Sequoia India GC of 9 years, Sandeep Kapoor, to leave • VP Siddharth Rao to take top job

Sequoia legal head Sandeep Kapoor to move on and out
Sequoia legal head Sandeep Kapoor to move on and out

Bangalore-based director legal at top venture capital (VC) fund Sequoia Capital, Sandeep Kapoor, will be leaving the firm, probably by the end of this month, according to authoritative sources.

We understand that Sequoia vice president legal, Siddharth V Rao is set to take over the legal director role from Kapoor. Rao is a 2006 Nalsar Hyderabad graduate who had been at Sequoia since 2015, after a one year stint at Platinum Partners from 2014 to 2015. Before that he was at Themis Associates, a consultant at Ashoka, manager at Samhita Social Ventures and an associate for three years at Wadia Ghandy & Co until 2009.

We have not been able to confirm where Kapoor will be moving at this time, who declined to comment when contacted.

Siddharth Rao to take over role from Kapoor
Siddharth Rao to take over role from Kapoor

Sequoia is one of India’s busiest VC players and in his time there since 2010 Kapoor has grown the legal team to around five lawyers.

He is also hugely “passionate” about legal technology, having integrated artificial intelligence / machine learning tools into Sequoia’s investment process.

Before joining Sequoia in 2010, he was working as GC South Asia at computer chips giant Intel and senior attorney South Asia for Intel Capital.

Previously he had also worked with Vaish Associates and Luthra & Luthra in Delhi.

He is a 1996 Delhi University LLB graduate, who is also a qualified company secretary. He had started his career in-house at Ranbaxy.

Comments

Wild Coconut Thing 21 Mar 2019, 13:31
+17 -1
Congratulations Sid Rao! An excellent lawyer and a fantastic guy. Wishing you all the best in your new role!
Guest 22 Mar 2019, 17:01
+1 -0
Hi LI

Just wanted to know when you post articles on twitter, then why dont you use hashtags. In fact there are no popular hashtags for indian judiciary or law firm culture. Let me know if possible. Its actually very difficult to curate articles for reading.

Thanks
Guest 23 Mar 2019, 15:18
+1 -0
You could use #SupremeCourt or #DelhiHC #attorney #lawyer #law #legal #lawfirm #lawyers #lawsuit #lawschool
Futurite 23 Mar 2019, 03:52
+1 -3
What should be his pay package?
Dear Futurite 24 Mar 2019, 06:42
+2 -5
30 LPA
in house 25 Mar 2019, 03:53
+3 -1
That's just silly. Must be at least 1-1.5cr. Can't imagine any lawyer with more than 10 years PQE earning anything less than that as a GC
@LI 23 Mar 2019, 08:03
+0 -2
Hahha Kian, so much moderation. I am sure you are getting each of the comments being verified directly from the source then!!. You had to delete a comment already published. So much for free journalism!! But I can understand this is coming as an exclusive piece to you, hence terms have been made clear then. Quoting Harry Potter.. No one takes his (this case firm) name, together!! :):)
kianganz 23 Mar 2019, 08:31
+0 -0
To be honest, I didn't quite understand your comment, it was rather cryptic...

In any case, in line with our usual takedown and moderation policy, after the comment was reported and no evidence had been offered in support of whatever argument it was making, we took it down (although I'm not sure how any evidence could have been proffered, since its point was so oblique?).
Themisian 23 Mar 2019, 09:32
+3 -0
I think what was being alluded to was the closeness with Themis.
smart capital 23 Mar 2019, 16:33
+5 -2
Gone are the days when Sequoia was considered to be a primie - there are bigger and better players in the block, being a PE/VC lawyer, founders prefer seasoned investors who add value than just being dumb capital, which is why we see more listed / large closely held unlisted companies having the capacity to lead a series A round and buy-out the business eventually. That said, businesses which are build with the need of having to raise rounds after rounds of capital, you need funds like Sequoia and Accel around.
Dealer 25 Mar 2019, 06:33
+2 -2
True. In fact, I have recently noted in atleast 4 deals that Seq. has teamed up with Accel to play hard ball with incoming investors to ensure that no exclusive right is given to the incoming investor and rather all rights are exercised collectively by majority % that is shrewdly calculated to ensure that Seq. + Accel can have whatever they want but no one else can without having them on board. Nothing wrong with being business smart, but the way they do it is very sneaky and unprofessional. Anyone who would have dealt with them in the recent past would understand.
Please report 26 Mar 2019, 06:12
+4 -1
@Kian at least report the deals (PFC deal), it appears that we are reading a newspaper with less content. Why are you not reporting anything that has L&L in it. are you afraid of anyone?
Guest 28 Mar 2019, 12:44
+0 -0
Your comments are hilarious at best. You must be a disgrunted lawyer
Reply 28 Mar 2019, 21:50
+0 -0
Kudos to your analysis on both points. Hope you are not a lawyer, except the fact on reaching such conclusion, its incomprehensible to think that how are you even surviving in this world.