Longest-surviving Clasis partner Sumeet Lall resigns, as cookie continues crumbling in impending Clydes break-up

Long-time Clasis hold-out Sumeet Lall to leave
Long-time Clasis hold-out Sumeet Lall to leave

Sumeet Lall, who is the longest-surviving lateral partner hire at Clasis Law which under managing partner Vineet Aneja has lost its partnership several times over in the last years, has resigned, according to authoritative sources.

Clasis is due to break up with UK-headquartered international firm Clyde & Co by next month, as we had first reported last week.

Lall specialises in international arbitration and disputes, and is a qualified advocates-on-record (AoR) of the Supreme Court.

The 2000 ILS Pune graduate had joined Clasis in 2011 from Parekh & Co.

Lall was not reachable for comment at the time of publication.

Aneja did not respond to a call and message for comment.

Lall had been the first lateral partner hire at Clasis in 2011.

But as we had reported, Clasis has seen huge turnover of co-founding and lateral partners since it was founded in 2011, until by 2014 only Aneja was left out of the co-founding partners.

With Lall’s leaving, other than Mustafa Motiwalla who had joined in Mumbai from JurisCorp in 2015, there will now not be a single lateral partner hire who is still at Clasis, though the firm has made several promotions in the last few years.

Clyde & Co’s India web microsite states that Clasis Law has 47 “legal staff”. There will be 10 partners remaining, following the departure of Lall, litigation partner Jaideep Singh who started his own practice in Jaipur and Delhi, and IP partner Rahul Breruar who started a three-partner firm in Delhi and Mumbai at the beginning of this year.

Comments

Ex -CL 26 Mar 2018, 07:52
+7 -6
Clasis is going in reverse, all good hiring of past now undone. another practise area shut. Dispute litigation practise is over!
Ex -CL 26 Mar 2018, 07:54
+5 -5
Congrats Kian for keeping us updated. it will help lawyers take uniformed choice.
Guest 26 Mar 2018, 08:51
+1 -0
Resigned?????
Resign 26 Mar 2018, 09:16
+6 -6
Are you suggesting that Vineet removed him with his team?
Lalli 26 Mar 2018, 09:39
+9 -7
Way to go Lal. Good decision. Wish you all the best wherever you go. You deserve better. Much much MUCH better.
Lallu 26 Mar 2018, 10:58
+4 -1
[..] with whom LAL works now and also who are working for him.
God save LAL team now 26 Mar 2018, 11:27
+8 -7
Feel sad for those who work for LAL..... [...]
Guest 26 Mar 2018, 10:13
+11 -5
But what about those poor people who he will now join. Don't they deserve better!
The end is near 26 Mar 2018, 10:15
+8 -4
This now means the Delhi office has only corporate and no litigation and the Mumbai office has only litigation and no corporate. Knowing vineet, he will not recruit. No one wants to join. Once mustufa and priyanka leave, that will be the end.
Guest 26 Mar 2018, 11:35
+7 -9
In fact it is the end of all things negative and deterimental for Vineet. Knowing him he will now take his firm to new heights. I don't know from where you are getting your facts but Vineet started his firm with four people . The likes of Mr Lal joined Vineet's firm , it is not because of them but despite them that Vineet has managed to run a firm successfully. It is very easy to predict end but it takes a lot of determination, grit , honesty and hard work to start from a scratch and build something. But the likes of you who can only see ends and negativity will not understand these words and that is why you probably see good in the likes of Mr Lal. Best of luck to you and your types.
Antiguest 27 Mar 2018, 03:46
+6 -3
It also takes bieng a decent and respectful human bieng to run a successful firm or any organization for that matter. The likes of Vineet succeeded only because of the work that got tossed to him by Clyde and now that honeymoon is over. Starting from scratch and building something is commendable but bieng an [...] about it is far from it. But sadly you and your types will not understand because you are too busy oggling at yourself in the mirror [...]
Bonnie looking for Cly 27 Mar 2018, 03:42
+8 -3
This is a classic textbook example of how one man has the single handed ability to destroy an organization simply because of his arrogance and trigger happy attitude. Credentials as a lawyer may be questionable at best but this and all other comments posted on the other Clasis story definitely evidence a lack of empathy and respect for fellow colleagues. It's not always about the money. Human relationships matter as well.Good that Sumeet left that toxic working environment. God speed to him on his next venture.
Guest 27 Mar 2018, 05:17
+4 -5
Mr Lal [...] was never the raison d'être for any organisation least of all Clasis. [...] And if all positive comments on Clasis lack evidence I don't see any negative ones being supported by either. And if anyone with an ounce of common sense reads them they appear to have one aim - to undermine Clasis. What is the real agenda here? People who are staying with Clasis are poor souls with no option but those who have left or otherwise are exalted , virtuous beings . So why are these people not able to find a single organisation good enough for them. Because it is not the organisations they departed from but they who have issues.
New heights 27 Mar 2018, 05:43
+5 -4
The idea is to save anyone that we can to join that place. Rightly said, it’s nothing less than toxic. Are you really telling me that a firm which had about 50 lawyers and are now left with about 15 in almost one year, is the greatest and the ones who left (all of them being better placed now) were good for nothing? Really? I am actually convinced now, that the bunch that remains there is definitely meant to be together. Good for you guys! And for the record, the new heights that someone is talking about above, would be new heights of even worse work ethics and environment. So yeah, we get you.
Guest 27 Mar 2018, 05:59
+5 -5
So the idea is to get revenge. Dear Good Samaritan you and the likes of you are not responsible for humanity , didn't anyone tell you that. In fact It is your kind that one must be very careful of. And since when did numbers assure goodness. Don't know if Kian will edit this too but in Mahabharat there were hundred kauravs and only five pandavs. But we know who we're the right ones.
ex Lal team member 27 Mar 2018, 12:38
+4 -3
[...]

