‘Easy’ and ‘cheating’: How was Bar Exam day for you?

As the fastest candidates are starting to come out of the first All India Bar Exam that is set to end by 3pm today (Sunday), according to one report the standard was “very easy” and candidates were overheard loudly comparing answers. Share your experience here.

One candidate who had wanted to leave the exam venue early but was at first not allowed to, said: “It was very simple and every option was taken directly from the text. The second part was very simple – you didn’t even need to open the booklet.”

The 2010 graduate from a national law school added that there were roughly 1,000 candidates to the exam hall. “Cheating was going on,” he said. “One [candidate] was asking another loudly what is the answer to question 63.”

“The biggest faux pas was they asked candidates to write their enrolment number […] but 90 per cent of students did not have it,” noted the examinee, explaining that the invigilators made a phone call and candidates were allowed to write their names on the paper.

All candidates’ hall passes were checked but proof of identification was not asked for at the venue and no search was carried out for mobile phones and other electronic equipment, contrary to earlier intimations.

What was your first bar exam experience like? How difficult was the exam? Share questions and answers, discuss the venues, invigilation and more here.

Comments

advrajivpatil 6 Mar 2011, 19:48
+1 -0
Is this examination is entrance test to become an advocate? Then why to study law for five years? Is it insufficient curriculam by Universities or BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA???
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 20:11
+0 -0
In Madras, the exams were postponed, since a section of the students protested against the exam. Most of those who protested did not appear to be students who from the local law college and not the candidates for the AIBE. They did not permit even those who had were prepared to write the exam. Hope BCI proves adequate arrangement by allowing only those who hold hall ticket to enter the venue.

Interestingly, many candidates with whom I had interaction, shared my view that the material provided by BCI (Rainmaker's) is very good.
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 20:23
+0 -0
Bar exam is a test for law gradutes and not for advocates who register with state bar council hence I decided to remain absent in today's bar exam and I did
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 20:40
+0 -0
Wow... what a brave but stupid decision.
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 21:11
+0 -0
The very fact that some students / advocates protested at Chennai and manner in which they did it, clearly shows that the profession needs a greater regulation. Those who agitated could have presented their case before the SC, seeking intervention. But they chose to take the law into their hands and prevented others from writing the exam.

God save this profession from these educated(?) goondas.
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 21:54
+0 -0
What a joke. spineless BCI sets a paper fit for 6 yr olds so that everyone can pass and the goonda students will not pelt stones at gopal subra and moily's house.

in countries abroad only a minority pass but here 99% will pass. recruiters will continue to prefer NLU students. what kind of reform are we talking about?
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 22:04
+0 -0
it was easy and even invigilators were encouraging students to cheat so that everybody can pass and nobody is left out. was a mere formality and done to satisfy claims regarding fees paid.
JAIPUR CENTRE
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 22:24
+0 -0
In India we have a culture of preserving the status quo, so if the first AIBE was as tough as Bombay Solicitors test then the reform process would stop in 2011. By making students agreeable to the idea of AIBE the screw would be tightened in subsequent years. If the AIBE survives for that long then you would be surprised that in 2016 there would be less than 50% pass rate.
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 22:30
+0 -0
Can anyone please post the answers
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 22:59
+0 -0
Completely agree with 8%. A 50% pass rate would've greatly hindered the process of reform.
lalkumarms 6 Mar 2011, 23:07
+0 -0
BCI should have taken care to conduct this Bar Exam in an exemplary manner as it is apex body regulating the legal profession. It is really sad to hear such gross malpractice in the Bar Exam which negates its very purpose.
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 23:27
+0 -0
@8... completely agree
Anonymous guest 6 Mar 2011, 23:42
+0 -0
The test was fairly easy... we cannot expect it be as hard as US bar exams in the first year itself..it is a trick to make students agreeable and get in line... but a great decision by GS to filter unwanted elements in legal system.. hope Indian lawyers in the coming 5-6 years get recognition and respect as a chartered accountant or a CS.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 00:26
+0 -0
Lets get this something crystal clear. The people who are for decreasing the success rate of this examination will never have appeared for one. They have been fortunate enough to be eligible for practice without any such hurdles.

