8 promoted to Wadia Ghandy partner in Mumbai (including 2008 NLIUite & a Noojie)

Wadia Ghandy has promoted eight of its lawyers in Mumbai to partnership, including one 2008 NLIU Bhopal graduate and a 2006 NUJS Kolkata graduate.

With effect from 1 April, the following have been made a partner (with law school and graduation year, where available on Linked-in or social media profiles at the time of going to press):

  • Gaurav Gopal (NLIU Bhopal 2008)
  • Gaurav Singhi (NUJS Kolkata 2006)
  • Gautam Ganjawala
  • Gopal Bankar (Symbiosis Law 2000)
  • Jasmine Sheth (University of Mumbai)
  • Rati Patni
  • Rohini Verma
  • Shoma Maitra (St Xavier’s College)

The following have been promoted to senior associate level:

Mumbai

  • Krishna Moorthy
  • Megha Sharma
  • Nikhil Pai
  • Noshir Vania
  • Sahil Nagamiya
  • Sameer Pandit
  • Sneh Mehta
  • Soumya Shankar
  • Tanu Banerjee
  • Vidya Venugopal
  • Zia Ahmed

Delhi:

  • Prateek Rastogi

Bangalore

  • Namrata Sinha

NLSIU Bangalore has made up the majority of partners at the Big Six law firms in the past three years, with NLIU Bhopal and NUJS Kolkata, both younger national law schools, only making up 5 and 3 per cent respectively, according to Legally India research.

Comments

Soorma Bhopali 29 Apr 2014, 03:17
+5 -0
Excellent news! Congrats to all.

Bhopal should have more now with Gaurav Gopal at Wadia, and Debyanshu joining Khaitan from JSA.
NLIU 29 Apr 2014, 04:14
+5 -3
Congratulations Gopal! Well done and all the best...

Congrats to all other deserving people for their respective promotions! They make their respective alma maters and families proud.
Old friend 29 Apr 2014, 04:24
+5 -2
From an unceremonial and record-breaking exit from AMSS to partnership at WG!! What a journey... tip of the hat from an old friend!
who? 29 Apr 2014, 09:11
+2 -0
Which of these exited AMSS unceremoniously?
NLIU-Alma mater 29 Apr 2014, 04:42
+4 -1
Congratulations Gaurav :)

Superb achievement! Much needed reward to your tremendous hard work and dedication. You have made us proud and has inspired to achieve big.

Cheers!
WR 29 Apr 2014, 05:03
+3 -1
Good job by WG, what about CB...
Jury 29 Apr 2014, 06:06
+7 -2
This is to legally india:

"Wadia Ghandy has promoted eight of its lawyers in Mumbai to partnership, including one 2008 NLIU Bhopal graduate and a 2006 NUJS Kolkata graduate."

You would have stopped "Wadia Ghandy has promoted eight of its lawyers in Mumbai to partnership"

NLU grads do not have two horns to be highlighted.

Kian - you do not have to be their unpaid PRO.

Everyone (including non-NLU) had put in the same level of hardwork to reach partnership.
kianganz 29 Apr 2014, 06:16
+10 -2
True, agree with you to some extent, though the NLIU Bhopal grad Gaurav Gopal definitely deserved singling out, since he's only from the 2008 batch which is rather unusual.

In light of our recent research on the topic - http://www.legallyindia.com/201310044020/Law-firms/nls-glc-du-ils-rule-law-firm-partnerships-law-firms-don-rsquo-t-play-favourites - it was also relevant mentioning the mark that younger law schools make.

Partner alums from other law schools, while no worse or less deserving than those from NLUs obviously, are frankly a bit less 'interesting' on a macroscopic level, since lawyers from GLC, DU and so on have been making partner at law firms for decades now...

So yes, while I take your point, I also respectfully and slightly disagree in this instance.
kianganz 29 Apr 2014, 06:21
+7 -2
Adding to that - for instance, we wouldn't have singled out an NLS grad in this story, since they've practically become the status quo in partnership promotions and an NLS grad making partner alongside 7 others is nothing unusual.

An old adage in journalism is: dog biting man is not news, but man biting dog always is.

All that said - yes, I admit that we do like highlighting NLUs for several reasons: they are fun to write about, there's a public interest in how well they are performing since they are supposed to be the state-funded 'islands of excellence' of legal education, and there's obviously also arguably stronger reader interest because of alumni ties and the 5-year residential model.
Scooters-S 29 Apr 2014, 12:10
+2 -1
Kian you are going the modi way. I say stop with these dog and puppy analogies! Very bad!
Bad journo 29 Apr 2014, 06:55
+2 -2
And why doesn't Gautam Ganjawala deserve a special mention as well? Or are you unaware that he's a 2008 pass out as well?

Congrats Gautam! The only deserving one from the lot!
kianganz 29 Apr 2014, 07:03
+0 -1
Indeed, unaware - we posted this late last night and only went with the information that was available on Linked-in and other social networks.

