Cyril Amarchand rebolsters corporate, bags JPMorgan's Ruetveij Pandya as partner

Cyril Amarchand works at regaining corporate strength with JPM's Pandya
Cyril Amarchand works at regaining corporate strength with JPM's Pandya

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired JP Morgan executive director and assistant general counsel Ruetveij Pandya as a Mumbai corporate partner.

Pandya reported to JP Morgan India general counsel (GC) Jigar Shah, handling the legal work in the investment banking vertical of the company.

Pandya commented in a press release: “I am very excited about joining Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas to further bolster the corporate practice of the firm.

“The firm prides itself for being trusted advisers to its clients and is globally renowned for rendering high quality, innovative, strategic and solution oriented services. This shared ethos makes the firm a natural fit for me and affords us with an excellent opportunity to bring to our clients an unique global perspective and international best practices.”

Managing partner Cyril Shroff added: “Having known and seen Ruetveij grow into a fine lawyer over the past decade, we at Cyril Amarchand are delighted to have him as part of our partnership. Ruetveij’s rich industry experience in a global cross border environment would add immense value to our firm and to the service of our clientele.”

Pandya began his career at DM Harish while studying at GLC Mumbai, joining Nishith Desai Associates in 2002 after graduating. He joined JP Morgan in 2008.

Top-billing Cyril Amarchand corporate partner Ashwath Rau and three of the partners in his team are set to leave the firm.

To be updated.

According to Cyril Amarchand’s press release:

Ruetveij has extensively worked as transactional counsel in a law firm and as an in-house counsel in the global financial services industry over the past 14 years. He specializes in mergers & acquisitions, private equity, transaction & business structuring, financings and has a rich experience in the international capital markets and stressed assets space.

Prior to joining Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Ruetveij was an Executive Director and Assistant General Counsel with JP Morgan, where he provided cross jurisdictional legal coverage to JP Morgan’s investment banking franchise and its global private equity and principal investments groups.

Ruetveij has worked closely with banking and management teams in a variety of situations and has contributed towards the formulation of several innovative structures, strategies and novel solutions. He also brings with him a rather unique experience of overseeing complete investment cycles and exits.

Having graduated from the Government Law College, Mumbai in 2002, in his free time, Ruetveij takes keen interest in photography, being an avid traveler, loves music, enjoys trivia and history, and is a foodie.

Comments

Scamsters 26 Apr 2016, 09:53
+15 -9
Transformation into a TTT firm is almost complete it seems.
Thor 26 Apr 2016, 14:43
+1 -1
What is a TTT firm?
Scamsters 26 Apr 2016, 16:28
+10 -3
Third Tier Toilet :)
2 cents 28 Apr 2016, 10:19
+3 -1
Replying to comment #1 for visibility. Also because comment #1 and similar comments below are utterly misconceived and completely baseless (O yeah, I am a litigating lawyer!).

1. Only someone who lacks experience and/or brains will say that a General Counsel (or any In-house Counsel) cannot be a partner and vice versa. It really depends on the individual and what experiences s/he has gained. Many senior lawyers in Tier 1 and Tier 2 firms are pretty shoddy - forget the law or drafting or commercials, they make stupid statements and can't even talk/dress properly. Again, it all depends on the individual and what they have made of their experiences.

2. More importantly, a partner who is a "finder" or a "minder" does not have to draft his hours away. He can just get the associates and junior partners and the "grinders" to do the grunt work. The comments on this article only shows how little people/lawyers know about their own profession and how much they think they know! Grow up chaps.

Just to substantiate my credentials, I have worked both In-house and at Tier 1 firms- both in India and other jurisdictions.
Scamsters 28 Apr 2016, 16:17
+2 -0
A litigating lawyer implies a person who goes to a Court of law and maybe opens his or her mouth before those deities that in the religion of law are referred to as Judges. The importance of a quality draft in litigation is again arbitrary and solely dependent on whether the particular deity you are face with on a given day is one who bothers to draft.

Now unless you are the subject matter of this current article, and i shall make the assumption (I know I know assuming makes an ass out of you and me) that you are not the said protagonist of this story, i doubt you are qualified to authoritative say this gentleman's legal career as illustrated in this finely drafted press release makes him qualified to fill the void left by the certain top tier talent that has exited. Call me whatever, but i doubt the replacement of top quality talent from N schools by GC's was the future that this firm was looking at a year back.

