Delhi HC kills NLU Delhi 50% reservation this year, orders extending admissions deadline by a week

The Delhi High Court has temporarily stayed the 50% horizontal local domicile reservation that NLU Delhi had announced in January 2020, reported Livelaw today.

The court directed the university to reverse the notification of the 50% reservation by issuing a new one its website, without the reservation before 2 July, because the petitioner had made out a good prima facie case.

“A further one week period is given to enable the students to apply afresh who may be interested in applying for the admission process,” the bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad said, according to LiveLaw.

The petitioner Pia Singh, who wants to apply for an LLM from NLU Delhi, had argued that the 50% domicile reservation in addition to 22% OBC and 10% EWS reservations in the LLM “without increasing the number of seats as per MHRD guidelines is adversely affecting her chances of selection and her future career prospects”.

The petition noted, according to LiveLaw:

But respondent university is not giving this reservation to the domicile of the state but to the students who have passed their qualifying examination from Delhi. Delhi is a metro city and capital of India and a hub for the prominent educational institutes. Students from every corner of the country came here to study. Circumstances may arise that many students who are the permanent resident of Delhi may not get admission in any school/college situated in Delhi and they got enrolled in any other institutes located outside Delhi.

And even we consider that the University has such power [to implement such reservation] then also the quantum of reservation i.e. 50% is bad in law as it has reduced the all India unreserved category seats to the extent of 20% of total seats.

If we add up all the kinds of reservation provided by the respondent university then the quantum of total reservation is 80% which means, now OBC reserved seats are more than the Unreserved category seats. Hence, quantum of 50% reservation is also against the principle of equality enshrined under part-III of the constitution.

Comments

Guest 29 Jun 2020, 09:20
+10 -8
Interestingly, the petition was filed by an LLM candidate, the group considered by LLB and most others as 'beneath their notice'. The go-getter turned out to belong to an oft-neglected group.
RandomGuy 29 Jun 2020, 09:59
+10 -1
There were two petitions, one filed by an LLM candidate and the other filed by current and former BA LLB students. The latter was considered the lead natter for purposes of argumentation before the court.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 10:20
+2 -0
So people from two programs were 'on par' - something most people at NLUs (definitely older ones in 2000s when I was at one) found hard to digest.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 09:20
+2 -1
The 30% reservation at NUJS was worded differently. Although points concerning vagueness etc were discussed in articles in LI, Wire etc, I am told that students could only stall the implementation for a year. There was a strong push from the EC and there were off-the-record indications that HC would not confront the state govt on this issue. Many judges were privately in favour. Although the blame ball will be kicked between Justice and Injustice Leagues, the person who helped NKC, Sen and Co to implement this reservation was SB, part of the "new blood" that NKC is "promoting". To prove that he is now wearing the PC jersely, NKC wanted the domicile hiked to 50%, which may still happen for the next session. He is waiting for a certain SC judge to retire so that one of the two friendly SC judges from WB is appointed as the Chancellor's nominee. Once that happens, state takeover will be complete.

