Amarchand Mumbai kills automatic ‘designate’ associate lockstep, promotes 13 principals, 20 senior associates

Amarchand Mangaldas Mumbai region has promoted 13 of its lawyers to principal associate and 20 to senior associate.

Amarchand Mangaldas Mumbai region, which includes the Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai and Hyderabad offices, has promoted 13 of its lawyers to principal associate and 20 to senior associate.

A total of 10 lawyers were promoted to the principal associate designate level, which is a designation between senior and principal associate at Amarchand, and 11 associates were bumped up into the senior associate designate bracket.

However, for the first time this year, it is understood that Amarchand changed its policy so that “designates” would not automatically advance to the more senior level in the following year.

In other words, previously a principal associate designate would be guaranteed to become a principal associate the next year. Legally India understands that this policy has been discontinued.

Amarchand Mangaldas senior partner Vandana Shroff confirmed the number and names of promoted associates (below), but declined to comment on the firm’s promotion or designation policy.

New principal associates:

  • Aditya Mehta
  • Sundaresh Maheshwari
  • Tapan Deshpande
  • Arun Siwach
  • Kunal Savani
  • Ashish Jain
  • Harsh Maggon
  • Rishabh Shroff
  • Tirthankar Datta
  • Nikunj Maheshwari
  • Atman Desai
  • Ruchira Shroff
  • Subhojit Sadhu

Senior associates:

  • Abhishek Singh
  • Adarsh Saxena
  • Aniruddha Ghosh
  • Arpan Chowdhury
  • Kashish Bhatia
  • Madhav Kanoria
  • Manasvini Raj
  • Meera Jayakumar
  • Namrata Rao
  • Prateek Shroff
  • Ridhesh Vora
  • Rohan Banerjee
  • Ronak Ajmera
  • Shehryar Khanum
  • Shruti KP
  • Soumya Hariharan
  • Surya Sreenivasan
  • Taher Mandviwala
  • Vipul Jain
  • Vivek Rathore

J Sagar Associates (JSA), promoted 23 lawyers to the senior associate level across its offices in Mumbai, Gurgaon, Delhi and Hyderabad. JSA does not have a principal associate designation.

Many thanks to readers who have helped us with confirming these names. If anyone can confirm Amarchand Delhi, Khaitan & Co Mumbai, and AZB & Partners’ associate promotions, that’d be much appreciated.

Comments

Anon 7 Apr 2014, 12:06
+1 -1
Have 10 people been promoted to the principal associate designate level in addition to the 13 new principal associates?
Obvious Dodo... 7 Apr 2014, 12:31
+1 -1
Isn't it obvious, 10 makes PAD & 13 makes PA...read again....

"A total of 10 lawyers were promoted to the principal associate designate level, which is a designation between senior and principal associate at Amarchand, and 11 associates were bumped up into the senior associate designate bracket."
AMSS Delhi 7 Apr 2014, 13:54
+3 -1
When does AMSS Delhi announce its promotions?
Guest 7 Apr 2014, 14:15
+2 -0
The designations would be misnomers now - now the word designate should be removed and something conveying 'in-waiting' or 'expecting' should be introduced!
NALSARite 7 Apr 2014, 20:41
+11 -1
Congratulations to Manasvini, Shehryar and Vivek! Proud of you guys :)
Guest 8 Apr 2014, 05:45
+0 -0
Does the PA list include anyone from capital markets?
LOL 8 Apr 2014, 09:12
+1 -2
No
Client 8 Apr 2014, 10:23
+1 -1
Is Prateek Shroff also related to the family?
LOL 8 Apr 2014, 10:51
+2 -0
No. Only Rishabh on this list.
Wah wah 8 Apr 2014, 10:53
+22 -1
At 26, Rishabh Shroff, must be the youngest PA in the history of AMSS.
ha ha 8 Apr 2014, 13:04
+20 -1
arre bap ka firm hai...
hee haw 8 Apr 2014, 13:19
+13 -2
no shardul had become the managing partner of delhi office in is early twenties.
Sonia 8 Apr 2014, 13:27
+12 -1
Like how Rahul Gandhi will be PM if Congress wins General Elections
Monymohan 8 Apr 2014, 17:49
+7 -3
Unfortunately, these promotions and the comments that follow, reflect the general perception of the firm.

Love them or hate them, you have to hand it to the Shroffs. They have a bunch of very talented lawyers who have a lot of attitude about being so good and have yet managed to get them to work in a family owned firm where over 50% of the equity (as previously reported on LI) is held by the family. There is no real attempt to disguise this either. Not an easy task.

Now, why anyone would want to be a partner (not that relevant for PA's) in a family owned firm no matter what the incentives (money, good deals), is beyond me.
AM Associate 9 Apr 2014, 06:16
+4 -4
Best work in the market, market value, greater respect with clients, highest smartness density vis-a-vis partners and associates for a big firm, real full service firm, did I say best work in the market?

Most people know all of this but cant come to accept it publically.
disgusting 8 Apr 2014, 13:03
+2 -0
Why have you censored my comment? Have you sold out to Vandana? Didnt exepect this from you Kejriwal I mean Kian.
disgusting 9 Apr 2014, 04:52
+0 -0
[quote name="disgusting"]Why have you censored my comment? Have you sold out to Vandana? Didnt exepect this from you Kejriwal I mean Kian.[/quote]

You still have not posted my original comment. Why?
kianganz 9 Apr 2014, 05:13
+1 -1
There were bits that needed editing before publication and didn't get around to it.

