L&L corp pays out (higher) bonuses with slight Covidelay, pushes fresher joining dates till 2021 [CORRECTION]

Unlike Covid, bonuses are generally not hazardous to health and on time at Luthras
Unlike Covid, bonuses are generally not hazardous to health and on time at Luthras

L&L Partners corporate transactional advisory partnership has paid out bonuses to fee-earners just a little behind schedule last week, though it notified its 44 fresh campus recruits that they would not be able to join the firm before 2021 as opposed to around this month (though a few of these have since joined - see update below).

The firm said in a statement confirmed that the joining date had been postponed to 2021: “Our offices have been closed since 16th March and we are unlikely to open [until the] Covid situation improves in India. In that situation it does not make sense to risk new joinees to Covid.”

In addition, since many of the new joinees were not from Delhi and Mumbai, starting work early would force them to look for a place to live in the cities during the pandemic, which would add additional hardship, according to the statement.

Update 22:37: We understand that the timetable may have been accelerated slightly. Two freshers have since joined L&L (remotely), another two are set to join in September, with another three freshers now scheduled to join in the first week of October. More may join before January, providing teams are able to adapt to onboarding and training the new recruits remotely, a firm source shared.

While not explicitly mentioned, the move will also no doubt save the firm some cash, and follows in the footsteps of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM), which twice postponed fresher start dates to now also be no earlier than January.

Unlike CAM, which told freshers about the postponements in emails, we understand that someone from L&L personally called each future joinee on the phone to tell them about the deferral last month.

Bonus on time

By contrast, bonus payments to L&L fee-earners have not been indefinitely postponed unlike at many other major firms.

Correction 9 September 2020: The initially published story stated that bonuses were paid on time, however, they are normally paid in July. The error is ours and regretted. L&L said in a statement: “July bonus is always paid on completion of 1-1 review of every associate and every partner. This year on account of lock down, review was delayed and was completed only in August, and immediately thereafter bonus was paid out.”

Partners and managing associates at L&L are paid bonuses four times a year, while other associates get paid bonuses twice per year.

It is understood that the amount of bonuses for each fee-earner are fixed at the start of the year at L&L, depending on performance calculated by a formula.

Those bonuses were paid out in full as calculated at the beginning of the financial year, on 1 April 2020.

The bonus component calculation also includes a 360 degree evaluation of teams and the fee-earner (in June and July of each year). So-called 360 degree evaluations usually consist of taking anonymous feedback of everyone that someone has worked with, including those above and below them in the food chain (of command).

Update 9 September 2020: The firm said in a statement that this year the average bonus percentage was much higher than in the last two years.

L&L corporate’s decision to pay out bonuses on schedule, as well as being one of the few firms not to have announced salary cuts or deferrals), is also in contrast to L&L’s own separate litigation partnership, which had retroactively imposed four months’ of salary cuts-cum-deferrals by 15-35% in July.

Photo by Antonio Kless.

Comments

Yogi D 9 Sept 2020, 05:11
+6 -1
ROFLOL LI! Whatte picture you've chosen for L&L's bonus payment :D
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 08:24
+2 -0
It's not that funny. Kian is no Jerry Sienfeld.
+1 9 Sept 2020, 09:42
+0 -1
Lets give credit where it is due. I got 100% bonus, I know of people in my team and other teams who got 100% bonus (yes people talk). Anyone who says bonuses got docked because of Covid has either been misled or is lying.

Yes there have been no talks of increments or promotions but there have also been no pay cuts or deferments.

Yes, I was the one ranting on the KCO shifting bit news on bonus delays but all things considered, this could have been a lot worse.

I am grateful and I think we should all keep a gratitude jar on our desks (okay the last bit may have been in jest).
Where is my comment? 9 Sept 2020, 11:23
+0 -0
@Kian, why would you not publish the reference to blue eyed boy, when there are references to S,V and B in the comments below. Is there any issue with the terminology? or you are relying on false Statements of V?
Bently 9 Sept 2020, 11:31
+0 -0
Can you buy a Bently?
Ullu 11 Sept 2020, 09:14
+1 -0
First you need to know hot to spell it correctly :)
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 06:04
+9 -5
This information/ article appears to be sponspored by L&L. what happened to you Kian? Need funds? We will subscribe to legallyindia. I thought its about publishing right facts after due diligence. Typically bonuses are paid in the first week of July, this time its September. So there is no timely payment. Secondly, full bonuses have not been paid citing covid issues.
???? 9 Sept 2020, 06:43
+3 -9
Bonus is performance linked. So if you have performed not up to the mark then you won’t get full bonus. It’s the same every year. Baap ki khairaat nahi baat rahe hai. People have received (and a number of them at that) more than 100% also.

