‘Mission to transform practice of law’: Ex-Sequoia GC Sandeep Kapoor’s start-up Algo hits 11 partners, 48 lawyers

Algo: 11 partners in a few months
Algo: 11 partners in a few months

Former Sequoia India general counsel (GC) Sandeep Kapoor has quietly expanded a start-up law firm to three offices in 11 partners (of whom three are associate partners) in the space of only three-odd months since opening its doors on 1 August.

Algo Legal’s aims are ambitious, with Kapoor saying, no less: “It’s my mission to transform the practice of law in the next 10 to 15 years.”

Explaining why he had decided to start a law firm after his nine-year stint at Sequoia, he said: “I want to be responsible as a service provider. Technologies can be served only when you control the process end to end.”

And such knowledge would be shared with the entire industry, Kapoor vowed: “We are going to actively help every firm, create a network, share our learning.”

So far, some of that ambition at least has been borne out in its rapid growth and technology back-end put into place.

Algo Legal’s largest office in Bangalore is 6,500 square feet right now and has a total of 55 staff, of whom 48 are fee-earners, including 11 partners; of those two partners are in Delhi, two in Mumbai and the rest in Bangalore.While the firm is understood to include around 15 lawyers who formerly worked at Themis, Algo’s partnership has clearly drawn from a wider array of (primarily) VC specialist firms and independents (pictured above, left to right, top to bottom):

  • Kapoor, as founder and managing partner,
  • partner Siddharth Manchanda in Mumbai, heading the firm’s transactional advisory practice (formerly a partner at Themis; ILS Pune LLB 2009),
  • partner Vinayak Mishra in Delhi (who had worked as an independent lawyer in early 2019 after having been a principal associate at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas; HNLU Raipur LLB 2008),
  • partner Prashant Kataria in Bangalore (who had been partner at Bangalore private equity boutique Lexygen until July; NLSIU Bangalore LLB 2003),
  • partner Jitender Tanikella in Delhi joined with a team of three (co-founder of TRA Law, who went independent after the split with co-founder Anirudh Rastogi in September 2018; NLIU Bhopal LLB 2006, Columbia LLM 2012),
  • partner Smita Goel, a chartered accountant (not a lawyer) heading Algo’s tax practice in Bangalore (formerly associate director at PwC India),
  • partner Archan Chakraborty (formerly partner at Themis),
  • partner Unnikrishnan Venugopalan, a lawyer and company secretary, heading the corporate secretarial practice at Algo (having previously worked at chipmaker Intel India as company secretary and legal adviser; LLB Bangalore University),
  • associate partner Lalu John Philip in Bangalore, who joined with a team of two (after running a legal tech start-up for a year after having been senior associate at J Sagar Associates (JSA); NLSIU Bangalore 2011),
  • associate partner Prateek Mohapatra in Bangalore (who had joined from K Law, where he was associate partner; RMLNLU 2012), and
  • associate partner Minhaz Lokhandwala (not pictured) in Mumbai (who had joined from Khaitan & Co where he was a principal associate; ILS Pune 2010).

Kapoor said he eventually wanted Algo headcounts to continue growing, though not massively, with an emphasis on efficiencies gained through technology to allow fewer fee-earners to service multiple clients.

Techy back-ends

Algo’s mathematician ex-banker, ex-CEO Nagarkatti
Algo’s mathematician ex-banker, ex-CEO Nagarkatti

Algo also has a number of senior non-lawyer positions as its backbone, said Kapoor: its chief operating officer (COO) is Dhruv Nagarkatti. Before joining Algo he was CEO at LeapStart - a physical education provider to schools - from 2015 to 2018, after two years as head of operations at Bengaluru FC, around two years in the tennis coaching space, and four years at HSBC between 2006 and 2010.

