exploit the asymmetry of information and the result is a bunch of BS. There are firms like India Law Services which do nothing but project finance but are surprisingly absent in this ranking. ELP also does a fair bit of project finance but is missing while AZB with hardly any deals is no. 3.
Insider 29 Jul 2013, 06:38
+0 -0
If you get a change, do a DV of a ILS draft and an AMSS draft. We need stronger IP laws which also need to be enforced vis-s-vis law law firm docs.
Sasha 29 Jul 2013, 07:43
+0 -0
[quote name="Insider"]If you get a change, do a DV of a ILS draft and an AMSS draft. We need stronger IP laws which also need to be enforced vis-s-vis law law firm docs.[/quote]

Haha seems to be a case of dacoit accusing pickpocket. AMSS drafts were all copied from Allen Overy, Linklaters and other foreign firms 15 yrs ago when they first started working together.
Insider 29 Jul 2013, 10:19
+0 -0
Do a DV and you will know.
Bogus 1 Aug 2013, 07:28
+0 -0
U mean to say that all AMSS drafts are 100% their IP. U should also do a DV of AMSS drafts with other foreign law firms.
H 29 Jul 2013, 12:58
+0 -0
I learn that AMSS and Luthra have picked large PF Transactions for riduculous fee for meeting the Dealogic tables...
Nonsense 29 Jul 2013, 16:09
+0 -0
1) AMSS, 2. Luthra, 3) Link Legal, 4) HSA, 5) Khaitan Sud/Fox, 6) SJ Law/JSA

That is the order for PF firms ranking in India
Guest 1 Aug 2013, 08:07
+0 -0
[quote name="Nonsense"]1) AMSS, 2. Luthra, 3) Link Legal, 4) HSA, 5) Khaitan Sud/Fox, 6) SJ Law/JSA

That is the order for PF firms ranking in India[/quote]

AMSS Delhi has hardly any PF practice. AMSS Mumbai is strong in project finance, with Vish, Ameya, Santosh. Not Delhi. AMSS Delhi is more of Infrastructure practice

Khaitan Sud???? Ha ha

You missed ILS.

HSA is more an infra practice than Project Finance.
Lex 31 Jul 2013, 15:03
+0 -0
Lexygen does pf work?
Bogus 1 Aug 2013, 07:38
+0 -0
Projects are not lucrative any more. Hardly any mandate will fetch you a sizable fee. In fact firms are making more money on restructuring and foreign currency loans (ECB, FCNR, Bonds) as they do not involve the strenuous exercise of DDR and PDC compliance.
Nonsense again 2 Aug 2013, 07:07
+0 -0
These are meaningless until accompanied with client feedback