Khaitan hires Indus partner Tanu Banerjee for TMT push in Mumbai

Tanu Banerjee joins Khaitan in Mumbai from Indus Bangalore
Tanu Banerjee joins Khaitan in Mumbai from Indus Bangalore

Khaitan & Co has ramped up its technology, media and telecoms (TMT) practice in Mumbai with the hire of Bengaluru-based IndusLaw partner Tanu Banerjee.

Banerjee had been at IndusLaw since 2017, and had been promoted in 2019 to partner.

The 2008 Symbiosis graduate is the first specialist Mumbai-based TMT partner.

“She will be a great addition to our niche TMT practice,” commented Khaitan executive director HR, Amar Sinhji.

“We foresee tremendous growth in the TMT practice with the impact that the Covid-19 crises has had on the telecom (and related technology & media) industry. There is always a silver lining to every dark cloud!,” he added. “Our TMT practice, like all other practices, operates as a national practice and Tanu’s joining will increase our national footprint substantially.”

IndusLaw commented: “We are wishing her the best.”

Tanu BanerjeeWork history From: Feb 2017: Partner, IndusLaw (Bengaluru Area) Aug 2013 - Jul 2016: Senior Associate, Wadia Ghandy & Co. (Mumbai) Jun 2010 - Jul 2013: Senior Associate, DSK Legal (Mumbai Area) Jun 2008 - May 2010: Legal Counsel, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. (Mumbai Area)Education 2003 - 2008: Symbiosis Law School

Comments

Guest 20 Jan 2021, 06:50
+12 -16
She is from Symbi. I think you will find Symbi at par with tier 1 NLUs when it comes to partnerships.
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 07:45
+31 -3
It predates NLSIU by almost a decade, and has got at least three times a batch size, so absolute numbers would not give any accurate picture to support your statement.
Legal 500 20 Jan 2021, 06:55
+57 -9
Did nobody else find it amusing that even 2nd year associates were recognised as noted lawyers by Legal 500 recently? Quite a few Khaitan associates found themselves in the Legal 500 list.
?? 20 Jan 2021, 07:21
+12 -31
So that's a good thing! What's the issue ? Lawyers are lawyers - and they can be good at their respective level of experience. What's wrong with that?
Please go find some work.
anbb 20 Jan 2021, 08:40
+14 -23
are you crying because you haven’t been noted ?
Overpopulation 20 Jan 2021, 09:49
+22 -10
Crying because my team has enough senior level counsels to be nominated without having to fall back on the only associates left in the team.
Bhole 20 Jan 2021, 11:04
+19 -9
These aren't exactly the ratings of Nadal and Djokovic (based on objective parameters of wins/ losses) that the world at large cares about. These are random ratings put up by some random people for some random professionals that (excluding those being rated) people would care for as much as Jeffrey Epstein cared for sexual assault laws. So no amusement here.
Kya? 20 Jan 2021, 18:41
+0 -2
Acha? Name 5 media lawyers you have met.
Objective 21 Jan 2021, 06:51
+8 -23
It is of no surprise that people who do not get ranked or mentioned in these international publications find multiple ways to discredit them or make fun of people who have featured in them.
Legal 500 21 Jan 2021, 07:53
+23 -7
It is of no surprise that people who get ranked or mentioned in these publications get touchy about genuine questions on the ranking process.

While it may be possible for an exceptional associate to in fact be recognised, but where it involves multiple such associates across firms, it does raise questions about the ranking process. Assuming you got ranked as a partner, you should be really bothered about the target audience not finding much credibility in these rankings given the presence of 2nd year associates. Got nothing against them associates, but one got to really ask if a 2nd year associate can match up to a 10 yr experience partner (purely on experience, not on ability). Rankings, after all, are about pitting one against another.