As to delay, I agree there has been about a 30-45 day delay. Normally this is expected by July mid to end, never in June. But with Mr Luthra being unwell, again people in the firm were expecting the delay and were understanding.

Please stop being an uninformed troll. You can do better. Aspire to be better.
kianganz 9 Sept 2020, 06:47
+1 -0
Thanks for pointing out the error, have issued a correction in the story.
Fascist 9 Sept 2020, 08:17
+2 -1
So you want to subscribe so that you can influence LI’s editorial freedom. Wokes, Whines, Mobs, Cancel Culture and faux belief in freedoms and faux outrage. Fascist.
Bhai 9 Sept 2020, 10:51
+13 -3
Bhai, thoda Indian english bol le.
Bhojai 9 Sept 2020, 11:08
+4 -1
Sure. I saying with pleasant respect that guest ji is being bad saying Respected Shri Kian ji Ganz is taking money from Shri Luthra ji but must take rupee from Guest ji. This make Guest ji demand from Shri Kian ji Ganz what he write. That not write.

Shri Kian ji Ganz need to have freedom for whatever he want to do. Leftists should not take that freedom.

Hope the above makes sense to your dehati mind. All I meant to say is that Guest should not try forcing Kian to change editorial freedom by holding subscriptions as a carrot.
Bhai again 9 Sept 2020, 12:08
+0 -0
bhai tu normal angrezi mei hi likh diya kar. Common sense could be applied here, if subscription based model is followed then its ethical as well as gives complete freedom, but if money is taken to publish good things, then obviously its unethical. When did I said that if money should come from us then Kian will also write what we want. Dofus kaam kar le bhai, mei toh litigation mei hu aur vella baitha hu (ps: I was once part of luthra).
Bhai bhai 9 Sept 2020, 12:31
+0 -2
And then someday you would threaten Kian and others with revocation of subscriptions cause he chose to write a story about something you and your mob disagreed with. Happens everywhere and every time. Any time judgmental people like you have ability you would misuse. On no basis you blamed him for having a bias in favor of Luthra/L&L (whatever that place is). Writers got Bloomsbury to withdraw. Coop threatened Spectator. Left Liberals force Twitter and FB. All the time anyone like you has power.
Behen to the Rescue 9 Sept 2020, 19:55
+1 -0
Seems like you have some sort of problem in understanding. You start with an argument then rebel it out with some nonsense examples. Have you had any sort of monthly or annual subscription of any publication? Akhbar aata hai ghar pe nahi. I guess you would have understood by now. Mehnat mat kara itni yaar.
Funny 9 Sept 2020, 12:27
+0 -0
Bahut hi funny ji. Really the pressure of cancel culture and from wokey liberals to make people confirm is very problematic.
Junior Associate 9 Sept 2020, 06:09
+12 -1
Bonuses were not paid out on time this year. They were delayed by two months. Please invest in a little fact checking.
Ok 9 Sept 2020, 15:25
+0 -0
What was the average percentage of bonus paid by Luthra this year?

