Cyril Amarchand files for interim injunction against Chennai partner Dorothy Thomas in Bombay HC, settlement possible soon

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has started arbitration proceedings against Chennai partner Dorothy Thomas, who is due to join Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, filing in the Bombay high court yesterday for interim measures.

The petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was first reported by [http//barandbench.com/exclusive-cam-initiated-arbitration-ex-partner-dorothy-thomas/ Bar & Bench].

However, we understand from sources that settlement talks to end the arbitration are in process and may conclude by Saturday (15 October).

According to Bar & Bench the arbitration concerns enforcement of Thomas’ contractual “confidentiality, non-solicitation and notice period” obligations.

We understand that the section 9 petition in the Bombay high court, which was listed before Justice SJ Kathawalla yesterday (13 October) according to the case status (see above), was about a more urgent a matter relating to Thomas’ departure.

Section 9 allows for arbitrating parties to apply for:

“an interim measure of protection in respect of…

a) the preservation, interim custody or sale of any goods which are the subject-matter of the arbitration agreement;

b) securing the amount in dispute in the arbitration;

c) the detention, preservation or inspection of any property or thing which is the subject-matter of the dispute in arbitration, or as to which any question may arise therein and authorising for any of the aforesaid purposes any person to enter upon any land or building in the possession of any party, or authorising any samples to be taken or any observation to be made, or experiment to be tried, which may be necessary or expedient for the purpose of obtaining full information or evidence;

Beri & Company is representing Cyril Amarchand, according to the Bombay high court.

Thomas is represented by senior advocate Soli Cooper.

We have reached out to partners at Cyril Amarchand and Shardul Amarchand for comment, and have reached out for comment to Thomas.

Comments

DD 13 Oct 2016, 20:50
+12 -1
Is this a new low?
ThePhantom 13 Oct 2016, 20:53
+28 -2
This was the last thing required. Firm sues its Partner. No lawyer would want to join CAM now seeing this miserable state of affairs. This is now a last ditch and desperate attempt to retain their partners. They think using this method will act as a deterrence and example to other partners that they may not leave. More existing partners will leave and other outside lawyers will be scared to join. Join other better firms than ruining career and life at CAM!! Many others took the right decision at the right time. Need to wait and watch if the family are successful in scaring others to not leave!!

~~~~~~~~~~~
ThePhantom
~~~~~~~~~~~
Gossip Girl 14 Oct 2016, 04:22
+8 -3
Buzz is that there was data theft happening. Not very unlike the Titus case some years back. CAM has been this high-strung in the past too. Bhatta for example (where there was no data related controversy even as far as I know). Legitimate claim or not, it seems like CAM is missing the woods for the trees.
kianganz 14 Oct 2016, 05:43
+2 -3
Prima facie, it seems unlikely that they would have gone for an interim order under section 9 if they didn't have good reason to do so, surely?

Why risk taking the case public in the HC otherwise?
No Baddua 14 Oct 2016, 06:15
+4 -0
Why do you feel so sir? What will be the fun of initiating a legal action in such type of cases when you do not seek any such interim reliefs? If the person successfully transitions to new place along with team and know-how without restrictions then what will you achieve even if you win the case after 7 years?
Historian 14 Oct 2016, 08:28
+6 -1
Data theft... didn't that happen in SAM when another partner and his team moved to CAM?

Life comes full circle. Payback is a b***ch!
Atrocious 13 Oct 2016, 21:41
+13 -1
CAM has fallen to a new low.
Desperate times at CAM if it has to resort to these tactics.
"May Day, May Day!l"
But actually not surprising. They did this with Ashwath and Nisha etc but then since they wanted Percy, arrived at a swap deal.
Disgusting stuff.
Hope all of CAMs international best friends are watching
Once a CAM Aspirant 13 Oct 2016, 23:25
+5 -2
Well said Phantom. This is definitely not good for CAM, for whatever Cyril is trying to achieve. Also, not sure how far CAM can enforce such non solicitation clauses, considering they are difficult to be proved (apologies if my position is incorrect, and happy to stand corrected).

