Women make up only 15% of senior law firm lawyers: Amarchand & banking with most female heavy-hitters; JSA, Trilegal & projects the fewest

Women-friendly workplaces: Legally rare (Photo (c) AMC)
Women-friendly workplaces: Legally rare (Photo (c) AMC)

Amarchand Mangaldas emerged as the large law firm with the highest ratio of female lawyers ranked by the 2014 Chambers and Partners lawyer directory, while J Sagar Associates (JSA) and Trilegal came lowest with as few as 6 per cent of senior female lawyers.

Meanwhile, banking and finance was the major practice area with the largest percentage of women - 34 per cent - compared to corporate and private equity where only around 15 per cent of ranked lawyers were women.

Firm wise (see table below)

Amarchand, Khaitan & Co, JSA, AZB & Partners, Luthra & Luthra and Trilegal were the only law firms with more than seven lawyers ranked by the directory out of 150 Indian law firms.

However, nine lawyers, or 37.5 per cent of Amarchand’s 24 total ranked lawyers, were women; by contrast, at JSA and Trilegal, only one woman was ranked out of 18 and 11 total ranked lawyers respectively, giving percentages of just over 5 and 9 per cent.

Luthra had the second-most ranked female lawyers after Amarchand with four women, or one-fourth of its 16 rankings, belonging to women.

AZB with 17.65 per cent out of 17 total rankings and Khaitan with almost 16 per cent out of 19 total rankings were in a similar range.

At the mid-size firms, ALMT Legal and Wadia Ghandy performed best, as each had three ranked women as against four men, making up 43 per cent of the ranked lawyers at the firm.

Dua Associates, Economic Laws Practice (ELP) and Talwar Thakore & Associates had only one ranked woman each out of seven rankings.

The only two firms with a majority of ranked female lawyers were Samvad Partners and Juris Corp, where two thirds of ranked lawyers were women (four out of six in Samvad’s case, and two out of three at Juris Corp).

Practice wise (see table below)

Banking and finance emerged as the most female-friendly practice area out of the six largest practice areas, according to Chambers.

Over 34 per cent out of a total of 38 rankings in banking were earned by women, while projects was the large practice area with the fewest women: only two women (less than 7 per cent) out of 30 total ranked lawyers.

Banking and finance, Mumbai and Delhi-based corporate and M&A, private equity, intellectual property and projects, infrastructure and energy were the areas with over 30 lawyer rankings.

Insurance was the most women-friendly practice area overall with three out of five ranks going to women, followed by competition and anti trust, where four out of seven ranked lawyers were women.

According to Chambers data, women were not represented at all in law firm practices such as capital markets, employment, shipping and Delhi-based real estate.

And in the dispute resolution senior counsel rankings, there were also zero women ranked out of 23 senior counsel.

However, Delhi dispute resolution boasted 28 per cent ranked women, compared to Mumbai where in dispute resolution there was only one out of 15 women.