What college did Gautam graduate from?

Best regards,
Kian
Guest 29 Apr 2014, 07:17
+1 -0
GLC
Bad bad journo 29 Apr 2014, 07:48
+1 -0
Im sorry Kian - but that's really shoddy journalism. Coupled with "St. Xaviers college" for Shoma - I really did not expect this from a website that I routine visit multiple times in a day.

In a rush to print something before everyone else, please dont compromise on quality reporting. Sincere request. Your lack of diligence (or indulging in bad research rather) shouldn't take away credit where credit is deserved.
kianganz 29 Apr 2014, 08:04
+2 -0
Thanks for your feedback but honestly I don't think it's that bad :)

I had clearly added the proviso that those were all the details we were able to get from Linked-in and social media at that time and it was obvious these weren't complete.

In this case and in the internet age and social media when news travels fast, I think it's rather important to get the names out fast, rather than confirming everyone's full biodata, and we will update the rest once we get confirmation from the firm (which will probably still take a few hours).

In the case of Shoma Maitra, the only listing on Linked-in is a Xavier's BA in English from 2003. Once we get the full details for everyone we'll update it of course.

Best regards,
Kian
Bad bad journo 29 Apr 2014, 08:26
+0 -4
The proviso is much appreciated - it really is. I still think its shoddy journalism to get the names out fast (before other websites do) without providing full details to the extent relevant but I don't think it would cost you much to get a confirmation from the managing partner of the firm in question or from the firm itself as opposed to reporting incomplete data and making ignorant statements in the comment section. No firm will report complete details - as a journalist I think it's your job to ensure that your reporting is complete and your facts are accurate.

On a side note - I wasn't implying that you publish everyone's full bio data. Ordinarily what school a partner is from isn't very relevant - however, you made it relevant with your biased headline and with your comment later on. No one expects you to upload CVs while reporting a partnership promotion, but if you're going to dabble on about what law school one particular partner is from and what year he passed out in - its not unfair to expect another person who's made it after passing out in the same year (and more deserving so) to also get that credit. It's unfair reporting and it's highly unfair to the person in question (though personally I don't think he would really care).
kianganz 29 Apr 2014, 08:31
+1 -0
I don't think there's any real harm done, so let's agree to disagree - the names are accurate and were confirmed from the managing partner, and we always have to pick one angle or other to the story. If we'd had all data, the angle might not have changed slightly to also include a GLC 2008 grad, but a 2008 NLIU grad and an NUJS grad making partner is newsworthy IMHO in any case.

The biodata, I assume, is not readily at the top of the head of most managing partners, so we've yet to receive it but will update. Waiting a day for that when the announcement was made yesterday, is not really worth it in the case where the main news is about the names themselves, and anything else is just proverbial icing on the news cake.
Scooters-S 29 Apr 2014, 12:12
+1 -1
And even if you could only find out that much, how is info about BA degree in English relevant to a lawyers qualification. I was left wondering if there is a St. Xaviers Law college anywhere. Could have dont without the xaviers here.
Scooters-S 30 Apr 2014, 06:11
+0 -0
done*
@ Kian 14 Aug 2014, 04:47
+0 -0
You are absolutely right, Kian, in focusing on the NLUs for the reasons you state. Many grads of other colleges (with a few exceptions) have little interest in their college and they can't even maintain a LinkedIn account properly, which all add up to lack of information. The relevancy of the arguments of the critics who label your reporting fast and "shoddy", while [s]conveniently[/s] stupidly and illogically overlooking the disclaimers, is not even worth debating.

@ Bad bad journo: the least you could do is check the LinkedIn profile of Shoma before making a random comment. It shows her poor standards that her LinkedIn account only mentions St. Xaviers; as for your logic and IQ: [i]res ipsa loquitur[/i].

@ All other critics: News isn't an IPO, so speed is more relevant than completeness. An online publication can keep updating and it is okay to prefer speed over form. As long as there are no mistakes, or adequate disclaimers are offered, what is the problem? Not like you guys write perfectly without spelling and grammatical errors.

