Haigreve Khaitan explains why family used to have a legal HSBC Swiss bank account under RBI scheme, cleared by taxman

HSBC Kolkata: Recommends Switzerland
HSBC Kolkata: Recommends Switzerland

Khaitan & Co Mumbai-based partner Haigreve Khaitan has confirmed that while three members of his family, in a personal capacity, had once opened a Swiss HSBC Bank account together, it was set up as a way of legally and transparently diversifying their investments abroad, but was never actually used as intended and closed after only a few years.

The Indian Express had reported exclusively today, in collaboration with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) that brought together more than 50 media organisations in 45 countries, that 1,195 Indians held accounts in the Swiss branch of HSBC in 2006-07.

One HSBC account was in the names of Haigreve Khaitan, Pradip ‘Pintu’ Khaitan (Kolkata-based Khaitan partner and Haigreve’s father) and their spouses Tarulika and Prabha Khaitan, according to the Express.

Khaitan & Co managing partner Haigreve Khaitan told Legally India today: “We bank regularly with HSBC [in India] and they had really recommended to us to diversify investments and to start looking at investments abroad.”

Legally India has seen copies of four letters from the Kolkata income tax office to each of the Khaitans, confirming that “the proceeding for assessment year 2005-06” has been dropped.

Each of the four Khaitans remitted $10,000 (nowadays Rs 6.2 lakh) from India for a total of $40,000 in 2004, under the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Liberalised Remittance Scheme, explained Haigreve, which currently residents to remit $250,000 a year out of India to invest abroad, having been recently increased earlier this month.

“That’s how these accounts came to being,” he said. “It was always in our tax returns, so the tax department always knew of these accounts but after the leak they got in touch with us like they would have been with everybody else, which we provided with details and they actually passed closure orders in our case and did nothing further.”

He said that the account was closed in July 2004, even before the leak, because “we did not see much return on the investments”. The “amount was too little to be actively managed” and interests rates on the account were only nominal.

“The idea really was to look at really start having a portfolio of investments over time outside India, but with all of this controversy we just decided it’s not worth continuing,” he said.

Clarification: An earlier version of this article stated that the account was closed after a few years. After checking the records, Haigreve Khaitan confirmed that the account was actually closed in July 2004.

Leak: Perspectives

The list of 106,458 HSBC Swiss account holders was allegedly stolen by a self-described HSBC whistleblower in 2007, who escaped to France but was not extradited to Switzerland after the French used his records to identify French tax evaders.

In 2010, Frances’ finance minister Christine Lagarde shared the lists with several other countries in order to trace tax evaders using the jurisdiction that is globally renowned for its banking secrecy laws.

The government and other political parties have been selectively leaking several names from the list, after the Supreme Court began looking into the issue of black money allegedly stashed by Indians abroad in Swiss bank accounts, in a petition started by senior counsel Ram Jethmalani and others.

Globally, the scoop has in particular raised red flags about the lack of internal compliance procedures followed by HSBC and its apparent complicity in clients’ money laundering activities, collusion in hiding black money and providing accounts to criminals, corrupt businessmen and “other high-risk” individuals, The Guardian reported in the UK.

HSBC told the ICIJ: “We acknowledge that the compliance culture and standards of due diligence in HSBC’s Swiss private bank, as well as the industry in general, were significantly lower than they are today.”

The Express report had listed dozens of names on the list, which included prominent industrialists such as both Ambani brothers who each held $26.6m in HSBC Switzerland (with a statement for Mukesh denying he had “any illegitimate bank accounts anywhere in the world”, and a spokesperson for Anil saying that he did not have any HSBC overseas account).

The list also included hundreds of non-resident Indians (NRIs), who are legally also allowed to open up foreign bank accounts, which they can continue to operate even after they return to India.

The Express reported that according to sources in the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) undisclosed income of Rs 3,150 crore ($508m) had been taxed after the HSCB leak, though 200 accounts had no balance and 211 were of NRIs, who would have to prove their NRI status in the relevant period.

