CAM partnership grows 6%, promotes 10, nearly 50% fewer than last year • Good mix with 2 GNLU, ILS

New CAM partners
New CAM partners

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has promoted 10 to salaried partner level, as first reported Bar & Bench.

Managing partner Cyril Shroff said in a press release: “While COVID-19 continues to create uncertainties and challenges, we remain focused on taking steps to navigate its impact while looking at the future and promoting partners is an important part of this.”

While 60% of the new promotees are women, the promotions this time have been announced around two months later and the total number is nearly half the number that had been promoted in May 2019, when 19 were elevated, reflecting CAM’s so-far hyper-cautious outlook towards the ballooning Covid-19 crisis.

Albeit in June projecting “business as usual” in its other fee-earner promotions, CAM has taken aggressive steps to shore up its bottom line, such as deferring fresher start dates until 2021 and cuts-cum-deferrals of fee-earner and partner retainers.

In general corporate + employment:

  • Abe Abraham: employment (Bengaluru), ILS Pune (2001)
  • Aditi Singhvi: general corporate (Mumbai), NLU Jodhpur (2011)
  • Mudit Shah: general corporate/real estate (Ahmedabad), GNLU Gandhinagar (2009)
  • S Harish: general corporate (Bengaluru), GNLU Gandhinagar (2011)

In banking, finance and/or projects:

  • Abhishek Sridhar: banking and finance (Mumbai), Nalsar Hyderabad (2008)
  • Aditi Misra: projects and project finance (New Delhi), ILS Pune (2011)
  • Mallika Chopra: banking and finance (Mumbai), Symbiosis (2008)
  • Shukti Trivedi: banking and finance (Mumbai), NLIU Bhopal (2006)

In dispute resolution:

  • Radhika Dubey: disputes (New Delhi), IP University (2007)
  • Shikha Tandon: disputes (New Delhi), Amity Law School (2006)

The firm has also promoted Mumbai-based financial regulatory lawyer Gazal Rawal to partner designate, which is a pre-salaried partner rung in CAM’s career progression.

Practice focus

The firm has promoted four each within the wider corporate and finance umbrellas, and two in dispute resolution.

In a press release, the firm’s chair of finance, projects & insolvency, L Viswanathan, said that the promotions would “foster a culture of performance enabled growth”, adding: “The finance practice at CAM continues to grow at a steady pace and is uniquely positioned in the market. The additions to the banking and finance and projects streams will help maintain and strengthen CAM’s market leading position in these areas.”

Reeba Chacko, national head of corporate, said in the release: “As a firm, we have considered a very high individual performance threshold in addition to our practice requirements such as a special sector or product focus over and above the broad-based practice of each of them.”

Mumbai saw four new partners, followed by three in Delhi, two in Bengaluru and one in its Ahmedabad office.

Does size matter?

These promotions grow Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas partnership to 141, just shy of Khaitan & Co’s 153 partners following its massive round of 16 salaried partner promotions earlier this month.

While largest number of partners in an Indian law firm is a somewhat arbitrary metric (though a virtual prize that firms have understandably long publicised and tried to aim for), if the roles had been reversed and Khaitan had promoted nine to partner and CAM 16, CAM would now have the largest number of partners again.

Khaitan’s total number of partners, despite promoting a greater number than last year, only increased by one from 152, as at the promotion round in April 2019, suggesting significant attrition or departures at Khaitan over the last 12 months.

CAM’s partnership tally in May 2019 stood at 132.

CAM senior partner Vandana Shroff said in the press release: “I am also very proud to see an increasing number of women partners in the partnership.”

Law schools

The spread between alma mater law schools, for those readers interested, is fairly evenly split in this promotion round at CAM, with no law schools except GNLU Gandhinagar and ILS Pune having produced more than one partners.

Other LLB colleges are NLU Jodhpur, Nalsar Hyderabad, SLS Pune, NLIU Bhopal and IP University and Amity Law School.

Comments

Mastram 27 Jul 2020, 06:13
+18 -0
Congratulations to all on your promotion. You have worked very hard for many years, and have now arrived. So here is wishing all the best to each one of you :)
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 12:41
+6 -24
No one will talk about gender representation here.