If not average, then what were the lowest and highest percentage?
L&L launda 9 Sept 2020, 20:40
+0 -3
Not sure about average, but I know people who got a 125% bonus
JSA 9 Sept 2020, 06:29
+13 -1
JSA here. Despite no reduction in workload, no news on bonus.
AZB 9 Sept 2020, 09:23
+16 -1
Same here
JSA 9 Sept 2020, 16:40
+1 -10
No bull, heard AZB has already paid
AZB 10 Sept 2020, 16:54
+6 -0
Not a penny
Obviously 11 Sept 2020, 06:08
+0 -7
Go check your billings; you need to work to receive bonus or even a retainer. And commenting on LI does not constitute work. Free Lunching Gold Diggers would be the death of this noble profession.
Smartass 15 Sept 2020, 10:17
+0 -0
Since bonus has not been paid to anyone yet you mean EVERYONE in AZB has low billings? Think mister
Kachra 15 Sept 2020, 04:05
+0 -0
Rumour has it that AZB has decided to indefinitely postpone the bonuses for last year. Any news, Kian?
Waller 9 Sept 2020, 06:52
+3 -2
Looks like someone is trying to portray himself as a saviour and trying to lure people to his camp so that he can fly solo. Won't ever happen. Everyone is with the big man. Time for the three others to introspect and gain confidence of those who work under them.
Bhole 9 Sept 2020, 07:50
+7 -3
Let me assure you the "three" you are referring to (and I have no doubt you are referring to S, V and B) have the utmost confidence of their teams. They have done well for and by their teams, and not just today but across many many number of years.

The savior bit (there is no doubt that the reference is to Mr. Saraf) is a bit unclear, given someone a few comments ago hinted Bonuses have been leached. Mr. Saraf wouldn't be much of a savior and would be inefficient in "luring" people as a savior if he has docked bonuses. So go back to your troll hole and confer with brother / sister trolls and decide, have bonuses been docked or is he trying to be a savior and is luring people. Both cannot coexist.
Trolleywala 9 Sept 2020, 09:14
+4 -1
Is that why they docked salaries and cut the bonuses for lit while others in corp got their due? Is that the spiel that youve been asked to troll on? If thats the truth then you need to go furnish your troll hole which may presumably be next to the master trolls hole on the 9th floor because you will be spending a lot of time there.
S, V, B 9 Sept 2020, 10:57
+4 -7
S, V and B in the comment is no reference to the litigation "superstars".

Think Corporate which actually has atleast 3 real superstars with the above initials.
Managements 9 Sept 2020, 07:00
+2 -0
Corp v Litigation actions show what even a remotely professional setup can achieve.

RKL and Mr Saraf creates transparency and empowerment, better money. Created structures.

Empowerment of teams has resulted in better work quality, better client retentions and therefore reasonably high work flow. Better talent pool also, though whether that lasts long enough given myopia now setting in at Corp is anyone’s guess.

Peace of mind for associates was something Corp management (especially Mr Saraf with his constant pursuit of teams on invoicing, recoveries and work generation) had assured to the partnership pool and they have till date delivered.

Litigation just doesn’t care it seems. They are happy being totally full of their own awesomeness and that reflects on their discomfort about the future and hence the pay cuts (deferral!!!)
Ghanta 11 Sept 2020, 06:14
+4 -0
The transparency in corporate is hogwash. They disclose billing factors to only name and shame. Same with punctuality tables. Toxic place. Had they really really really been professional, they wouldn't be the only "modern" firm with no equity. The management truly fears empowered juniors. What if any of them are questioned about their role and value.
Insiderbaba 9 Sept 2020, 07:03
+11 -0
A good job on the bonus point. Is L&L planning to distribute the increments as well?

Insider info- The attrition rate at L&L is still very high despite Covid times. L&L should introspect of why are people still continuing to leave the firm! heard that a certain team in corp has 3 associates leaving in together and another corp team has 2 associates leaving with 2 more set to leave soon.
Nag Panchmi 9 Sept 2020, 13:47
+33 -3
Please be crystal clear - there is one and only one Partner at L&L who faces mass exodus of associates in a six monthly cycle. No work generation, no base legal knowledge or skill, zero execution ability, zero peer skills, unprecedented nosiness and nauseating flattery. RKL and MS are good judges of character and have hired and nurtured some really good lawyers - but they have undone all that with this one (maybe two) relatively recent hire. That partner is known in the market to be the harbinger of death (career wise) and kids are loath to apply to L&L for fear of being assigned to the said partner. If you don’t believe this, go ahead and ask anyone at L&L or any young associate in the job market. What mystifies people at L&L (including the support staff) is why the root cause is not addressed despite being repeatedly pointed out. Perhaps, the flattery is hard to overcome and who doesn’t like to hear sweet nothings/ platitudes when their world is burning to the ground. That would explain why associates are sent by the powers that be to be mentored by this partner (repeatedly) with the end result being loss of the associate

That aside, let’s keep it factual. Yes, that partner has lost two resources (out of three) mid COVID and will probably lose the balance. But, please don’t try and target the corp practice at large for no rhyme or no reason. This attrition has nothing to do with them and is not applicable to the rest.