Kian, is this the first instance of a law firm partner being sued by the firm on this ground?
kianganz 14 Oct 2016, 05:44
+3 -0
There are a few instances actually... Check out our round-up from 2015 of lawyers suing other lawyers:
http://www.legallyindia.com/Law-firms/when-lawyers-attack-other-lawyers-5-of-the-biggest-law-firm-partnership-battles-in-history-via-mint
Gambler 13 Oct 2016, 23:44
+5 -1
Cyril is speaking at the IBA seminar next week on Talent Management. From Aswath to Dorothy all partner exits have. Een mismanaged by cam. New Partner recruitment will be very difficult. Clients will be wary using cam and sam on the same transaction.
Flip flop 14 Oct 2016, 00:07
+6 -0
First Chennai office was closing down to focus on Mumbai
Delhi and Bengaluru.Poor performance so no appraisal,
No increment as new tools to withhold talent from leaving.
Push for locals to buy out Chennai.Mass resignation at
Chennai. Everything backfired. So suit filed to salvage
Sunk reputation. One more nail in the coffin. Hyderabad,
Chennai and finally Ahmedabad suffer same fate of cost
Cutting and closure
Bhatta 14 Oct 2016, 01:33
+3 -4
The firm didn't go after Ashwath or Nisha when they left, so obviously Doro has done some mischief. Naughty...

Kian, ask the insiders everyone knows !
EmilyRatajkowski 14 Oct 2016, 03:11
+25 -2
[img]http://i.imgsafe.org/04caf5d3e0.png[/img]
Outsider 14 Oct 2016, 03:24
+6 -0
Keep those memes coming, Emily! :)
FanClub 17 Oct 2016, 10:39
+0 -0
Loving your memes, keep them coming please :P
Dawning... 14 Oct 2016, 04:17
+9 -1
CAMS south region practice is almost dead now. Chennai closed due to departure of sole partner (that too on bad terms) and Hyderabad post Star Partner Rahuls exit is being run for namesake and is as good as over. Bangalore is the only office which remains almost unaffected but any news about CAM is generally bad news and there may be impending departures there as well.

Mummy ka aashirwad is really important!!!
EmilyRatajkowski 14 Oct 2016, 05:12
+36 -2
[img]http://i.imgsafe.org/068e609adf.png[/img]
Unknownsatan 14 Oct 2016, 05:45
+6 -1
keep them coming :))
Academic 14 Oct 2016, 05:35
+4 -1
Why under the 1996 Act? This was a fresh petition, right?
Anna Academic 14 Oct 2016, 06:20
+8 -0
.....whoa...has a new Act been passed repealing 1996 Act? Or it was merely amended drastically? Please ask you prof and let me know ASAP! I need to sue a lawyer urgently.
Pheku 14 Oct 2016, 13:07
+0 -0
Funny you do not know the difference between an amendment to an existing statute and a new statute....
Disgusted 14 Oct 2016, 05:38
+10 -4
They wanted her to go.
They made sure she quit.
They were congratulating themselves on her departure.

She goes on to join SAM.

They sue her!

Shame on you Cyril.
Shame on the other equity partners at CAM who are letting him do this to people.
Cammie 14 Oct 2016, 06:26
+3 -2
After treating Ashwath and Nisha badly cam is now resorting to suing partners? What is the equity partnership at cam doing? Who would want to join or even stay in a firm like this? Terrible move by cam to pick on defenseless Dorothy
Chennai Lawyer 14 Oct 2016, 06:30
+7 -2
So…do you geniuses really think CAM would allow shorter notice periods for Ashwath Rao and Nisha Oberoi… but sues to make Dorothy Thomas serve notice because her services were invaluable ??!!!

A little bird at the Chennai bar (who heard from one of Dorothy’s flock) tells me that Dorothy and her crew [...] (who have been allowed to stay around for far too long), were given the chance to set up their own practice. Instead, they reached out to the only person who would have them [...], and the price of entry was that Dorothy and her associates had to
a) [...]
b) [...]

A S.9 application is made for urgent relief or prevent irreversible damage. CAM wouldn’t go to court unless they had proof that such damage was imminent.
chennailawyer 14 Oct 2016, 08:08
+3 -1
KIAN, PLEASE DONT MODERATE THIS POST. THE LEGAL WORLD DESERVES TO KNOW!
kianganz 14 Oct 2016, 08:09
+0 -0
Please give me an hour or two, and we'll have the true story out :)
GG 14 Oct 2016, 09:12
+2 -0
Kian the hour is over
a & b 14 Oct 2016, 08:15
+0 -0
Kian, please don't hold a & b, readers should know full facts...
kianganz 14 Oct 2016, 08:19
+0 -0
Yes, but have only just reached out to comment to SAM, need to give them at least an hour to respond...
Ex Partner 14 Oct 2016, 06:41
+4 -0
All partners, equity or salaried, just warming their seats.