How come less men got promotions in this law firm?
Hot dog 27 Jul 2020, 12:50
+12 -4
Because law firms are already a sausage fest...
Ex CAM 27 Jul 2020, 06:21
+21 -5
A very hearty congratulations Abhishek and Shukti. Working with both of you has been such a pleasure and a great learning experience.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 06:37
+0 -2
Is firm dispute resolution anywhere as good as real lit?
In terms of comp, potential for growth, uncertainty etc.......
CAM joinee 27 Jul 2020, 07:38
+1 -1
I have asked a similar question below. Hope someone answers that.
Insider 27 Jul 2020, 08:10
+14 -1
New joinees opt for firm lit at the beginning because it almost entirely eliminates uncertainty. They have a steady retainer coming in for the first few years while their peers catch up. Pay disparity for an A0 with a "real" lit counterpart can be over 10x in some cases.

Potential for growth plateaus 8-10 years into the profession, because even a full equity partner cannot rake in the amount of money that a halfway successful litigator can. One must also take into account that unaccounted-for cash income forms a substantial part of "real" litigator take-home, in some cases nearly 80%.
Suggestion 27 Jul 2020, 08:32
+3 -7
In that case, a better alternative could be to go to lit firm for the initial years and then go independent.

However, I don't think most litigators earn more than a law firm partner. Most law firm partners make much more than their litigation batchmates.
Follow ups 27 Jul 2020, 09:22
+4 -1
1. Are you saying that in the LONG RUN a decently successful litigator makes less money than a law firm partner?
2. How do these two paths compare: a) working in a lit team of a large firm for 10-12 yrs (becoming a partner) and then directly going independent & b) working in a firm for 2-3 yrs, joining a seniors chamber for a few years and then going independent?
I've heard firm lit people struggle to handle volumes / have less breadth of knowledge compared to a hardcore litigator.
Thoughts?
Insider 27 Jul 2020, 11:59
+1 -0
1. In the long run, say 15 years or so, a moderately successful litigator can take home a very sizeable income, definitely on par with law firm partners. The uncertainty is also reversed to some extent, because an independent litigator can sail through free months, like the summers, but law firm partners are never off the timer.

2. Option a is very very common. In a law firm you can only take home a portion of what you make, whereas as an independent counsel you can take home the whole amount and pay far less in taxes. Option b isn't considered ideal because you're kind of in a limbo without adequate experience in either sphere.

[quote]I've heard firm lit people struggle to handle volumes / have less breadth of knowledge compared to a hardcore litigator.[/quote]

Well, that's a generalisation, but law firm litigators are obviously used to a slightly more cushy work ethic than on-the-ground litigators.
Evangelist 27 Jul 2020, 13:07
+9 -2
If your conundrum is counsel practice vs litigation in a firm, I suggest you leave the economics out of the equation at present.

Counsel practice is the most dynamic and exciting field of litigation. If you are interested and can see yourself willing to put in the time, it is a perfect career option. It requires immense dedication and focus on a consistent basis. Weekends will typically be spent working or in conferences.

Firm litigation is also a very exciting field. While you will not be arguing before the Court, there is an ocean of thought, ideas, research, drafting and strategy, apart from what transpires in Court. In time, you will realise that as the AOR, you control the the destiny and direction of your matter. You will realise that you must guide the Senior Advocate / arguing counsel. The very best of Senior Advocates rely on AORs for guidance and direction. And the relationship and rapport that you, as the instructing attorney, would develop with arguing counsels, is truly special and one of my favourite elements of the practice.

