Khaitan & Co vows to hire 40 freshers again in 2021, pays bonuses • To ‘shave costs’ via tech, policies as WFH blows open old model

Blue skies ahead at KCo, at least for the time being and for 2021 graduates
Blue skies ahead at KCo, at least for the time being and for 2021 graduates

Khaitan & Co has committed to honour all current job offers made to graduate recruits starting this year and that it would also hire a similar number from campuses as this year, to start in 2021, despite the global looming COVID-19-related depression.

According to a statement by executive director, human resources, Amar Sinhji: “We will also go ahead with all committed hiring - both on campus and for laterals. We will continue to be on the lookout for good talent that is also culturally aligned to our firm values & ethos.”

Sinhji added: “We will have a batch of approximately 40 joining in July or now wherever the law colleges complete their academic year.”

We also asked whether the firm had made plans yet for the upcoming graduate recruitment season, for current students who would start work at the firm in 2021 after so-called Day Zero campus interviews that would have started around about now.

“Yes,” he said. “We will also hire for the batch of 2021 - approximately the same number [40].”

This echoes the statement we had reported from Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas on 13 March, whose managing partner Cyril Shroff said the firm had no plans to reduce its recruitments.

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Khaitan have historically both been amongst the largest of law firm recruiters on campus, so this will be welcome news for law school recruitment committees, especially considering that globally law firms have already begun cutting costs and future commitments aggressively.

That said, Days Zero have understandably been shelved for now, in light of campus closures, with new dates being currently worked out.

Bonuses as normal, promos upcoming

Khaitan has also completed its internal performance review and promotions process, which would be announced soon, alongside having announced its bonus payments.

“We have today released our bonuses in full for the financial year 2019-20 - across the firm,” Sinhji said, adding that bonuses had been the “same as last year”, or “higher in case of exceptional performance”.

“As we also follow the CTC concept, we do not view the bonus numbers in isolation.”

He added in a statement: “The firm has had a record year and we look forward with optimism to the year ahead, inspite of the current pall of gloom cast by these unprecedented events.

“We are in fact looking at the current situation to relook at the way we work. We will become even more technology focussed and use what we have learned from this situation to shave off costs and improve processes and delivery quality.”

Shaving of costs

We asked Sinhji how such savings could be made.

“We will look at more ‘work from home’ options and thus shave off real estate costs,” he said. “This period has also taught us that travel is not necessarily essential. The same results can be achieved with the use of technology.”

For nearly all firms and businesses, the pandemic has been an unprecedented trial by fire, in many cases, for firms to stress test - in many cases for the first time - their remote working facilities and systems.

This has worked well, according to Sinhji.

“Team work became seamless and if we relook at how we structure our teams & work flows - we just may not need to have so many people working on deliverables in the future,” he said.

“Even geographies ceased to matter - as long as the most competent person was on the assignment. That has blown to smithereens the concept of growing (physically) across different geographies.

“As long as the final product / service that is delivered is the best possible, the recipient could not care which physical location it originated from.”

25% savings in support costs possible

Sinhji continued: “Same with many others costs, such as local travel, physical libraries and so on. Even on the employee engagement front - the engagement without physical presence can be almost as deep, when done digitally. In fact the reach is far more and the whole process far more efficient too.”

Back office and support services could also be “centralised”, according to Sinhji, “irrespective of physical location, using technology”.

“At a rough estimate one could look at shaving off 25% or more of those costs.”