If you want to deny their TTT status it is your funeral. But remember the first rule of TTT, if you don't know what it means, you are probably in one.
near, far, wherever.. 26 Apr 2016, 09:55
+39 -18
unimpressed. a partner is supposed to run a deal or have atleast some experience in that. how much of his work at jpm was without the crutch of a law firm-only that sort of work which does not hit law firms anyway. good luck to clients. ofcourse he can give some good perspectives but misleading to stick a partner label.disappointing to see the firm go down this way, rearranging the decks and playing violins.
Guest 26 Apr 2016, 11:49
+7 -4
Can't agree more.
fire exit 26 Apr 2016, 11:50
+17 -10
bhai don't trash inhouse so much man. He also has been in a law firm. this is not rocket science.
Jabalpur never sleeps 26 Apr 2016, 13:41
+6 -15
I think you are an in-house guy... Otherwise every law firm guy knows that in-house lawyers no matter how talented or impressive are not used to doing the drafting work. You may offer perspective over calls but carrying out the transaction is a different ball game. Rutveij is no doubt a capable in house lawyer but he has been away from a law firm set up and has been working in-house for so many years. Let's see how this works out for him.
kianganz 26 Apr 2016, 14:20
+38 -2
With all due respect and aware that this could cause some controversy: how hard is it really to do drafting?

If you are moderately talented at writing and logic, and have received some good training and a few years of experience, drafting becomes something that you can either do or you can't, no?

Sure, maybe you need 30 years in private practice to become a drafting equivalent of Shakespeare, but don't 90% of corporate lawyers get by just fine with competent drafting skills?

The harder part in being a corporate lawyer is surely transaction management, client relationship skills (i.e. handholding) and legal knowledge, no?
Jabalpur never sleeps 26 Apr 2016, 15:21
+2 -5
My point was limited to the time you need to invest in this aspect of work. However, as I said there is no doubt that he is a very capable lawyer. Let's hope he performs this role equally well. All the very best to him!!!!!!
BoredLawyer1 26 Apr 2016, 16:01
+20 -5
I'd say Ruetveij probably learnt all the drafting he had to learn at DM Harish and NDA. An in house role teaches you how to structure deals, helps you better understand the economics of deal making and these things in turn help in house lawyers (especially the ones working in financial insitutions) provide commercially sound legal advice to their internal clients. While external lawyers' role is usually limited to due diligences and preparing transaction documentation (occasionally they may be involved in structuring deals), in house lawyers at financial institutions, while not doing a great deal of drafting, are usually invovled in making strategic decisions about transactions and the financial institution itself.

I think private practitioners tend to diss in house counsels primarily because (a) a lot of the legwork for such in house counsels is in fact done by the private practitioners, and (b) the work hours of in house counsels are much more predictable :)
Comment added 26 Apr 2016, 16:57
+16 -1
I hate it when people give so much importance to drafting.... Drafting is ancillary. What people care more about is business acumen, which would be plenty with a JPM GC.
In-House Guy 28 Apr 2016, 10:18
+0 -0
"My point was limited to the time you need to invest in this aspect of work." - You clearly don't work in a good law firm to come up with this sentence.
Snoop 27 Apr 2016, 06:22
+1 -4
if so simple- wudnt your articles be mistake free all the time?
wise words 27 Apr 2016, 11:05
+0 -1
Nicely said Kian!

To say that one is incapable of something because he has not done it in the past. really don't understand the mindless opposition
In-House Guy 28 Apr 2016, 10:16
+0 -2
Go Kian! Suck it Jabalpur!
Really? 27 Apr 2016, 11:19
+11 -2
SOME in-house lawyers spoon feed external law firms as they draft documents at the inception. So get out of your small pond and swim in the ocean. Without having worked in-house such assumptions are bound to be there ! corporate's with the most efficient in-house lawyers rarely outsource work to external law firms. This is no disrespect to lawyers in law firms. Good lawyers are found in both facets of the legal world irrespective they are in-house or law firm lawyers.
fire exit 27 Apr 2016, 13:50
+7 -2
I have only worked in law firms with a small secondment inhouse where I was very impressed with the level of actual client service that one can do. With a good inhouse lawyer, the value of the law firm on the deal is driven down massively as all the big thinking has already been done at the termsheet stage.

