Editor’s clarification on Nalsargate and the problems with talking about sexual harassment

Editorial note: After publication of Monday’s report entitled Nalsargate exclusive: The inside story of a secret report and the quest for excellence, a flood of Nalsar Hyderabad alumni came out in force to support Nalsar’s dean of academic affairs Amita Dhanda via telephone and email.

After detailed conversations about their concerns, Legally India would like to set the record straight: at no point did we intend for any implication to arise about the legitimacy or otherwise of any charges of sexual harassment. While we believe that the alleged sexual harassment is a valid part of the back story that illustrates the fraught relationship between the two most important staff on campus – the vice chancellor Veer Singh and Dhanda - putting it into the context of an institutional power struggle is all too often used as an excuse for dismissing such complaints.

We do not wish to exacerbate a situation about which not enough can be conclusively determined from a Times of India report, or to discourage anyone else from filing similar complaints in academic institutions or elsewhere. We have therefore edited the earlier version of the story in respect of a number of references to the personal dispute between Veer Singh and Dhanda, which should be settled between them according to established procedures.

Comments

Thomas Carlyle 7 Feb 2012, 03:23
+6 -0
fourth estate in full retreat
you know who 7 Feb 2012, 04:55
+0 -0
Kian, this is just the starting. Yesterday i told you to wait for a couple of months. Now wait for a couple of weeks. Hahaaa
Well actually 7 Feb 2012, 05:03
+5 -0
A commendable display of ethics. If only the rest of the Indian press was as mature... Hats off to you Kian

For the rest of you, "No man is an island..."
Legaldeagle 7 Feb 2012, 05:16
+1 -0
Highly professional on ur part kian! Great stuff. There is a reason why LI is considered to be one of the best legal newspapers
Desi Lawyer 7 Feb 2012, 10:45
+2 -0
[quote name="Legaldeagle"]Highly professional on ur part kian! Great stuff. There is a reason why LI is considered to be one of the best legal newspapers[/quote]

probably this can be attributed to the foreign training of Kian?
random 7 Feb 2012, 05:57
+4 -0
Why is LI so defensive? i found the earlier version fairly balanced. Stop this talibanisation of the country and the media. Rushdie, and now Kian.
9:02 PM 7 Feb 2012, 15:32
+2 -0
Kian sir will you ever change your display pic?
kianganz 8 Feb 2012, 10:10
+1 -0
No. :)
Meme 8 Feb 2012, 19:46
+1 -0
The folks at ANH are waiting for a change! We need new Memes.
Dear Ed 8 Feb 2012, 18:41
+0 -0
To know how to report:
http://www.barandbench.com/brief/2/2042/nlsius-school-review-commission-report-and-nalsars-quadri-report-does-it-open-a-pandoras-box
abc 9 Feb 2012, 03:35
+1 -0
It is mature of Bar & Bench to refer to LI and for LI to not censor the link to Bar & Bench (LI has censored links to B&B in the past). In all foreign media rival outlets refer to each other. Only in India media outlets say that this was reported in "a newspaper" or "a news channel" and sometimes they do not even cover a scoop reported by a rival. I fail to understand this mentality. Because of the internet everyone knows what was reported where, so why shy awy from references t rival outlets?
kianganz 9 Feb 2012, 07:28
+0 -0
I agree with your point. And since this is an Editorial Note page, I would like to add that I welcome Bar & Bench's recent move to credit us as the originator of the Nalsar report.

Credit would also be nice when we first report other stories exclusively, which has not happened so far I believe.

As a policy for more than a year now we generally link to sources or first reports of stories that we were not following up at the time the report appeared.

You are correct that ultimately this should be about information being as freely available as possible, though reciprocity is always nice.

Best regards
Kian