Chambers & Partners’ ranked women lawyers out of total ranked lawyers per firm

OrganisationTotal ranked womenTotal ranked menTotal ranked lawyersPercentage women ranked
Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co9152437.5
Khaitan & Co3161915.79
J Sagar Associates117185.56
AZB & Partners3141717.65
Luthra & Luthra Law Offices4121625
Trilegal110119.09
ALMT Legal (Indian Advocates)34742.86
Wadia Ghandy & Co34742.86
Dua Associates16714.29
Economic Laws Practice16714.29
Talwar, Thakore & Associates16714.29
Samvad Partners42666.67
Kochhar & Co15616.67
Nishith Desai Associates14520
Phoenix Legal14520
S&R Associates14520
Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe0550
Poovayya & Co13425
Crawford Bayley & Co0440
Desai & Diwanji0440
DSK Legal0440
IndusLaw0440
Majmudar & Partners0440
Platinum Partners0440
Juris Corp21366.67
Anand and Anand Advocates12333.33
Bharucha & Partners12333.33
Kanga & Co12333.33
Karanjawala & Co12333.33
Rajani, Singhania & Partners12333.33
Tuli & Co12333.33
K&S Partners0330
Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan0330
Link Legal0330
Tatva Legal0330
Vaish Associates0330
Dave & Girish & Co11250
K Law11250
R K Dewan & Co11250
Udwadia, Udeshi and Argus Partners11250
Archer & Angel0220
Bhatt & Saldanha0220
BMR Legal0220
CrestLaw Partners0220
Dhir & Dhir Associates0220
Federal & Rashmikant0220
HSA Advocates0220
LexOrbis Intellectual Property Practice0220
MNK Law Offices0220
PH Parekh & Co0220
Saikrishna & Associates0220
Seth Dua & Associates0220
SNG & Partners0220
Aarna Law0110
Abhishek Manu Singhvi - Sole Practitioner0110
Aditya Sondhi Law Chambers0110
Advani & Co.0110
Advaya Legal0110
Agarwal Law Associates0110
Amarjit & Associates0110
ANA Law0110
Anil Divan - Sole Practitioner0110
A.N. Jayaram0110
Anup S Shah Law Firm0110
APJ-SLG Law Offices0110
A.R.A. Law0110
Arvind P Datar - Sole Practitioner0110
Ashok Desai - Sole Practitioner0110
Aspi Chinoy - Sole Practitioner0110
Bharucha & Associates0110
Bhasin and Bhasin Associates0110
Bhasin & Co0110
Bose & Mitra & Co0110
Chadha & Chadha0110
Chambers of S. Venkiteswaran0110
Darius Khambata - Sole Practitioner0110
De Penning & De Penning0110
Dhall Law Chambers0110
Dhaval Vussonji & Associates0110
D.M. Harish & Co.0110
DP Ahuja & Co0110
Dushyant Dave - Sole Practitioner0110
Fali Nariman - Sole Practitioner0110
Finsec Law Advisors0110
Gagrats0110
Gandhi & Associates0110
Groser & Groser0110
Hariani & Co0110
Harish Salve - Sole Practitioner0110
Holla & Holla Advocates0110
HSB Partners0110
IC Legal0110
I.L.A. Pasrich & Company0110
Inttl Advocare0110
Iqbal Chagla - Sole Practitioner0110
Janak Dwarkadas - Sole Practitioner0110
Jehangir Mistry - Sole Practitioner0110
Juris Legal & Financial Services0110
Kachwaha & Partners0110
K K Venugopal - Sole Practitioner0110
Koura & Co0110
KoVe Global LLP0110
Krishna & Saurastri0110
Kusuma Advocates0110
Lall & Sethi Advocates0110
Law Chambers of G. Nataraj0110
Lexygen0110
Mason & Associates0110
Messrs Doijode Associates0110
Mohan & Associates0110
MPC Legal0110
M S Syali - Sole Practitioner0110
M. T. Miskita & Company0110
Mukul Rohatgi - Sole Practitioner0110
Mundkur Law Partners0110
M. V. Kini & Co0110
MZM Legal0110
Naik Naik & Co0110
Obhan & Associates0110
P & A Law Offices0110
Parimal K. Shroff & Co0110
Percy Pardiwala - Sole Practitioner0110
Porus Kaka - Sole Practitioner0110
P P Rao - Sole Practitioner0110
PSP Law Office0110
Rafique Dada - Sole Practitioner0110
Rahul Narichania - Sole Practitioner0110
Rajinder Narain & Co0110
RDA Legal0110
Remfry & Sagar0110
Rohinton Nariman - Sole Practitioner0110
Sarin & Co0110
Scriboard0110
S Eshwar Consultants0110
S Ganesh - Sole Practitioner0110
Sibal & Company0110
S Majumdar & Co0110
Soli Dastur - Sole Practitioner0110
Soli Sorabjee - Sole Practitioner0110
Solomon & Co0110
S.S. Rana & Co0110
Subramaniam, Nataraj & Associates0110
The Chambers of George A. Rebello0110
Thiru & Thiru0110
TLA (Tree of Life Associates)0110
Tyabji Dayabhai0110
Vidhii Partners0110
Virag Tulzapurkar - Sole Practitioner0110
W.S. Kane and Co0110
Industry aggregate51 women315 men366 total14%

Source: Chambers & Partners. Note: The table specifies counts only unique lawyers ranked per firm

