Senior DSK partner Balbir Singh resigns (amicably) to pursue litigation & senior counsel dream

Balbir Singh: Living the litigation dream
Balbir Singh: Living the litigation dream

DSK Legal Delhi corporate, competition and litigation partner Balbir Singh has resigned from the partnership to begin counsel practise in Delhi.

He started his chambers with between five to seven lawyers – some of whom came from his existing DSK team - on 1 January 2015.

Singh said: “I honestly feel that I did my home work in the last two years, being in court every day, doing 600 matters in the last year-and-a-half.”

He told Legally India that one of the reasons for going independent was because friends and contacts at other firms had indicated they would brief him as a counsel, though conflicts between DSK and other firms prevented them from doing so.

As an independent counsel, Singh said, DSK could continue briefing him in disputes, but hopefully other firms too would come through with instructions.

DSK Legal Mumbai-based managing partner Anand Desai confirmed that DSK would continue working with Singh, and commented: “Balbir decided to become a counsel as court litigation really interests him. He got excellent opportunities in the past few years, including in Competition Commission matters.”

Legally India had reported in August that Singh had resigned from the CCI panel after two years ahead of expiry of the tenure in order to avoid future conflicts with existing clients. He had been appearing regularly for the CCI in that time.

While Singh said he would do some filing work and “whatever comes my way”, the ultimate objective was to run a pure counsel practice broadly in the commercial litigation space, which would also include competition and tax work.

The 19-year qualified lawyer, who had set up his own firm in 1998 and merged into DSK Legal in 2006, said that he hoped one day he would be given the nod to become senior counsel, though he admitted it was a long shot.

“I would like to go that way [senior counsel],” he said. “It’s not predictable at all but I’m willing to take my chances.”

Desai added: “Two other partners, Chirag [Mody] in Mumbai and Ajesh [Kumar] in Bangalore had also left our firm to establish their practice as counsel (although in Bangalore the distinction is not as clear as in Mumbai and Delhi). The good part is that we continue to work with all of them.”

DSK had merged with Kumar’s firm in 2011 to enter Bangalore.

Comments

Dreamcatcher 5 Jan 2015, 04:45
+2 -4
Senior Counsel. Dont most of us have that dream? Whats so special about this guy?
"..one of the reasons for going independent was because friends and contacts at other firms had indicated they would brief him as a counsel, though conflicts between DSK and other firms prevented them from doing so."... HOOT!
Aisse hi 5 Jan 2015, 06:13
+4 -1
So, last of original DSK stalwarts in Delhi has gone !
Guest 5 Jan 2015, 11:02
+3 -5
U clearly haven’t heard about Anand and Satish! They are real stalwarts way bigger than the ones you know in your firms.
Worshipper 5 Jan 2015, 08:37
+2 -2
so this is the kind of comeback....after the lull of around a week.
Lol 6 Jan 2015, 04:36
+18 -2
600 matters? Is he kidding? Even leaving out court holidays that is 2 matters a day!! A single partner handling 600 matters? :O Does the entire Amarchand or Kochhar have 600 lit matters? Heights of exaggeration. I understand 600 hearings.. but 600 matters in "a year and a half" is unimaginable!
kianganz 11 Jan 2015, 19:26
+0 -0
I believe it's possible in part by being standing counsel for the CCI, no?
Confused Zeus Says . . . 12 Jan 2015, 03:50
+1 -4
I don't find anything exaggerated. When I started my practice under a fairly busy solo attorney who had 6 juniors, our office had 25-30 matters listed before various courts daily. Having 10 matters a day was considered a light working day. Really busy law firms specializing in litigation have 50 matters posted every day at the minimum.
Guest 12 Jan 2015, 17:46
+1 -0
[quote name="Confused Zeus Says . . ."]I don't find anything exaggerated. When I started my practice under a fairly busy solo attorney who had 6 juniors, our office had 25-30 matters listed before various courts daily. Having 10 matters a day was considered a light working day. Really busy law firms specializing in litigation have 50 matters posted every day at the minimum.[/quote]

You are truly confused. A senior may have 25 matters at a given point of time but its bad maths to argue his matter count is 25 x 365 (less holidays). Those 25 matters would be active for many days. Most of the time every day results in 10-20 matters being listed out of a total of 100-150 active matters. Ditto for law firms.
Guest 12 Jan 2015, 17:42
+3 -0
[quote name="Lol"]600 matters? Is he kidding? Even leaving out court holidays that is 2 matters a day!! A single partner handling 600 matters? :O Does the entire Amarchand or Kochhar have 600 lit matters? Heights of exaggeration. I understand 600 hearings.. but 600 matters in "a year and a half" is unimaginable![/quote]

I agree. At AMSS the entire lit team in Mumbai must have done 30, maybe 40 matters in a YEAR. AMSS has a dedicated lit office in Lentin chambers so this is an impresive count. WG had about 50-70 smaller matters and maybe another 40-50 really small matters.

600 is a completely fabrication. Even a senior counsel in Delhi will barely have 300 matters a year and all those guys do is appear in court.
rakesh123 1 Apr 2018, 13:41
+1 -0
he was a senior standing counsel for income tax department... must have done more than 600 matters easily... lks alone has 1200 live matters in supreme court...
Aisse hi 6 Jan 2015, 08:48
+9 -0
What is 'between five to seven lawyers' .... is the number of lawyers in his chamber difficult to count between these numbers ?
kianganz 11 Jan 2015, 19:27
+1 -0
Usually, in my experience in such cases, lawyers say x-y lawyers when they're starting up because they haven't got confirmations from everyone yet on whether they're joining, so five names might have confirmed, while 2 or so are subject to acceptances...
Scooter- 8 Jan 2015, 07:36
+2 -1
They mean 6. They have been advised numerologically that mentioning six gives between 5 to 7 years of bad sex.
Pedantic 12 Jan 2015, 13:29
+0 -0
What's that part about the distinction not being as clear in Bangalore? Kian, care to elaborate?