Comments

Agarwal Sweets 31 Mar 2020, 15:56
+12 -2
Someone please tag the Agarwals. :)
CEO 31 Mar 2020, 16:50
+2 -4
Sinhji seems to be the new CEO of KCO.
Competing firm spy 31 Mar 2020, 16:55
+14 -7
Generally the sense is that overall CTC growth was “less than exciting“ and in a lot of cases “disappointing”. For the first time town hall did not have any promotion announcements. This article also missed that there is officially a freeze on increments for the time being. Clearly as of now KCO is very nervous about the year ahead!
NLU 31 Mar 2020, 17:46
+10 -18
Good. Now Khaitan should hire en masse from the NLUs and put private law colleges and other law colleges on the backburner so that they can maintain the quality of the institution and hire capable graduates to ensure they weather the COVID19 storm
NoU 1 Apr 2020, 04:25
+21 -3
Hahahaha, oh goodness me. The NLU insecurity squad is out in full force. If you've worked at Khaitan (or had gainful employment anywhere at all for that matter), you would realise that the NLU tag stops mattering the minute you step into your office. Your college does not define your capability, but I'm sure you'll realise that in due time.
NLU 1 Apr 2020, 06:08
+5 -11
If other colleges were so great, why do the top 4 NLUs consistently have better placements and mooting achievements and publications? Pray tell
Guest2 1 Apr 2020, 06:27
+5 -9
I hate this browbeating, but a lot of kids read LI so please don't mislead them. It matters. I'm from NALSAR and have been at a top firm in Mumbai ever since I graduated. I have found professional and personal networking to be directly related to the law school you went to. It has been easier for me (with seniors, peers) based on the NALSAR tag than the few people in my year from no-name colleges who made it to BigLaw. At the same time, the NLSIU cohort has it better than we do as well. In all honesty, I did feel some pangs of jealousy when they had their massive blowout at Willingdon. These are opportunities to socialize and network, and pay dividends later in life. Of course, it cannot compensate for incompetence or hard work, but all else being equal, it can certainly be an edge.
Guest798 1 Apr 2020, 06:50
+9 -3
If law students really think that LI is a good place to obtain information about prospective places of employment by reading the comments section, I'd seriously worry about what kind of people they'd be if they ever entered the workforce
Non Nlu 1 Apr 2020, 11:35
+0 -2
@guest2, so the NLU tag enables you to get better connections so that it may be helpful for you in the future? Great got it. Next time you look down on someone who's gotten an internship/placement through a 'connection' based on some assumption that that they aren't meritorious, come back and read your comment.
Guest2 1 Apr 2020, 13:28
+1 -4
Its equally bad, I'm no hypocrite. Just laying out the world for what it is. Though, I did say "all else being equal" connections matter. If I work exceptionally hard and smart, and so does another from say HNLU or Amity, chances are, I will be doing better than the other because my firm has more NALSAR alumni in senior positions. I also know that this game can go against me, if I come up against a stronger alumni body from another college.
But the key here is, "all else being equal". That's the way of the jungle, and we can't begrudge that. On the other hand, incompetent people with good connections who end up wasting everyone else's time deserve to not be respected.
Well 1 Apr 2020, 14:00
+5 -3
Being from a top NLU is inherently meritorious (by virtue of CLAT/AILET) rather than the free for fall that is Jindal (if you can afford it) or GLC/ILS/Amity and so on. So a foot forward for the former category is not unfair. Of course, they have to consistently perform to validate it, and the latter can overcome it with good performance.
Guest 1 Apr 2020, 15:09
+3 -2
CLAT/AILET is a metric of judging 'inherent merit', while LSAT is not? Since when? CLAT is one of the worst entrance examinations in the country in terms of its ability to pick the best possible students to study law. Out of the 12 times that it has been conducted, 11 times it has faced multiple lawsuits highlighting very real limitations and atrocious organization. The less about the questions and their quality, the better.
Non Nlu 1 Apr 2020, 16:44
+0 -1
@well I certainly hope you aren't a law student. Otherwise your education is going to waste.
Well well 2 Apr 2020, 03:11
+1 -3
If working at a top tier firm for the longest time has taught me something, it is this that kids from GLC/ILS/Jindal last the longest and end of having some excellent business relations with clients - there is no trend to it but that’s how it is.
Yes, the NLUs come with their own set of advantages of which the most prominent one is the batch size at NLU which is way to small and helps you stay connected both horizontally and vertically.

Just to conclude - You might have the placements but you end up quitting before taking the second years bonus
Well 3 2 Apr 2020, 06:55
+1 -1
@Well well does have a point. So many top NLU grads quit early. Which is a damn shame - if this isn't what they want to do, they shouldn't waste their time. And this isn't about those who have pressing financial needs - because then a 12 month job doesn't amount to much. But ILS/GLC/Jindal have a MASSIVE batch. So the fact that (say) 8 out of the 10 that do get corp jobs end up staying isn't much of a metric. Because only the really motivated ended up getting corp jobs to begin with, and not those that woke up just in time for Day Zero applications because they don't really know what to do with their lives.
Non NLU 1 Apr 2020, 06:58
+0 -1
If only KCO could realise the same
Guest 31 Mar 2020, 17:49
+9 -4
Don't let this fool you. The world is already in recession and law grads will have a very hard time. On the specific case of Khaitan, here are the possible reasons:

1. They want to "lock in" talented law grads rather than let them go into litigation, UPSC etc as backup options. These law grads may be paid less.

2. A few sectors may do well, e.g. healthcare, online working and education software etc. Khaitan is eyeing these sectors.