Also, before you blame the “toxic” culture of L&L, please note that the partner in question is not a home grown partner. Ironically, they come from a very “cultured” firm.

Kian, please do publish this - the truth, is the truth, and it’s best to let it have its day. Else, this will become another troll bait and a vessel for spreading falsehood.
Ooo curious 9 Sept 2020, 14:30
+1 -1
Name the person no...you're anyway anonymous here...might as well spill the beans then
No 9 Sept 2020, 15:28
+5 -24
No, please. No maligning of any person. Kian, you must censor maligning comments which are reasonably sufficient to point to a specific person. There could be personal vendetta behind such comments as well. Let alone the immense mental trauma it may cause the related person.
Complete Facts 11 Sept 2020, 13:16
+1 -29
While any one can use this forum to vent out personal vendetta, at least give full facts - (I) if one attorney who left in COVID time had joined the partner just for 3 weeks, can it be Partners fault? (II) If an associate leaves corporate team to join independent litigator, is it Partner's fault? (III) If an attorney leaves to wanting to do child welfare laws, is it partners fault? (IV) If partner asks attorneys to contribute to knowledge management and firm development work in months affected by COVID to be productive, is it a strength or fault?
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 07:15
+6 -3
Is LI run by Modi govt? Why are you not covering the mass unemployment, redundancies and pay cuts in the legal economy? Why are you not discussing that legal sector liberalisation is desperately needed, along with government efforts to create jobs through an Indian Judicial Service and clerkships? Why are you not criticising the apathy of the clown law minister and clown BCI chairman?
OxygenGenGen 9 Sept 2020, 11:33
+1 -0
Yes, especially a report on boutiques
15 lakhs 9 Sept 2020, 14:16
+2 -0
Governments create most number of legal jobs. Constant arbitrariness, pettiness, paralysis, political vendetta. How much more can they support the legal practice. Give them some time on other functions also.
Impact 9 Sept 2020, 08:18
+3 -0
I think LI can legitimately claim this as an impact feature - L&L paid bonuses after multiple comments on how L&L hadn't paid bonuses on an unrelated article on LI (one on Khaitan shifting offices).

LI you could think of an alternative business model where the comments section acts as a grievances redressal platform for law firms.
JSA ka bonus/increment 9 Sept 2020, 10:38
+1 -1
@JSA - Yaar hum log ka bhi bonus de do. Kitta suspense bana rakha hai! Increment to wese bhi nai de rae ho. Ek town hall kar k bol hi do - at least I will do my job search freely (read 'shraddha se').

All this despite the fact that the business is booming now (no kidding!). I mean there was a dip in the period April - July. But its not that you let us live then. Then too it was constant work and cribbing - as if we are vacationing and not in lockdown. Dont get me wrong JSA, I love my work and the pressure that comes with it (and I am one of the reliable/ productive ones). But I know my billings, recoveries, etc. (shout out to Jyoti for making JSA transparent!), and I seriously feel an increment and full bonus payouts are warranted immediately. I mean make provisions for supporting lit. team and for any other estimated COVID impact - but release the rest of the damn bonus and increments now.

On increments, if you were giving me a 50k raise then give me a 35k raise. And I know for a fact the COVID dip has not been worse than that (30%). In the name of provisioning, dont effectively stunt my growth, even when you are taking all your emoluments in full (and I know for a fact that you are).
JSA 1st floor 9 Sept 2020, 16:39
+1 -0
well said bhai
JSA 12 Sept 2020, 15:18
+0 -0
JSA Update from MPs - firm has done better than expected. Bonus will be given end of this month/early next month. Looks like all this beating and battering paid off. Hope we get bonus at actuals!
L&L 9 Sept 2020, 11:26
+8 -1
I am utterly perplexed by RKL’s management decision. As a litigator I take risks during COVID (meeting counsels, attending office, clients) and I get penalized through pay cuts disguised as deferrals, clawbacks of cashflow, lien on bonus, etc. Corp sits at home, relaxes with kids, spouse and parents and bears no stress of being OOH, and bingo gets rewarded.

