Mirroring Rajiv Luthra ad in papers, Saraf warns public of ‘misreps’ & Delhi HC win vs co-founder

Saraf records new status via newspaper ad
Saraf records new status via newspaper ad

Following his victory on Monday in the Delhi high court, co-founding partner and de facto reinstated senior partner of L&L Partners, Mohit Saraf, has responded in kind to his co-founder Rajiv Luthra with a newspaper notice that of the favourable judgment and warning the public that the public should “exercise caution in dealing with Mr. Rajiv Luthra”.

The public notice, which we understand was published in the Times of India today as well as probably in other newspapers, was made under the L&L Partners logo, and stated:

PUBLIC NOTICE

On 16 October 2020, Mr. Rajiv Luthra issued a public notice to the effect that I, Mohit Saraf, Founder and Senior Partner, was no longer a partner of L&L Partners (formerly Luthra & Luthra Law Offices).

Mr. Rajiv Luthra had also attempted to expel me from the firm and sought to appropriate for himself its various assets, including bank accounts. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide its detailed judgment in OMP(I)(COMM) 339 of 2020 dated 18 January 2021 has stayed Mr Luthra’s actions which were held to be in violation of the partnership deed and the Partnership Act, 1932.

Operation of this direction is in abeyance till 22 January 2021. The detailed 148 page judgement of the Hon’ble Court is available at http://164.100.69.66/jsearch/ (judgment section on the website of Delhi High Court).

In these circumstances, members of the public should exercise caution in dealing with Mr. Rajiv Luthra and not rely on his misrepresentations. Any person dealing solely with Rajiv Luthra in relation to the affairs or assets of the partnership firm do so at their own risk.

Mohit Saraf, Shaurya Chakra

(National Peacetime Gallantry Award)

Founder and Senior Partner.

Saraf’s newspaper notice, follows a similar notice by Luthra on 16 October 2020.

In particular, the last paragraph is almost a verbatim mirror of Luthra’s notice, which had warned “members of the public who deal with Mr Saraf treating him as a representative or acting on behalf of L&L Partners in any capacity, do so at their own risk as to costs and consequences. L&L Partners takes no liability for the same.

Rajiv Luthra
Rajiv Luthra

Reuters journalist Aditya Kalra had tweeted Saraf’s notice today:

The fight between senior partners at one of India’s top law firms, L&L, has now made it to a newspaper “public notice” ad advising caution. Ugly.

— Aditya Kalra (@adityakalra) Wed, 20 Jan 2021, 08:01

Comments

Yeh baat 20 Jan 2021, 06:11
+14 -0
[img]https://media3.giphy.com/media/9hPHL685LJ9v3SpKpq/200.gif[/img]

Kaleen bhaiyya to respond
Kya Yaar! 20 Jan 2021, 06:13
+1 -0
:(
Office Room 20 Jan 2021, 06:20
+19 -2
Wah Wah: Height kam..Fight Jyada!
Associate 20 Jan 2021, 08:55
+2 -0
Sidhi to tab bhi lagani paregi...
Ex LL 20 Jan 2021, 06:50
+20 -10
MS is going to get whooped for this - stay is still under abeyance and using LL logo is clear cut misrepresentation here. Aggressive move but wrong - will backfire when appeal is heard
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 07:47
+17 -4
His moves so far have been the hallmark of the things not to do. Why should this be any different? It is clear that sole leadership quality is lacking in him, especially amidst crisis.
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 06:52
+7 -1
Troll level 100/100!
Oak Law 20 Jan 2021, 06:56
+18 -0
Popcorn lao bhai!
Reema Kohli 20 Jan 2021, 07:11
+12 -4
Full disclosure... This reeks of despair. He might have won the fight but not the war. He still has no powers within the firm as Rajiv, as per the deed, enjoys special governance rights
insider Luthra 20 Jan 2021, 09:39
+1 -1
yeh lene jate hai to seedhee toh paka lagti hogi!
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 09:45
+13 -0
What on earth has he appended to his name? Did he give himself a gallantry award or something?
Oh 20 Jan 2021, 09:50
+9 -0
Is it true that he has already approached DLF towers Jasola for a 1500 square feet office to start with 5 partners?
Jasbir Rumbah 21 Jan 2021, 15:42
+0 -0
Yes it has not been finalized as of now. It's happening
Curious Batliwalla 20 Jan 2021, 11:41
+5 -2
Any idea why the Shaurya Chakra Award was granted?