Some on the list told the Express that the tax department had been heavy handed in its pursuing of the claims.

The Khaitans’ entry was published in the Express as:

PRADIP KUMAR KHAITAN, HAIGREVE KHAITAN BALANCE: Not mentioned

They are owners of Khaitan and Company, one of the oldest corporate law firms of repute in the country. The law firm has now expanded to cities outside Kolkata, where they started out. It employs over 300 lawyers. In the HSBC list, Pradip Kumar Khaitan and son Haigreve and their spouses Prabha and Tarulika are listed. No balance is shown for the accounts opened in 2004. COMMENT: Pradeep Khaitan said, “The Income Tax department has given us a clean chit since everything was documented and money sent to the HSBC account under the official remittance scheme. The account is in my name as well as other members of the family.”

Photo by drgarga

Comments

Me First 9 Feb 2015, 09:04
+11 -8
Thanks God!! I had almost decided to quit KCO!
Not sure 9 Feb 2015, 13:19
+14 -4
I think u should still Save urself!
Insider 9 Feb 2015, 09:58
+5 -4
I believe some of the KCO Associates (those from Kalkatta) also have Swiss accounts.
$$$ 9 Feb 2015, 10:20
+3 -8
I want a job in K&CO!
Dude 9 Feb 2015, 14:17
+9 -2
hmm don't think you understand the repercussions!
black money 9 Feb 2015, 10:06
+10 -12
Khaitan is honest. We all know which is the law firm that has all the illegal money! Lucky their name did not show up.
conspiracy 9 Feb 2015, 11:30
+0 -8
conspiracy I say... by people close to the powers that be...
Ass 9 Feb 2015, 11:36
+3 -10
Conspiracy of C AMSS
ASSS 9 Feb 2015, 14:21
+8 -1
Why would they waste any of their time on this! there is no smoke without fire!.. khaitan would have had to send the money to a swiss account to land up in this mess.. how would CAMSS be able to contribute to this.. are you saying CAMSS sent the monies in the name of Khaitans??
Goofball 9 Feb 2015, 20:17
+2 -2
CAMSS has bigger fish to fry, as we're all aware.
Orphanmaker 9 Feb 2015, 11:44
+2 -0
The picture and the caption... brilliantly done, Kian!
Thomas 9 Feb 2015, 12:08
+22 -3
I have my doubts. A swiss account for diversifying investments in 2004....when the whole world was looking to India as an investment destination. Not really believable as a story. Could it have been for other purposes...we will never know.
Bangalore 9 Feb 2015, 14:24
+0 -0
Bangalore based firms and individuals may have swiss accounts...
Guest 9 Feb 2015, 14:44
+7 -0
I cant believe that the authorities would let go of someone on this list so easily considering the political pressures.. I would think they will remain under scrutiny for sometime!..
Clients 9 Feb 2015, 14:45
+8 -3
Would this affect the foreign clients who have paid Khaitan?
kianganz 9 Feb 2015, 14:47
+5 -10
Uh, what??? How?!? These accounts were in individuals' names in any case, not in the firm's.
Guest 9 Feb 2015, 14:56
+6 -2
authorities have the power to lift the corporate veil where necessary right?
kiddo 9 Feb 2015, 16:38
+17 -2
It seems you have just studied corporate law in law school and are therefore using big words like 'corporate veil'. Let's chat after you grow up.
A 9 Feb 2015, 15:09
+4 -0
I have an account with a bank in Nepal, does that create any problem?
Nepali 9 Feb 2015, 17:49
+4 -0
Consult a bangalore based law firm.
Guest 9 Feb 2015, 16:13
+6 -2
From the looks of some of the comments, Kian, I think you must introduce a basic IQ test before one can troll.
guest22 9 Feb 2015, 17:05
+9 -2
LI should do a story on how indian law firm partners take kick-backs in order to depress earning and deny profit sharing to other partners. very common in the real estate practice - where there is so much cash dealings.
superman 9 Feb 2015, 19:28
+15 -5
BTW, was there not an income tax raid in zia mody's house last summer and her blackberry was seized by the income tax ? The tweets are that there was some connection to illegal income. It was also covered in the media. LI you should cover it equally. why is KCO being singled out ?
Maybe not 10 Feb 2015, 02:16
+4 -0
Don't think LI is to be blamed here it appears that khaitan found the need to go to the media and clarify itself... Also the version of the indian express article I saw mentioned the amount in their Swiss account as undisclosed.. They seem to explaining themselves by saying that the amt was not that much (which we don't know for sure)
kianganz 10 Feb 2015, 03:23
+4 -6
Actually, it is our fault. Contacted Khaitan and offered him opportunity to comment, which, to his credit, he was keen to take up, intending to be completely transparent about it.
Thomas 10 Feb 2015, 06:05
+5 -4
I am often a harsh critic of LIs reporting. However, in this case, LI has done well. Its not a fault to reach out for reaction. Well done. I think a lot of professionals have been trying to comprehend KCOs business model and are not surprised. The news should make law students looking for jobs wonder about KCO.
kianganz 10 Feb 2015, 07:14
+3 -5
Umm, a little confused by your comment...