Kian please be fair to all, dont be selective to publish, atleast let everyone know the truth.
kianganz 27 Mar 2018, 12:56
+2 -5
We generally don't allow personal attacks against individual lawyers, unless it is criticism of management, or managing or senior partners of firms, who are by definition in a more public-facing position.
Guest 27 Mar 2018, 15:51
+4 -2
I am flummoxed Kian. Please explain why personal attacks to any extent are allowed against one individual whereas others are immune to it. It seems your articles are serving as a platform for vendettas based on lies and wrong reporting. SAD.
kianganz 28 Mar 2018, 09:51
+3 -2
Our moderation rules have been the same for a while now.

Criticism of managing partners' style of running a law firm, for instance, are generally allowed and fair comment, since as managing partner they have a somewhat public facing role which is open to scrutiny.

A comment on a managing partner or any other partner or lawyer being an incompetent lawyer, however, we generally don't include.

We generally moderate all comments that abuse leavers on all stories, otherwise some firms' PR functions just make it a free-for-all to denigrate anyone leaving a firm.

We also sometimes do factual sanity checks on comments. In this case, criticism of Aneja, for instance, generally corresponds to the facts as we credibly understand them from a large number of sources over the years. As such, comments criticising Aneja's management style, for instance, reflect very commonly held opinions.
Guest 28 Mar 2018, 11:21
+0 -2
Dear Kian, you also run a business and I hope and believe a very successful one. In your years as a head of your organisation have you only had good employees, never a single bad one? And if you did what did you do? It is very easy to sit in judgement over anyone's management style without facing the difficulties. Most of the people who the comments on your articles say left Clasis started their own firms. So if one wants to look at it positively one can. Also to say all Associates who left Clasis left only because they had a management problem is a very inappropriate assumption. Also people leave even the best firms across the world due to various reasons family, health issues, other ambitions in life but as One can see that rather than admitting to the truth you have given a statement to support your version of wrongful statements.
kianganz 28 Mar 2018, 12:02
+3 -1
Many thanks for your kind wishes. I'm not saying every departure is for management reasons, but...

When every single co-founder leaves, when nearly every lateral partners leaves over the years (except for Motiwala), and when even Clydes leaves, then you surely have to wonder whether the problem is the people leaving or the place they're leaving, no?
Anonymous Guest 2 Apr 2018, 11:16
+0 -1
Kian, what makes you believe that what you believe is believable?
kianganz 2 Apr 2018, 11:26
+3 -0
Wow, that's some heavy post-modern stuff there. What is truth? Discuss. :)
Anonymous Guest 3 Apr 2018, 09:57
+1 -2
That's some high quality ;).

Point is - people come, people go and so do firms and businesses. But why article is so biased against Clasis/ Aneja. Why cant it be a news only without any personal prejudice. Have appreciated your reporting always, please don't make it 'Republic'.
Anonymous Guest 4 Apr 2018, 09:41
+0 -2
Ah! you censored my last comment?? It wasn't targeting anyone except your hypocrisy. Learning a lot from China.
kianganz 4 Apr 2018, 10:14
+3 -0
Ah, sorry had missed that, here you go.

The article is not biased: there was literally nothing positive to say about the firm that's been reported anywhere. And I looked through our entire archives of Clasis stories...
Insider, well wisher 24 Apr 2018, 18:50
+3 -0
Everyone knows that when the management powers are shifted/delagated from the management to the administrative department problems will occur. The partners were great but I feel like that the administrator(tive) powers were more dominative. Warning again for the management to consider to have a new administrator (too dangerous). You will flourish if you do this replacement.
Update 30 Jan 2019, 17:10
+1 -0
Heard more exits are likely to take place shortly and Classis is going to be left with only Aneja and 1-2 partners who have no where to go and stuck to get their bonus forever. Also heard Aneja has finally started to pay it's partners as per industry standard now that he doesn't have any talent left in his firm & existing partners are under tremendous pressure to fetch work before it again affects their bonus. Feeling sorry for people stuck there.