Don't really know of other reputable publications such as Chambers ranking non-partners that often.
Objective V.2 21 Jan 2021, 09:35
+8 -20
@Legal 500 it really shows you have never been mentioned or you haven't ever been part of the submission process. An associate obviously doesn't match up to the partner. Nobody claims that, least of all the publication or the firm. An associate getting ranked usually means either clients have spoken about him/her in their feedback or the firm itself has highlighted the associate in a separate section in the submission form. No client also confuses a partner's expertise with the associate's; its laughable to even consider that option. Instead of trying to belittle the rankings or bringing these featured associates down, work harder on whatever you are doing and try to get mentioned or at least try convincing your firm/boss to highlight you.
Subjective 1.0 22 Jan 2021, 06:00
+18 -4
@Legal500 has a point though. The Legal 500 submissions are entirely orchestrated by BD teams in all of these firms and since there's no real cap on the number of submissions per firm per practice area, enthusiastic BD guys slap every possible name onto the submission form and send it out. Legal 500 on its part doesn't do independent vetting, they pretty much take the submission at face value and do not have a PQE requirement, so it's actually surprising that there aren't more 2 year associates being recognised.
Objective V.3 22 Jan 2021, 09:12
+5 -17
There is a cap in the submissions I think. Last I was told it is around 20 deals or around that figure for an M&A submission. The BD guys do 'orchestrate' it but it is not like they write fictitious stories. They do exaggerate but for that the basic stuff has to be there. If A acquires B in a billion dollar deal, your BD team might say that you were God's gift to the deal but the point is that the acquisition had to happen and you had to be part of the deal and it had to be included in the submission. It is true that it is impossible for Legal 500 or a Chambers to verify everything around your role and that's where the client feedback comes to play. One can of course game the system but it takes a superhuman effort and for an Associate to do it, it is almost impossible.
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 07:12
+36 -8
One of the best media lawyers I have worked with. Wishing her all the best!
All the best! 20 Jan 2021, 08:29
+16 -9
She's a great person to work with also! Always keeps her calm.
Hahaha 26 Jun 2021, 10:48
+3 -4
Lol what? You need to definitely ask her previous juniors at Indus. 'Keeps calm' 🤣
Please open your eyes! 20 Jan 2021, 12:23
+5 -17
Then you've not seen the world of media lawyers!
Lol 20 Jan 2021, 14:20
+21 -6
Why are you so upset? No tier 1 firm hiring you?
Sorry but not sorry 20 Jan 2021, 17:24
+5 -9
Don't take it personally... Get over the rat race!
KCO 20 Jan 2021, 07:29
+29 -5
KCO keeps on hiring partners, but does not give increments of previous year and comes up with flimsy excuses as well to not give the same. God knows what's the Town Hall of 28 January is for. Hoping that they won't again say that business was not good.
Camsamindus 20 Jan 2021, 09:06
+7 -3
True. Alleviating partners and SAs and marring the chances of their associates by no increments due to COVID. It will crumble. [img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/wFmJu7354Csog/200.gif[/img]
Ummm 20 Jan 2021, 12:54
+19 -7
Allow me, please.

1. KCO keeps on hiring partners: Irrelevant to the context here.

2. but does not give increments of previous year: Right, did not give increment but then lawyers in other leading firms also had to go through the same. Partners took a hit of 20 % but not associates like us.

3. and comes up with flimsy excuses as well to not give the same: It was the start of the pandemic during March-April 2020 and I don't think coronavirus situation has been a flimsy situation for law practice. When you start your business and have 1000 people to be paid, you will realise the importance of cash/funds that may come handy in case of uncertain future .

