Nalsar top prof Amita Dhanda becomes first ever prof emerita, to ‘drastically improve research output’ of univ

Prof Amita Dhanda now emerita, not exclusively at Nalsar (picture by Anindita Mukherjee)
Prof Amita Dhanda now emerita, not exclusively at Nalsar (picture by Anindita Mukherjee)

Nalsar Hyderabad academic dean and professor Amita Dhanda has been made professor emerita at the university by the executive council (EC), in order to focus on primarily on research and having been due to reach the mandated retirement age of 65 later this year.

According to a press release from the law school, “she is the first amongst NALSAR’s faculty to be honoured with this title, the highest academic recognition a University can bestow”.

Dhanda commented that she would still continue to do teaching on-and-off, as she saw a “robust relationship between research and teaching”.

However, she would primarily be focusing on research, “anchored” at Nalsar while also aiming “collaborations” with other institutions, she said.

Vice-chancellor (VC) Prof Faizan Mustafa added: “For me it is a matter of great satisfaction that Prof Dhanda has consented to remain with us.

“She is indeed a researcher par excellence and the tallest professor of our university. I am sure under her leadership we will drastically improve our research output.”

“I have consented to the honour and agreed to continue my relationship with NALSAR,” she said. “I am passionate about research and feel may have more elbow room to experiment as well as opportunity to reach out to all those who wish to research with requisite collegial support. Collegiality in my opinion is the single most prerequisite to robust research.”

“Or let us say an encouraging interested environment,” she added. “Prof [and vice chancellor (VC) Faizan] Mustafa has been that secure leader who has unswervingly backed merit, a quality not commonly found in persons heading institutions.

“It is always fulfilling when you are recognised by the institution to which you have contributed.”

“I feel we disseminate the law not reflect on it,” she noted. “Reflection comes with research and deliberation and I am hoping to create triggers for that to happen. Talking and thinking about the law by who ever has the capability to revel in uncertainty and is not in a hurry to wrap up and close.”

According to the university’s press release:

Dr Dhanda, who is retiring effective November 30, 2020, joined the University in 1999 and has since played an unparalleled role in building the institution to what it is today. Prior to her association with NALSAR, she worked solely in research at the Indian Law Institute, New Delhi. Her pioneering work in disability rights, and in mental health law in specific, set the stage for several legislative and judicial interventions at the national level. Her doctoral work, published as Legal Order and Mental Disorder (Sage, 2000), was the first full-length analysis of the legal status of persons with mental disabilities in India. Her co-authored report on the status of persons with mental illness in the jails of West Bengal, caused the apex court of the country to declare the practice of housing persons with mental illness in jails unconstitutional in Sheela Barse v Union of India. She was also a member of the drafting committee which sowed the seed of legal capacity in the National Trust Act, 2000.

In making the shift to full-time teaching, Dr Dhanda brought with her an exacting research ethic and the love of a well-crafted argument. Her teaching encouraged a generation of students at NALSAR to view the world of the law through a critical lens and her trademark course in Law and Poverty pushed the student body to reckon with the structural inequities that the law creates and maintains.

Through her two decades at NALSAR, Dr Dhanda has seamlessly juggled teaching, academic research, legal advocacy and, more recently, administrative responsibilities as the Chair of the University’s Academic Committee. As an internationally recognised authority on legal capacity, she has lectured and taught on the subject across the world. She joined the Ad Hoc Committee tasked with drafting the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as part of the civil society—a member of the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry. She was the spokesperson for the International Disability Caucus on legal capacity (Article 12) throughout the negotiations. The contribution that Dr Dhanda made to the concept of universal legal capacity with support was recognised by the United Nations by inviting her to speak on the concept in order to inform State parties and members of the treaty body. Her writings on the subject have been relied upon in the formulation of the General Comment No 1 on Legal Capacity and in law reform efforts in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, France, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Moldova, Philippines, Poland, Serbia and South Africa. Since the ratification of the Convention by India, the Centre for Disability Studies at NALSAR (which she heads) led the consultative drafting of the Disabilities Rights Act and worked on State Report on Disability to be submitted to the United Nations.