#betterlatethannever
SB @ NLIU 29 Apr 2014, 06:27
+3 -0
Congratulations Gaurav! Youngest partner around I guess!!
CuriousGeorge 29 Apr 2014, 06:27
+6 -3
I wonder how firms like Wadia manage in terms of revenue. Year on year, they make 5-6 (roughly) partners. Do these new partners have any obligations to bring in business? After Anand Bhatt’s unfortunate demise and Djena leaving, I wonder about Wadia’s future.
Hurray! 29 Apr 2014, 07:11
+3 -2
Go Nikhil Pai! Huge congratulations! Hopefully now you'll "see" things for what they are!
Hurry Indeed 29 Apr 2014, 08:39
+1 -1
In fact, Nikhil is the one of the very very few truly deserving ones from the list of SAs! Congrats Nikhil!
Guest 29 Apr 2014, 06:58
+9 -10
2008 to partner? In any big firm he would barely be a senior associate. Looks like Zia was right to keep Anand Shah as a Senior Associate despite his being a "partner" at Wadia Ghandy. I had some sympathy for him when he did not make the cut in AZB few weeks ago but now it seems the decision was justified if this is the callous manner in which WG promotes to partnership.
Scooter-101 29 Apr 2014, 07:09
+2 -1
What do you mean by Xaviers or Mumbai University? Its GLC!
Scooters-S 5 May 2014, 13:16
+0 -0
isnt there KC as well?
Guest 29 Apr 2014, 09:08
+6 -2
WG continues the trend of making young people partner. 2008 is too early and immature
Guest 29 Apr 2014, 09:27
+1 -1
Gopi sir, many many many congrats, reali proud of u. Bhatta
Anonymous 29 Apr 2014, 10:47
+1 -1
Congrats Gopal.
ex-WG Reader 29 Apr 2014, 10:49
+23 -5
Taking from early partnerships... equally appalling is [...], a mere 2012 graduate from [...]..being designated an SA. An SA designation holds some significance in a firm hierarchy, and by no measure or standard can an under 2 yr associate justify it. Congratulations to all others!
WG Reader 29 Apr 2014, 11:39
+5 -8
Ouch.. did you know her? I don't know her work but maybe she is really good..

you seem bitter... you must have left as an associate
Strange 29 Apr 2014, 19:26
+7 -1
Well I do agree with ex-WG to an extent, obviously excluding the bitterness. [...] I guess they just promote anyone who sticks around in office long hours... [...]
filling in the blanks 29 Apr 2014, 13:07
+5 -1
Jasmine is 2007 GLC. Rati is 2006 GLC (also the current CJI's daughter) , Gautam is 2008 GLC. oRohini is 2005 ILS
Anonymous 29 Apr 2014, 14:25
+0 -0
Curious to know SA grad years too now.
Info 30 Apr 2014, 08:50
+0 -2
I can fill in the ones I know. Maybe someone at the firm can answer this better -

Krishna Moorthy
Megha Sharma - 2010
Nikhil Pai - 2008
Noshir Vania
Sahil Nagamiya
Sameer Pandit
Sneh Mehta - 2012
Soumya Shankar - 2010
Tanu Banerjee
Vidya Venugopal - 2007
Zia Ahmed - 2009
filling in the blanks 29 Apr 2014, 18:19
+0 -0
By current, I mean Justice R.M. Lodha's daughter
pseudo lawyer 29 Apr 2014, 16:53
+0 -0
how much doed WG pays to a partner and a sa?
Guest 29 Apr 2014, 21:45
+9 -0
Wadia Ghandy can't pay money, but they are trying to spoil the market by giving double triple promotions. Kya backwas hai.....
Salaries 30 Apr 2014, 04:44
+3 -0
I have heard they have drastically reduced salaries 2 years back.
Anon 30 Apr 2014, 06:39
+9 -1
[quote name="Guest"]Wadia Ghandy can't pay money, but they are trying to spoil the market by giving double triple promotions. Kya backwas hai.....[/quote]

Arre baba - you be happy with no / single promotion and a fat pay packet. Let these guys enjoy the partner / SA tag! Why so annoyed? I too have heard that promotions are given at WG in lieu of pay rises, but you can't blame an organisation for doing what it needs to do retain the people they consider talented! Congratulations to all those promoted - I know most of the new partners and they are excellent lawyers. Good luck!
Scooters-S 30 Apr 2014, 06:21
+1 -0
i see quite a few of these names as the ones being promoted to SA just 2 years back (http://www.legallyindia.com/201204032707/Law-firms/wadia-ghandy-promotes-hires-4-braveheart-partners-growing-77-in-2-years#comments)

Wondering if all are partner material in just 2 years as SA.

Disclaimer- I do not work with WG. Dont personally know how good these lawyers are.
More on SAs 30 Apr 2014, 18:15
+1 -3
Krishna Moorthy is 2009 batch. Megha Sharma is 2009,GNLU. Nikhil and Noshir are 2008(GLC). Sahil is 2007. Sameer Pandit: 2008. Sneh Mehta: 2012. Soumya Shankar: 2010 (NUJS)
Tanu Banerjee: 2008, Symbiosis Law: Also a recent lateral hire. Vidya Venugopal is 2007. Zia Ahmed is 2009(GLC).

So SA promotions are mostly to 2009 and earlier graduates. Pretty much fair.
Guest 30 Apr 2014, 18:45
+0 -0
Pretty sure Zia is 2010 (GLC)
Success 7 May 2014, 10:56
+5 -1
To all the Partners and Senior Associates: Don't be distracted by criticism.Remember the only taste of success some people have is when they take a bite out of you.
ex-WG-int 17 Sept 2014, 17:04
+0 -1
Those who cannot achieve can only talk criticism against achievers so good luck and congrats to all achievers.