Phoenix wins withdrawal for Arnab’s Republic vs India Today in Delhi HC ratings writ

The high court won’t get to know...
The high court won’t get to know...

Phoenix Legal and senior counsel Ramji Srinivasan won for Arnab Goswami’s new TV news venture Republic in the Delhi high court, after the India Today Group withdrew its writ that we had first reported yesterday, which challenged Republic for allegedly violating the telecom law to gain unprecedented TV ratings (TRP).

The writ by India Today Group’s news channel TV Today claimed that Republic had purchased multiple listings on the Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) of various operators, thus violating TRAI regulations under which one channel can be listed only under one genre.

After both the Republic as well as TV Today submitted in court today that they were registered only under in the “news and current affairs” genre on the EPG with a single channel, TRAI said that several similar complaints were also pending against other channels including the petitioner and would be dealt with together.

TV Today is understood to have withdrawn the writ after that and the matter was disposed of.

The Republic TV channel has already displayed the headline that the Delhi high court refused to hear the writ.

India Today was represented by senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, while DSK Legal acted for the co-defendant Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC), instructing senior counsel Sandeep Sethi.

Comments

Guest 25 May 2017, 14:54
+1 -0
Well done Phoenix!
Senior 30 May 2017, 18:42
+2 -1
Seems like Phoenix is out of the corporate market, maybe making its corporate associates do litigation as well, after all, something should keep the boat sailing.
Great News 25 May 2017, 15:25
+3 -6
Phoenix is the new litigation powerhouse ! Time for SAM, etc to beware of the rise of the Phoenix.
Big One 26 May 2017, 04:09
+3 -2
This is awesome!! Big one Phoenix...Look forward to moreee ...Best wishes
Guest 26 May 2017, 09:46
+2 -5
This was not the actual decision. The application was withdrawn on certain conditions and this can't be termed as the win of any party.
Guest1 27 May 2017, 12:52
+1 -2
Ironical how a legal news reporter didn't carefully read the order itself.
Decimus Meridius 28 May 2017, 03:37
+1 -1
Kian, to borrow Shashi Tharoor's words, seems like we have a couple of corporate lawyers masquerading as litigators.

Dear Guest, it was not an application that was withdrawn. There was no option left but to withdraw the petition. Secondly, as the order clearly records, the petitioner itself was allegedly involved in the wrongdoing that it wanted the court to direct TRAI/UOI to rectify. The order also did not injunct BARC from publishing the viewership data, which was the prime motive of the petitioner. Be around in the courts and perhaps you would realize that this was a win, through and through.

Dear Guest1, sorry to disappoint you but the real irony is that it is quite apparent that you have not read the order at all, forget carefully. Not all reporters are bad ;)