Leave the economics aside my young friend. Analyse yourself and know yourself, and accordingly take a decision. This is a very rewarding field at a personal level - with integrity and dedication, sky is the limit.
Sawaal na poocho buss 27 Jul 2020, 16:20
+9 -5
"Sir is nothing else is dynamic or exciting?"
"Counsel practice is the most dynamic and exciting field of litigation."
"Please can I get some objective guidance, sir?"
"Objective? I suggest you leave objectivity out of the equation."
"No, sir. Can I get some facts and figures please?"
"Leave the economics aside, my yound friend."
"Sir please sir, my whole family is waiting for me to start earning. Can I please get some real guidance instead of hot air in cheap prose"
"What? Didn't I mention this is a very rewarding field at a personal level? "
Sorry but not sorry 28 Jul 2020, 03:33
+2 -1
It's been sometime that I have been asking the same question on several LI post and everytime I ask this, I am either trolled for asking about the money or given platitudes in answer. Sir, for me economics is important. And how does it hurt someone if he wants to keep money as an important determinant in his career trajectory? And no, I am not being entitled here, I am merely requesting answer. But is it too much to avoid blaming people who ask about money?
Guest 28 Jul 2020, 05:31
+2 -0
Yeah I mean it’d be great if someone could go into some eco - let’s say for a moderate successful 40yr old AOR ??
Because most of us already have some broad idea about economics of a firm career
Evangelist 29 Jul 2020, 02:06
+1 -0
If this is your attitude, you are doomed. If money is your paramount consideration, you can join a firm and take your chances there. There is nothing more to be said to someone who is incapable of understanding the distinction between a profession and a job.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 06:40
+1 -6
How long before they take the Okhla train?
NoOkhla 27 Jul 2020, 07:49
+16 -4
Why would anyone board the Okhla train. That train is no longer in service. No one wants to go to Okhla to endure those pointless food critiques. There are better places.
falling standards 27 Jul 2020, 06:45
+3 -20
Why zero from NLS? It's been a trend, clearly NLS is no longer dominant and other NLUs are at par in the corp firms.
Entitled 27 Jul 2020, 07:51
+12 -20
Thats because the NLS ones feel that they are entitled. No longer. There is better talent from other schools. Besides, its not about the school. Its about your talent and ability as a lawyer. Anyone who thinks that the law school stamp is the all in all parameter for selection to a law firm is sadly mistaken. Its about you and your talent. Not about the school anymore so stop making it about the school.
Haan bhai 27 Jul 2020, 18:47
+7 -2
Time has come

Now we will soon start having partners from Himachal Pradesh national law school, Assam National law school, Sikkim national law school and jabalpur law school
NLS Grad 27 Jul 2020, 07:59
+14 -2
Law Firms are really not on top of the food chain, you know? There are several career options that people would think outrank them. Many of them pay as much, or more, than law firms.

Not to diss those who work in firms, it's still one of the most lucrative and most respected options out there, but if that's all your imagination can contemplate, then I do feel sorry for you.
Yes 27 Jul 2020, 12:39
+7 -9
And some of them don't pay as much, but provide a path to cause impact and change the society. Like being a social justice activist.

If one has the option to be meneka guruswamy or a lawfirm partner (Clerk/peon/ghonchu/), who would one choose?

People argue that lawfirm pays the bills. But why have those bills in the first place? Why does one have to take expensive vacations, or live in a big flat? Or go to high end restaurants?

Wouldn't one be happier if one helps a underprivileged person fight for his or her legal rights?
Blind 27 Jul 2020, 13:07
+16 -3
The lawfirm life has more demerits than merits, that is for sure. But your presumptions are idiotic, not to mention ignorant. People do what they can - not every law firm partner is cut out for activism or fighting PILs. In fact, most lawyers aren't. What people do with their money is their prerogative; your weirdly textbook marxist agenda finds no place in real life, you bitter person.
Ghonchu Clerk 27 Jul 2020, 16:56
+6 -4
Right on Comrade!! Laal salaam ..isn't that what they say in your world?
Real reason 27 Jul 2020, 11:43
+5 -4
Most of these guys are around 12 years PQE and overdue for promotion. Guys from NLS or other not represented NLUs from same batch would have made partner atleast 2-3 years back
Just asking 27 Jul 2020, 12:41
+1 -2
By that logic NLUs from 2-3 batches should have made partner this year. So, do you really think you answered the question.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 12:59
+3 -0
Not true - Aditi Singhvi is only 9 years PQE and some others have less than 12 too. These are just talented people and it just so happened that there aren't that many NLS grads in that bracket to promote.
Hahha 27 Jul 2020, 14:55
+0 -1
There are no NLS grads at CAM from the 2011 batch? Who are you trying to kid?
Awstruck 27 Jul 2020, 15:34
+6 -4
The information in the LI article is different. There are people from 2006 batch, it's frightening / absurd that they stayed behind to make salaried partner after 14 years, quite surprising. I'm fairly certain no one from NLS would have to wait such a ridiculously long time for what is essentially a glorified PA role (as a junior salaried partner)
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 16:38
+0 -2
Have any stats about the career pathways of all NLS grads from even a single batch? Where do all these fair certainties fall from? The sky?
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 07:16
+8 -19
HYPOCRITES
can’t pay poor incoming associates till Jan......but promote partners
All to try and show clients that everything is great
Truly bad situation
Evangelist 27 Jul 2020, 07:23
+38 -4
Why will they pay a paisa to a useless dolt associate who has to be trained from scratch? when they can extract work from partners/SA's/existing associates, who know how to work? Especially when work flow itself has been impacted and matter volume has decreased?

