Eco Times reports/guesstimates founder equities at KhaiCo, AMSS, JSA, AZB. So, does Zia hold 90%?

Economic Times looks at law firm equities and reports: Khaitan & Co, the firm of 58 partners, 300 lawyers and 101 years, retains 15 to 25 per cent of equity with the family, while at Amarchand Mangaldas (20 equity partners, 50 salaried partners, 555 lawyers, 95 years old) around 75 per cent equity is with the Shroff family, with mother Bharti Shroff holding lifetime equity, and the veto vote resting with the family.

Jyoti Sagar at JSA and Rajiv Luthra at Luthra & Luthra are the only Sagar and Luthra, respectively, at their firms. Sagar with Mumbai senior partner Berjis Desai holds under 13 per cent of equity in the 20-strong equity partnership of the 21-year-old firm. And while family is barred from joining JSA, strict observance of the rule resulting in retainers quitting if wanting to marry each other, at Luthra the bar to family is only in terms of automatic entry.

Speculation for AZB apparently goes that founding partner Zia Mody, amongst the 17 equity partners at the firm, holds 90 per cent of the firm’s equity, but she denies the rumours [ET]

Comments

acapulko 12 Sept 2012, 07:07
+0 -0
Well the numbers are just speculation...... so dont know how true the figures are.
Err 12 Sept 2012, 07:31
+0 -0
Jyoti Sagar at JSA and Rajiv Luthra at Luthra & Luthra are the only Sagar and Luthra, respectively, at their firms
LoL 12 Sept 2012, 09:03
+5 -0
"The firms have also put in place policies that ensure those who have a certain surname do not have advantage over the others. This means the younger generations from the families have to spend as many years as any other lawyer doing the grunt work at junior level and go through the same performance evaluation processes."

YA RIGHT...
Lawyer 12 Sept 2012, 09:53
+0 -0
What about Mulla and Kange...
Perpendiculal 12 Sept 2012, 10:39
+1 -0
Do AZB Delhi and AZB Mumbai have separate partnerships?
anon 12 Sept 2012, 11:20
+1 -0
The moot question is what is the annual profits of the highlighted firms ?
Legally Absurd 12 Sept 2012, 13:47
+0 -0
Definitely the top 5 - great to see the steps taken by JSA and Khaitan! The remaining firms in India have an extremely long way to go before they can even come close to this bracket - truly "India's magic circle"!!
Kishen 12 Sept 2012, 20:01
+1 -0
Actually all the top firms in India have a looooong way to go before they come anywhere close to the magic circle firms. The worst offenders are undoubtedly AMSS and Khaitan. Professionally, the best big firm is probably AZB (Zia is a very hands on boss but that does not make the firm a family firm). Instead of putting up this charade of professionalism, why not the Shroffs and Khaitans and Luthras openly declare they are family firms. Join us if you like or get out!
Bangalore Lawyer 13 Sept 2012, 13:46
+3 -0
I have no problem with a family run law firm. Its entirely their discretion whether to make their sons and daughters Partners or make their mother lifetime equity partner. What irks me is the fact that they lobby with the government and restrict the entry of foreign law firms thereby limiting the growth opportunity of young lawyers.

If you have the balls, then have a fair play. After all you guys are century old firms.
Columbus 14 Sept 2012, 05:51
+2 -0
The article blatantly misses out Trilegal as an example of a firm that from the beginning followed a completely different model and has achieved significant success.
Kishen 14 Sept 2012, 23:18
+1 -0
[quote name="Columbus"]The article blatantly misses out Trilegal as an example of a firm that from the beginning followed a completely different model and has achieved significant success.[/quote]

Trilegal never stood on its own legs. It was a flawed model from the start and thats why ended up in bed with Allen and Overy. Go look around the firm. their systems and network and promotions are all integrated with allen and overy. I am all for letting foreign firms in but till that time indian firms should obey the letter and spirit of the law. BCI and SILF are turning a blind eye to this sort of wilful contempt