2016 law firm salary surveys bonanza: Find out if you're over- or under-paid

Please hover over each line in the chart to see individual figures according to each recruiter (click here to view larger version of chart in new window)

Q: How much can you earn as a lawyer in a law firm? A: It really really depends...
Q: How much can you earn as a lawyer in a law firm? A: It really really depends...

The range of salaries at India’s law firms is wider than ever, with even a 10-year PQE (post qualification experience) lawyer on remuneration (including bonuses) potentially ranging all the way from Rs 25 lakh per annum to Rs 200 lakh, according to salary data from four legal recruitment consultants compiled by Legally India.

According to data from recruiters Aquis Search, Legal League Consulting, Michael Page and Vahura, even for entry level lawyers who just graduated from college there is a wide potential range from between Rs 5 lakh per year (Legal League figures) to Rs 18.2 lakh (Aquis figures).

(See more on our previous surveys of starting salaries here).

Each recruiter has reflected ranges of salaries for ranges of several years of seniority, which means that the numbers for each point of seniority are a little fuzzy.

Also, in light of the wide ranges, especially between different recruiters’ assessments of the market, no figure in isolation should be taken as gospel.

There is also the fact that recruiters’ maximum recorded salaries are likely to be higher than average, because job moves with the largest salary hikes could be down to only a few top performers, who are relative statistical outliers.

However, when combined as in the chart above, this gives an amalgamation of indicative, average ranges.

Our previous in-house salary surveys in 2011, in 2011 and 2012 had revealed a similarly large divergence of figures between firms, often even within the same firms.

(see full tabulation of our 2012 data at the bottom of this article, or click here for the full story and graphic from 2012).

Versus 2012: Top end appears to have sky-rocketed (or is it the recruiter effect?)

We have also compared Legally India’s 2012 survey of tier 1 and 2 firms, and the 2016 recruiters’ data, which suggests that at the more senior end of the market, remuneration has more than doubled.

However, it is difficult to infer precise pay increases across the board from this, due to the time elapsed, the different methodologies used, and recruiters usually being involved in placing candidates with pay-hikes.

That said, according to the data, it appears that maximum salary ranges have increased in the last four years across the board from between around 20% to 40%, particularly at the more senior levels:

PQE2012 (maximum)2016 (approximate maximums)
01518.2
11622
21826
32034
52340
63865
75580

Mumbai-Delhi divide

Legal League and Michael Page have also broken their figures down by city.

On average, according to Legal League’s figures, Mumbai law firms pay around 10% more than firms in Delhi, while according to Michael Page, the difference can be around 20%.

Legal League had also divided its figures between what it calls tier 1 and tier 2 law firms, which suggest that tier 1 firms pay between 30% and 50% more than tier 2 firms.

Full tabulation of all recruiters original figures below, in alphabetical order.

Aquis Search 2016 figures

PQEDesignationLaw firms Delhi / Mumbai (Rs lakh)
0Entry Level Associate11.2 - 18.2
1-2Associate14.4 - 22
2-3Associate17.4 - 26.4
3-4Associate19.8 - 34
4-6Senior Associate28.6 - 52
6-8PA / MA44.2 - 80
8-12Salaried/Retained/ Associate Partner70 - 200
PQEDesignationTier 1 law firms Delhi (Rs lakh)Tier 1 MumbaiTier 2 law firms DelhiTier 2 law firms Mumbai
0-5Associate8-249-255-157-16
5-8Senior Associate18-5522-6014-2516-28
8-12PA/Counsel/MA/ Partner55-7055-7525-4028-45
10+Partner65-100+70-120+40-65+45-90+

Michael Page 2016 figures

Law firm Delhi (Rs lakh)Law firm Mumbai (Rs lakh)
3-512-2012-25
5-1020-6025-75
10-1560-10075-120
15+100++120++

Vahura 2016 figures

PQELaw firms (Rs lakh)
1-39.5 - 25.4
3-519.8 - 43
5-835 - 72
8-1062 - 110
10-1590 - 175
15+120 - 250

Legally India 2012 salary survey figures, for reference

Via survey of 400 lawyers in early 2012.

PQETier 1 Remuneration (incl bonus, Rs lakh)Tier 2 remuneration (incl bonus, Rs lakh)
012-159-11
113-1610-13
215-1811.5-15
317-2013.5-17
418-2315-20
520.5-3017-25
622-3819-30
724-5522-40

Leglaly India's 2012's salary survey (graphic via Mint)
Leglaly India's 2012's salary survey (graphic via Mint)

The above data was first published in our exclusive subscribers-only newsletter last week. To get news and insider info first, please subscribe below:

Comments

Starboy 9 Dec 2016, 15:12
+2 -1
So by that calculation, how much is my cut?
Know all 9 Dec 2016, 19:47
+17 -3
Associates are underpaid for the following reasons:

1. Many of these figures are merely on a CTC basis (an Indian jugaad that doesn't exist anywhere).

2. The huge living costs in Bombay make the salaries seen more modest

3. Some firms are paying less than a lakh a month. As a comparison, after the 7th pay commission even junior assistant professors at NLUs will get a lakh a month, while Jindal Law School pays much more.

