[UPDATE: Gupta denies 'ill-advised' allegation strongly] Grant Thornton, much miffed, vows to sue CAM lateral Kunal Gupta: Claims broke contract

Grant Thornton is seriously miffed at and has threatened to sue for breach of contract former Grant Thornton senior forensics team member Kunal Gupta, who was poached by Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas as reported in the previous week.

Grant Thornton has threatened to sue for breach of contract former Grant Thornton senior forensics team member Kunal Gupta, who was poached to join Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas as a partner, as reported earlier this week.

A statement from the global accountancy and consultancy firm, sent to Legally India by one of the firm’s India partners, alleged that Gupta was never a partner at Grant Thornton, as stated on his Linked-in profile or in the Cyril Amarchand press release, but had been an executive director.

The statement also alleged that Gupta breached his contractual obligation to Grant Thornton, which “intends to pursue all available remedies including possible legal action, if required, in furtherance of this contract”.

Update 20:36: Gupta has responded with a statement of his own rebutting Grant Thornton’s allegation that he had misrepresented his partnership. Read his statement in full below.

He wrote:

I am extremely shocked and hurt by the allegations made by GT. I will separately be writing to GT on contractual matters, which are completely baseless but would also like to clarify my position to you.

I was an Executive Director (which is equivalent to a Partner) and was treated as a partner for all practical purposes, both within GT and externally. This is borne out by how the firm represents me as a partner to clients, including charging me out at partner rates. This is also the case with other ED’s within the system, who are represented as partners. In addition, it is also used a pitch to attract talent by the firm as an inducement.

Here is the scan of the tombstone that GT awarded me on my admission to partnership.

Gupta included a scan of the “tombstone” Grant Thornton had awarded him to congratulate his admission to its partnership, included a screenshot of a Facebook post by Grant Thornton on its page referring to him as a partner, and a Grant Thornton brochure implying that he was a partner at the firm.

He added in his statement:

There are numerous pitches and mandates which are shared with the clients, where I am represented as a partner by GT. It is quite clear that GT’s allegations are clearly motivated and baseless.

My representation as a partner is completely consistent with how the firm has represented me before the clients and internally. I reserve the right to take appropriate legal action against GT for defamation for attacks on my reputation and other issues relating to my exit from the firm and I will also be defending any legal action should GT be ill advised to do so at their risk and cost. I will also place all the above material and more if so required at the appropriate forum in order to demonstrate the incorrectness of GT’s allegations.

Grant Thornton’s statement in full:

Mr. Kunal Gupta was an Executive Director and not partner at Grant Thornton. Further, Mr. Gupta has failed to honor his obligations (including notice period) under his contract with Grant Thornton.

Grant Thornton intends to pursue all available remedies including possible legal action, if required, in furtherance of this contract.

Grant Thornton is disappointed at such unprofessional and unethical conduct of Mr. Gupta.

It is shameful that a lawyer from NLSIU Bangalore and Harvard Law School fails to honor his obligations under a simple contract and misrepresents his position at Grant Thornton.

We have reached out to Gupta and Cyril Amarchand managing partner Cyril Shroff for comment.

Cyril Amarchand’s press release, after the original report of the news, had stated:

Prior to joining Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Kunal was a partner with Grant Thornton in India, having led a multi-disciplinary team catering diverse industry segments such as Retail, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices, Automotive, Real Estate and IT/ITES Prior to Grant Thornton, he was at PriceWaterHouse Coopers (PwC) at New Delhi and also at the World Bank, Washington DC as part of the Integrity Vice Presidency, where he was involved in large, multi-country investigations involving fraud and corruption in World Bank financed projects across the world.

Kunal is a 2006 Erasmus Mundus Scholar, having obtained his European Master in Law & Economics from the Erasmus University, University of Ghent & Hamburg University. Further, he holds a BA LLB (Hons) degree from the National Law School of India University, Bangalore and a LL M from the Harvard Law School, 2008, where he was also the editorial staff for the Harvard Journal on Legislation.

Kunal Gupta rebuttal of Grant Thornton’s statement

Comments

Thorn 13 Feb 2016, 09:33
+24 -4
"Grant Thornton is disappointed at such unprofessional and unethical conduct of Mr. Gupta.

It is shameful that a lawyer from NLSIU Bangalore and Harvard Law School fails to honor his obligations under a simple contract and misrepresents his position at Grant Thornton."

I see a defamation suit in the making. It is shameful that GT would react in such a manner.

Employment contracts are not enforceable. Surely your "legal" guys would have advised you as such in between their "accounting" jobs!