3. Khaitan expects work from China. The Chinese economy will be the only one to survive the recession. Like the vulture that he is, Xi Jinping will ask Chinese companies to buy companies abroad, including in India. Khaitan expects such work.
really 1 Apr 2020, 06:29
+1 -0
"lock in"? what a joke! KCO (as with all firms) know fully well that an accepted job offer means nothing. If they're considering litigation or UPSC, they will, regardless. Assuming you're referring to NLSIU/NALSAR/NUJS/NLUD.
Guest 31 Mar 2020, 18:18
+10 -9
Another publicity gimmick. Bonus has been stagnant and no increments - if the Firm has done well, then who is hoarding the money! Or are poor associates being shortchanged with this excuse and a false euphoria?
Broseph 31 Mar 2020, 20:04
+15 -4
Bro they raised the base component across the board by A fairly big amount with the intention to increase monthly pay and reduce bonus. keeping that in mind same bonus is actually a net net double digit percentage hike when you take both base and bonus into account. so whoever has been talking to you is clueless. Ok increment i understand they will assess the market and economy and take a call once the uncertainty ends: that is normal and sensible. And so dont think cam or sam have announced increments either. Dont be a hater bro. Chill.
Jon Snow 1 Apr 2020, 06:32
+2 -1
You know nothing. KCO doesn't trim bonuses for bottom rung. They will make arrangements by creatively pruning top level allowances
Bottom rung @ KCO 2 Apr 2020, 05:53
+3 -1
Well you will be amazed to know that this year KCO trimmed bonuses for AOs.
Middle Rung 2 Apr 2020, 09:18
+6 -1
That must then be on account of the performance of the relevant A0. As the comments above suggest, the increase in bonus % is slightly lower because a part of that was already passed on as part of your monthly salary. If you do a CTC calculation, you will find that associates across levels are paid at par with or better than most other top tier firms. Of course, if your comparison is only with the top performers at a CAM or SAM and you did not get the best rating at your rung, then it is understandable why you would think that the bonuses were trimmed.
Guest 31 Mar 2020, 20:14
+9 -4
LI is eager to show the top firms in good light and cover up the bad news. LI is acting like WHO!
Guest 1 Apr 2020, 01:52
+26 -3
Pehle ye batao, ki ab spam emails likhoge ya nahin.
DisappointedDaisy 1 Apr 2020, 02:21
+6 -3
Disappointing bonus announcements especially for a good year. Where's all that money gone, I wonder. No increments and so far, no promotions. Generally disappointing end to a busy year.
Ex KCO 1 Apr 2020, 07:01
+1 -1
Looks like someone didn’t suck up to their partner(s) enough
Associate 1 Apr 2020, 05:27
+4 -1
The bonuses have been great coupled with the increase base last year. I hear most bonuses have been better at CAM/SAM. SAM boasts about 200% which is given to 5% of the eligible pool. The rest are all struggling. CAM bonuses have seen just a 3-5% increase and there have been no increments in these Firms. Its the market and the situation which is same for all law firms. What will show is actions and not words and therefore attrition at these firms will show as to who really is unhappy where..
A1@KCO 1 Apr 2020, 07:11
+3 -1
Very happy with the bonuses paid in KCO. 3 years into this professions, we have all been given a bonus of 5-6 Lakhs.
Tumhara Kat diya 2 Apr 2020, 03:13
+5 -1
The amount you are suggesting above for 3PQE is what we got after 2 some 6-7 years ago. Stop boasting.
Farzi Vakeel 1 Apr 2020, 09:32
+5 -1
So, even after a great/record year, the bonuses were reduced on account of recovery issues for the last 3 weeks. Plus, no increments. Lot to be read between the lines and not just not be lead by the headlines.
Nonsense 1 Apr 2020, 20:51
+1 -0
Fake news bhau...stop spamming
Guest 2 Apr 2020, 04:15
+0 -4
All law firms (from CAM to those operating in basements) must declare what percent of their revenue comes from Chinese clients. Indian clients can then exercise an ethical choice whether to do business with such firms.
Hahahaha 2 Apr 2020, 08:14
+4 -1
All of this is a good laugh! So what KCO is saying they will hire associates at the cost of support staff. Soon the first year associates will also double up as support staff. Be prepared to serve tea and coffee at meetings, travel coordination for your partners (if you didn’t do it before), fill timesheets for your partners. All in all, when you exit KCO for your next job, you can add a lot more on the admin skills you acquired.
Bwahaha 5 Apr 2020, 18:08
+1 -0
Well clearly you know how you get your bonus. Ordering Starbucks goes a long way?
Sammie 2 Apr 2020, 18:26
+1 -0
What is the tea on other BigLaw firms? Are they planning to respect their accepted offers for this June/July?
Ab Zyaada Bachao 4 Apr 2020, 01:14
+1 -0
AZB had amazing foresight. Bonuses are paid only in August, and they haven’t had to fork out precious cash, unlike the rest of Big Law! Cash is king children. Mother had it all figured out....
Hahah 8 Apr 2020, 10:27
+0 -0
It seems the Mother has interesting insights into the dragon and is getting her cake from across the Himalayas. This is bull shit. The truth is when the Mother is roosting - the children are starving.
PFH 28 Apr 2020, 08:38
+0 -0
Have they announced?
Bawa 25 May 2020, 10:51
+1 -0
Looks like people have forgotten about this issue. Kian how bout a follow up on what really is happening at all these firms as on date. Horse trading has commenced again it seems.