For the candidates appearing this is a point for which they have prepared for half a decade. Their choice of career depends on this one exam. 3 hours.

For what? To make the profession more respectful. Bull is my opinion. If your a good lawyer, your going to be respected. Period.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 00:33
+0 -0
when will the BCI post the answer key...??
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 00:58
+0 -0
this exam is part of larger conspiracy of india against hindustan, this way psudo elite buggers are trying to block entry of commoners into the legal profession, salute to tamilnadu friends.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 00:58
+1 -0
There was a some cheating going on in my center. I helped a girl sitting next to me with almost all of Section 2. My only regret is that I didn't get her number when it was over :-(
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 01:42
+0 -0
you should have got the number before starting to help
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 02:02
+0 -0
@17 never expect fruits for your action... Karm kar..pak ki apeksha nain:-P
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 02:12
+0 -0
Mr Subramanium you have to answer the nation about the cheating scandal. A PIL should be filed.... cmon NALSARites!

On another note, has anyone noticed the amount of crap happening in TN? I am not racist against Tamils but it seems to be the hub of corruption in India not just in politics but also law.
lex suprema 7 Mar 2011, 02:31
+0 -0
who is "APEKSHA"?
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 02:51
+0 -0
travesty of the profession
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 02:52
+0 -0
I thought the paper was on par with expectations - some straightforward questions, some subtle googlies (or atleast i though they were googlies).

I think there might be a fair number of people who'll recalculate their chances once an answer key is released (which btw, BarHacker should get on ASAP ;-) )

Feel completely vindicated for having opted for the BarHacker crash course - The mock tests and the subject indexes made life so much easier! Money well spent.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 02:54
+0 -0
Booklet with probably same QS order so students keep on buzzing all the time 15 - B,43-E etc in the examination hall.

Good way of reform indeed.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 03:29
+0 -0
I was in room no. 6 of the Shalimar Bagh school centre. There was no scope of any cheating unfortunately.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 03:53
+0 -0
fellas..... seems lyk sm of u are nt happy wid the easy papering ... lol..... if it was a tough one then i mite hav had the moment to read many more complains or displeasure.... its alwys d othr way round... :D
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 04:44
+0 -0
mr. gopal subramaniam at dwarka centre to advocate aspirants:

1. thanks for comming (as if it was his personal invitation).

2. results will be anounced on 15th march (when all will pass then what is the need of declaring result).

3. (an advocate to gs) sir why r u talking in class n wasting our time, will u give us 10 minutes extra? yeah 10 extra minutes granted, swift reply (what a despot)