Not to diss either, but honestly, very few partners draft - except to rework a clause here and there which inhouse people also do.
In House Counsel 28 Apr 2016, 06:04
+3 -3
Once you hit partner level, you'll realise how little drafting a partner actually does, and how much of it is structuring, giving instructions and correcting juniors...sort of like what an in-house lawyer does.
Lol 26 Apr 2016, 11:07
+3 -1
The other three have already been forgotten as expected!
Calzoned 26 Apr 2016, 13:07
+8 -0
Kian, I wonder if you have ever seen a similar line in a press release for partner appointment/ promotion....
"Ruetveij takes keen interest in photography, being an avid traveller (sic), loves music, enjoys trivia and history, and is a foodie."
AnTiwa 26 Apr 2016, 14:08
+5 -1
Don't wonder so much as "Outside of work, Anu’s interests include watching football, playing squash and travelling to coastal destinations"

http://www.legallyindia.com/law-firms/cyril-amarchand-promotes-8-to-partner-90-in-mumbai
Hobbyist 26 Apr 2016, 14:11
+33 -0
Are there just photography, music, food and travel that are hobbies. Nobody I have seen so far has listed out any eclectic hobbies, say collecting dung beetles, computer coding, having an interest in mathematics. Bah! this world is so plain!
Bhoj ka boj 26 Apr 2016, 14:41
+20 -35
NOW! Now CAM makes a comeback. You naysayers can just watch in open mouthed awe as CAM takes it rightful place as the true successor to legacy Amarchand.

Hiring, Staff pyramid and BCG Consulting will leave CAM competition in the dust (AZB can try). We will be so far over the horizon, forget catching up, the others won't even see us.

Our aim is 85% of the market. Others can fight for scraps.

We will revamp the ops, HR and IT and most importantly, our legal departments. Delhi will become our shining beacon of hope, which even Mumbai will look up to.

Revenue and clientele will go through the roof.

The purple elephant will reign Supreme! Others, who were so far negative about CAM will watch in amazement as we zoom beyond the stratosphere. Mark the words of an experienced man.
lol. 26 Apr 2016, 19:01
+18 -1
Yeah. About that. No.
Hahahaha 27 Apr 2016, 03:59
+7 -0
I love the sarcasm!
He-man 27 Apr 2016, 05:24
+0 -0
Oooh yeah. I'm shivering with excitement!
Bing 27 Apr 2016, 07:42
+0 -1
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Nhogooc9-jE/U5X92CYCFII/AAAAAAAAIQ4/__k3uGjhVkA/s1600/rofl-smiley.png[/img]
In House Counsel 28 Apr 2016, 06:07
+3 -0
The purple elephant shall realise it shares a stable full of white elephants.
Express Towers 26 Apr 2016, 15:04
+15 -0
Heard Mr. Pandya was invited to and attended SAM's swanky office inauguration party- without revealing future career plans of course. Spying much?
UnProf 29 Apr 2016, 13:40
+2 -0
He shouldnt have come to SAM's party.
the jpm papers 26 Apr 2016, 17:56
+14 -3
there should also be a sort of check by mnc banks done internally in cases where their bank in-house guy goes to firm on how much business the in-house guy has given the firm in the past 3 years. it is unhealthy for firms to offer partnerships to people who have been key to their mandates. it is unusual globally for in-house to go firm (for good reason). it is quite different if firm guy goes in-house.
Guesterator 26 Apr 2016, 18:26
+5 -0
An unique... AN UNIQUE [b]AN UNIQUE[/b] [b]AAAAAAN UNIQUEE[/b]... sniff...sniff
Guest 26 Apr 2016, 19:48
+9 -0
Is he now head of the investment banking client relations committee at CAM?
Daddoo 27 Apr 2016, 03:01
+12 -2
In SAM he would have made National Practice Head of Something or the Other
Ass 27 Apr 2016, 05:30
+2 -0
Soooo true along with his other in house brothers!!
SAM co 27 Apr 2016, 16:31
+1 -0
with two GCs - Hildul would really have been hilooed - ek ka burden kya kam hai for mumbai office???????
of 30 Jun 2020, 09:11
+0 -0
of talking
Taylor 27 Apr 2016, 05:20
+0 -5
Mr Suits, ain't he?
Hah 27 Apr 2016, 05:57
+4 -1
Clearly there's something about Mumbai and Pandyas :-) First Hardik, then Krunal, now this
Lokkhoner Murgikhana 27 Apr 2016, 11:34
+1 -0
Yeah, true....this must be unusual for a city where Gujratis form the second largest demographic class.
Fan 27 Apr 2016, 06:57
+9 -0
Who cares about drafting.... a JSA draft says "Author SAM"...isnt it all about templates and precedents these days?
Pearson 27 Apr 2016, 07:43
+6 -0
[img]http://www1.pgcps.org/uploadedImages/Region_1_Schools/Elementary/Valley_View/smiley_with_popcorn(2).gif[/img]
Anonymous 2 29 Apr 2016, 08:46
+0 -0
Any clue of his team?
heh 11 Aug 2021, 15:14
+0 -0
heh
AR Team 29 Apr 2016, 14:33
+7 -0
Is this your answer to Ashwath Rau??? Like Seriously Boss??