Clifford Chance NRI Sumesh Sawhney makes partner

Sumesh Sawhney
Sumesh Sawhney

Clifford Chance has promoted Indian passport holder and India-practice senior associate Sumesh Sawhney to partner in London.

Sawhney (pictured) joined Clifford Chance in late 2006 from Amarchand Mangaldas in Delhi where he was a partner, and has since focused exclusively on India-related corporate work.

He said: “It is a huge step forward for me both in terms of my responsibility and in terms of the India practice. India is a very key market for us and a very important part of our strategy from the firm’s perspective - I look forward to developing our India business to much greater heights.”

Sawhney had qualified as an Indian lawyer in 1992 from Punjab University Chandigarh’s faculty of law and took on in-house roles in two conglomerates before joining Amarchand in 2000, becoming a partner in 2003.

After he joined Clifford Chance in 2006 he gained the right to practice law in England and Wales after passing the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test (QLTT).

He said that he had originally decided to move to London to gain experience in international markets and practices, although he hoped that he would one day be able to return to India if regulations allowed it.

“As far as my views of liberalisation are concerned I am not that hopeful of a timing of less than two to three years time,” Sawhney explained. “I hope that it happens, but fear it won’t happen so soon.”

Clifford Chance also made up a record 21 other partners this year following the major reshaping of its partnership following the credit crunch. The firm now consists of 560 partners.

Comments

Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 01:59
+0 -0
So hear starts the comment series;-) so great...I wish liberlization will make more Indian lawyers partners in foreign firm. nd then ppl will start cryin as if they have been asked to join as partners and will do do cry in same tone as it is done after oscars...
P.S But really its a grt achivement!
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 02:32
+0 -0
He made partner at Amarchand in 2003 and joined CC as a senior associate (or less) 3 years thereafter in 2006?
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 04:04
+0 -0
"As far as my views of liberalisation are concerned I am not that hopeful of a timing of less than two to three years time," Sawhney explained. "I hope that it happens, but fear it won't happen so soon."


to all the [...] indian oligarchs and unscrupulous government ppl opposing foreign law firms: may you [...]
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 06:27
+0 -0
Bit understated? Perhaps this is the first instance of a lateral entrant Indian homegrown lawyer to have been made London partner in a magic circle. Good work Mr Sawhney. May your tribe increase.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 14:22
+0 -0
#4 Don't think Mr Sawhney is the first Indian homegrown lawyer...Murali Neelakantan worked in an Indian law firm and then became a partner at Arnold & Porter and Ashurst London
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 14:27
+0 -0
Lakh lakh vadaian. A matter of pride for us.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 16:19
+0 -0
I echo #4. This is big. But 18 years to be partner! That is a long time. Given that it almost a matter of entitlement to become Partner in a big Indian law firm like amss, luthra or azb in 7-9 years; - why should I consider joining a magic circle in the UK where (a) evidently there is little certainty that you will make partner, and (b) it can take as long as 18 years. While i'm guessing the quality and kind of work is going to be vastly superior in a UK magic circle firm - is it really worth it? And US Big Law is even tougher, yes?
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 16:21
+0 -0
Congrats Sumesh - good news for all Indian lawyers working overseas. You have again proved your mettle.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 17:06
+0 -0
Who are the others? Indian law school grads, who made partner in a big US or UK Law firm? In addition to #5's comments - there is Nandan Nelivigi - White & Case. Who else?
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 17:13
+0 -0
Kunal Thakore and Narayan Iyer at Links (now to TTA). There must be plenty more...
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 19:11
+0 -0
Srinivas Kaushik @ Kirkland Ellis; Kirtee Kapoor @ Davis Polk; Arun Balasubramanian @ Linklaters; Srinivas Parthasarathy @ A&O (now to Trilegal).. there are plenty more.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 19:36
+0 -0
Rahul Guptan - AMSS to CC
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 19:45
+0 -0
Yes, 18 years is long and people hit equity in that much time in City firms. But usually, it takes 7-9 years even in UK to become salaried partner. There, the lockstep and PQE requirements to make partner are more time-bound and not at the discretion of other partners.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 20:07
+0 -0
#13 you aerously have a very favourable view of how easy it is to make a partner in a Magic Circle or for that matter a CIty Firm!! Partnership is time bound? Do you reallly know what a small % of trainee /NQ intake actually gets to partnership? Also you would be surprised at the procedure for electing partners at Magic Cirle fimrs. Not only do ALL partners have to vote, the candidate has to have a perfect appraisal record allthoughout, the business case has to be good (especially in these times!) and the candidate has to finally clear a number of tests...
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 20:12
+0 -0
Sumesh *did not* take 18 years to become parter. Sumesh was inhouse in India for many years, joined Amarchand quite late in his professional life and rose in a matter of just a few years to become partner.