Why was the Peacetime Gallantry Award bestowed upon him?
Would be fun to know among all this negativity.
Here you go 20 Jan 2021, 13:58
+8 -1
https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/Awardee/mohit-saraf
Besan Lover 21 Jan 2021, 02:20
+5 -2
Very cool, the Shaurya Chakra
Shauraym 20 Jan 2021, 19:32
+9 -0
Sure is milking it..
Well 21 Jan 2021, 09:04
+10 -1
Well, it wasn't given in secret. Don't people append 'Padma Bhushan', 'Padma Vibhushan', etc. to there name? If you can milk 'Founder', 'Co-Founder', 'Founding Partner', 'Senior Partner', etc. - then so can the other titles.
Guest 21 Jan 2021, 10:51
+3 -1
Yes, you can milk it for all that it is worth, and if someone makes lactose-intolerant jokes, then that becomes a moo point.
Well 21 Jan 2021, 12:34
+1 -0
Well, isnt the milk meant to benefit my calf?
Guest 20 Jan 2021, 19:32
+3 -10
Mohit is the Cheteshwar Pujara of lawyers: courageous and determined.
Guest 21 Jan 2021, 05:45
+1 -0
Can't [...], or stop taking questionable actions, or be effective in seizing control of his own firm. So basically, no.
Popat bhai, Esquire 21 Jan 2021, 08:39
+10 -7
For a moment I thought Shaurya Chakra was another aggrieved soul and comrade in arms with MS.

Btw, is it okay to use such titles as a suffix (or prefix) in view of Art 18 of our Constitution and the Supreme Court's pronouncements on the topic.

Gallantry...hmm. And in peace time. Saved a person from drowning? Rushed into a house in flames, showing reckless disregard for own life, in order to retrieve the partnership deed?

Am reminded by of a poem I enjoyed mugging up in school:

"The bride had consented, the gallant came late:
For a laggard in love, and a dastard in war,
Was to wed the fair Ellen of brave Lochinvar"
Guest 21 Jan 2021, 10:00
+13 -7
Your self identification as Popat really is so apt.

You and your comment reeks of privilege - how you make fun of people like firemen, lifeguards and other thousands of bystanders who risk their lives to help others. You really are a pathetic person. I am sure you enjoy making fun of disability, speech defects, anxiety; and dead baby jokes must be wholesome entertainment for you.

Read / research on what he has done. He risked his life to save a girl from trafficking. Have some shame and do not mock unnecessarily, especially good deeds. Mohit may have a lot which can be made fun or rubbished but not this.

I just hope you and yours are never put in a situation where an innocent bystander has to show any kind of spine leave alone heroics.

Sick to the core by people like you.
Guest 21 Jan 2021, 10:50
+7 -4
Yes, if you want to make fun, do so of him trying to shamelessly leverage the award in a matter like this. Not the reason he had been awarded the honour.
Feku 21 Jan 2021, 12:24
+4 -0
And you, basking in reflected glory? Drink up mate, this is going to be one hell of a fight....two gallants. Dutch courage!
Guest 2 21 Jan 2021, 18:39
+2 -1
Spare the fake outrage.Valid point raised on use of govt conferred titles as prefix/suffix.
Jasbir Rumbah 21 Jan 2021, 15:43
+0 -1
Lol
wah wah 21 Jan 2021, 09:57
+4 -0
https://www.gallantryawards.gov.in/sites/default/files/20_3.png
Well 21 Jan 2021, 12:39
+2 -0
Can someone tell why the soft copy is maintained in such bad shape?
From thin air 21 Jan 2021, 13:35
+0 -0
This is why we had the talk to file things as soon as they arrive.