(a decent exit thereafter)
regards: an eyewitness.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 04:49
+0 -0
whos giving these foolish ideas to conduct the exam,is this the way to test advocates,after enrollment in state bar council.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 05:26
+0 -0
@ 16 I needed a good laugh. Thanks.
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 05:40
+0 -0
dummy exam. pass all..make money. another scam nothing else. the pass rate will tell what this exam was actually meant for!
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 06:39
+0 -0
money money is making this all
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 06:47
+0 -0
please reduce exam fee
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 06:55
+0 -0
money money is making this all problem so please reduce fee 1300 to 500
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 07:30
+0 -0
Respected Sir,
Sir my stature is too small to write to you but still I write this to you with lot of expectation and each one of us who has written above respects you like anything we look upto with lot of expecations.
Sir some how were feel cheated by this exams and feel like no useful purpose is served by this examination if these examinations are held for some other purpose for doing rouitne check then it must be stopped.
Sir, when you came up with this concept of Bar examination we were completely against it as we thought that it was too harsh on us and we are being complled to give this examination and its brought to our notice only two weeks before the examination, our dearer friend Fatepal who is no more was our flagbearer filed a writ changelling the Acts of the BCI but after reading your blog in legally india we completely agreed with your opinion which completely changed our mindset and started looking things as you showed us, as you said Sir this examination would be for our benefit only.
In today's newspaper when I read your Article Sir, i was truly moved by it, a thought that now this profession would be taken to higher degree the glory of the past would be revived which is missing these days, we felt the honesty of your word which literally brought tears to my eyes when i read the article closing with an beauitful lines where you address" its a big day in my life "
Sir but when we witnessed what all happened the atmosphere of the hall was very pathetic, I must tell you seeing mass copying, three people in one seats, open house dicussions, I asked myself is this was promised to us,is this the new change that is for our benefit ? to which i had no answer .
Sir, I must tell you i went out of the hall and for fifteen minutes i was thinking wheter to write this examnation or not , but ulimately due to fear of being solded by my parents if i dont clear this examination i went in to write the paper,Sir you could imagine the atmosphere of the examination hall.
Sir,i dont have an iota of doubt that you should be blamed for it but our trust in you that you reposed has tremendously gone down some how feel that you must write and some how convenience us, and there is also a very personal interest involved in my request as I am from Lucknow where i and some of my friends tried to pass on your vision about the Bar Examnation and requested students not to support the Bar examnation, Sir we are very proud to inform you that we carried out this job very successfully and as per the information there was no writ filed in Lucknow Bench challenging the Bar Examination
Sir, now we would extreamly gratful if you guide us in difficult times.
I must also take this opportunity congratulate the team of legally india for providing us with all the minute information about the bar examnation, without legally india our journey to the All india bar Examnation would be very difficult, extremely great full to team of legally india.
Thanking You,
Yours Sincerely,
RAM
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 15:25
+0 -0
Where is BarHacker now?? Not even came out with the answers to Bar exam!!! Made their money and back now!!!! True Business!!!!
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 18:51
+0 -0
Cheating was rampant at the exam centre. The invigilators were doing nothing about it. It became distracting after a while because everyone was shouting and giving away the answers.

The paper was a mockery. It was too simple. (Probably done intentionally to gather support from the student community to not further their protests with the same vigour).

GS came to the centre (at least to my centre) and wished all the candidates luck for their paper.

It was a simple paper, no one should get below 40%
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 19:06
+0 -0
No cheating in my class room.. and decent paper set to gather support.. GS came to my class room to address the august gathering (ahem!) about how the students are about to create history by being the first batch to write this exam which has international standards by the way.

Waiting for the answer key now...
Anonymous guest 7 Mar 2011, 21:26
+0 -0
I hope in coming years many people fail this exam so that ill educated characters like the hooligans in chennai and the goondas elsewhere can stick to hanging around in the streets. Atleast there eve teasing will shift from the courtroom to the streets where they can be caught and put in jail. dehatis ...
Anonymous guest 8 Mar 2011, 00:10
+0 -0
i too ,,
Sir, I must tell you i went out of the hall and for fifteen minutes i was thinking wheter to write this examnation or not , but ulimately due to

"fear of being solded by my parents"

