Trilegal makes second female partner out of 'founding associate'

Bangalore Vidhana Soudha
Bangalore Vidhana Soudha
Trilegal has promoted the second woman to its partnership, as Bangalore corporate senior associate Kosturi Ghosh has swelled the senior ranks to 16.

Ghosh has joined Trilegal’s Bangalore in 2002 from law school in ILS Pune, shortly after the firm was started up in 2001.

Her practice focuses on general corporate law and corporate advisory work in the technology space.

She said she was very excited about the promotion but added: “Of course life will get harder [as a partner] but it will be a different kind of game.”

Last year the firm promoted four partners, including its first female partner Charandeep Kaur in Delhi, and increased salaries and bonuses.

Bangalore employment and corporate lawyer Ajay Raghavan was also promoted to the partnership in the same 2009 promotion round. He had also joined Trilegal right when it was first set up in 2001.

Ghosh is the second woman to join Trilegal’s partnership of 16, and like Kaur, she also took maternity leave two years ago after she gave birth to her child.

She said that it was difficult juggling the twin commitments. “It was quite hard to go off on leave for a while and come back,” she recounted. “I’ve had to take it a little easy and step-by-step but I’ve always wanted to come down this route.”

“I’ve got sort of flexible hours and I can work from home when I want to,” she added. “To that extent [Trilegal is] quite good and there are no questions asked, there is no sort of red tapeism. As long as I do my work and all work is done.”

Trilegal co-founding partner Anand Prasad said that there were likely to be further partnership promotions before the end of this financial year on 31 March, although some might get deferred until afterwards.

“The default is that we do it on an annual basis,” he said, “but to deal with various situations we also sort of do some promotions as we go along.”

Comments

Anonymous guest 9 Mar 2010, 22:42
+1 -0
Atleast some law firm in India which appreciates the fact that a woman can manage home and her profession together well with support from the employer in terms of flexi hours and permission to work from home....its time other law firms provided similar support to their women lawyers and allowed them to work from home in pressing times....if similar support and trust is extended by other law firms, not many female lawyers would give their flourishing careers due to long hours involved with the profession...!!
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 00:26
+4 -1
I too want flexible hours and I am a man!!! Where are my rights?? I too manage my home!!
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 01:10
+2 -1
@ #2 LOL
Funny but true
singha 10 Mar 2010, 01:19
+1 -0
Seems like women are going places :-)
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 02:04
+1 -1
Kos, very well done!! You deserve it - you are a fantastic lawyer - and I know because I have been ur mooting researcher and u taught me how to walk fast :-)
Anon
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 03:30
+0 -0
Even Mulla n Mulla appointed a female partner, Rashna Khan, earlier this year....she is a qualified solicitor and has been with the firm for the past three decades!!
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 03:48
+0 -0
yey kosss!!!! super
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 04:30
+1 -0
it seems that this is quota politics in the private sector. ppl should be promoted on the basis of merit and not because they happen to be women.

if women consider themselves to be equal they should not get any special favours.
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 14:21
+0 -0
@ 2

Are you a hermaphodite? If not, then you will not be entitled to maternity benefits.
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 18:18
+0 -0
@8
When we are talking about flexi-hours and permission to work from women...we are not asking for any favours...i think women have the capacity to perform to their fullest and make sure all work is completed on time even if she is working from home...i think women are born with this special capability which i think men lack....i must tell our profession which is male dominated...and to which all women will agree with me that women have to work harder to prove that they are better than their male counterparts even when not sitting long hours at office. We all believe that any promotion in law firms is based on merit and quota is never a basis...atleast not in our profession.
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2010, 18:29
+0 -0
#8, go through pregnancy and have a baby and then make that comment. Can't because you are a man? Well then consider your words carefully. They "happen to be women" as you say, yes and women "happen" to be the only gender of the species capable of having babies, had you noticed? Society needs to recognise that this is an important thing and place some value on it, which is what the firm seems to be doing.

Also, your comment seems to presume that Ms. Ghosh has not got this on the basis of merit - on what basis do say that? 2 women partners out of 16 hardly smacks of "quota politics". This is a sensiible retention policy for lawyers considered to be good as far as I can see.
Anonymous guest 11 Mar 2010, 16:11
+0 -0
well well.... seems that trilegal have come a long way from the days when the office didn't even provide safe and reliable transport for female staff working late into the night (which, I must add, is quite common in the firm) to making up their second female partner. Well, congratulations are in order - to Kos in particular.