You seem ignorant of demand and supply. Please understand that no firm is doing a favour to a law graduate by hiring him/her. Please also rid yourself of any 'entitlement' to a job.
Ahead of the curve 27 Jul 2020, 13:39
+2 -8
I certainly don't think the comment was regarding entitlement. While I understand demand and supply, you forget to understand that a person who is eager to join to support his student loan and family has a right to question what the firm is doing especially when the firm fails to even address their concern. That my friend is in no way entitlement. Time for you to check the time when you were going to join a law firm first. Did it happen that your job got deferred six months while your friends joined other law firms through WFH?
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 14:28
+6 -1
The concerned fresher can ask the firm directly and if the answer is not up to their satisfaction, then look for other jobs.
Seventh Sense 3 Aug 2020, 04:17
+2 -0
The kids' point is this - a lot of them were offered jobs at multiple firms but chose CAM. Those other firms haven't deferred salaries - CAM has (despite the promise of work starting in June 2020). Now for CAM to abnegate its responsibility and suggest "look for other jobs, we aren't doing you a favour" (after extensively courting kids) definitely leaves a sour taste in the mouth.

If you can't understand the plight of students with student loans and families to support, and the nature of promises, and honestly, just empathy, then there's so much wrong that I can't say or do anything that'll sway you.
Guest 3 Aug 2020, 04:52
+0 -0
Can understand. Still don't think venting in this forum is going to do any good. Venting before the firm might be a better idea.
Namit Boka 4 Aug 2020, 09:03
+1 -0
Forgive me for not quivering with sympathy for a student complaining that his 1 lakh a month job is deferred. especially when that student complains on an article dedicated to new partners. if you think getting your princely new salary deferred for some months is hardship, you are the definition of entitlement.
Evangelist 29 Jul 2020, 02:09
+0 -2
Anyone can question anything. I can question Amit Shah on his favourite samosa tomorrow. Will I get a reply or will that change anything? You have yet to understand that eagerness to join is irrelevant. In the current market, the vast majority of firms can continue to operate with existing or reduced capacity. Understand that before spouting some entitled garbage.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 07:49
+13 -1
It's the market determining value - remember each of these names. These are the people the firm thought are so valuable that they can't afford to lose them at any cost. That's how these things work.
Wanton 27 Jul 2020, 07:54
+16 -2
Yes because no one has the time to "jhelo" and baby sit a bunch of whiny brats who harbor a sense of entitlement. One more thing- dont compare yourself to partners. First give away at least 5-10 years of your life to the firm and then even consider the comparison. Till then its DD reports for you. If you get in to a law firm with your attitude that is....
ROI 27 Jul 2020, 13:09
+4 -1
It makes business sense to do so. Partner billing rates are magnitudes higher than associate billing rates. And these guys have been promoted to non-equity partnership, their pay is peanuts compared to what they bill in a month, even in a slowdown. With bonus deferrals, increment freezes and whatnot, these promotions will actually bring in a lot more revenue than they cost.
Swami Nithyananda 27 Jul 2020, 15:19
+1 -3
And clients are idiota to agRee to pay for partners doing dd?
Ch-tyananda 28 Jul 2020, 04:58
+3 -0
These people didn't go from A0 to Partner, they went from PA to Partner, please exercise those brain cells a bit.
Swami Nithyananda 28 Jul 2020, 06:26
+0 -3
And if your firm makes hourly fees for DD as a general rule, maybe give me a job pls. ?