Chambers & Partners’ female lawyers ranked by practice areas

Practice AreaTotal Female RankingsTotal Male RankingsTotal RankingsPercentage Of Ranked Women
Private Equity7424914.29
Corporate/M&A: Mumbai-based8374517.78
Banking & Finance13253834.21
Corporate/M&A: New Delhi-based5293414.71
Intellectual Property4263013.33
Projects, Infrastructure & Energy228306.67
Dispute Resolution: Senior Advocates023230
Technology, Media, Telecoms (TMT)220229.09
Tax3182114.29
Real Estate: Mumbai-based118195.26
Dispute Resolution: New Delhi-based5131827.78
Capital Markets018180
Corporate/M&A: Bangalore-based2151711.76
Dispute Resolution: Mumbai-based115166.25
Aviation113147.14
Competition/Antitrust471136.36
Intellectual Property: Litigation291118.18
Shipping011110
Employment010100
Tax: Senior Advocates0880
Dispute Resolution: Bangalore-based16714.29
Real Estate: Bangalore-based24633.33
Insurance32560
International Trade14520
Corporate/M&A: Chennai-based13425
Dispute Resolution: Insolvency0440
Real Estate: New Delhi-based0330

Source: Chambers & Partners. Note: Some individuals appear in more than one practice area.

Comments

StatsGuy 24 Feb 2014, 13:26
+0 -0
These percentages lose significance as the total numbers become small e.g. Real estate, insurance, international trade, all the small law firms etc.

The real anomalies worth commenting on may be shipping, employment, cap marks and B&F.
Sidharth Chauhan 24 Feb 2014, 14:56
+1 -0
These are interesting numbers but I cannot understand why the study clubbed large and mid-sized commercial law firms with sole practitioners. That is akin to comparing apples with oranges.
Denny Crane 24 Feb 2014, 16:24
+1 -0
I think it was a political obligation.^
kianganz 24 Feb 2014, 16:34
+1 -0
Thanks for your comment - the study actually was not conducted to compare male and female partners.

Chambers only compiles lawyers ranked per firm and we asked them for the data on male / female rankings.

We published the full list they supplied, ordered by the number of lawyers ranked per firm. Agree, the lower parts of the rankings don't give much insight into gender differentials, though they do also highlight how few female practitioners are ranked in directories such as Chambers.

Thought it was information that was worth sharing.

Best wishes,
Kian
Errors 24 Feb 2014, 16:37
+2 -0
The list is technically incorrect. The Chambers ratings are only band 1-6 lawyers. Technically, up and coming and associates to watch are not a ranking in Chambers. So your figures are incorrect. The actual number of women rankings is even lower than identified by you. Do update as this study has real relevance. Shocked about Khaitan and JSA. Family friendly policies seem to translate into male counterparts getting the market recognition. AZB is another surprise.
kianganz 24 Feb 2014, 16:44
+1 -0
As far as I know, 'up and coming' and 'associates to watch' are not included in this list...

Indeed, quite interesting data, though it has to be taken with a pinch of salt - it could partly depend on how good some firms are at marketing their partners by entering them into the running for directories.

However, in aggregate, the numbers don't lie and an aggregate percentage of 14% across the industry should give plenty of food for thought...
ERror 2 24 Feb 2014, 17:00
+2 -0
Delhi corporate, employment, competition all have included up and coming/ associates. Skewed data. Capital markets has Madhurima on a sabbatical. That's the uncaptured 0 ranking.
kianganz 24 Feb 2014, 17:12
+3 -0
Thanks, I checked out the individual underlying data and you're right - it appears that up-and-comers and associates to watch are included.

In the case of Employment, 2 are up-and-coming and 1 is an associate to watch (all male); in competition 2 women are up-and-comers; capital markets has one associate to watch, one up-and-comer, and 2 'senior statesmen' (all male).

