2017 H1 M&A leagues: Vodea boosts 5 firms but SAM, AZB would have topped anyway, chased by Trilegal, CAM, NDA • Khaitan, Luthra down lower

Vodafone-Idea gives windfall to 5 firms in M&A league tables
Vodafone-Idea gives windfall to 5 firms in M&A league tables

The Vodafone-Idea mega-merger has gifted five Indian law firms a $10bn+ deal values in the first half of 2017 in league tables, according to data collated by analytics firm mergermarket.

The $12.2bn deal led to Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (SAM) and AZB & Partners having advised on the greatest aggregate value of M&A transactions in the first half of 2017.

SAM and AZB (which both assisted on the transaction as competition counsel) advised on an aggregate of more than $16bn of M&A deals, with SAM exceeding AZB’s tally marginally by $200m.

However, even without the $12.2bn of the Vodafone deal, SAM and AZB would have topped the league table with 15 and 31 other deals, respectively, with values of $4.5bn and $4.4bn respectively.

S&R Associates, Vaish Associates and Bharucha & Partners, also received deal credit by mergermarket (although DMD Advocates, which advised Vodafone on taxation aspects of the deal, did not receive M&A credit).

Outside of Idea-fone

Amongst firms without Vodafone involvement, Trilegal made it into the seventh place with $2.7bn from 16 deals, marginally ahead of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, which stood at $2.7bn over 26 deals.

Nishith Desai & Associates, Desai & Diwanji and PDS Legal also managed to break the $1bn marker this half-year.

However, Khaitan & Co, despite registering 19 deals, has only notched up $854m of reported M&A deals so far this year, closely followed by J Sagar Associates (JSA) with 14 deals worth $616m.

The remaining Big 7 firm, Luthra & Luthra, came in even lower at $393m from 6 deals, behind DSK Legal and HSA Advocates’ deal values and volumes.

Platinum Partners and Veritas Legal came in 16th and 17th position by value from 3 deals each.

IndusLaw and Economic Laws Practice (ELP) both registered three deals worth $81m and $23m respectively.

By value

In terms of the total number of deals, the top of the table is dominated by the seven firms with the largest headcounts, other than Luthra.

By the total number of deals done, AZB came out on top with 32 deals, followed by Cyril Amarchand with 26, Khaitan with 19, Shardul Amarchand and Trilegal with 16 each, and J Sagar Associates (JSA) with 14.

Versus 2016

At the same time last year, in 2016, Cyril Amarchand was topping the values table at $6.2bn, followed by AZB with $4.5bn, Vaish Associates at $2.5bn and Shardul Amarchand and Khaitan around $1.9bn each, JSA at $1.2bn, Induslaw at $1.1bn and Trilegal at $1bn.

Luthra was not represented in the top 13 by value in 2016’s first half (though by 2016 year end the firm made it to 10th in the table with $2.1bn from 17 deals).

RankHouseValue (USD M)Number of Deals
1Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co1671716
2AZB & Partners1657832
3S&R Associates132126
4Vaish Associates129443
5Bharucha & Partners126681
6Trilegal288616
7Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas271526
8Nishith Desai Associates18708
9Desai & Diwanji13229
10PDS Legal10856
11Khaitan & Co85419
12J Sagar Associates61614
13DSK Legal51510
14HSA Advocates4247
15Luthra & Luthra Law Offices3936
16Platinum Partners3893
17Veritas Legal2783

via mergermarket

RankHouseValue (USD M)Number of Deals
1AZB & Partners1657832
2Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas271526
3Khaitan & Co85419
4Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co1671716
5Trilegal288616
6J Sagar Associates61614
7DSK Legal51510
8Desai & Diwanji13229
9Nishith Desai Associates18708
10HSA Advocates4247
11S&R Associates132126
12PDS Legal10856
13Luthra & Luthra Law Offices3936
14Bathiya Legal454
15Vaish Associates129443
16Platinum Partners3893
17Veritas Legal2783
18IndusLaw813
19Economic Laws Practice (ELP)233
20BMR Legal982
21Spice Route Legal872

via mergermarket

Comments

Downwithluthra 7 Jul 2017, 19:13
+16 -7
If only people at Luthra were more concerned with doing real work instead of checking who uses which phone number
SOW 8 Jul 2017, 05:38
+2 -0
Disappointed with CAM's ranking
Out of date 8 Jul 2017, 06:54
+1 -0
With Nisha's move to Trilegal, the comp work for the Voda-Idea merger has now moved from AZB to Trilegal.
Sacchai ki Kadwahat 8 Jul 2017, 07:28
+3 -0
What is the essence of an organisation? Its people. But more importantly, its leaders. When the leaders grope to find direction, life turns a full circle when its leaders are not in synch with reality. Nothing hits harder then life. And they are finding it out the hard way.
Sinking Luthra 8 Jul 2017, 09:33
+28 -23
Luthra should recruit more from NLUJ. They will keep on sinking. Every firm with majority NLUJ students is sinking. Look at ARA Law and Majmudar for example. Their toxic behavior towards students from other colleges never let's the firm grow. No matter how old they get or what positions they reach, they cry like babies and go on with "My college is better than yours". NLS, NUJS and NLIU students just work hard and help the firm grow. NLUJ students due to their insecurities just keep fighting and create a bad work atmosphere. It is not a coincidence that the downward spiral of Luthra begins when they mass recruit from NLUJ. Look at ARA and Majmudar for example. No one wants to think of working there anymore.
really 10 Jul 2017, 04:02
+8 -13
You cannot make such a generic and sweeping statement about an institution - any personal agenda? sour grapes? I am not from NLUJ, and I have worked across few of its alumni, in Luthra, CAM and a bulge bracket US investment bank, and I felt they were top notch - comparable to the finest.
Foreigner 10 Jul 2017, 10:24
+18 -0
What is NLUJ
But yeh toh batao 8 Jul 2017, 13:47
+3 -0
Which firm made the most from these deals? UK firms usually announce their total profits and PPP. While expecting that is a little far fetched for Indian firms, some indication as to their revenue from these deals would be welcome.
Azb 8 Jul 2017, 17:24
+5 -0
AZB is not Idea's competition counsel. Nisha and her team left AZB and took Idea with them. Azb is not doing the corporate piece. Inaccurate reporting.
Lawl 27 Jul 2017, 10:56
+1 -0
When mergermarket collected the data, she was at AZB. There's no inaccurate reporting. It's not mergermarket's fault that she moved.
To be noted 9 Jul 2017, 21:24
+3 -0
Deal value doesn't reflect which firm is more profitable.
Kya yaar 11 Jul 2017, 01:13
+0 -0
IDIA? Come on yaar, Kian! Aise kaise ho jata hai?
kianganz 12 Jul 2017, 08:10
+2 -0
Lol, thanks, sorry about that - some good brand-building by IDIA...
Tea 11 Jul 2017, 04:44
+1 -0
Ranking in terms of value doesn't make sense at all in the law firm context. Big value or small value transaction, lawyer rates are same with slight variations here and there. Infact a law firm with more foreign clients likely to make more money than one which has primarily Indian clients.
Blah 11 Jul 2017, 06:16
+0 -0
Its Idea - not IDIA...
Profit 14 Jul 2017, 05:43
+2 -0
I think what matters at the end of the day is how profitable the organisation is. Bharucha ranks amongst the top in terms of deal value but that was their only reported deal. They could not have made more profit than say Khaitan which reported 19 deals with a much less aggregate value.