In challenging post-RERA regime, ex-RNA GC, Hammurabi partner Vidya Adsule joins Sheth builder as GC

Vidya Adsule moves to
Vidya Adsule moves to

Former RNA Corp general counsel (GC) Vidya Adsule joined the Mumbai-based $300m+ net worth realtor Ashwin Sheth Group, run by Sheth Corp, as group GC.

On 21 January 2019, Adsule has begun leading its team of 8 in-house lawyers at the group, which had been without a GC for the last four years.

She had left RNA Corp after one year at the group, which she had joined from JP Infra.

Adsule is a 1988 Mumbai University alumnus, who had worked in-house at companies including Ahuja Constructions, ICICI Bank, ICICI Venture Funds.

From 2005, she also spent time as GC at Kotak Mahindra Investments Limited and Bombay Dyeing, before briefly joining law firm Hammurabi & Solomon in 2014. She then moved back in-house to Kolte Patil Developers in Pune, JP Infra and RNA in Mumbai.

She commented that one of the biggest challenges facing the real estate sector was contending with the imbalance of equity in India’s post-RERA regime.

While the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 (RERA) stipulates timelines for developers to complete projects, the authorities under the Act are under no obligation to grant necessary approvals under a strict timeline.

“The 1980s was the growth story for real estate. The market obtained its peak between 2005-2010 and after 2010 [there was a decline]. Under the [Maharashtra Ownership Flat Act 1963] there was no separate regulatory body,” she said. “Post RERA, there is a separate regulator and every project has to be registered with the regulator before the developer can start selling.”

Adsule added: “RERA is just two years old and it is getting evolved right now. In that evolution the authorities, which are not from a legal but a bureaucratic background, [tend to lose sight of legal implications to business in] passing new rules.”

She said that on the flip side the government has also supported the sector on ease of doing business by relaxing certain environmental regulations such as reducing the defined limits of the “high tide line” from 200 metres to 50 metres - this has helped developers in Mumbai increase business. They can now build “affordable housing” in No Development Zone (NDZ) areas.

The government has also increased the threshold of project site areas for compulsory clearances from 20,000 sq mts to 50,000 sq mts, she said.

The four-decade old Sheth Group had split into separate groups in 2012, with Adsule now joining the Ashwin Sheth group. The Ashwin Sheth group has projects in Mumbai and Dubai with over 12m sq ft delivered assets across residential, commercial and residential segments.

Comments

Future In-House 26 Feb 2019, 02:35
+0 -1
How much do in-house counsel make?
Present In-house 27 Feb 2019, 08:38
+1 -6
20-25 lakhs
Wise guy 27 Feb 2019, 11:12
+1 -0
Depends on the role and the organisation. varies from 3 L to 3 crores.
Actual In Houser 28 Feb 2019, 07:49
+3 -0
Not heard of these builders, but 60L to 2 crores is a realistic range for this kind of profile.
huhh 27 Feb 2019, 17:10
+7 -0
Mukesh Bhuvnani from Airtel earns upward of 4.5 crores. see https://www.telecomlead.com/telecom-services/airtel-discloses-salary-of-sunil-mittal-gopal-vittal-and-directors-85368
IKR! 28 Feb 2019, 08:33
+0 -0
Which should be blinder - given most of his background is purely secretarial and not that of a lawyer. But yes - any top 10 nifty company's could be anywhere between 2-5 crores including stock options, etc. Real estate, given the shady industry it is in India, is not known to be a paymaster so any event cannot be more than 2 cr for a GC, depending on the scale of operations.
Please Stop 28 Feb 2019, 08:48
+6 -0
I guess handful of GCs earn such high amount. Unless you are heading legal function of a corporate engaged in complex / highly regulated business, other companies don't pay such high amount. Ironically, Indian corporates still see GCs (and overall legal function) as a cost centre and most of the GCs are not vested with powers to bulldoze / veto the demands of business teams (who want to sign anything if it gets money to the company). Globally, this is the other way round and in India too, this needs to change.
Yeah 28 Feb 2019, 12:39
+0 -1
Correct! In a lot of companies, GCs are simply used for signoff, sometimes just to show the firang overlords that everything has been legally vetted. I do know GCs who hold some sway but most of them just work as liaison officers between the various law firms engaged by their bosses.
Please Stop 1 Mar 2019, 05:39
+3 -0
Yes. Being a law firm lawyer, I work with several GCs. A few of the GCs we have worked with are extremely capable and have great understanding of the sector. However their usual feedback is management supports business teams more than a legal function. Management (especially Indian corporates) still feels that legal function is 'support' as everything can be 'FIXED'(!) in India. This thought process needs to change dramatically. It is also a waste of talent of GCs and their teams.
Bored 1 Mar 2019, 07:17
+1 -0
"[i]such as reducing the defined limits of the “high tide line” from 200 metres to 50 metres - this has helped developers in Mumbai increase business. They can now build “affordable housing” in No Development Zone (NDZ) areas.[/i]"

ha ha ha... don't even know where to begin -

1. 2019 Notification will not apply until the State puts in place a revised CZMP under the new Notification (Rule 6 of the Notification). For the 2011 notification, most States (including Maharashtra) had their revised CZMPs approved in 2018.

2. It is the NDZ that has been reduced from 200 to 50 meters. The High Tide Line as the name would suggest is to be determined scientifically. Maybe she meant to say "from" the HTL and not "of" the HTL.

3. There is certainly no scope for a builder to build "affordable housing" in the NDZ even under the 2019 Notification. Only repairs and reconstruction of existing structures and that too only for permissible activities is permissible in the NDZ. Even beyond the NDZ in any CRZ III area dwelling units are only permissible if it is within the ambit of traditional rights and customary uses such as existing fishing villages and that is subject to a 9 meter height limit and a Ground +1 restriction.

[...]
Bored 4 Mar 2019, 09:32
+0 -0
Not sure why my comment was not published - all it did was set out the correct legal position.. If the little joke at the end was offensive, it could have simply been redacted.

In my view, leaving a comment in the main article, which articulates an incorrect legal position, un-rebutted is far more damaging than a little joke.
kianganz 4 Mar 2019, 09:37
+0 -0
Hi, sorry for the delay and thanks for your comment. Have now published with the last line redacted :)
Rakesh Chaurasia 25 Mar 2019, 03:18
+0 -0
what is the advantage of RERA to home buyers who are waiting the possession since last 5-8 years beyond the target possession date..we are paying heavy interest to bank on borrowed loan and also paying rent in the same city..Builders like RNA and Amprapali have cheated the poor buyers and government is looking from distance to helpless buyers