This just shows why many firms are resisting liberalisation.
Fyi 10 Dec 2016, 06:31
+18 -0
The junior assistant professor's year by year increments would be negligible when compared to that of an associate of a law firm.
Outsider 10 Dec 2016, 17:17
+10 -2
7th Pay Commission is giving away 1 lakh to junior assistant professors? What are you smoking, bro? 70-75k if we are being charitable. Agree with the Jindal part though. They start with 1.2 lakhs or thereabouts depending on your qualifications. Also, the living costs in Mumbai is high definitely, but that affects everyone living there, including A0s and partners alike.
Skewed Stat 10 Dec 2016, 04:49
+8 -1
Kian,

This graph is a good initiative but needs some improvement, may be next year when you do it you bear in mind that as presently set out it is rather uninformative, and represents a rather skewed statistic. The comp needs to indicate variable and fixed pay, for very often the entire variable portion only remains on paper for various reasons.

Do you think this could be provided or will such info be tough to get? In any case a rather good initiative which is much needed in our market.
stark 10 Dec 2016, 07:03
+2 -1
Which firm pays more than 40-45 lakh to Senior Associates???
Ara 10 Dec 2016, 15:40
+26 -4
Platinum, TTA, S&R to name a few.
for public interest 10 Dec 2016, 16:49
+22 -22
Dear Ara (and all others under this stupid impression),

I have seen 10s of these comments on LI, claiming that one or all three of these firms pay substantially more than tier 1 firms. However, the exact opposite is closer to the truth. Having worked at Platinum for over a year, let me tell you that the firm pays less than tier 1 firms at most levels of PQE and just about comparable sums at PQE 6-7 and upwards. From what I've gathered, the same is true for TTA and S&R. I can tell you for a fact that the fresher pay at all three is in the range of 10-14 lakhs, which is decidedly less than all tier 1 firms.

For heaven's sake, do some market research, instead and blindly claiming something that hasn't been true for half a decade now. Stop misguiding poor souls, especially freshers and associates with less than 4 years' PQE who join firms like Platinum (a tiny firm with little to no growth prospects) hoping that the super pay package will compensate for the long-term career suicide.
Ara 11 Dec 2016, 08:33
+3 -8
Then probably you should bave bargained for more and I am guessing you might be from the Delhi office of Platinum as Mumbai definitely pays more. Anyway, not trying to debate but these guys definitely know what the market is right now than you and I. Also there are many lawyers at these firms who are definitely being paid pretty well. Good initiative, Kian- makes us understand where we stand and what we could bargain for.
@ Ara 12 Dec 2016, 05:49
+6 -2
Comment 4.1.1 is actually in the public interest because a lot of people, especially students and young lawyers, have incorrect information.

FIRST, some boutique top firms indeed pay 4-6 lakhs more than Tier 1 firms at PQE 3 to 6 level, they do it ONLY because they offer lesser growth prospects and lesser deal exposure i.e., they have nothing else but money to attract talent. Just look at the number of deals they do in league tables!

SECOND, the only senior associates getting more than 40-45 lakhs are the ones who have around 6 years of experience.

THIRD, the market has been really low for the past few years and lawyers at Tier 1 firms are very much underpaid and bonuses at top boutique firms have been relatively dismal year after year.
Guest 12 Dec 2016, 10:05
+5 -2
I dont think that even a top tier is paying 40-45 lakhs to a lawyer with 6 years of work experience. For example, I know a senior associate in Trilegal who is getting 30 lakhs and someone in SAM who is getting 35 lakhs with 8 years of work experience. Hence, these figures seems to be inflated.
@ Guest 13 Dec 2016, 12:11
+2 -0
I should have been more specific and included the WORDS IN CAPS - the only senior associates getting more than 40-45 lakhs are the ones who have around 6 years of experience AND WORK AT TOP TIER BOUTIQUE FIRMS.

By way of an example, S&R pays more than SAM, CAM and the lot - at 6 PQE a S&R associate makes 40+ lakhs, with annual base pay at 30 lakhs.
kianganz 12 Dec 2016, 06:36
+3 -0
I think S&R and TTA is maybe possible in very rare cases because they have high base pay, and firms like AZB could be too because of its very discretionary and fluid bonus structure for top performers...