if i dont clear this examination i went in to write the paper,Sir you could imagine the atmosphere of the examination hall.
Anonymous guest 8 Mar 2011, 04:44
+0 -0
Can any one upload the Question paper of the AIBE exam. B'cause it will be useful for the future advocates those are going to attend the exam.
subhadeepsaha 8 Mar 2011, 05:29
+0 -0
I felt the the system of answering through OMR sheet was laborious & time consuming. It made the paper hard to finish even in 3.30 hrs.Otherwise paper was set decently.Now as the exam has already been conducted no use of discussing whether the exam was a mockery or genuine.But I feel the instructions of BCI like Photo ID proof, non-exchange of study materials, not to carry mobile phones etc. were strictly not performed by the invigilators. Lastly,the exam was a good experience.
Anonymous guest 8 Mar 2011, 16:14
+0 -0
The paper was just plain stupid. You did not require the study material, and cheating wasn't even required. If at all, it just added to the entertainment quotient of the 'examination'. It was truly, a mockery of an examination designed so that everyone can pass.. I agree with No. 8, but this was ridiculously easy.
Anonymous guest 8 Mar 2011, 22:32
+0 -0
What a crap exm it was!!! Funny & Disgusting Idea of conducting AIBE is, if dis is the level of questions.
Thankfully, none cheated in my exm hall at least.
I gave exm without evn looking at books. Nw m waiting for results.
Bt i request BCI, if they are interested to carry on with AIBE from next yr also, then plz raise d standard of questions.
Secondly, don't make it an open book exm, such a shameful thing for any genuine law graduate who hs actually studied during graduating in law.
Lastly, don't give prizes for toppers as this is not an excellency exm bt just a qualification test for carrying practice of advocacy. And most imp. how cn sum1 claim of being a topper in an open book exm, isn't it more shameful?
I don't knw wat others think, bt i don't intend to make a show off dat m very smart kind of (else i wud hv given my full name also wid dis comment
What do you think???? Plz Share...
Rainer 8 Mar 2011, 23:03
+0 -0
The question paper was 55 pages long and the answer paper was 1 sheet. Almost all questions had answers straight from the preparatory material. You just needed to know where to find it. I finished the paper in 135 minutes (to be precise) but wasn't allowed to move out. Invigilators were excellent and gave out detailed explanations to the examiness dumb-struck by the OMR sheet.

I must admit though that it was fun to fill up those little circles with black ink. Felt like I was in third grade again and could almost hear my art teacher yelling at me to stay within the lines.
Anonymous guest 9 Mar 2011, 04:24
+0 -0
@ 34
kindly write ur views in short.... no1 is giving exms here.... appologies if it hurts ur sentiments, but ppl dont feel lyk to read if its more lengthier than necessary .... peace
Anonymous guest 9 Mar 2011, 13:30
+0 -0
In Mumbai Centre, there was no bell during and at the end of exam to alert examinees about time. Nowadays, many people do not wear watch as they carry mobile which shows time, but mobile was not allowed in examination. Hence examination was not conducted in the usual manner and normal practice. There is no information on official website of BCI about mark system as indicated in this news report. Hence normally students while attempting answers in serial order may have attempted 80-85 questions and assuming having attempted 85 questions with all right answers, he will secure 77 marks in the first section and 8 marks in the second section falling one mark short of 9 marks required as per this news report. Under such situation, an examinee will fail though he secures 85 marks out of 100 marks. Apart from this, the examination is discriminationatory as who passed prior to 2009-10 but not enrolled with any state bar council shall get enrolled and need not give examination (AIBE) for right to practice. All persons who sought enrollment with 2009-10 batch students must be taken at par with students of 2009-10 batch for right to practice to eliminate such discrimination. In fact, if this examination is devised to improve quality in legal profession, then all existing lawyers should also appear for such an examination for right to practice. In such event, the discrimination will vanish completely and all practising lawyers would be having right to practice.
Anonymous guest 9 Mar 2011, 21:02
+0 -0
MARKS OBTAINED MUST BE GIVEN ON THE CERTIFICATES.
-----------VED PARKASH SEHTIYA
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2011, 01:11
+0 -0
#35 you are so right! surprisingly no one is even concerned about getting the answers! and if bar hacker and LI were so concerened about the law students, they should have come out with the answers by now! isn"t it an eye opener on what bar hacker actually was? think, think think!!!
kianganz 10 Mar 2011, 02:16
+0 -0
Absolutely incorrect.

Just to clarify, the BarHacker guys have actually been working overtime to get the answers.

First problem was: getting hold of an answer sheet because many invigilators actually wouldn't permit removal. (and no one has been too forthcoming in sending one to us, despite requests on FB and Twitter).

Second problem: putting the answer sheet in a presentable format (we currently have a huge PDF, which is unwieldy and needed cleaning up).

Third problem: Making sure all the answers are correct.

In any case, if you had been following BarHacker on Facebook, the team published model answers earlier today:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/BarHacker/203989006278010

They are working on putting this in a format that people can understand without the answer sheet too - please bear with them, they are a lot of questions.

