BMR Legal poaches ‘ace’ LKS litigating partner of 28 years

Madhav Rao
Madhav Rao

Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan (LKS) partner and head of indirect tax litigation Madhav Rao joined BMR Legal in Delhi as partner on 1 April, handling indirect tax litigation.

Rao joined LKS in 1986 after having practised in the Delhi high court for six years in the chambers of senior advocate M Chandra Shekharan, having enrolled at the bar in 1980. He had obtained his LLB from the Delhi University (DU) after graduating from SRCC in the DU.

He told Legally India that he had joined BMR Legal to give the firm additional support in its indirect tax litigation, and will handle “all facets of such litigation” including VAT, customs, service tax, import-export.

BMR Legal managing partner Mukesh Butani, who heads the firm’s tax practice, said that Rao was going to lead the firm’s indirect tax disputes work – work which was handled by former BMR Legal partner Sujit Ghosh who resigned last year. Hiring Rao, however, had no connection with Ghosh’s exit, he said.

“It is business as usual. The firm’s focus is on tax disputes. We had a gap in our indirect tax practice at the senior level and we are filling it,” commented Butani. Rao’s move was first reported by allindiantaxes.

The firm also merged with Souvik Ganguly-founded start-up law firm Acuity Law this month, with Ganguly inducted as partner to grow the firm’s M&A practice in Bombay. Other than Rao and Ganguly, BMR Legal has former Desai & Diwanji partner Amit Khansaheb as M&A partner in Delhi, and Sriram Seshadri in Chennai who handles the firm’s direct tax disputes for South India.

BMR Legal will not be announcing any partnership promotions this year.

LKS partner Seetharaman S, commenting on Rao’s exit, said: “Mr Madhav Rao has been our ace litigating lawyer in the various high courts and the Supreme Court, and he has been assisted by a number of people, [he’s] always had a team. With the departure of Mr Madhav Rao the team members are in a position to handle those cases.

“If there is a special fact to be argued Mr Parthasarthy or Mr Lakshmikumaran, or Mr Narsimhan can go and argue that case. In fact, our law firm has used very senior counsels very largely. All our people go and argue. If people join, within one year or six months [of joining] also we give them actual litigation experience. People who have been working with Mr Madhav Rao under him are fully trying to take care of his role.”

“For this the entire credit should go to Mr Madhav Rao who has trained people. He has never been individualistic… His juniors will be taking care of most of the burden, except if a client would like a senior person to argue. This is how we slot the things in our organisation,” he added.

Comments

Guest 7 Apr 2014, 19:06
+11 -0
I owe a lot to Madhav sir....he has been a true guide philosopher and friend to me apart from being my immediate senior while i was part of LKS...a great human being...a thorough gentleman...a truly spiritual person....best wishes Madhav sir....a humble request to the editors of Legally India...please don't use words like "poaching" in his context...he has served 28 long devoted years to LKS...that speaks volumes about his stability and dedication....that word is unfair to both LKS which is a great institution as well as BMR....i guess we need to respect his decision and choice and not trivialise him by the word...great personal emotions and gratitude are attached to my thoughts....thank you.....srinivas kotni LEXport
Sunshine 8 Apr 2014, 04:27
+4 -0
Very well said Srinivas, I respect your sentiment . You will agree law firms in India are made up of professionals but are not professionally run . I think BMR, PDS Legal , ELP are the firms which are taking steps to bring in professionalism.
Poaching is not a bad word . It is better than Senior Partners of the Old Boys Clubs getting into arrangement that they would not poach from each other . Individuals have become more important than the firm or even profession . This is certainly a good move . One such movement would benefit not only the clients , BMR but also those associates who have been left behind . L&S would also become a better place to work . This is a good move for the profession it will take the profession forward.
Vakil 8 Apr 2014, 05:17
+1 -2
Rao moves on and so does LKS,one hopes LKS learns from departure of the original people who were part of VLK's plan of running a firm, hope the I takes a back seat and the firm be more pan indian than be parochial
Reply 8 Apr 2014, 09:45
+3 -1
[quote name="Vakil"]Rao moves on and so does LKS,one hopes LKS learns from departure of the original people who were part of VLK's plan of running a firm, hope the I takes a back seat and the firm be more pan indian than be parochial[/quote]

Mr Vakil, I sincerely hope that you are making such statement only after having shown the ability & the courage to build up a practice as inspiring as L&S. Try doing that first before commenting as a by-stander expert! (I am sure you cannot make a claim about your current organisation or any other organisation being free of all possible issues.)

No doubt Mr. Rao's (and I should also add respect of 'Sir') moving from L&S is a significant development, both professional as well as emotional. It is also accepted that L&S has scope to improve on the organisational aspects though they are already strong on knowledge & technical issues. Whether and when that improvement will happen should be left on the firm's owners.

Mr Rao, on his own, is an ace lawyer and was certainly amongst the best ones in L&S. He has been a good mentor and one of the founding pillars in building L&S practice. I am fully confident he will bring a lot of value addition in BMR and also that L&S will continue to bring indisputable quality to it's clients.

Let us take this development as a professional decision and wish both Mr Rao and L&S, the very best for future.
Confusing 8 Apr 2014, 19:55
+3 -0
Very Senior Counsel very largely ??? Prachi, have you lost your wren & martin book ?????
Prachishrivastava 9 Apr 2014, 03:56
+1 -9
Hi,

Quotes are reproduced verbatim in the final story, unless absolutely incomprehensible. Notice the quote marks around that part of the story.

You'd appreciate that things spoken verbally appear more spontaneous and less colloquial sometimes, than written English.

Best wishes,
Prachi
Confusing 9 Apr 2014, 20:47
+3 -0
Kian, your interference is very much required considering LI's prospects.Imagine, if every english daily had followed your reporting method wrt our politicians interviews and speeches. Trust me, no one reading such content in our dailies would have understood what that politicians were saying. A little bit of editing is honestly required in this article from the point of making your readers understanding the content.