Also, if someone made partner, likely that some SA also made PA who replaces the earlier PAs job.
Ch-tyananda 28 Jul 2020, 12:33
+2 -0
Have you stepped foot in a law firm, ever? You seem to be operating under the assumption that law firms exclusively do diligences.
Nithyananda 30 Jul 2020, 17:14
+0 -0
Guess you have been there long enough to know all matters are hourly ?
Still waiting... 27 Jul 2020, 07:24
+12 -0
Still waiting for signs of SAM promotion announcements to appear :/
Foodiea 27 Jul 2020, 07:55
+13 -1
The restaurant and food dish promotion is on in full swing. What are you talking about... dont you follow his FB and Insta feeds?
Pote 27 Jul 2020, 07:33
+5 -1
How much do these Partners make in a year? Must be under huge pressure to make things viable once you are made partner.
Poor one 27 Jul 2020, 07:56
+6 -3
All said and done, barely enough to pay the mortgage, the car loan and take care of your kids.
Informed Guess 27 Jul 2020, 10:55
+5 -0
60-90 lacs in there first year
Nope 28 Jul 2020, 05:01
+5 -5
No, Partners do not take anywhere near 90 lacs in their first year as a salaried Partner. Around 45-50 with an additional variable amount at most. There is a crazy amount of variance in this pay structure across firms and practice areas, but I am fairly certain that practically nobody touches 90 in their first year.
Money 28 Jul 2020, 05:46
+3 -2
45-50 including variable or excluding? How much variable approx on an average, if it is not included in this 45-50 figure?
Suggestion 28 Jul 2020, 07:33
+7 -4
45-50 would be that of a PA/Counsel. Salaried partner would take home much more.
Insider 28 Jul 2020, 10:57
+8 -10
That's flat wrong.

Nobody makes 60Lakhs in their first year as salaried partner. The pay increases 10% or 15% to Rs 3.5 lakh p.m. (which is on the higher side). Altogether about 40 lakhs fixed with about 10/20 lakhs variable (average 12-14).

60-90 is more appropriate for those after 3-4 years of being a partner
Kachra PARTY 28 Jul 2020, 11:26
+12 -5
Are you from a tier 4 firm?

No partner makes less than 80 lakhs
Insider 28 Jul 2020, 11:48
+8 -6
Lol mate. Tier 4 firm partners make much more than Tier 1 firms. They have very few partners and per partner pay is more. An elephant sized firm like CAM or SAM simply cannot pay that kind of money to these "partners". Where do you think the pay comes from?? Are they growing it in the supply room ?
Insider LoL 28 Jul 2020, 14:38
+7 -11
What stuff are you smoking? Whatever it is, it definitely must be pretty scarce!

By your path breaking logic all Tier 1 partners should be begging the Tier 4 law firms for partnership.
But I can assure you most of the Tier 1 tribe doesn't even know the names of Tier 4. We don't dive that deep
At best may know the names of some Tier 3 firms

Tier 4 is like Tis Hazari lawyers. Those who lock and chain their chairs to the desk at the end of the day! And work for 200 rupees
Tees 29 Jul 2020, 04:51
+5 -6
Your comment against Tis Hazari lawyers reeks of your elitist and snobbish attitude. A Tis Hazari lawyer can kick a law firmies *** anytime. Because they do grassroots litigation in its stark naked truth. Get over yourself.
Tis Hazari Star 2 Aug 2020, 12:26
+2 -2
Yes yes. That way a sweeper can also kick the CEO's ass in cleaning the bathroom. But that ain't the discussion here. We aren't challenging the ability or the contribution of a tis hazari lawyer or a sweeper. The question is something else and deals with the league they operate in.

The word 'tier' refers to hierachy. Of course, tier 4 could be the supreme with the smartest brains and the most amount of money. Maybe I need to re-educate myself.
Insider 29 Jul 2020, 21:02
+4 -1
I quit smoking long ago, it doesn't help the cognitive processes, and it's a life shortener.