4. God knows what's the Town Hall of 28 January is for: You're are clearly an insider (and, insidious one too).

5. Hoping that they won't again say that business was not good: They never said that, hopefully never will. Had it been the case, you would have not received that huge bonus on 31 March 2020, which, of course, you failed to mention.
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 17:41
+0 -6
Well, foret how do you know the person has got huge bonus ? Is it an assumption that associates across all practices get huge bonus ? Also, the term 'huge' is very subjective. To add, lot of the firms actually declared the increments some time back. The increments could have been declared later. Work has picked up to pre covid levels by August - September. Also, it appears that's you are an insider as well. Lastly, most of the comments on LI is posted by insiders, why so surprised?
arieltham 20 Jan 2021, 08:42
+10 -12
Media will be a big and booming industry soon and this is definitely a master stroke by KCO
Kamalam 20 Jan 2021, 12:43
+23 -5
After Modis masterstrokes...we all know what masterstrokes actually mean now

[img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/13N6SL72YeRPeo/200.gif[/img]
RangDeBhagua 20 Jan 2021, 17:28
+6 -3
Except for the name, @5.1 is perfection
Ex-junior 20 Jan 2021, 17:59
+13 -2
Actually she has a very interesting career history and does many different things, media being something she started on her own. She’s very focused and often pretty demanding.
Insider 20 Jan 2021, 10:09
+32 -5
Big loss for Indus & we all know why it happened
Batao 20 Jan 2021, 14:39
+19 -0
[img]https://media0.giphy.com/media/3o7TKOQzwBAubB1ZDO/200.gif[/img]
Kaun 20 Jan 2021, 18:05
+8 -0
[img]https://media1.giphy.com/media/Tt9jctxaVjRny/200.gif[/img]
Also insider 20 Jan 2021, 18:03
+10 -0
True. It was bound to happen & everyone knows why. Don’t know why she waited this long.
Wake up Sid. 20 Jan 2021, 19:36
+28 -1
Ambitious person + silly management = partner exit.
Media Budget 20 Jan 2021, 11:04
+5 -3
How much budget should a firm keep for listing itself and some of its members in various publications/ rankings etc.? Any idea?
Lol 20 Jan 2021, 14:17
+14 -6
You might be better off focusing on actual work, than figuring out budgets for which no budgets are needed - just good work.
Waah 21 Jan 2021, 06:55
+11 -3
Kya sawaal hai. Kaam karo & make sure your clients are happy. You don't need to pay a penny to get ranked in these publications like Chambers, Legal 500 etc
Bankrupt 22 Jan 2021, 06:02
+3 -2
1.2 lpm to pay the business development team to make up stuff for the submission documents.
Curious cat 20 Jan 2021, 12:44
+9 -0
Any idea if she's moving with her team?
Insider 20 Jan 2021, 22:15
+8 -3
Yup, she is. Lucky them, I'd say! From what I hear, the exit was anything but amicable :)
Curio 20 Jan 2021, 19:47
+2 -10
What's the gender ratio at Indus? Is there a gender bias, causing this exit?
Outsider 21 Jan 2021, 05:07
+19 -6
Khaitan & Co seems super excited about a junior partner from Induslaw joining..........Induslaw must be doing something right!!!
Jilljoe 21 Jan 2021, 06:40
+5 -2
And it seems the announcement is made while she is still serving her notice in IndusLaw!
So 21 Jan 2021, 07:00
+8 -0
[img]https://media1.giphy.com/media/xT77XTpyEzJ4OJO06c/200.gif[/img]
Hmmmmm 21 Jan 2021, 07:12
+8 -0
Must be from KCO, Indus usually keeps departures under wrap
Why 21 Jan 2021, 08:28
+3 -0
Are there other departures from indus that are under wraps?
Guest 21 Jan 2021, 06:25
+13 -3
Oh what a great new. She is an amazing human being and a lawyer. Worker with her earlier. So nice to know that good people deserve good things happening to them. Yay Tanu:)
Wow 21 Jan 2021, 06:41
+13 -3
Well done Tanu. So happy for you. Truly a loss for Indus.
exc kco 21 Jan 2021, 07:13
+24 -5
The fact they have to hire from outside every month shows how much trust and faith they have in the 600 attorneys already there to get business.
Fan no 1 28 Jan 2021, 05:50
+7 -1
Yay Tanu! Good luck and god speed.