Entry of foreign law firms: We asked Prof Madhava Menon what he thinks

Prof Madhava Menon thinks entry of foreign law firms is generally a good idea
Prof Madhava Menon thinks entry of foreign law firms is generally a good idea

Liberalisation of legal services directly upholds citizens’ constitutional right to the choice of lawyers they want to engage, in Prof NR Madhava Menon’s view.

The ‘father of modern legal education’, as the founding vice chancellor of NLSIU Bangalore and NUJS Kolkata is often popularly referred to, commented: “One may submit that subject to some conditions internationalisation of the legal profession will be advantageous to the Indian bar and of great benefit to the litigant public.

“After all, the client has a constitutional right of choice of the lawyers which is to be respected even under a globalised regime.”

The comment was part of Menon’s lecture delivered in the Orissa high court bar association’s commemoration of the death anniversary of barrister Ranjit Mahanty on 2 September 2016.

Menon shared the full text of this lecture with us via email today, in response to our questions on whether he thinks foreign law firms should be allowed to set up shop India, what he makes of the current discussions on liberalisation between the government and other stakeholders, and what he thinks of the various proposals on liberalisation in legal services.

Menon commented via email: “I have spoken at length in favour of trade in legal services in a Memorial Lecture I delivered at the Orissa High Court Bar Association last month… This answers your first three questions.”

Excerpts from Menon’s speech

There are genuine concerns such as expectations of society for professional sensitivity to legal and cultural traditions, standard of professional service to clients which in turn demand uniform rules of professional ethics and disciplinary controls, independence of the profession, reasonable balance between local lawyers and their foreign counterparts in the matter of distribution of work, fees and market control. Professional control in any case will remain with the local professionals who are bound to be far greater in number and therefore powerful in organizational matters.

In the circumstances, one may submit that subject to some conditions internationalisation of the legal profession will be advantageous to the Indian bar and of great benefit to the litigant public. After all, the client has a constitutional right of choice of the lawyers which is to be respected even under a globalised regime.

There can be conditions to ensure quality of services rendered by foreign lawyers/firms and to ensure fair treatment of Indian lawyers/firms abroad.

They can be worked out through discussions and through GATS/WTO procedures.

Comments

A K Awasthi 6 Oct 2016, 06:42
+0 -1
We agree with Dr Madhava Menon. there will be healthy competition and our own students will be benefited by this.
Guest 6 Oct 2016, 16:52
+4 -1
Excellent!!! KIan why didn't u give him coverage earlier instead of 1000 articles on what mana mishra and bhasin have to say? You publicised those people too much and spoilt everything.
Fixer 7 Oct 2016, 07:30
+3 -2
Menon's statement may be a game changer. He is a Padma Shri awardee and is seen as a respected Bhishma pitama-type figure by political leaders. I would request Kian to highlight this development in Mint and also interview Ranbir Singh (who also supports liberalisation). People like Menon and Ranbir Singh are taken more seriously than Manan Mishra and Lalit Bhasin by many political leaders. Jyoti Basu personally invited Menon to set up NUJS, and Chandrababu Naid had a similar rapport with Ranbir Singh at NALSAR.

And I agree with the comment that Legally India has been remiss in not covering this earlier. It has been 8 years since Kian has been covering this topic and he has devoted several articles to SILF and BCI. Yet, it took him so long to cover what Menon think. Can you imagine the US media not speaking to the Harvard/Ivy League professors for 8 years if this issue was being discussed in the US?
Guest 7 Oct 2016, 21:07
+2 -0
I also agree that too much attention has been given to unimportant people like Lalit Bhasin instead of Padma awardee jurists and lawyers like Professor Menon, Soli Sorabjee, Fali Nariman, KK Venugopal etc. Kian has some explaining to do! He seems obsessed with his favourite Lalit Bhasin.
McKinsey 8 Oct 2016, 11:23
+0 -0
Dear Legally India, as you are increasing your focus on education I would suggest you please cover the story of World Class Universities Act and recent call for applications. It is a major reform of Modi government. Can you confirm if any of the NLUs are submitting a bid to be designated under the act? If yes it will solve the problem of lack of funding and bring them on par with IIMs. If not they are losing a golden opportunity and those VCs must be hauled up. According to rumours NLSIU is submitting a bid.

http://indianexpress.com/article/education/hrd-ugc-regulations-tweaks-norms-to-push-world-class-institutions-plan/

http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Public%20Consultation%20Document.pdf
Guest 8 Oct 2016, 19:11
+0 -1
Request you to cover 2 stories:

1 )Retrograde judgement by Dave J which is front page on website of UK Guardian newspaper: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/08/india-divorce-man-cruelty-western-thought-in-laws

2) PIL by Dave J's son seeking ban on Pokemon Go for displaying eggs. What does the SC have to say about frivolous PILs now?