Linklaters India head Katwala widens horizon as EEMEA managing partner

Linklaters-Sandeep-Katwala
Linklaters-Sandeep-Katwala

Linklaters India head Sandeep Katwala has been appointed as Emerging Europe, Middle East and Africa (EEMEA) regional managing partner while continuing in his role as India head.

Katwala (pictured) will take up the role from 1 May 2010, succeeding Stuart Salt who was appointed Asia managing partner at the start of this year.

The firm wrote in a press release that Katwala would continue to head up the India practice and work with India-related clients.

Katwala became a Linklaters partner in 2000 and inherited the India practice from previous India head Nikhil Mehta who had left to join Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton in 2002.

Katwala specialises in corporate and M&A, as well as some infrastructure work.

Linklaters managing partner Simon Davies said in a statement: “The CEE, Middle East, Russia/CIS and Africa are important and dynamic markets. Furthermore, we are seeing increasing cross-border activity between the EEMEA region and Asia (including India).

“Sandeep’s broad experience in Asia, including his success in building our India practice, make him ideally suited to this key leadership role.”

Linklaters has a best friends relationship with Indian firm Talwar Thakore & Associates (TTA).

In November 2009, two Linklaters partners joined TTA as equity partners.

Comments

Anonymous guest 28 Apr 2010, 19:54
+0 -0
Well done Sandeep! This promotion means a lot to all Indians working overseas...
Anonymous guest 28 Apr 2010, 20:49
+0 -0
Is he an Indian citizen?
Anonymous guest 28 Apr 2010, 22:06
+0 -0
No he's not.
Anonymous guest 28 Apr 2010, 22:38
+0 -0
The last I know about Sandeep was that his parents were from the African continent and that they had migrated to UK. So how is his promotion good for Indian overseas? Please do enlighten me.

Best friend.
Anonymous guest 28 Apr 2010, 23:44
+0 -0
#1:
Katwala is 100% British. He just happens to be of Indian descent and does work related to India. Period.

If he's "Indian" then so is Bobby Jindal
Anonymous guest 29 Apr 2010, 01:33
+0 -0
Sandeep's achievement is cause for pride for evryone of Indian origin (and being a lawyer in the corporate world) I am happy about it, even though I dont work for him (and I work for a competitor!). Hope #4 is sufficiently enlightened (whatever he meant by that...)
Anonymous guest 29 Apr 2010, 02:18
+0 -0
Sandeep is a good man (more than wise man), which makes him a very fit managing partner for Emerging Europe, Middle East and Africa (EEMEA). India for that matter as well. Those markets (including India) are really hostile to outsiders and you need a people's person to run them.
Anonymous guest 29 Apr 2010, 09:32
+0 -0
and certainly miles ahead of others esp those who use their well-oiled PR machinery to position themselves as "senior statesmen" for India despite having done no India-related work and having no feel for the region. Think it is high time we made a distinction between people who are genuinely good and salesmen who think that by visiting clients and contacts every month they suddenly have a claim to fame...
Anonymous guest 29 Apr 2010, 19:32
+0 -0
"Indian-origin lawyer Rashad Hussain will be America's new special envoy to the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, a post vital to President Barack Obama's bid to repair the United States' strained relations with the Islamic world."

The above is something much more important vis a vis something dynamic being done by a lawyer of Indian descent overseas such as Sandeep.

The entire world peace depends on this. Come on yaar, get your facts right and then shower praises.
Anonymous guest 29 Apr 2010, 19:46
+0 -0
#4 and #9, seriously whats with you people? cant you even accept someone else doing good? why so pedantic about who is a citizen and who will cause world peace and who wins noble prize? they are all good achievers who left their motherland and achieved a name for themselves in a foreign land. They all must have gone through the pain of fighting and winning the perception of being Indian but being as good (or even better) than the locals.

or is it more shallow and your comments merely reflect your professional insecurity?
Anonymous guest 30 Apr 2010, 14:39
+0 -0
Its not about professional insecurity and all --- what is it with Indians trying to claim others who like them as "Indians"... the ones who have left, have settled abroad, are citizens abroads are NOT Indian --- it really irritates me when newspapers, TV channels and now the discussion on this site --- try to claim their achievements as "Indian" achievements - be it Bobby Jindal in the US, some guy who was supposed to join Obama's administration at some level, NRI lawyers, random NASA scientists with Indian-sounding names, Venkatraman "Venki" Ramakrishnan the 2009 Chemistry Nobel prize winner.... the list is endless

These people are not "Indian" and we should really quit trying to say their achievements are those of Indians or show the potential Indians hold... Their life experiences and what they achieved came primarly out of their time abroad and not due to their Indian origin. What they have achieved is remarkable - no doubt about that - but it would have very little with them being Indian, coz they really are not - not just as a matter of the passport they carry but also the way they think and uproach issues due their time aborad....
Anonymous guest 30 Apr 2010, 21:18
+0 -0
#11 is right. do you ever hear italians claiming al pacino as their own?
Anonymous guest 30 Apr 2010, 23:02
+0 -0
Awesome post, great one. You made your point crystal with such a simple example. #10 must be rolling in his grave oops books, if he has them. LOL
Anonymous guest 1 May 2010, 03:32
+0 -0
#11, 12 and 13. I really dont know why I am replying to you (all) but yes do your research, Al Pacino is loved, admired by Italians, contribution acknowledged and numerous awards being given. I really dont know how else could Italians "claim" Al Pacion. Check Wikipedia and check this website of national Italian American Foundation (http://www.niaf.org/research/contribution.asp)

Probably, inspired by your bureaucratic government, you will say that since Al Pacino does not have a PIO (Person of Italian Origin) Card so it cant be said that he has been claimed by the Italians. How typical of of this trait of making statements without doing any research (or probably even visitng Italy).

Stop wasting your precious billable time on this debate, your owner - partners will not give you credit for defending theri fiefdoms... (unless you are lucky and have become free for the weekend, in which case have a good weekend)
Anonymous guest 1 May 2010, 13:09
+0 -0
Don't condescend to me brother and no one asked you to reply. So quit trying to play all superior

I work at a good firm abroad and have time and access to the internet at work and more than reasonable hours. My hours are up and billing is no issue (the firm has no billable min) and I work hard. So thanks for your concern.