Indus poaches Anupam Prasad & team from RDA

Indus grows to 16 partners and 90 associates...
Indus grows to 16 partners and 90 associates...

IndusLaw has hired RDA Legal corporate partner and Mumbai office head Anupam Prasad as a corporate partner.

He will join with his team members Anindita Ganguly and Trupti Katale.

He is a 2006 NUJS Kolkata graduate who began his career at Nishith Desai Associates, followed by three years at Khaitan & Co between 2010 and 2013, and the last two years at RDA Legal.

Prasad and Ganguly had recently acted for Naveneet Education in an investment round, we had reported , with Indus adding in its press release that his:

practice area spans across advising Indian and Foreign clients on acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity investments, financing, India entry strategy, media & entertainment advisory, private client practice and general commercial law advisory under Indian laws

Ganguly and Katale have both joined as Mumbai associates; the former in corporate, and the latter in litigation.

Indus co-founding partner Suneeth Katarki commented in a press release: “His enthusiasm along withhis can do attitude is something that will definitely benefit the firm generally and the team in Mumbai in particular.”

The firm now has 16 partners and 90 associates in four offices (Bangalore, Delhi, Hyderabad and Mumbai), according to its release.

We have reached out to RDA managing partner Rohit Das for comment.

Comments

RDA aka PXV aka Ashlar 15 Jun 2016, 10:37
+1 -1
Rohit Bhai - Aur ek breakaway ka time ho gaya hain!! I wonder what would be the name of the new firm!
Nobody!! 15 Jun 2016, 10:45
+0 -1
Who is left in the firm now besides Rohit!!Has RDA shut?
Pathetic 15 Jun 2016, 10:53
+3 -0
Ohh LI! Your grammar and typos are pathetic! Touches new lows daily.
Rohit U-Das 15 Jun 2016, 10:58
+4 -1
Rohit Bhaiya - Please remove Avik's name from the website. He has left you guys long ago. Anupam bhi chala gaya. I can safely assume that both Bangalore and Mumbai would stop functioning.

Mentos idea - Bring back Pingal and Souvik.
Again?? 15 Jun 2016, 11:50
+0 -1
Everytime you hear partner exits. When will he finally put an end to this? I guess he is now the sole lawyer in the firm.
Congrats ! 15 Jun 2016, 13:02
+17 -5
Congratulations Anupam. All the best for your new role, and you will always do well wherever you go. Amazing human being and so very down to earth.
Puhlease 15 Jun 2016, 13:33
+3 -1
Legally India needs to improve their English, grammar and editing skills. This is preposterous.
kianganz 15 Jun 2016, 13:39
+2 -2
Uh, is it really that bad? I spotted one major grammar error before the press release quote and some accidentally deleted spaces inside the press release quote; other than that, it may not be Shakespeare but it seems mostly correct, no?
Alias 15 Jun 2016, 13:51
+2 -5
Apart from legal advice, Indus seems to be very good at cherry-picking too ;)
Arya Stark 16 Jun 2016, 03:53
+2 -1
Rohit, you have a lot of contacts, please get in touch with a top tier law firm's managing partner and set up their practice in Kolkata.
Well-wisher 16 Jun 2016, 05:27
+12 -2
Rohit, my two cents are as under:

1. You need to regain credibility in the market. For this you need to shed all vestige of RDA, PXV;

2. Don't do any BD straightaway. Concentrate only on your work for a few years; and gain confidence of the clients through your work alone;

3. Merge your practice with a mid-tier firm where you will be relevant and could, at a later point in time, assume a leadership role. Do not assume any leadership role straightaway.

4. Publish scholarly articles which would demonstrate that you are still o top of the game on law;

5. Do not give any interview or do any PR event;

6. Finally, take a break for two weeks, refresh, and reboot.

Pure unsolicited advice. So, feel free to discard it wholly.
ThePhantom 16 Jun 2016, 23:47
+4 -3
Are you and Arya Stark out of your minds? Rohit is [...] He has tried his luck merging, selling, etc for years, no one has taken the firm. [...] I am his junior but I am not really glad about it. He has ruined our name! [...]
Proteingee 19 Jun 2016, 04:28
+0 -0
Kian, how is it that Phantom's original comment was edited and partially redacted subsequently? I have read the original comment when it was published earlier. Did someone from RDA object to it? I am just curious.
ThePhantom 8 Jul 2016, 23:11
+0 -0
Well I agree with Protiengee. My comment has been edited atleast twie. When you claim to be defensive and protecting the interest of the legal system, helping law students make an informed choice, the edit was really unnecessary and uncalled for!! There have been worse things written about AMSS/ SAM/ CAM/ Luthra amongst other firms, but yet RDA is more of a priority is surprising. In fact worse things were written about
ThePhantom 8 Jul 2016, 23:37
+0 -0
Well I agree with Proteingee. My comment has been edited minimum twice. When you claim to be defensive and protecting the interest of the legal system, helping law students make an informed choice, the edit was really unnecessary and uncalled for!! There have been worse things written about AMSS/ SAM/ CAM/ Luthra amongst other firms, but yet RDA is more of a priority is surprising. In fact worse things were written about Ms. Mukherjee now in AZB, Mr. AR now at AZB, Ms. ZM the "Z" of AZB and even CS and PS of AMSS!! Why are you so defensive about RDA? Well, it is a fact only Mr. RD remains in RDA so did Mr. RD complain? But Mr. RD's priority was more important than the most important people in the legal profession? Please do not lose your worth censoring comments on small people but letting go on comments on giants!! The more you censor the worse it gets. This time I will not use names but I feel the analogy of RDA and a certain bankrupt airline and the analogy of the two running it was really funny!! If you are not scared of Shroff's and the Modi's and comments on them, then why scared of my earlier comment? Well I remember my comment, it was just funny[little offensive but deserved offensive but no where close to people abusing/ commenting on Zia, Cyril, Ashwath and Nisha (I do not even want to go to the topics and comments on Luthra and Desai Diwanji whih are worse)]. So does it mean that you are actually letting people talk on big firms and not on small because in big firms someone cannot be caught or you hate big firms? I have been following LI for some 7-8 years, commenting, working now in a top firm, but this editing was surprising!! So working in the top law firm, I should assume you allow any and all comments on a person, but when it comes to RDA you censor? Please do not act like a Pahlaj Nihalani. You wish and request our help for subscribing for newsletters claiming fair journalism, but do be fair!! I have fought for you and your website against most when they troll you/ others, but you censor my comments against RDA, etc but let allow other comments on AZB/CAM/SAM/ Luthra, etc? Is this fair? I wish you post my comment and reply here. I do not check THAT e-mail ID ..lol. [If you do not (post this) I will have a screenshot of my post and how it may be edited, and your reply to it. I am not threatening. Just going by your logic of fair journalism. I have seen pathetic things written bout Ms. Mukherjee, Modi, Shroff's, Ashwath, Nisha, etc, which was posted but you have had some affinity with RDA always as I have seen in the past 1-2 years!! (you may delete this square bracket)]. So as you claim for free journalism, I wish to contribute to you. But you claim but I never saw it as "fair"! I will not mind paying 900 if you were fair. THe edit on my previous post was unnecessary considering other posts on this site...
Aah 17 Jun 2016, 10:13
+1 -1
Which was the last meaningful transaction that Rohit did (apart from drafting and redrafting his own partnership deed)?