Why L&L? Why RKL? Why?
LoveDay 9 Sept 2020, 12:49
+4 -0
Bobby and Sondhi ko kyun bhoola re?
BOBSY 10 Sept 2020, 11:21
+2 -0
Kyunki, unse kuch expect nahi karte hai.

RKL was our guardian in litigation. But now I am not sure. He announced the giving up of managing partnership but now it seems all of that was just drama, he continues to be a managing partner. Our salaries continue to be eaten by him and his cronies. The so-called reversal and incentive policy is dead on arrival.

Life is a circle and someday these 4 especially RKL would need us and then lets see. Ashamed of my position and helplessness. Today I need to work here, but times are a changing and legal economy is getting robust.
Guestt 9 Sept 2020, 12:04
+3 -0
Does anyone know the bonus range for A0 and A1?
Guest2 13 Sept 2020, 03:34
+1 -0
As for bonus range at Luthra, it depends on team to team and even from person to person within a team. There is no structure in place, no base remuneration, no equality in pay. The quantum of bonus (and fixed remuneration) remains on the sheer whims of the Partners and may be affected even by the law school of the associate and bonus can range anywhere between 1 LPA to 4 LPA (irrespective of level of experience).
No 13 Sept 2020, 07:15
+1 -0
Wrong! Bonus or even fixed retainership is not decided by "partners" . It is solely decided by one or two persons in the firm.
Reality is THIS 9 Sept 2020, 12:17
+2 -0
Its not like any firm is really facing a lockout or closure because they dont have money. Trust me. They have enough of it in the banks...and more stashed abroad and in the form of real estate. They just dont want to dip into their pockets and ride this through. Workflow is hectic. People are busy and if you have a half good accounts team, your invoices will get paid. The money is coming in. May not be flowing in but there isnt scarcity also.

They just want to take more from the pockets of those who toil for them and put the money in their own equity kitty- well thats just following what the ruling dispensation is also doing. All this talk about claw back of pay cuts, deferral of bonus/ increments etc because of covid is hogwash. THEY JUST DONT WANT TO PAY YOU FOR GOOD WORK.

Oh well....someone else will for sure.
Guest 9 Sept 2020, 20:23
+0 -0
the day you have to send this message from anonymous handle, means that you never could. Get another job
Father Figure? 9 Sept 2020, 12:47
+3 -3
Mr Luthra Sir,

Please guide us on why we have been treated like this. We also joined Luthra of Rajiv Luthra and not a different firm relative to our colleagues in corporate. Why do you discriminate against us. Why are we lesser children. What wrong did we do?

Why did our monies get cut. Why did we not have benefit of your benevolence or fairness. Why is it that corporate colleagues, who I like and am not grudging, got more than 100% bonus and I had to cry and thereafter borrow from my brother to meet bank installments.

I feel betrayed today.
L&L Lit is not L&L 9 Sept 2020, 13:20
+2 -1
Some MAs in L&L Lit get paid as much as A0s in corp. The two are one firm only in name. Quality, recruitment, and administration is completely separate, you know it too.

Ask Bobby, Sudhir, Vijay what they're up to (they're to blame).
SimranKaRaj 9 Sept 2020, 13:47
+0 -0
Bade bade shehron me choti choti baatein hoti rehti hai Senorita.

Losers. Come to SAM. Big Daddy loves everyone equally.
Godfather 11 Sept 2020, 13:13
+2 -1
Father Figure my foot!

We all saw how he behaved at the Litigation townhall. The modern day Dhritarashtra at best and an active conniver at worst. He did not speak a word when the ridiculous bombshell of retrospective salary deduction was being discussed. In fact most of us felt he actually supported it. As the 'Managing Partner' he is absolutely responsible for what happened with the litigation.