Madhurima Mukherjee is presumably not included this year since she's currently not practising...
KIKI 25 Feb 2014, 09:40
+0 -1
[quote name="ERror 2"]Delhi corporate, employment, competition all have included up and coming/ associates. Skewed data. Capital markets has Madhurima on a sabbatical. That's the uncaptured 0 ranking.[/quote]

Hi Madhurima fan (this also includes you, Kian, since you still haven't published my previous post - though I don't think there was anything offensive or abusive in my previous post)

Obviously, Chamber's will not rank a lawyer who is no longer practising. I don't believe that Madhurima is on a sabbatical (in the true sense). She has resigned from her previous job (or was asked to resign, I don't know). To put it more correctly, she is "between jobs"!
honest harry 24 Feb 2014, 17:24
+0 -5
This report is completely erroneous. Firstly the date on which this count was taken.(it was not taken in a day). Besides, there is no clarity whether resigned associates/employees were considered within the period, the survey/census was completed. No credence has been given to various other small-time firms which may yield better senior-women lawyers. If this Asia Pacific 2014 guide is to be considered as a holy bible, do we circumscribe that only 51 senior women advocates exist in this nation ? Why such bias by this Report against women? Does this mean that women are REALLY the weaker sex ? Why legallyindia is even reporting such a biased report exposing such weakness of women ??
Interesting 25 Feb 2014, 11:43
+0 -0
The general point is well made, although dig deeper and there may be other stories there.

For example, how many senior female lawyers are ranked as a proportion to the total number of senior female lawyers? I suspect more than is the case for senior male lawyers. That indicates that there are fewer women partners AND they are very good.

Leaving aside rankings in Chambers, it would be interesting to see the split between larger law firms and smaller law firms in terms of number of female partners generally. Are larger law firms such as JSA, AMSS, AZB and Luthra (ignore the Chambers rankings here) better able to support women than smaller firms? If not, why not? And if so, does that alter the general perception of smaller firms as somewhat easier places for women to flourish than the larger firms?

Finally, impressive to compare the proportion of people in general ranked at smaller firms compared to larger firms. How many lawyers in total do firms such as TTA (7 ranked), Samvad (6 ranked), Phoenix (5 ranked) and S&R (5 ranked) have compared to AMSS, AZB, JSA, NDA etc and what proportion of the senior lawyers in these smaller firms are ranked compared to in larger firms?
jiyo 25 Feb 2014, 12:07
+1 -0
I don't know how it works in the courts and in litigation, but in law firms, there is no such thing as a glass ceiling for women.
If a woman is a good lawyer, she will make it to the top in a law firm and the gender does not matter if you have the capabilities and the expertise.
Look at Zia, Pallavi, etc. JSA may not have ranked lawyers, but they still have a lot of women on the top.
I don't think that there is any gender discrimination in any top law firm
Jiyo Lite 25 Feb 2014, 17:12
+0 -0
[quote name="jiyo"]I don't know how it works in the courts and in litigation, but in law firms, there is no such thing as a glass ceiling for women.
If a woman is a good lawyer, she will make it to the top in a law firm and the gender does not matter if you have the capabilities and the expertise.
Look at Zia, Pallavi, etc. JSA may not have ranked lawyers, but they still have a lot of women on the top.
I don't think that there is any gender discrimination in any top law firm[/quote]


Zia and Pallavi own the firms. Let's look at more realistic examples. JSA has Dina at the top and she is their only ranked woman lawyer. Serious dearth of ranked women lawyers in the non family/ non senior woman lawyer segment.
gyan 25 Feb 2014, 13:01
+2 -2
Can't understand what the ballyhooo is all about. Listing and rankings are dependent upon for whom the Firm wants to pay for and not on their competence. Women tend to stick with the Firm and therefore worth the investment in getting rankings for them especially if unmarried. The spend on rankings is investment and one tends to invest based on stickiness and not competence. The numbers may appear to be low but whatever they are, they are inflated.
Gyan connection 25 Feb 2014, 17:18
+6 -1
[quote name="gyan"]Can't understand what the ballyhooo is all about. Listing and rankings are dependent upon for whom the Firm wants to pay for and not on their competence. Women tend to stick with the Firm and therefore worth the investment in getting rankings for them especially if unmarried. The spend on rankings is investment and one tends to invest based on stickiness and not competence. The numbers may appear to be low but whatever they are, they are inflated.[/quote]