Then, more unusually for most (Indian) law firms, there’s chief innovation officer (CIO) Rasmeet Charya, who had been an advocate at the Delhi high court from 1999 to 2008, worked with legal process outsourcing (LPO) company Mindcrest from until 2010, then co-founded ThemisGroup (which also includes law firm Themis Associates), and in 2016 joined Altisource and then OneDelta Technology Solutions, where she was a strategic advisor. Finally, Algo also has a chief technology officer (CTO).

Algo is a “different and unique story” emerging, noted Kapoor, in part because in “everything we will do, there will be a technology engine behind it, a tool we have built or licensed from third parties”.

Kapoor would not be drawn in great detail yet on some of the exact technology products the firm used, though he said the firm was developing a collaboration platform that promises clients seamless project and workflow management of mandates, while the firm has also started an early-stage legal tech incubation centre that is supporting a centre of online dispute resolution and another entity, which Algo is assisting in “building up an ecosystem”.

As for whether Algo was already able to utilise any gains in efficiency, COO Nagarkatti noted that the firm was “already using contract automation tools to generate contracts, and where we work with funds, we standardise our processes - it is part of our DNA when it comes to processes”.

A large part of that DNA will not just be efficiency, but detailed analytics of exactly what each lawyer is doing and for how long, which will hopefully allow the firm to model how to be more efficient in future. “We have put in the foundation to start collecting data that will give us some insights,” noted Nagarkatti.

Cyborg-lawyer practice profiles

The firm’s main focus, much in line with Kapoor’s and most of the other partners’ background, is on private equity, venture capital and corporate work, though the firm is also assisting clients with finance work, for instance, and “supporting our clients on litigation through our associate networks”, Kapoor said.

That said, it is understood that some areas such as capital markets, for instance, were currently not explicitly on the cards, though service lines would be client-demand driven.

In addition to servicing clients, Algo’s partners will also be expected to strongly interact and improve with technology, including whatever comes out of the incubator or the products that are eventually developed in-house. “We want partners to invest time to ensure the [technology] initiatives take place.”

How grim / bright is the future for tech-aided lawyering?

We asked Nagarkatti, who holds bachelors and masters degrees in mathematics, what kind of maximum efficiencies could be expected from the roll-out of legal technologies in future, but the answer is not so simple. “It’s too early in the day to [establish such figures],” he said. “Even something like a document editing [software] could give you 10% efficiency [boost] - but what does this mean overall? I don’t think anyone has the answer.”

As for whether technology was finally getting into a place where several pundits’ long-predicted ‘death of lawyers’ and the legal profession could become a reality, he said: “Absolutely not. That is something we’re absolutely clear on. Too much has been written about how AI can replace lawyers but technology is there to aid the process. Lawyering will always be an art and [about application of] mind.”

“Where technology comes in, is where it frees up lawyers to do the lawyering.”

On the flipside, and perhaps as a corollary, is it possible that most legal tech is still overhyped and its promises often too lofty, with it never quite getting there? “If [we] had that conviction, I don’t think we would go down that path,” said Nagarkatti. “The reason we are building these tools is because we believe there is value in integrating technology in the entire life cycle of a transaction.”

Comments

Dazed and Confused 5 Dec 2019, 05:36
+63 -1
Wish them well, but sounds like some serious Valley-style Kool-Aid in the office Bisleri dispenser. The only portion of this message that Indian clients will hear is "cheaper," which is just about the worst strategy a personal service professional can take for long-term success. And the top-heavy, non-fee earner structure will implode. Driving down the price of standardized deal docs for clients already contemptuous of the value of advice (*cough* PE/VC funds), will freeze your market perception, not provide a rung up the value chain. I say - less than 18 months before major departures, three years to closure or a "strategic merger to better leverage our innovation on behalf of clients." And yes, I had breakfast today.
Legal tech 5 Dec 2019, 19:41
+4 -0
Would be worth doing some research on how the legal tech industry is growing. This would help lawyers become better by atleast taking care of mundane tasks. Atleast someone has the courage of trying this in India. Any tech can do wonders to process. All the best to the pioneers!
It happened 30 Dec 2020, 04:31
+4 -0
Well, some thoughts on the year gone by reminded me of this feature on Algo. The first comment then had predicted - less than 18 months before major departures, three years to closure or a "strategic merger to better leverage our innovation on behalf of clients."