He left Amarchand about 3 years back to join CC in a non-partner role on the understanding (I am sure) that he would become a partner in London (in those times, there were literally no Indian law firm - foreign law firm, lateral partner to partner movements). Anyone who thinks that he moved into a 'pure' associate role is quite wrong. Some of us know differently.

The financial crisis hit and his partnership was delayed. But now Sumesh is finally where he wants to and deserves to be. London partner, no less.

Congratulations and well done Sumesh.
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 20:36
+0 -0
doe sit matter how long Sumesh took - its the end that matters
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 22:30
+0 -0
I agree with 14. From the little I have heard, you need to be BLOODY awesome to make Partner in a Big UK or US law firm. And its amazing that there are so many Indian law schools grads who have made it (regardless of the number of years it takes). But to go back to my question: What would you say to someone (reasonably certain of making partner in a big indian firm - but that doesn't mean much, really ;-)) considering taking the plunge and joining a Big UK or US law firm at this stage (4-6 yrs experience in India)? As I see it: Chilling out (relatively speaking) in Big Indian law firm and becoming partner in a couple of years VERSUS Working VERY VERY VERY VERY hard for an uncertain period of time in the hope that at some point in the very very distant future you are considered for partnership in the US/UK. I am interested in responses primarily from lawyers working in the US and UK. Go for it, you think?
Anonymous guest 5 May 2010, 23:31
+0 -0
Why the foreign law firms not allowed to have their offices in India ????

The brilliant lawyers and legal professionals in India are always at the mercy of a home-operated sole proprietors - so called law firms - in India.

I hope the legislators and BCI shall liberalise this area too.

If this could be true, many brilliant and young professionals could be partners in such firms.
Anonymous guest 6 May 2010, 00:31
+0 -0
I fit into the profile you requested a response from. Well I would have like to reply in greater detail, as there are too many things to tell you about, but I guess this forum is not something I would be the best place to talk about it. Maybe if Kian opens up a separate discussion where people like me can share our experiences of working abroad, it will be better.

There are positives and negatives in the whole expereince. To begin with the negatives, you are likely to loose out on money (in a short term though) while your former colleagues experience rapid promotions. Also it is expensive to live overseas. Then, you would have to negotiate a steep learning curve here, not jjust in foreign laws, but also in drafting styles, precedents etc. Sometime it can be very difficult and you would have to give up any intellectual arrogance whatsoever. this process is easier if you are ready to be humble while unlearning and relearning basics of lawyering in a different country.

In terms of positives, I must admit that the gain in knowledge and skills of transaction management and the sheer opportunity to work with the industry experts (i.e. senior partners accross practicve streams) is what makes all of the effort of relocating overseas worth it.

Hope this helps you to some extent. I promise to reply further if a separate discussion opens up on this topic
Anonymous guest 6 May 2010, 16:37
+0 -0
#19, Thank you. A few more queries: Do you think (in terms of quality of work, and value addition on a transaction), Big UK/US law firms are in a different league from Big Indian firms? How significant is this difference?
Is it worth it - Giving up a cushy Indian firm job to embrace the uncertainty of working in the US/UK (uncertainty in terms of, you have no idea where you are headed). And (assuming a couple of years down the line you realize that US Biglaw or the magic circle is not working out for you) - and you decide to come back to India, would you consider it a compromise? Finally, how do Big Indian firms view people who have worked for a few years abroad? 7 years in India versus 5 years (india) plus 2 years (us/uk). the US/UK dude is cooler? Or is the 'averse to taking risks' 7 years dude in India cooler? - Cooler from the perspective of the Big Indian law firm. Kian, if you think we should take this discussion elsewhere, please let us know.
Anonymous guest 6 May 2010, 21:15
+0 -0
The difference could be characterised as follows. The best UK/US partners have both breadth and depth to their work, if their firms ensure that they have broader experience in their initial years, after which they specialise. The best Indian law firm partners have a lot of breadth of knowledge and can think on their feet on a number of issues but at times do not have the knowledge of transaction structures, industry details and other similar issues that can only come through specialisation in a few limited practice areas, after getting an idea of what the big picture is.
Anonymous guest 6 May 2010, 21:53
+0 -0
Do you have an email ID on which I can send you my thoughts on the doubts concerns you have raised in your post? maybe you can create an ID so that it can be posted on this blog?

[Note, an easier way to communicate anonymously is to sign into your Legally India account or to create a new one, which has private messaging and instant messaging functionality. Just click the Community tab above to create an account in 2 minutes. -Kian]
Anonymous guest 7 May 2010, 20:54
+0 -0
#7 & #19

It would be great if you could keep this dialogue public....gives us budding lawyers an interesting perspective about working in India v. abroad & will help us take a decision!! Thanks