Here goes part of your original comment:

[quote]Amarchand Mumbai doesnt seem to follow the merit model. You have missed highlighting that Rishabh Shroff has been made a PA! Wow! Talk about being biased Kian! What qualifications does he have to leap frog to PA? His older cousin in Delhi, Natashaa, is not a PA yet![/quote]

To be fair, anecdotally, I didn't think Rishabh Shroff had leapfrogged at all, has he? There are other PAs with similar PQE to him, no?
bumbledbee 9 Apr 2014, 06:53
+0 -0
Ok Kian. I didnt know that. Can you name a few? Very curious to know who made pa so young.
kianganz 9 Apr 2014, 07:38
+0 -0
Actually, you might be right - promo to PA at 26 is probably quite rare, can't think of anyone else off the top of my head (Umakanth, perhaps?)
LOL 9 Apr 2014, 08:17
+0 -0
UK and LV probably
Bulla 9 Apr 2014, 08:58
+2 -0
Dont think PA concept was there when Umakanth was. If my memory serves me well, youngest was Deepto Roy, Karan, Gupte and that batch when the concept of PA was introduced. Wow! you should let me be LI's historian Kian, I'm not even from AMSS!
kianganz 9 Apr 2014, 09:02
+0 -0
You've got the job Bulla!
kianganz 9 Apr 2014, 09:03
+2 -0
Indeed, Deepto Roy made PA after 5 years from graduation, just judging by his Linked-in profile...
also 9 Apr 2014, 10:01
+0 -0
So did Neelkantan in Delhi I think
Scooters 10 Apr 2014, 07:38
+2 -0
UK and LV made partner in 5.5-6 yrs. So notionally passing the PA phase earlier.
? 8 Apr 2014, 15:02
+1 -0
Kian

Why have u not published the names of associated promoted to principal/senior associate designate level? Any particular reason?
bludgeonedbee 8 Apr 2014, 16:37
+0 -0
Cause its really not a promotion. If they are "designate" and there is no guarantee of being promoted the following year, the "designate" tag is of no consequence. Basically, Kian has seen the obvious.
Guest 8 Apr 2014, 18:31
+0 -0
[quote name="bludgeonedbee"]Cause its really not a promotion. If they are "designate" and there is no guarantee of being promoted the following year, the "designate" tag is of no consequence. Basically, Kian has seen the obvious.[/quote]

Even so, Kian - can you provide a list of the PA designates? (since these are only 10 in number)
kianganz 9 Apr 2014, 07:40
+0 -1
Hi Guest, probably not this time - it would just become a monster list if we included all PA and SA designates, and since PA designate is an automatic title you get after SA, there's not really that much point...

Also, we don't have the data - if someone wants to share it in the comments below, anonymously, please feel free, but we won't be including the names in the main article.

Best regards,
Kian
Guest 10 Apr 2014, 07:39
+1 -0
Kian

SA and PA designates are not automatic titles. There are many Associates who do not get such titles. So in a way its a promotion. AMSS is a big firm, but just because the list would be long should not be a reason to not publish it. That ways law journals should not publish long judgments!

In any case, I guess you would find data if you check the place where you receive data from "send us a tip".
Guest 8 Apr 2014, 18:33
+0 -0
Any info on amss delhi promotions yet?
Guest 8 Apr 2014, 18:43
+0 -0
[quote name="Monymohan"]Unfortunately, these promotions and the comments that follow, reflect the general perception of the firm.

Love them or hate them, you have to hand it to the Shroffs. They have a bunch of very talented lawyers who have a lot of attitude about being so good and have yet managed to get them to work in a family owned firm where over 50% of the equity (as previously reported on LI) is held by the family. There is no real attempt to disguise this either. Not an easy task.

Now, why anyone would want to be a partner (not that relevant for PA's) in a family owned firm no matter what the incentives (money, good deals), is beyond me.[/quote]

Money alone is incentive enough for most.
ROFL 9 Apr 2014, 09:05
+3 -1
Who says AMSS pays? Among the top 6 firms in the country AMSS pays the lowest.
Scooters 9 Apr 2014, 10:47
+0 -0
Its more like- You want to work with us more than we want to work with you!

That's why it can pay lesser and still thrive!
Two firm theory 8 Apr 2014, 19:14
+0 -0
Amss Mumbai and Delhi. Lear operate as two different firms. Don't even bother to coordinate promotions.
Guest 8 Apr 2014, 20:15
+1 -0
[quote name="Two firm theory"]Amss Mumbai and Delhi. Lear operate as two different firms. Don't even bother to coordinate promotions.[/quote]

True. But it would be interesting to note the number of promotions in Delhi vis-a-vis Bombay. Bombay has usually cared a bit more for quality control than Delhi.
Scooters 9 Apr 2014, 08:31
+5 -0
I hope your bowels are not affected because of this anomaly!
From the Del office 10 Apr 2014, 11:18
+0 -0
PA-D or SA-D, the way this firm works is sad (especially the delhi office). IN essence, they dont care for the associates.
Yes and it does not pay them either.

Its losing its charm (presuming it had any). Anyway ppl still consider it (AMSS) something. try working here, then see.
Ex-SA 15 Apr 2014, 07:51
+6 -0
My two bits: You can make what you wish to, out of a stint there.

If you (a) have a solid understanding of the basics of law (a) can hang your "i'm so cool" boots when dealing with the family, get "to the point" and "get it done with" (b) work, work, work and bill, bill, bill (c) stay single-mindedly devoted to the King (d) not bitch about anyone anywhere within or outside the Firm and (e) trust them to assess you for what you really are... For about 5-odd years.

Then you will be a part of their thinking process.. and are likely to have 'arrived' in the Indian corporate law scene. Screw up on any one of the above - and you will be marginalized. Fast.