The first prediction has come true already, as if it were a soothsayer's premonition..8 out of the founding 11 are out!!! Of the remaining, it's SK as non-lawyer Founder and SG as non-lawyer tax partner. Today this corporate VC focussed firm as only 2 so-called VC lawyers across the board!! With a non-lawyer sitting on the top as Managing Partner, this was bound to happen! Let's see if SK manages to prove the 3-year predictions wrong.

[img]https://media4.giphy.com/media/kILxwQoafCVi84cgUw/200.gif[/img]
Aam Admi 5 Dec 2019, 05:55
+26 -1
Same old stuff in new packaging and new jargons.
VishalK 5 Dec 2019, 06:52
+7 -8
That's a formidable growth in such short time. Seems like Algo Legal has found its sweet spot as far as market fitment is concerned.
“Where technology comes in, is where it frees up lawyers to do the lawyering.” - I think this principle is absolutely necessary for any legal tech venture.
I see a lot of lawyers' time is wasted in operational overheads, waiting in courts, drowning in heaps of paperwork. They should be spending time doing thorough case research, improving efficiency of legal services etc. Tech driven services like what Algo Legal is providing should take a lot of burden off the lawyers' shoulders and help them focus on lawyering instead.
RealityStone 5 Dec 2019, 09:08
+21 -2
Sounds great on paper (or the notes app on your iPad) but this simply means that the teams will constantly be short-staffed, because the founders decided that a buzzword driver third party software is good enough to replace two associates.

The tech just don't exist yet and no matter how much machine learning or AI-assisted software is put into place, you simply can't replace a lawyer with an app, just yet.
Littu guy 5 Dec 2019, 09:30
+7 -2
You mean now Aglo lawyers will not wait in courts or will not drown themselves in paperwork! I guess then they will be ding coding for clients!
Litigator 12 Dec 2019, 00:05
+3 -0
Where in the article there is any mention of lessening the burden of a litigating /court attending lawyer. How can technology replace the Indian judicial process? The only solution technology provides today is in back-end jobs like contract drafting or analysis which is more relevant to non-litigating high-profile corporate law firms. In this day of using templates for initial drafting, there is not much hype for technology based contract generation. Real hope the AI/ML brings in is through the negotiation of agreements, which sadly remains in the minds of lawyers
Salman khan 5 Dec 2019, 08:24
+0 -0
So good to see new initiatives like these. Law firms in India need to evolve and go beyond family run business set up style.
Littu guy 5 Dec 2019, 08:41
+9 -1
investing in ...15% interest bearing bonds has paid off !
007 6 Dec 2019, 05:09
+3 -0
Very nicely said! 15% ka kamaal!
aaaa 5 Dec 2019, 09:11
+8 -1
100% agree with dazed and confused here. Indian firms need to get out of the "hey one year and 80 lawyers" marketing trap. The question is always going to be are you sustainable as a practice. Anyone looking to buy work by lowering prices wont be. Its simple math.