Back to pay. Tier 4 firms are pretty conservative, induct barely a partner a year and are content to do plenty of work for a few clients who trust them with everything. These clients dont do big-ass M&A so no need for the Zias and [...] Brothers. They may not pay their associates much and certainly slave-drive them as much as the next firm but oh boy do they take home the green every payday.

In contrast the big firms have massive staffing and overhead costs and in their model partners in the
Fan of Vahura 28 Jul 2020, 11:29
+2 -2
What do you think about this? [img]https://www.legallyindia.com/images/uploads/20200728-170446.jpg[/img]
Insider 28 Jul 2020, 11:49
+11 -2
Cute graphics but only someone born yesterday would fall for this drivel
GmbH 28 Jul 2020, 20:51
+4 -0
This means that at the least an SA2 will take home ~2.8L to 2.5L per month. You are a tad bit delusional. One can hope for around -15% of what’s projected by vahura.
Fan of Vahura 29 Jul 2020, 11:31
+0 -3
Even if I account for a 15% decrease, it would amount to atleast a crore for partners. This is far more than what Insider suggests.
CAM joinee 27 Jul 2020, 07:34
+5 -3
1. Do people in Disputes make as much as people in Corporate vertical of the firm?

2. Is the y-o-y growth similar?

3. How much does a new disputes partner make at CAM?
Cammie 27 Jul 2020, 07:58
+12 -7
Youve just joined. Dont waste your time on this. Partnership is a good 10 years away for you. Focus on your work.
Daydreamer 27 Jul 2020, 08:30
+7 -3
No sir, I have not joined. I would have joined if it was not for corona. Regardless of that, I really want to know the aforementioned questions. Can someone please answer that?
Sorry but not sorry 28 Jul 2020, 03:35
+0 -0
Is that the way you would answer a judge/your senior? [...]

Much love,
S
P Bhush 28 Jul 2020, 05:12
+1 -1
Yes, I would.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 07:40
+10 -26
Regarding NLSIU partners, the number is low because Indian law firm jobs are no longer sought after by NLSIU grads. They prefer working in foreign firms, or careers in litigation, think tanks, academics, IAS, fellowships etc. The alumni who are role models for them are the lawyers featured in Time magazine, or the professors at Oxford. This is also true for NALSAR. In contrast,the lesser NLUs like GNLU, NUJS, NLUJ etc have no such ambitions or role models.
Joke 27 Jul 2020, 07:52
+21 -3
Kya joke maara! Joke combined into a pissing contest. Respect.
Lesser NLU-ite 27 Jul 2020, 08:07
+7 -3
By that logic, the NLSIU partners currently made or to be made up at Indian law firms can surely be understood as being lacking any vision? Absolutely agree with that as most of the NLSIU partners at SAM, Khaitan that I have seen only act as ringmasters without any credibility on the law.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 09:17
+5 -0
Care to support your argument with some stats? Such as the percentage of NLSIU grads from a given batch sitting for day zero, as compared to writing upsc, going for 'think tanks' and all the rest? I think it would reveal that your boast is considerably misplaced. As for role models, if you think that your law school stamp has anything to do with that, then you are sorry ass product of law school that nobody would ever look up to, even if you are from Law School, which I doubt.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 09:19
+6 -2
Has there been any year since 1985 when the number of NLSIU grads recruited by foreign firms has even reached two digits? Talk about blowing hot air!
Nice try 27 Jul 2020, 14:57
+4 -3
Which NLS grad has cracked IAS? Recently only NLUD has consistently done this.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 16:39
+6 -2
Erm...no. Every year, graduates from several law schools do that. NLUD is the only one who actually boast about it.
Great news 27 Jul 2020, 07:47
+7 -7
Many congratulations Abhishek and Mallika! So happy to see this
Happy client 27 Jul 2020, 07:54
+16 -18
Great to see Mallika make partner! So very well deserved. An excellent, well rounded lawyer and with good communication skills. It is a pleasure working with her. Best wishes!
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 13:02
+9 -8
So comments congratulating women are being downvoted and the ones congratulating men are being upvoted. Some things never change.
Congratulations 27 Jul 2020, 08:42
+11 -18
Congratulations Aditi Singhvi! Great human being and excellent lawyer. One of the rising stars to watch out for
Once upon a Clique 27 Jul 2020, 09:12
+21 -10
In my time at CAM, I worked continuously with Abhishek for 2 and half years and I can tell you this, the man is one of the smartest lawyers and the greatest mentors I have come across (and have come across many). Working with him meant you were on your toes all the time, you get a great feedback each time and at all times, he is the most sympathetic and empathetic ear (as the situation may call for) you will have. You never walk alone with him around. You are constantly learning, and oh so much, each time. His comfort with us as juniors, the confidence his clients have in him, his hands on approach, his in depth review of everything that goes out, his slew of questions on everything you put forward, his thoroughness with his work and with his juniors, all of it, coupled with the ever so calm approach to things with that comforting look of "dont worry, it will all be fine" is unconventional to the law firm world.
Thanks Abhishek Bhaiya, way to go!
TTNA 27 Jul 2020, 09:49
+8 -1
Bhaiya says Thank you !
Fangirl 27 Jul 2020, 09:34
+13 -17
Aditi Singhvi is easily one of CAM’s best performing lawyers. Darling of all the clients she handles and of the senior partners. Great move by CAM to recognise and promote talent like her in a Lockdown year. Heartiest congratulations!
Women power 27 Jul 2020, 10:19
+5 -3
Cam rocks it. Trilegal old boys club should learn about equal opportunity. Anyway heard major moves in the offing.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 10:53
+9 -2
Request to Kian: The media is giving lots of coverage to nepotism and cabals in Bollywood. Please do a similar story for law
... Fan Club 27 Jul 2020, 11:12
+15 -5
Congratulations Harish!! I should actually congratulate CAM instead, for having retained you. They should be proud!