They couldn't be bothered about their fellow colleagues or even juniors for that matter.

They are happy Cyril takes the blame or the fall.

It's always and only about their money and self preservation that matters, and have their own selfish motives or agendas !
EmilyRatajkowski 14 Oct 2016, 07:32
+40 -2
[img]http://i.imgsafe.org/089c2c2c1c.png[/img]
Harvey 14 Oct 2016, 07:53
+11 -2
Emily you are killing it..
Bonded 14 Oct 2016, 07:56
+8 -2
Way to go with the surgery.
What's next? Shackles? Goonda threats?
People at CAM should seriously think why are they continuing.
Jee Jus 14 Oct 2016, 08:51
+6 -1
Why did CAM hire Beri & Company to represent it? Perhaps Cyril does not have confidence in his own lit team.
Pagle 14 Oct 2016, 09:24
+2 -2
You know nothing, Jon Snow!
vantage 14 Oct 2016, 12:57
+1 -1
shoddy knowledge!!
Ex CAM 14 Oct 2016, 10:01
+1 -10
These comments are so vindictive! Highly doubt that CAM would be doing this without due cause.. and for all the people whining and whining.. on and on and these belaboured jokes (yawn).. move on ya ...
Best of luck CAM.
And now all you other gophers can quickly start down voting my comment.
JCO 14 Oct 2016, 10:29
+4 -5
Very sad to see this happening to Dorothy. She is a highly regarded lawyer in Chennai and has won the confidence of several companies in her deals. Whatever the problem is, both of them should have sorted it out. People in Chennai always felt Dorothy was a great asset for any firm - SAM is really lucky to have her !
kitchen worker 14 Oct 2016, 11:21
+3 -3
But didnt she promise that we will be behind the firm forever and ever to strike new highs. 200% efforts types. Why do these guys spout this nonsense when they are planning their own exits. Duplicious.
Duplicitous 15 Oct 2016, 17:05
+2 -0
"Duplicious" is not a word. Go back to cleaning the kitchen.
Tyrion 14 Oct 2016, 10:56
+13 -6
Well those who deserve to be sued should be sued. If CAM cannot go legal to safeguard its own interests then it cant save the interests of its clients. There is no book which says that a law ifrm cant go legal. As far as exits is concerned, the organisation is bigger than any individual or partner. Many firms have seen many exits and have survived many exits. CAM is a name bigger than the partners who decide to leave or are let go of. So those who think that the CAM time is up because of the exits, please note that when Cyril started building a practice, it was hardly a handful of lawyers, and today CAM is a name to reckon with. No one should forget what this organisation has acheived in the past and is still capable of acheiving today.
golegal 14 Oct 2016, 12:05
+1 -1
Nothing on CAM/SAM/Dorothy, but I have seen several people use this term "go legal". What does this mean? Especially the reference to a law firm going legal. If a law firm does not go legal, who else will?
fresh one 14 Oct 2016, 11:42
+8 -1
Cyril made CAM in a different market and business environment. Today the competition is heated up to another level. Good old days had no rivals and competent adversaries. Today Cyril has them around him and he has built their expertise and then lost them. He will surely have a he'll of a task if he thinks he can build this again. Best of luck to him!
Guest 14 Oct 2016, 12:14
+1 -0
You cannot seek specific performance of a contract for personal service, so why would you move a court under Section 9!
For Kian 14 Oct 2016, 13:40
+0 -0
Kian, you didn't publish my comment.
For Kian 14 Oct 2016, 17:55
+1 -0
Kian, why don't you publish my comment?
For Kian 15 Oct 2016, 14:55
+0 -0
You should have atleast stated why you haven't put my comment. This wasn't expected.
kianganz 15 Oct 2016, 17:46
+0 -0
Hi - sorry for the delay... I assume the comment was for my eyes only, since it was labelled 'for Kian'. Also, haven't confirmed your tip yet, so until then, we usually keep such comments unpublished.
WW2 15 Oct 2016, 10:10
+2 -0
Oh,all of you are children. You take names thinking THIS is who runs CAM. Nope. The one who is BEHIND the one you think is running CAM, has actually been running CAM after the split. After all, behind every successful man, there is a........
Outsider 15 Oct 2016, 12:32
+2 -2
CAM will not risk their reputation by suing their own Partner unless something grotesque has happened and they can prove it. If someone robs your house, you dont shut up and take it lying down.