Whether Trilegal is actually doing this as part of trying to be a more women friendly firm remains to be seen, particularly judging from Anand Prasad's comment - "but to deal with various situations we also sort of do some promotions as we go along." Wonder if this is just a "situation" that they have had to deal with.

Watch this space!
Anonymous guest 12 Mar 2010, 04:47
+3 -1
generally speaking, men are more intelligent than women but women are more hardworking and sincere. thus, girls always outperform boys in the CBSE//ICSE, even though men have higher IQ levels.

women make better transactional lawyers because it requires little intelligence but lots of hard work and dedication. on the other hand, men make better litigation lawyers because it is more intellectually challenging.
Anonymous guest 12 Mar 2010, 18:09
+0 -1
Does Trilegal have some kind of Women Reservation Act already in place? Congratulations!
Anonymous guest 12 Mar 2010, 20:53
+0 -0
@13
Do you have study to support that men are more intelligent than women...sorry i beg to disagree...!! What makes you think that women dont make good litigation lawyers most of the women give up litigation and do not give you men a competition in litigation because of long hours involved in litigation...they do not take transactional work because of less intelligence...btw what even makes u think that transactional work doesn't require intelligence....i think all will agree that a good drafted document can avoid all future propects of parties going in for litigation...!! I think you need greater intelligence to avoid litigation than fighting in the courts..!! Good drafting can come only come from an intelligent mind!!
Anonymous guest 13 Mar 2010, 00:32
+0 -0
#13 is a classic troll.......and #15 is a classic bait-biter :-)
Anonymous guest 14 Mar 2010, 16:25
+0 -0
agree with #16 ..........anyway, congratulations Kosturi ! GOOD show!
Anonymous guest 16 Mar 2010, 15:08
+1 -0
This is unbelievable and really ridiculous to see the brawl over this man-woman thing..and that too by lawyers who claim to be superior intellects!!!
I thought that this is a matter of past and that we have accepted the way man and woman is...That man and woman both has advantages and disadvantages akin...That its not about equality but all about accpeting woman as a woman and man as a man...That respecting an individual for abilities irrespective of Gender...I doubt the entitlement of those who were pro-man or pro-woman to go on to become a judge in this country...if lawyers become biased it will definitely impact the administration of justice as these lawyers are the ones who are to draft laws and to become judicial officers in the future!!!
Anonymous guest 27 Mar 2010, 13:52
+1 -0
#11 - Why are you so proud about the fact that women can give birth to babies and men can't?! There are several things only men can do, and women can't, no matter how much anyone might argue! The unfortunate part about the Indian society is that if a man started listing things which only men can do but women can't, he would be labelled as a chauvinistic pig. However, if a woman points out that there are things like giving birth which only they can do but men can't, everyone seems to take celebrate that statement! Why the hell! Women should understand that they are NOT special, just like men aren't.
Someone also said women are capable of working from home and with flexible hours while men aren't. Really? You did a scientific study on this? If women are so much better than men, why is this only the 2nd female partner at trilegal out of 16? Because, trilegal likes to discriminate against women? I don't think so! Because women have to take care of household chores and upbringing of their child more than men?! That is far from true today.
Please be more responsible in making such general, sweeping statements in future. Thanks!
Anonymous guest 27 Mar 2010, 20:06
+0 -0
hehe. i agree with number 13. men are wasting their time being corporate lawyers. Agreement review and drafting isn't really the most manly thing to do!
Anonymous guest 27 Mar 2010, 22:39
+1 -0
@19 - what exactly did #11 say wrong? She did not say that women are entitled to promotions simply by virtue of being able to procreate. All she said was that giving birth to a child is something only a woman can do, and that it is very much a part of the natural human female life cycle for many many women. She did not say women are asking for favours; she stated that women and men are intrinsically different and have different biological roles to play, so it is common sense that some rules should be different for men as for women, in order that women be able to maximise both these important occupations - being a legal professional and being a mother. I have no doubt that if the lady's productivity significantly decreases post her beginning working from home, the firm will let her go. I also have no doubt that if you as a man had serious issues with working from office, and were valuable enough to retain anyway, you would be offered the option to work from home. Rules about where you work from are not sacred, billing is. This is the attitude of intelligent law firms.

Also? YES women are special. They have the ability to give birth, which men and eunuchs do not. Men are ALSO special in different ways; without their sperm, there would be no kids to give birth to. Eunuchs are different and special in many many ways. 'Special' is in context. This should be obvious. If it is not, YOU are obviously 'special', and I'm talking Special Olympic 'special'.

Get off the high horse.