Trilegal comp head Rahul Singh leaves to Oxford PhD, will practice ‘part-time’; Tambe takes over

Singh: Competing at Oxford
Singh: Competing at Oxford

Trilegal competition head Rahul Singh has left to Oxford University for a PhD in competition law and will continue to work part time as of counsel with the firm, as Mumbai corporate partner Amit Tambe takes over as head of the practice.

Singh is researching the “Emerging Jurisprudence of Indian Competition Law” at Balliol College, Oxford, where he is a Commonwealth Scholar. He was not reachable for comment at the time of going to press.

Delhi partner Anand Prasad said that Singh would work with the firm “a few hours every day” and would rejoin when he completes the PhD. “London is only four-and-a-half hours behind us and we’re working beyond nine to five anyway” he said.

Trilegal had created a pure-play competition practice in November 2010 after hiring Singh, who had taught competition law at NLSIU Bangalore until then. He had been competition law assistant professor at NLSIU since 2005 after completing his LLB from the law school and his LLM from Harvard University. He was also associate director at the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) directorate of legal education immediately before joining Trilegal.

Tambe was one of the firm’s first two non-founding equity partners, elevated into the 13-year lockstep in August 2011. He graduated from GLC Mumbai and joined Trilegal from Desai & Diwanji in 2004.

Prasad said: “[Tambe] stepped in a couple of months back to help with the transition. He used to do a fair amount of competition in the past, in M&A deals. We needed someone good, and that was hard to find in the market. Competition itself as a practice is new and not too many good professionals are there in the market. There are largely people who have retired from the competition commission and there is no abundance of competition experts. [We preferred to have someone internally] because we wanted to bring a certain quality, somebody who sort of was familiar with competition work and was interested also.”

He said that Trilegal’s competition practice had two or three retainers in Mumbai and three or four in Delhi, and that the team would remain unchanged. The news was first reported by Bar & Bench.

Comments

Khosla 31 Oct 2013, 15:39
+15 -8
Wow, Tambe is competition law expert as well now.
Guest 31 Oct 2013, 16:25
+3 -5
Congratulations to Rahul Singh, it will be a real loss for academia and policy makers if after completing a PhD he ends up coming back. As stated, it is hard to find capable competition law practitioners in the market!!
Lol 31 Oct 2013, 23:11
+13 -0
Dude, you really need to read your comment once before posting.
Ashwini Chawla 1 Nov 2013, 06:12
+29 -0
Having worked with Rahul (here at Trilegal), I would like to say that very few people are as down-to-earth as him, despite being so academically brilliant. His in-depth knowledge (of competition law and even other areas of law), ability to focus on the fundamentals (of any law), and humility are surely going to be missed.
Guest 1 Nov 2013, 12:18
+3 -1
Left "for" Oxford University.
Guest 2 Nov 2013, 06:55
+1 -4
No doubt He was good.

But Mr luthra helped in drafting the competition law.
Seriously? 3 Nov 2013, 20:24
+12 -9
This is like a lawyer billing 30 hours in a workday of 12 hours. Rahul has been teaching full time for years. Its impossible to attribute more than 3-4 years of fulltime practice to him in any field. He might be a good teacher but please dont confuse that with good lawyering. It seems Trilegal keeps him on retainer more to get some mileage out of his Harvard degree and NLS connection than expertise in competition law. The fact that hes not retained as a partner proves his limited experience or else means that the Trilegal competition practice which he 'heads' is not much to speak about. All this praise is a insult to real competition law pros like Nisha Uberoi and Samir Gandhi.
Dazed and Confused 4 Nov 2013, 05:56
+15 -1
Nisha was a junior associate and Samir has never practiced in a major market (he was some sort of intern in Switzerland briefly). He and Nisha are plenty smart and all but their inexperience shows how nascent this area of law is in India. When the CCI is itself finding its way, it's hard to call such people "pros." One-eyed lawyers in the Kingdom of the Blind, perhaps, but not "pros."

Since TriLegal has been making some progress toward a rational partnership structure, it's proper for them to borrow ideas such as "of counsel" to describe non-partnership status. The term "partner" has no meaning in India except for dinner parties and marriage proposals. It's the paycheck and power that matters. Few law firm "partners" have the latter.
Khan 9 Nov 2013, 07:44
+1 -0
[quote name="Dazed and Confused"]Nisha was a junior associate and Samir has never practiced in a major market (he was some sort of intern in Switzerland briefly). He and Nisha are plenty smart and all but their inexperience shows how nascent this area of law is in India. When the CCI is itself finding its way, it's hard to call such people "pros." One-eyed lawyers in the Kingdom of the Blind, perhaps, but not "pros."

Since TriLegal has been making some progress toward a rational partnership structure, it's proper for them to borrow ideas such as "of counsel" to describe non-partnership status. The term "partner" has no meaning in India except for dinner parties and marriage proposals. It's the paycheck and power that matters. Few law firm "partners" have the latter.[/quote]

Nisha was a junior associate ????

Samir was an intern in Switzerland ?????

And so both these ppl who are senior to Rahul in batch by 2-5 yrs and always been in the industry are less qualified than he is?????

Dude, what are you smoking????
Guest 12 Nov 2013, 10:58
+0 -0
[quote name="Khan"][quote name="Dazed and Confused"]Nisha was a junior associate and Samir has never practiced in a major market (he was some sort of intern in Switzerland briefly). He and Nisha are plenty smart and all but their inexperience shows how nascent this area of law is in India. When the CCI is itself finding its way, it's hard to call such people "pros." One-eyed lawyers in the Kingdom of the Blind, perhaps, but not "pros."

Since TriLegal has been making some progress toward a rational partnership structure, it's proper for them to borrow ideas such as "of counsel" to describe non-partnership status. The term "partner" has no meaning in India except for dinner parties and marriage proposals. It's the paycheck and power that matters. Few law firm "partners" have the latter.[/quote]

Nisha was a junior associate ????

Samir was an intern in Switzerland ?????

And so both these ppl who are senior to Rahul in batch by 2-5 yrs and always been in the industry are less qualified than he is?????

Dude, what are you smoking????[/quote]


Thank you for the comment. This makes so much sense. Now we know that Manan Kumar Mishra is a better lawyer than you as he is "senior" to you "in batch" and has "always been in the industry"!
Warped logic 4 Nov 2013, 11:20
+2 -0
How is this logical? Does good lawyering need validation by a law firm's label of partnership? Are none of the senior counsels, counsels or law professors good lawyers?