Best wishes
Kian
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2011, 15:26
+0 -0
Thanks Kian for the clarification!
Anonymous guest 10 Mar 2011, 22:36
+0 -0
Dears,
There is no right to conduct such an exam to advocates by AIBC, because the exam denies the livelihood of a citizen. After enrolment as an advocate a person cannot engage in business or any full time job, though if an advocate fails to qualify the exam the advocate cannot file vakalathnama, he has no other means of income. There the advocates right as a citizen is denying by this exam. It suppose not to happened in future. So, the AIBC can conduct such an exam before enrolment as an advocate.

Regards

Adv 4 Advs
Anonymous guest 11 Mar 2011, 21:25
+0 -0
@51: Assuming you are actually a law graduate, your post is the strongest possible argument in favour of a bar exam. If people with your knowledge of constitutional law are graduating from law colleges across the country, clearly there needs to be an exam that judges who is to be allowed to represent someone's real claims in a court of law
Anonymous guest 11 Mar 2011, 21:36
+0 -0
is it just me, or is this the first time someone's (or by the looks of things, almost everyone) complaining about an exam being easy?

imagine the furore if they set a tough paper!
Anonymous guest 12 Mar 2011, 05:00
+0 -0
@45 "failures are failures if u dont learn for them".
If u want the bar to be cleand and touts,goons should not come into this profession and expolit poor people get justice things have to be properly dealt with, people who are organising this examination should know the pros and cons of the examination to improve things.There was noting personal about your point you put forward,but i must confess i dont agree with your opinion, what all i wrote i thought was my duty or else i will be failing in it.
Anonymous guest 12 Mar 2011, 16:38
+0 -0
Hi Kian,

Thanks for the information re bar-hackers answers.

At least a few answers on the bar-hacker facebook page are wrong:

11) The answer ought to be (a)

16)The question speaks of reservations in favour of backward classes of NON-citizens, which aren't provided for in (d) Article 16(4), which is listed as the correct answer

27) (a) is definitely wrong because you can't claim a fee for storage. The right answer is either (d) or (e)

76) Part-performance by definition speaks of agreements that aren't registered, so I don't think (b) can be the right

84)The question is different from the one in the reading material, as the person is born to christian parents. This makes her a christian, regardless of whether she claims to be one, which is option (d), not (a) or (b), as suggested by bar-hacker

I'm posting these here because I'm sure they'll be communicated to them. I don't know how to post there without being a member
Anonymous guest 13 Mar 2011, 15:53
+0 -0
ALL INDIA BAR EXAMINATION. FIRST SAYS BCI ONLY PASS OR FAIL RESULT SHOWN. BUT AFTER EXAM THEY SAYS RESULT IS ON GRADE SYSTEM. IS THIS LAWFUL FOR ALL STUDENTS? COZ MOST OF STUDENT ATTEMPT ONLY FOR PASS THIS EXAM. GRADE SYSTEM IS NOT GOOD FOR THEM. ONLY PASS OR FAIL SHOWS THEIR ABILITY. G;E IS NOT A CRITERIA. PLEASE ONLY ANNOUNCE PASS OR FAIL IN THIS BAR EXAM.
Guest 23 Jan 2021, 07:25
+0 -0
AIBE is an open book examination. Hence calling it cheating etc is absurd and false.
Indeed, once a candidate passes Law Degree, conducting a separate exam to start practicing is a elitist decision. There's no such examination for Medical or Engineering or Management passed candidates while starting their career. It's my personal view.
Guest 23 Jan 2021, 08:18
+0 -0
You think cheating cannot happen in an open book exam? Please reexamine your logic. Granted, the exam is so easy that anybody who has actually studied even the basics of law in 5 years should sail through it with their eyes closed. But a lot of people still fail every year. Which goes to show the appalling state of legal education in this country. A person who cannot clear this exam should not be unleashed on the clients to be relied upon for legal advice. The next step would be to cancel accreditation of the institutes from where 50% plus graduates fail to clear this exam every year. BCI won't do that though for obvious reasons.