Anyhow I'm sure these guys know what they are doing - best of luck to the Algo team!
jingle bells 5 Dec 2019, 09:25
+12 -0
based on my experience, they certainly could do with an efficiency boost!![img]https://media0.giphy.com/media/Nweu3IeBIZIvm/200.gif[/img]
ex 5 Dec 2019, 10:16
+19 -0
I hope they at least pay their employees decent salary, unlike its previous avatar.
Gulabi bai 5 Dec 2019, 10:21
+0 -0
Someone should do some due diligence about [...]
Believer 5 Dec 2019, 12:43
+0 -7
I think their approach is slightly different to those lost in the usual tech-hype. Wait and see - clients and the technology might just be ready for something like this. And ultimately results will put the usual market cynicism and conservatism to rest.
LOL 5 Dec 2019, 15:58
+19 -0
A lot of jargon but no actual substance. There is nothing mentioned here other than a software that generates base drafts. as we all know, randomly using some draft without application Nevers ends well. Seems like the focus is on quantity over quality. But then again there are a lot of clients out there who look at legal costs as just money down the drain, this should appeal to them.
Gulabi bai 6 Dec 2019, 02:01
+5 -0
Someone should do a proper due diligence on [...]
kianganz 6 Dec 2019, 07:13
+0 -4
Honestly, that rumour has been floating around for a while and we've looked into it a fair bit over the years with absolutely zero corroboration, other than hearsay. If you have anything concrete that's possible to stand up, please share anonymously in a reply and will take it up.
007 6 Dec 2019, 09:45
+0 -0
Giving and taking both are an offence. Why would either party speak or give evidence?
ExThemis 6 Dec 2019, 04:49
+2 -0
Only 10-12 comments. Thats no buzz....
Well wisher 6 Dec 2019, 05:32
+1 -1
Kian,

Some advice. I know that you have sold subscriptions and now need to justify the same. This article is not that big a scoop that it needed to be redacted for subscribers for a while. This has been in the news for a while. You really need to make a better call on what to keep locked and what to release to the public. Keeping articles like this locked is counter productive to the subscription model and will put off people like me from becoming a subscriber if this is the exclusivity that is being offered.

Well wisher of LI.
kianganz 6 Dec 2019, 07:10
+4 -1
Thanks for your feedback. Agree that the Algo isn't super new anymore, but I believe we are still the first to cover what the firm is intending to do.

Regarding subscription, our strategy is very much to put more and more stories behind a temporary paywall accessible only to subscribers. Some of the news may be super fresh, some may have been kicking around the market for a while longer, but I think most are interesting and relevant reads about the market. This story, judging by the reader interest and traffic at least, certainly seems to be one of those.

In any case, I think this kind of front-ended paywall is a lot better and fairer to readers than hiding all our archives or all our articles behind a paywall, which would be an easy road to take. But for those who enjoy being in the loop on the cutting edge of what's going on in the Indian corporate legal market, I think it's a good way of supporting independent publishing, while still giving access to information to those who can't afford it.
Change is Imminent 6 Dec 2019, 07:48
+3 -5
Not sure why all the negativity.

It seems like a group of lawyers who have decent traction and name in the market are trying to do something different.

Legal Tech is already creating ripples in the west and is touted as the next big thing. Unlike some of the more prestigious firms (who have the so called legal Tech programmes), these guys are actually investing time, money and effort in doing something different.

Whether it works or not, only time will tell. What though is accurate is that they are targeting something largely untouched in Indian legal ecosystem.
Bramhastra 6 Dec 2019, 08:35
+7 -0
Post Disclaimer: The story, incidents portrayed here are fictitious. No identification with actual persons (working or resigned), places, buildings, and entity (except everyone knows which one) is intended or should be inferred.
exthemisian 11 Dec 2019, 20:04
+1 -0
Everything is fictitious ;-)
green lantern 6 Dec 2019, 09:13
+3 -0
my standards are realistic.
as long as men are not going about retorting to judges, stealing public money or .. raping.. and as long as they are doing a legal productive business which involves atleast some honest old-fashioned work: it is good. wish them
well. it is a good team.
Amazing.. 6 Dec 2019, 10:22
+16 -0
Kian, you might want to update the story because people represented above, if not more, 2 people are already on the move out, serving their last days:) But other than this, I guess this should turn out good for Algoians and for the community at large. Best of luck. And yes, I know about moves, because they are joining us or our frnds :):)
Bramhastra 6 Dec 2019, 12:33
+1 -0
[img]https://media2.giphy.com/media/mgqefqwSbToPe/200.gif[/img]
Update 9 Dec 2019, 08:15
+1 -0
I guess this will be covered in a separate article.
LackOfOxygen 6 Dec 2019, 16:48
+9 -1
If Prashant Kataria joined Algo, who is left?
JackalOfLuru 9 Dec 2019, 12:15
+7 -0
Founders?
Ta-Al 9 Dec 2019, 13:54
+1 -0
The exodus has begun. While the aspirations of Algo are lofty it all depends on the ability of Sandeep and everyone at Algo to stem the outflow of good talent and manage this current trying time. It may be time for a long hard introspection and breaking the Themis hangover in the management.