Not to suggest that he treats litigation as his step child. If he could he would have done the same with Corporate. The only difference being, in Litigation his sidekicks S,V, and B went along with his plan. Grapevine has it that the Corporate Senior Management and EC did not allow this. There was no intention of a differential treatment, it is just that he couldn't rule his roost over the Corporate side :). I have no resentment towards my corporate colleagues, I just am sad about my luck!!
Dharm not Dharamshaala 9 Sept 2020, 13:53
+0 -0
RKL and seniors please remember always -
Ik din bik jaayega maati ke mol
Jag men rah jaayenge, pyaare tere bol

Duje ke honthhon ko dekar apane git
Koi nishaani chhod, fir duniya se dol
Ik din bik jaayega ...
Smoking? 10 Sept 2020, 13:26
+2 -0
Wadia Ghandy and Juris Corp in the league of NDA? Pass me what are you smoking. The entry level pay in itself is more than twice.
Aspirer 9 Sept 2020, 13:57
+5 -3
Since I am a law student and will graduate next year, can some one tell me-
What is the average/estimated percentage of annual increments and bonus at these law firms for tier 1 like Kco, azb, SAM, CAM or tier 2 like juris corps, Nishith desai ,Wadia ghandy etc?
Wait 9 Sept 2020, 15:58
+2 -6
Don't think about money and all. If you have done law, have some self respect and don't join these law firms.
50% 10 Sept 2020, 03:06
+2 -0
Its 50%.

If you did 4 DDs in the previous year, you will do 6 in the next one. Also, if you were spending 10 hours / day working, then that was just 'breaking the horse'. Next you spend 15/ day. :D
Simmer & Boil 9 Sept 2020, 14:42
+1 -1
Me thinks, L&L lost its plot, man. Litigation's sorry story we read about 2 months back and most there are ready to flee. Ex-judge has already left. Ex-corp it is heard has reached the SCAMs. Many others are looking around. Vultures are circling.
Really? 9 Sept 2020, 15:19
+2 -0
Bharat left?
Heehaww 9 Sept 2020, 19:53
+1 -0
Okhla me ex judge ka swaagat h
Ex judge 10 Sept 2020, 04:32
+0 -0
Ex judge is coming to Okhla......
Whatttttt
Is this confirmed or just faff?
AARey 10 Sept 2020, 07:13
+7 -0
Some bonds transcend the first and ninth floor. Khel gaye bhai sahab! Whatttay game played! And some imbeciles at L&L were suspecting, humiliating, interrogating, and harassing someone else, all along. Kudos!! If ex judge is actually moving, this whodunnit is worth a movie.
Guest 10 Sept 2020, 08:46
+10 -0
If true, it is worth a movie. Used L&L resources to create a platform for himself and then sold his services to the highest bidder. True that everyone out there is attempting to do the same without any success. Some blame to L&L as well, they were treating the status of being an 'ex-judge' equivalent to being Mr. Palkivala himself.
PressureCooked 9 Sept 2020, 15:31
+0 -0
You thinks right, but me knows. But you thinks narrows at 1st levels, expand thinkings to higher levels, 9 levels. Tensions brewing there darker than the black coffee [...]. [...] is thinking righto partly.
Bonus 9 Sept 2020, 15:30
+0 -0
The firm said in a statement that this year the average bonus percentage was much higher than in the last two years.

What was the average percentage this year? What was the lowest and highest percentage awarded?
Bizarre 9 Sept 2020, 15:42
+4 -2
So I called up some of my folks at Luthra as I was quite curious about why Rajiv, whom I know personally as a good man; he has been ready to help my young disputes and arbitration practice; has been getting such roasting. Mohit, I can totally understand, again have personally met him a few times and also heard about him, he comes across as ruthless. But Rajiv's hospitality is legendary.

Rajiv appears to have allowed some partners at litigation take advantage of him and has in a way enabled the sorry state at litigation. Trust deficit is very high amongst the counsels. Pay cut, broken promises, randomness of behavior by seniors at litigation is all turning up against RKL and at RKL's doorsteps.

Just wanted to clarify that in my view RKL seems to be a victim of circumstances but within the firm he is perceived as being a dilettante and even worse a Trojan. Maybe they all need to sit and close things.
Interesting 9 Sept 2020, 16:56
+0 -0
Is there smoke without fire?

My understanding of the most senior levels at the firm indicate that corporate teams feel that litigation including seniors there don’t do the heavy lifting in client management or business generation but still reserve and demand a seat at the high table. The free lunch is getting to be a pain.