I think everyone should note though that these maximum figures are nowhere near market standard, necessarily: they are very likely to be due to a very small number of outliers and super-top-performers, who get far more than others at their level (mostly with a very big bonus) because firms want to retain them.

And also, as mentioned in the article, recruiters' maximum figures will by definition be higher than average, because if a top performer moves, it'll usually be for a significant increment, which skews the figures considerably...
@ for public interest 12 Dec 2016, 06:42
+2 -0
Some of these firms indeed pay a few lakhs more than Tier 1 firms, but rest of your points are valid. There is lot of misconception and nobody thinks of the "lack of exposure" when joining.
Also 12 Dec 2016, 05:02
+2 -2
AZB (discretionary bonuses) and JSA (for high performers who kill the 8%).
kmb 10 Dec 2016, 15:40
+2 -2
s&r, trilegal
Hello 12 Dec 2016, 22:55
+0 -1
SAM Bombay does. Confirmed
Shocked 10 Dec 2016, 09:10
+0 -2
Who the hell pays 18.2 and 22 to A0s and A1s, respectively?
dont be 12 Dec 2016, 06:55
+4 -1
http://www.livemint.com/r/LiveMint/Period1/2015/04/07/Photos/w-salary.jpg
Hichki 12 Dec 2016, 14:36
+0 -0
Well Khaitan apparently does 14.2 Lakhs purely fixed component to all their freshers coming from campus and PPO placements
Hichki 12 Dec 2016, 14:39
+1 -0
In my view its completely wrong to associate and certain slab to a certain PQE, firms are now identifying hi potential performers and are rewarding them aptly. One may have many years PQE but what if his attitude and go-getter performance is zero...are you still gonna pay him/her as much as the star performer just because both fall in the same PQE.
Unknownsatan 10 Dec 2016, 13:55
+16 -0
only 5 comments in 1 day !!

If you would have listed how much salary each firm is paying , there would have been 100 comments by now !!!!!
BENGALuru Thaiger 10 Dec 2016, 16:47
+2 -6
I hear bangalore based law firms pay really well.
Plz 12 Dec 2016, 06:39
+4 -1
LOL!!
Guest 12 Dec 2016, 07:25
+1 -0
I know at least one which pays about 14-15 lakhs per annum for fresh entrants.
Question 10 Dec 2016, 20:04
+2 -2
Kian which law firm is this?

http://m.timesofindia.com/city/delhi/Over-Rs-8-crore-in-cash-seized-in-raids-on-a-law-firm-in-south-Delhi/articleshow/55915961.cms
Unknownsatan 11 Dec 2016, 11:50
+3 -1
T & T
Just curious 11 Dec 2016, 18:11
+3 -0
I wonder how many people actually stay in the jungle life to reach the senior associate/partner level
Borring 12 Dec 2016, 08:00
+5 -0
Man i knew I was underpaid but these charts are crazy..

5-8 PQE as 35-72 ..72 thats insane for a SA/PA level.
Guest 12 Dec 2016, 09:59
+1 -1
I am highly underpaid, I knew this....
Leaglette 12 Dec 2016, 11:49
+3 -2
Just for clarification- did the survey cover any law firms other than ones in Tier-I and Tier-II? The list seems biased towards a few firms. Another fact which ought to be disclosed is whether all the said firms surveyed seem to be corporate. If Litigation firms are ever surveyed, the numbers will have a different story to tell.

PS- Dear Mr. Kian, please conduct a similar survey for litigation law firms in India
Hichki 12 Dec 2016, 14:43
+5 -0
Also I want to add that Salaries are directlt dependent on the Firms revenue and profits. A high performing 10 years PQE may be paid much lesser if he is not workinh with any of the tier I or II firms....its purely bespoke packages depending on the firms earnings and cannot be categorised or compared in brackets or graphs such as these....kian find a more innovative way of putting this accross
Phew! 12 Dec 2016, 14:53
+0 -0
Just glad I don't work for a law firm right now :)
Guest 13 Dec 2016, 07:55
+1 -1
This is completely incorrect reporting. There is a huge difference in pay scales between associates/sr. associates/partners in litigation dept and corporate dept even within a firm (whether tier I or tier II). this is too much of generalisation and generic data
Damn frm SAM 13 Dec 2016, 13:45
+1 -0
Damn I am underpaid!!
Little birdie 14 Dec 2016, 12:37
+0 -0
This is good. I heard of a person coaching students for CLAT from home and earning 36 lakhs per year. One starts wondering what these degrees end up being worth :P
Country cousin 19 Dec 2016, 09:34
+0 -0
Could your give us a brief idea about the in-house ones as well.
Guest 27 Dec 2016, 06:21
+0 -0
Kian, pls do a similar survey for in-house as well.