The talent at Algo that continued from Themis continued because of inertia not because they agreed with the Algo vision, before Sandeep can sell the Algo vision to the world he needs to sell it to his own team; and he needs to ensure it’s not used as a factory to feed the “tech” arm and that the tech arm has its own resources and is not overburdening the law firm arm.
KannadigaAnna 10 Dec 2019, 21:38
+7 -1
Founders and a few clients.
Gem of a guy 9 Dec 2019, 10:27
+1 -22
Sandeep Kapoor is a gem of a person and a fantastic senior to work with! :D

All the best guys!
Ta-Al 9 Dec 2019, 13:48
+14 -0
Not sure if serious or shifu level of sarcasm.
Marketplace 9 Dec 2019, 12:40
+0 -0
Their resumes are all over in the market! Kian, soon you will be reporting people resigning and joining other firms!
Rumor-monger 7 Mar 2020, 13:51
+0 -0
hearing rumors from left and right -some thoughts running through my mind are:- PwC (the auditors for Satyam Computers whose two year ban in listed entities by SEBI is set aside by SAT) now have a legal entity in India? When the law of the land prohibits accountants from giving legal advice, the Big4/6 open a boutique partnership providing everything under the sun? You are either a technology firm or a law firm. Can you be both? Does the bar council permit technology to start doling out legal advice left and right? Law may permit a law firm to use technology but can law firms start selling technology/software products?
The answer is a big NO. So what do you do to circumvent law? Give the law firm's brand name to the tech company or give the accountant's brand name to the law firm. As long as the invoicing is done under a different heading, who cares about law/ethics?
Guest 7 Mar 2020, 15:15
+0 -1
Does BCI regulate law firms as such or the individual lawyers in it only? In which case a firm can have other non lawyers selling the tech.
Rumor-monger 9 Mar 2020, 06:22
+0 -0
Please read rule 36 of Chapter-II of Part-VI of the Bar Council of India Rules, titled "Duty to Colleagues", which prohibits advocates from giving interviews or soliciting work through any advertisements, newspaper comments (either on legally India or otherwise). What is applicable for lawyers will also apply to a law firm - it is for this reason that most law firms have a disclaimer on their homepage. For a laywer to sell tech, when the said rule 36 prohibits solicitation or giving interviews (albeit even as a comment on legally Inida), would love have a lively discussion as to how can marketing of a legal tech be done by an advocate or a law firm.
Guest 9 Mar 2020, 07:09
+0 -0
What if the lawyer has allowed his advocate's license to be suspended? Like an in-house guy? There's nothing to prevent him from still being associated with a firm.
Rumor-monger 9 Mar 2020, 08:32
+0 -0
Answer is present in your reply. A law firm can practice law only through its advocates on roll of the bar council. A law firm which associates with a person who has suspended his license to practice will no longer be considered legal. Take for example, this Legally India article on which we are commenting. There is a chief operating officer- whose role would be limited to management of the law firm's internal management or enter into any agreement with vendors who provide services to the law firm, but not with any customers, as only a lawyer on the roll of the bar council can enter into agreement with customer to provide legal services (to get attorney client privilege, the customer should be agreeing with a practicing lawyer in India not with just any person who has suspended his license to practice like an in-house counsel).
Guest 9 Mar 2020, 08:55
+0 -0
Exactly, so that model should still work, right?
Rumor-monger 10 Mar 2020, 05:56
+0 -0
Blistering barnacles. So abstract a word - "that model," without specifying what is being referred to, gives rise more questions in my mind than before.
Firstly, this article of Legally India states that tax practice is headed by a partner who is a chartered accountant no less from PwC while the corporate secretarial practice is headed by a partner who is a company secretary. When reviewing the Bar Council Rules, I found a mention that accounts has to be audited by a chartered accountant or a firm of chartered accountants (CAs). Going by the same analogy that a firm of chartered accountants cannot have non-CA, when we talk about legal advice, it can either be a from lawyer or firm of lawyers. So it is legally permissible to have a law firm whose partners include a chartered accountant and a practicing company secretary? Would a client availing service from such a firm with non-lawyer partners get the the promise of advice which is statutorily legal?