Which part of his response is not satisfactory or elucidates the firm's business model? I, for one, was pretty satisfied by his responses and explanation, which seem very reasonable.
Clarification 11 Feb 2015, 06:37
+3 -1
The raid at Zia's house was conducted for the purpose of investigation into the affairs of Delta Corp, a company promoted by her husband. Google it and you'll find the news articles. It had nothing to do with Zia or AZB.
Lawyer 10 Feb 2015, 07:11
+4 -4
The fact Haigreve not running away from giving an explanation shows KCo above board
mmmmm 10 Feb 2015, 07:29
+4 -5
I dont understand most of you ... Haigreve has given a clear and transparent explanation ... even LI agrees to that ... people who still wanna make an issue out of it pl do so ... it really doesnt matter
Anon 10 Feb 2015, 08:09
+3 -1
I thought resident Indian's cannot open an offshore foreign currency account for just earning better interest / dividend etc. It is possible to remit funds under LRS but I am not sure whether those funds could be stashed in a foreign account just for earning interest. Many on the HSBC list has offered an explanation that they were NRI at the time the accounts were opened. Didn't see anything like that in Khaitan's statement. Did RBI approve the opening of the account itself? May be the statements from Khaitan should have dealt with that aspect too.
kianganz 10 Feb 2015, 08:12
+0 -0
I spoke to another banking lawyer yesterday at another firm and no, you don't need to be an NRI under the LRS, just need to get permission which these days doesn't even need to come from the RBI but is routinely given by your bank...
Anon 2 10 Feb 2015, 11:10
+4 -0
Don't "think", please read the law. You don't need RBI's permission to remit under LRS. Just read the scheme, FAQ's published on the RBI website dude.
Anon 3 10 Feb 2015, 12:41
+3 -1
Completely agree with Anon 2. The rules are very clear. Kudos to Haigreve for being transparent and clear. This is how you deal with matters like this, not by hiding or coming out with "corporate communication" type responses.
Anon 10 Feb 2015, 17:08
+1 -0
well,I did not say that you need permission to send monies under LRS. I asked whether one can open a foreign currency account offshore to 'keep' the monies remitted outside under LRS. As far as I know (and I may be wrong) there is a separate rbi regulation which deals with situations when residents can open a foreign currency account. Now I don't know whether LRS can be used to do anything or only those things which are permitted (q. Does LRS permit someone to open foreign currency account and send monies to that account for just earning better returnat?) Agree that Haigreve's statement is in the right direction.
Honky Tonk Woman 11 Feb 2015, 06:18
+0 -1
To the best of my knowledge word is out in The Square Mile that some of them are not just holding accounts in Swiss Banks or other tax-haven banks but actually also own and control those banks. For a very very short primer do look at the number of them who have offices in, say, the Isle of Man and why the Speaker of the previous Indian Government made so many trips there?

Hmmm, 0/70 says a bit too.