And please don't start with supposed regime change in 2021. Even the other camp knows that it will at best become the principal opposition part with greater numbers than the Left/Congress combine. Also the so-called saffron tinged "stalwarts" who are often named here haven't done anything meaningful to oppose TMC designs here.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 09:54
+0 -0
What's PC jersey?
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 13:33
+0 -0
Politically Correct in relation to WB
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 14:40
+1 -0
Okay. Any proof that the NUJS VC wants/wanted the domicile quota to be hiked up to 50%? Any interview, communication, or even any individual who can say out in the open that the VC has said so in front of him or her? Or are people just supposed to believe that without any of this? I am only trying to logically approach your arguments. For example, I have heard about the days being counted for the current SC rep to go away too, but that's because he's brought nothing good to the university, doesn't really allow any progressive decision making, considers himself a great judge and academician at the same time and overall tries to run the EC like his personal fiefdom. I am not asking anyone to believe my word. However, from what one knows about Arun Mishra in general, anybody else would come to think that there is a lot of truth in that. It could be for more than one reason of course. But given that almost all SC judges now have shown that they are rarely politically impartial, one really doesn't have much of a choice. Even the judge whom liberals consider their darling is far from what popular liberal media projects him as.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 09:55
+13 -1
Why is news/mention of NUJS relevant in the comments section of every post?
Whre 29 Jun 2020, 12:05
+1 -1
Where is the NLS faculty recruitment result? If it has been approved already by the EC, what is the reason for further delay?
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 13:32
+2 -0
Go and comment on that thread. Shoo!
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 13:34
+0 -0
Relevance in this thread? This is about NLUD.
Joe Rogan 29 Jun 2020, 12:07
+0 -5
Well. Only for a year! Ha, domcile's time had come for NLUD. If it is stayed for only a year, I don't see what good will come of it
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 13:33
+0 -0
For the batch that's trying to get in this year, I guess it makes all the difference.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 16:33
+8 -6
Remove all reservation s in india for next five years and see th quality of work education etc
Exception is economical poor candidates
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 17:01
+10 -7
Remove all the discrimination that upper castes still practice against the so called lower castes in every corner of India for just one year, and see the country become a beacon of hope for the entire world. Exception is: none.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 05:28
Troll
+3 -6
I agree with Guest 5 and I reported Guest 5.1 to LI . Guest 5.1 is making casteist remarks, whereas Guest 5 is making a case against ANY reservation and for merit.
Concerned person 29 Jun 2020, 16:50
+2 -4
All future law graduates should shun corporate jobs. It’s not worth it. You are treated like a slave and you don’t even earn that much to make it worth it. Devote your education and life to help the not so fortunate. Fight for the rights of poor and the like. That will give life true meaning and purpose
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 19:00
+4 -1
Would it let me eat, pay my mortgage, educational loan, healthcare expenses, possibly allow me to travel a little bit every couple of years? Because seeking those things from life isn't a crime either.
Concerned person 30 Jun 2020, 11:47
+0 -1
Yes it will pay for that. People who work in NGO's or fight cases for marginal feels do manage to make a living. Don't go after the fake allure of corporate life. You will regret it and your life will.go waste.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 14:17
+2 -1
Everybody who is alive manages to make a living. Even the migrant workers. Are you saying that's the limit of expectations one should have from one's career after spending 15 lakhs for a professional degree?
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 15:47
+0 -2
That is exactly what I am saying. Don't measure your expectations in money. The satisfaction and the impact you will make by fighting for the poor will be much more than 15 lakhs.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 17:27
+4 -2
Please do not impose your expectations from life on others. You keep the satisfaction, let me keep the money. Didn't you borrow your parents' or banks' money to study at the NLUs. How many years of NGO work did it take you to pay them back?
Concerned person 30 Jun 2020, 18:34
+0 -3
NLU was established to train lawyers who will fight for poor. And if everyone starts to think like you, what will happen to the downtrodden. Who will speak up for them? Do they not matter? I pity such people who care so much about money. As long as you are not hungry all efforts must be towards betterment of society.
Guest2 1 Jul 2020, 11:29
Troll
+0 -0
Can some please clarify, why people join corporate jobs? Shouldn't there be courses at NLU to help people understand how joining corporate jobs will be a waste of their education, tax payers money spent on them and also will lead to life long depression. Corporate jobs can never give you happiness.
So why do we even allow corporates to recruit from campus. There should be a complete ban on campus recruitments.
Guest 1 Jul 2020, 11:49
+0 -0
There should be a complete ban on you too. But such is life.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 18:21
+5 -0
All NLUs must unite and file a PIL in the SC on NLU nationalisation. Like Game of Thrones where everyone puts aside their differences to fight the evil white walkers.
Guest 29 Jun 2020, 18:23
+2 -1
NLSIU SBA is going to approach the SC directly,
NLUD to the top 30 Jun 2020, 04:47
+1 -1
With domicile reservation in every other NLU and with NLS increasing the batch size as well, NLUD surely will surge to the top.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 05:25
+1 -0
Well done to NLUD students and alumni! Now NLSIU students and alumni will also go to court and challenge their quota.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 05:25
Troll
+2 -0
NLUD is the only "National" Law University. Rest should be renamed as Regional Law Universities.
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 05:28
+0 -0
Coming soon: NSLIU Student Bar Association and Alumni Association v Union of India and Govt of Karnataka
Guest 99 30 Jun 2020, 08:57
+0 -0
Who are the lawyers representing the SBA?
Guest 30 Jun 2020, 09:05
+0 -0
They would love to have GS.
Guest 2 Jul 2020, 08:03
+0 -0
https://www.barandbench.com/news/petition-moved-before-delhi-high-court-challenging-domicile-reservation-at-nlsiu-bangalore

Kian, you are slow.
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 05:32
+0 -0
Can all you people commenting on LI explain something? When it comes to faculty, the tone of the comments is usually "my law school faculty is better than yours", but when it comes to admin the tone becomes "my law school admin is more corrupt than yours". So why is it not possible for law schools to unite just on the point of admin transparency?
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 08:51
+2 -0
That's because commentators are tone-deaf mostly. There are good faculty and bad faculty everywhere. Generalising is stupid. You can say X is good or bad. That's basically it. That too only students of X can say when it comes to teaching skills. LI commentators obviously have their customised parameters, which rarely make any rhyme or reason.
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 13:52
+0 -0
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/no-stay-on-reservation-for-obc-ews-category-delhi-hc-allows-nlu-delhi-to-issue-a-clarification-after-delhi-govt-moves-application

What is RS really trying to do here? Deliberate or has Tau completely lost it. Tau is being Trump/Nixon.