The unmarried women are crazy workaholics. The married ones have different priorities. I checked the list and the 5 unmarried women (I am a male lawyer) are all well respected for their legal acumen. If paying was the only criteria, every relative of a family firm and equity partner in a non family firm would have a ranking. These rankings are not life altering but cannot be ignored either.
Disgusted 26 Feb 2014, 05:54
+2 -5
Kian, unless you're seeing some sense of sarcasm here that I am missing, the comments here are shockingly misogynistic and you should be ashamed of publishing these. What do you mean by "the unmarried women are crazy workaholics, the married ones have different priorities"??? Let me be crystal clear - there is no difference between married / unmarried men / women. All can be equally workaholic and all can equally have different priorities in life. I work in a firm where I am surrounded by married workaholic women and men and 'different priorities in life' unmarried women and men and vice versa. The kind of comments made by Gyan and Gyan connection only go to show how truly sexist this profession is and answers the question as to why women lawyers are not given prominence in firms and rankings.
Mediocrity 26 Feb 2014, 06:34
+2 -1
Disgusted -- you're absolutely right. It is a sexist profession. And mediocrity is available in abundance and cuts across gender lines.
TukTuk 26 Feb 2014, 08:39
+0 -0
what mediocrity? I don't think that Chambers ranking has anything to do with mediocrity. Chambers only ranks those lawyers who deserve it
kianganz 26 Feb 2014, 07:54
+0 -0
Agree that some of views expressed here are pretty sexist but we chose to publish after careful consideration since these attitudes do abound and there is some value in getting them out in the open and discussing and refuting them.

The figures, over and over again, point to the same conclusion that there is a huge gender inequality, even in law firms, and particularly at the bar. But the numbers only say so much, and the things most people say in public barely scratch the surface of some of the underlying problems. However, the unfortunate fact is that privately a lot of men (and some women too) seem to believe stereotypes such as the ones propounded by 'Gyan Connection'.

I don't think it's possible to deal with the problem of gender inequality in the profession by ignoring and addressing such prevalent, if prejudiced and misguided, attitudes, which are more common than many think.
Commentator 26 Feb 2014, 07:44
+4 -2
... cuz once they are married and have a rich husband and have kids.. no one wants to work :) its a WTF fact!
kianganz 26 Feb 2014, 07:53
+2 -0
I assume you're being sarcastic and 'rich husband' could be substituted for 'rich wife', but, um, just three letters: Zia?

I think your point, if anything, is another: many men also put pressure on their wives not to work, particularly once kids are in the equation.
TukTuk 26 Feb 2014, 08:27
+1 -0
Kian, But then, even zia's husband is extremely rich - owning casinos, real estate, etc. He would be richer than Zia
kianganz 26 Feb 2014, 09:07
+0 -0
That was the point... :)
Amss guy 26 Feb 2014, 12:43
+1 -4
So true. I have seen many women leave and opt for the easy life once they are married and are thus financially secure. Marriage is the easy way out, whereas for the male, marriage spells "extra billable hours". Talk of inequality. I know this comment is going to be trashed because of its overtly sexist notes, but it is what it is.
2 cents 26 Feb 2014, 09:14
+1 -0
The male:female partner ratio is a HUGE topic of discussion worldwide, including in New York and London. The basic issue is that associate level ratios are almost 50:50 but partner level ratios are around 80-90:20-10. The general theme of discussion is that women find it difficult to break into an all-boys-club, possibly because the senior partners believe “women are not committed to the job and prioritise family over clients”. The critics add another reason - the partners prefer to invite men, who can socialize with them and the clients, into their (boys)club. The analysis by practice area is relevant as it informs us about the market trends and provides women the (informed) choice to opt for a practice area, or firm, where they have better chances.

So, what’s all the hue and cry here?

Fyi, some articles:
http://www.thelawyer.com/uks-top-firms-fail-to-increase-female-equity-partner-figures/1009165.article
http://www.thelawyer.com/revealed-females-make-up-less-than-10-per-cent-of-top-100s-equity-partner-ranks/1015190.article
http://www.thelawyer.com/diversity-league-table-female-lawyers-react/1015536.article
http://abovethelaw.com/2013/01/which-biglaw-office-has-promoted-only-one-woman-to-partner-in-25-years/
Diversity and Gender Equity in Law Firms http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/marketing/women/gender_equity_task_force/rhode.authcheckdam.pdf