ELP hires Bharti Airtel GC Jyoti Pawar to head TMT practice

Economic Laws Practice (ELP) has hired Bharti Airtel general counsel Jyoti Pawar to head its telecommunications, media and technology practice (TMT) in Delhi.

Pawar started her career Mulla & Mulla Craigie Blunt & Caroe in Mumbai in 1992, joining GE Capital India as a vice president legal and compliance in 2000. In 2008, as senior vice president legal and compliance at GE Money Financial Services, she joined Bharti Airtel as director legal and regulatory of India and South Asia.

She graduated from GLC Mumbai in 1992 and qualified as an English solicitor in 2003.

ELP managing partner Rohan Shah, who had been heading the firm’s TMT practice until now, said in a press release that Pawar had “built an outstanding reputation as a legal professional, and as a real force in the telecom sector”.

She is due to join in several months.

Comments

Sorry 12 Mar 2014, 16:51
+13 -16
Bad choice. In house lawyers rarely carry the zeal of law firm lawyers. He will become a burden very soon.
kianganz 12 Mar 2014, 16:56
+11 -6
*She
Sorry..really?? 13 Mar 2014, 02:22
+17 -8
I don't think you are sorry and you sound like someone who is neither a great lawyer at a law firm nor has made a mark for himself/herself in-house. To make a mark anywhere, you need a certain level of determination, intelligence and persistence. Please stop stereotyping and try and do well wherever you are. My belief is that you have a serious 'chip on the shoulder' syndrome and try to validate yourself by putting others down.
LoL 13 Mar 2014, 05:18
+9 -8
You must be Jyoti checking comments on news about her at 8 in the morning? Only GCs/Partners/Managing Partners start working so early! ;-)

Anyways, all the best to you for your move.
LoL 13 Mar 2014, 07:41
+7 -5
*news about yourself
kianganz 13 Mar 2014, 08:06
+7 -0
Dunno, if a troll can't even get the gender right, it does seem like deep-seated in-house envy at the very least. :)

Was on a flight next to a US in-house counsel a few days ago, and he was saying how amazing his life is, bossing around lawyers, getting them to worry about the nitty gritty and being able to focus on the big picture and strategy stuff instead of getting bogged down in details.

Sounds like in-house can be a pretty sane choice, to be honest, rather than a mark of 'lack of zeal'.
law firm lawyer 13 Mar 2014, 08:59
+3 -9
Usually in-house legal personnel are escapist since they don't have the caliber to deliver the knowledge expectations and pressures of legal front runners in the field i.e. lawyers. They don't know anything about law either and move in-house for money and easy lifestyle and bossing around. I know atleast 2 dozen of them.
Astounded at your s******** 14 Mar 2014, 09:27
+3 -0
Seriously, which planet are you from? You seriously are taking trolling to new levels. FYI, not all in-house lawyers, engage in just paper pushing. Most of them deal with various legal practices, instead of taking the easy route out of "I am a M&A lawyer" / "I am a structured finance lawyer". Unlike 'law firm lawyers', they also, do not have the option of square bracketting legal clauses (when they are unable to really advise on risk implications) and surprise, surprise!, are more hands on with laws, as well as commercial risks.
General Commentator 21 Mar 2014, 06:30
+0 -0
Genuine lack of class from you.
pseudo lawyer 13 Mar 2014, 09:50
+0 -0
strange...having worked in financial services sector, she will be establishing TMT practice...
haa? 13 Mar 2014, 11:33
+0 -0
haa? financial services?
General Commentator 21 Mar 2014, 06:30
+0 -0
Not only are you a pesudo lawyer you also seem to own a pseudo brain.
acapulko 13 Mar 2014, 14:07
+1 -0
sorry kian but "She is due to join in several months." what does that mean?
kianganz 13 Mar 2014, 14:12
+1 -1
Uh, just what it says? :)

But seriously, I believe she hasn't joined ELP yet though she has accepted the offer, which is fairly standard procedure in many hires, no?
Guest 6 Apr 2014, 19:12
+0 -0
I dont agree with that guy's assessment of in house lawyers but i agree they're not the client catching types.