Be mature. Be smart. Don't cry if your guys leave you. Be sporting.
Aram 13 Feb 2016, 13:01
+22 -1
Petty squabble made into a big story. GT should be discreet about this. You cannot discredit someone just because they left you.
Oooo? 13 Feb 2016, 15:24
+5 -1
I would be interested to know why you feel notice periods would be hit by Section 27 of the Indian Contracts Act. I would not read these as constituting restraints on trade.
Aah 23 Feb 2016, 04:09
+0 -0
Thorn does not seem to have suggested anything of that sort... what do u think happens if someone leaves without giving a notice? do u think they are forced to remain in employment? :P
Gupta Friend 13 Feb 2016, 10:23
+4 -1
Well done Guptaji!! Didn't expect you stay away from a controversy for too long
Bust 13 Feb 2016, 12:00
+1 -3
Not honoring notice period is jot a big deal..but misrepresenting a position is a big big deal. CAM also wouldn't like it.
Poly 13 Feb 2016, 13:32
+18 -1
In a big 4 and presumably GT as well, ED is equal to a partner. As only a CA can be a partner, the non CAs like lawyers MBA etc are designated ED but it is not misrepresenting to say partner.
Seriously ! 13 Feb 2016, 14:53
+7 -3
Are we now to interpret designations in spirit and not by letter ?
Vijay sharma 14 Feb 2016, 14:26
+2 -0
That's incorrect, big four firms do have no CA as partners, with only exception being the one in audit firms. All advisory practices of big four do have non ca as partners.

Also executive director is a similar profile that like a partner but they don't get share of profit in partnership. They are like salaried employees with some extra privileges.
Bust 13 Feb 2016, 16:31
+15 -0
Kunal seems justified here. He should go after GT. They have been nothing short of slanderous.
LP6 13 Feb 2016, 13:47
+3 -0
do the Senior Associates, Associate Partners in the Big 6 have a notice period clause in their contract??
Since essentially they work on a retainer basis & not on a proper employment basis.
Engage Bhaurcha 13 Feb 2016, 13:48
+0 -4
Engage MP Bharucha and sue Kunal Gupta!
haru 14 Feb 2016, 13:49
+9 -1
That will give Bharucha some work at least!
MR 13 Feb 2016, 14:26
+27 -1
This is a very silly story, though also scary. Grant Thorton is being ridiculous and ungracious. Firstly, there seems to have been no misrepresentation. Secondly Grant Thorton should be handling this is a much more mature way. This seems petty and vindictive. Would make me think twice before dealing with Grant Thorton.
Client 14 Feb 2016, 13:50
+3 -0
I totally agree. If they can stoop down to such levels so as to wash dirty linen in public i wonder what else they can do to keep afloat.
GeeTee 13 Feb 2016, 14:40
+14 -0
How hypocritical! GT represented Kunal as partner on their own social media page - Grant Thornton India LLP; 15 January at 02:12
Our Partner, Kunal Gupta speaks on Border protection: International cooperation in enforcement, at FICCI Casade International conference on Illicit Trade in Delhi. Grant Thornton India LLP's photo.

https://www.facebook.com/GrantThorntonIndiaLLP/photos/a.621707791218850.1073741828.621671057889190/1021073897948902/?type=3
XX 13 Feb 2016, 15:03
+6 -0
What a Shame GT!
So there 14 Feb 2016, 13:51
+11 -0
And charged him out at Partner rates to outside clients. If he wasnt one they why did they represent him and charge him out as a Partner? GT needs to understand that they are exposing themselves to BIG malpractice claims from clients. Dont throw stones at others if you yourself live in a glass house!
Gupta Friend 2 13 Feb 2016, 16:29
+9 -1
GT you are pathetic!! Instead of fighting with him in public, you should have fought to have retained them.
The Law Man 13 Feb 2016, 17:18
+11 -1
This is really immature on GT's part. They should have known better before making any allegations of misrepresentation on Gupta. I guess tables have turned with his response. BTW, what business does GT have in hiring a lawyer? Is it trying to get a backdoor entry into legal world??
Watching 14 Feb 2016, 13:52
+1 -0
True that. GT is an accounting firm. What business do they have in taking on a lawyer? Someone in the Bar Council/ Inst. of CA's should investigate them.
gyanji 13 Feb 2016, 19:35
+0 -3
1)what is the so-called notice period ?
2) what notice period did GT have if they wanted to chuck him out?
3) what amount in lieu of notice does the contract talk of ?
4) what client related work is suffering due to his exist, which started before his notice and the loss thereon to the client?
5)can the lawyer contract away his public duties other than on grounds of conflict of interest?
LI six 14 Feb 2016, 08:33
+7 -3
Instead of wasting time on such rubbish articles and non-entities please report on Scalia and Sri Srinivasan,
Grant Throttle 16 Feb 2016, 02:07
+4 -0
Can we order a forensic investigation into this Partner vs Not Partner claim...??
Nation wants to know! 16 Feb 2016, 15:43
+3 -2
How come no one is asking the real questions here - After all this will CSS be able to generate enough work for Mr.Gupta or will he be just another showpiece? How much time will it take for VCS to get him married to one of the star associates within the firm? Will Mr.Gupta in his first week be able to unearth the discrepancy in salaries at various levels within the firm and expose it?