RKL would rather let things lie as he entrenches his position. It’s a tactical issue for him and some unhappiness or adversity is a price he may be willing to pay. In my view his being tactical is foolish and is what is creating the crisis.
Interesting again 9 Sept 2020, 17:29
+3 -0
While you give him the benefit of the doubt, and I don’t have an axe to grind with him, but as a principal owner and managing partner, doesn’t he bear responsibility for what all has happened to litigation folks. To have people blame Bobby, Sudhir or Vijay for litigations woes and wherever relevant Mohit for all other problems reeks of abdication. He needs to stand up and own up to his role in the mess and cannot be allowed to showcase himself as a gullible fool and if he shows himself as such, then he needs to boot himself out as he would to others. I have known Rajiv Luthra long enough, was amongst the first 10 hires once they decided to move to pedigreed places, and I think he would run away. Bobby, Sudhir, Vijay and Mohit would end up holding the can.
Wait 9 Sept 2020, 15:56
+0 -0
What happens to batch of 2021 ? When will they join?
Oh 9 Sept 2020, 17:27
+1 -2
Did any firm even recruit from the batch of 2021? Do they even need to recruit? :P
Leech 10 Sept 2020, 11:31
+3 -0
A [...]

Appropriate for a lot of senior management in law firms and seems especially true in the object of LI’s commentariat’s affection.

To dock non-market salaries of associates With retrospective effect requires a particularly special kind [...]. This when all across the last 2 decades they have all solely enjoyed the benefit of equity. Churchill would be proud of the London City Board Member. In a good year the farmer gives lagaan, in a bad year The farmer gives lagaan and life.
To be Partner 11 Sept 2020, 06:26
+0 -0
Has L&L deferred and delayed promotions? No news on it until now. I think last year they had already announced the new partners this time.
Not to be 11 Sept 2020, 06:51
+1 -1
Promotions are announced at annual day. Since there is Covid, management will not have an annual day (saves money also - no food, daru and don’t need to pay some actor and/or swami fees to attend and give gyaan), hence no promotions. Plus, why promote when given the affairs, you won’t stay and this promotion would be like L&L enhancing your market value.

The Big Man is all we need. Tusi kaun?
Guest 11 Sept 2020, 11:50
+1 -0
L&L EPs are daggers drawn 4:1. Everything gets people roiled up there. Bonus was also stuck due to clash of egos. Talk of appraisal and sickness is a smokescreen.

Ask any headhunter and CVs are flooded in the market at senior levels with team moves being a major incentive.
Backlog 11 Sept 2020, 14:15
+0 -0
https://www.barandbench.com/news/corporate/trilegal-gives-out-bonuses-and-increments-to-all-lawyers-as-per-schedule-inducts-73-freshers-online

@luthra, please aap bhi kardo ye. We had our appraisal interview so many days ago. Ye tranches mein kyu dete ho yaar cheesein?

Looks like Trilegal does care about its lawyers . Increments + Bonus bhi
Gas Bag 11 Sept 2020, 15:04
+4 -1
Hope everybody read the article around attrition in which The Managing Partner spoke the most. How he is evolving a professional structure with equity blah blah blah and how he gets affected by departures. Reality is that the only thing which matters to him is his bank balance and his ego. Else litigation would not have suffered. Else the new video about the firm would not have just him hanging around as the Leadership while others are mere senior partner committee. Else he wouldn’t take the website down to spite a junior staffer.
Guest 11 Sept 2020, 18:16
+1 -1
Every other firm moves (most I’ve moved) to making itself a team sport like cricket with a captain, vice captain, strike bowlers and supergood batsmen, this firm is being pushed to make itself about one star golfer with caddies around in the form of other EPs and rest of the salaried partners, counsels, associates are merely staff for the star golfer. And the irony is that the star golfer is so beyond his prime but refuses to acknowledge it. His style was in vogue in 90s but he hasn’t bothered to even amend his play and technique to the 2000s.

Man believes he alone is of any consequence so why be surprised by the leadership roles Kay he wishes to showcase for the world. Of course we all know what he has ever done as a leader other than passing the buck and hemming and hawing in meetings. A bloody disgrace.