Secondly, this article mentions that the managing partner had a nine year stint at some private company, before starting a firm in August 2019. When bar council of India rules mandate a lawyer to suspend practice during any employment and prohibits lawyers to engage in any business (law firm is not a business - its a profession of lawyers alone),does the client verify/due diligence if the partners of a law firm have a valid roll number from bar council before engaging with them?
Unlike the United States of America, where even a advice in legal matters from a non-lawyer qualify to be a privilege, does Indian laws consider any legal advise as attorney-client privilege or legal advise only from a lawyer who has a valid roll number? Just like in any agreement, we verify that the authorized signatory have the authority to sign the agreement, do clients in India demand that the law firms provide the roll numbers of all its partners before engaging them for any legal related work?
What is the position in case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) paid on reverse charge mechanism by clients, in case it is held by Bar Council that the law firm's advice does not qualify to be legal advice? When such a law firm loses its standing in law to be a GST exempted establishment, what happens to all the validity of legal due diligence reports performed by such law firm from its inception?
As stated in comment no 22.1.1, rule 36 prevents lawyers from producing photographs such as the one published in this article for advertisement. In comment no.14.1 Kianganz admits that what he publishes qualifies to be news. So, will Legally India be liable for publishing interviews about the practice of a lawyer or will bar council will take action against the law firm for giving interviews?
Why does all these comments (including mine) are submitted anonimously? Is it because that rule 36 mandates lawyers to not solicit by way of inspiring newspaper comments?
Best regards,
Rumor Monger
Guest 10 Mar 2020, 06:17
+0 -0
And I'm sure you have a theory about who killed Kennedy too.
Rumor-monger 10 Mar 2020, 06:26
+0 -0
This reply of mine raises my hackles. How dare I reply that an in-house counsel's advice is not legally valid in India? Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits lawyers to disclose any professional communications made by clients without their permission. Lawyer is defined only by bar council and in-house counsels who accept employment are not lawyers at all. So in India, an in-house counsel may advise the corporate entity for whom he works, but his advise would not be treated as legal advice or professional advise. So, does this mean that there will be no attorney client privileges for any communication between an -in-house counsel and other employees?
Is this the reason that companies outsource the legal work to a law-firm with partners-all of whom are lawyers who are enrolled in bar council, even though they may have an in-house counsel?
Guest 10 Mar 2020, 06:39
+0 -0
What about some of the other famous unsolved murders then? Like the Zodiac Killer?
Rumor-monger 10 Mar 2020, 07:19
+0 -0
My only thought as a lawyer is with regard to the clients I get to serve. I would advise clients to get a representation and warranty in any engagement with a law-firm that the law-firm represents that all its partners have a valid bar council registration (valid because the lawyer should have paid for either life time membership or renewed membership after any suspension) and a warranty that in case the bar council initiates any proceedings suo-moto (based on this comment in Legally India) or on any anonymous complaint, the law-firm makes good all losses without limitation, including any attorney fees and losses suffered due to relying on so called legal advise (which actually turned out to be illegal due to vitiating the law-firm with partners who do not hold bar council registration).
Best Regards,
Rumor-monger
Post Script: My intention is not to harm any one individual but just a humorous way of depicting the way corporate law firms are being managed in India. I have also not touched upon the subject of foreign lawyers or opinion given by Indian law firms in association with foreign law firms, which will be more juicier than what is stated until now.
Guest 10 Mar 2020, 09:09
+1 -0
Bas kar pagle! Ab rulayega kya?