Excellent human being and a better lawyer and believe me I am not saying this just because I had a crush on him in college :-)
College ranking 27 Jul 2020, 11:14
Troll
+2 -24
Based on the past few posts of LI regarding promotions, I have compiled a preference list for CLAT aspirants.

1. NLS/NALSAR
2. NLS/NALSAR
3. NLUD
4. NLUJ
5. GNLU
6. NLIU
7. NUJS
8. RGNUL
9. NLUO
10. RMNLU

The rest don't matter
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 12:50
+14 -1
Excellent foundation for your observation. You should get a ministerial portfolio, given how close your vision is to twenty-twenty.
Onlooker 27 Jul 2020, 16:25
+1 -4
NLUO should not be at no.9. It is below this spot.
Why 27 Jul 2020, 12:23
+3 -14
Don't understand what is this obsession with being corporate peons?

It's great if NLS grads get into think tanks and litigation. Guys, if you have done law, then you must be passionate towards social work. Don't throw away your life doing DDs.

If salary was so important to you, you should have not done law.
Client 27 Jul 2020, 13:05
+7 -18
Aditi Singhvi is the kind of lawyer we hope to work with but rarely get to. Such a well deserved promotion! Congrats!
Client 1 27 Jul 2020, 14:59
+7 -6
Congratulations to all. Harish is certainly one of the best e-commerce attorneys in India. Well deserved.
Guest 27 Jul 2020, 18:43
+5 -11
Looks like Shishir is headed the Ashwath way. He is slowly and gradually building a big team with 4 partners already under him....a parallel GC team with expertise in everything. Great going.
Happy go lucky 28 Jul 2020, 06:53
+3 -6
Looks like an amazing crop of lawyers. Don't know all of them but Harish I have worked with on a few transactions. His work is top notch. Definitely someone who would climb many more ladders sooner than later!!
Wah 30 Jul 2020, 13:35
+2 -0
Aisa kya dekh liya? Are you a lawyer in another law firm?
Meanwhile@Okhla 30 Jul 2020, 14:45
+1 -0
Evidently, we're still waiting for an auspicious time to announce our promotions (yo, stars, get your asses aligned properly already. We're running out of patience here.)