Dr Dhanda strove, through her career, to match theory with practice. She was instrumental in bringing in wide-ranging changes to NALSAR’s academic programme, in order to centre students’ and faculty members’ preferences and to move away from a one-size-fit-all system. Under her guidance the University embraced a reasonable accommodation policy and universalised its application to the entire student body. In time, she has become one of NALSAR’s most steadfast pillars, a source of support in times of crisis and mentorship for students and junior faculty alike. Over the last few years, she has spearheaded two Ford Foundation funded research projects which have supported several young academics and produced scholarship published by renowned international academic publishers.

The Vice-Chancellor notes that it is a matter of satisfaction that the grateful NALSAR family has recognised Dr Dhanda’s institutional and academic contribution and decided to confer on her the the title of Professor, Emerita and our good fortune that she has very kindly consented to remain associated with the University and guide its research programme in the years to come.

Comments

Guest 7 Jul 2020, 10:22
+28 -5
While I have differed from her views on several issues in the past, I still have tremendous respect for her as a teacher and researcher. It's good to see that NALSAR made the wise decision of retaining her via this position.
Scooter- 8 Jul 2020, 11:29
+4 -11
Hope you first understood it before disagreeing ?
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 12:07
+12 -5
Very good move by Faizan. Other NLUs should not do so with their star ex-profs. Better late than never.
Alumni 7 Jul 2020, 12:11
+7 -4
Well deserved.
Fan 7 Jul 2020, 13:13
+19 -10
Easily one of the best professors to have taught at NALSAR and forcing me to "think like a lawyer". Well deserved recognition!
NALSAR Student 7 Jul 2020, 13:13
+24 -16
The amount of impact she's singlehandedly had on generations of students is simply unimaginable. Her retirement is a major loss for the institution and all the students who will no longer have the option of going through a journey involving a course with her, however, hopefully with her continued association she will continue to be a major asset for NALSAR.
Alias 7 Jul 2020, 15:52
+3 -7
Let the pissing contest among NLS, NALSAR, NUJS and the others begin.
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 16:51
+5 -0
About what?
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 01:18
+4 -0
No pissing contest, my friend. Instead, NLSIU and NUJS should feel ashamed that they have not designated some of their star ex-professors and VCs as emeritus professors. NLSIU's star ex-professors/VCs include Mohan Gopal, NL Mitra and NS Gopalakrishnan. NUJS's star ex-professors/VCs. include MP Singh, Chimni and Baxi. But it is still not too late.
CLAT aspirant 2728 7 Jul 2020, 16:14
+0 -7
Happy to see NLU grads taking charge at top universities....
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 16:49
+33 -0
This makes it official. People comment here often when high.
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 17:21
+37 -9
Yup, she's the "tallest" among total of four professors who have not published even beyond Andhra Law Times.....WOW!!!
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 17:25
+33 -5
There's no post of Academic Dean in any of of the NLUs including NALSAR.....this was the main controversy between her and Veer Singh.

Is should be questioned as to why Prof P V Rao, an Emeritus Professor appointed by the UGC, was thrown out two years ago?? There is total concentration of power in the hands of these two (VC and her) and the local faculty are sidelined by them.
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 13:42
+18 -1
It's very simple "give and take" between the two, obviously for mutual survival.
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 13:45
+16 -1
It seems the local faculty has no voice and these two have dominated them.
Good 9 Jul 2020, 17:58
+5 -9
Considering the caliber of those “local” profs- that might be a very good thing.
Guest 10 Jul 2020, 04:43
+7 -2
Then what are they still going inside instead of getting booted out? Is it because the powers that be know that they cannot control better people by keeping the latter under their thumbs?
Guest 10 Jul 2020, 06:06
+14 -1
Exactly.
Guest 10 Jul 2020, 06:20
+1 -1
They are all on permanent positions given by everyone's hero - Ranbir Singh. The local professors (profs - VBR, NV, KVR, assc. prof - KS, and asst. profs - GM, BR among others) can not be removed from their posts. It is a government university bound by certain rules.

Kuch bolne se ek baar soch liya karo. But sochne ke liye akal chahiye. Toe rehne do - annonymity ka fayada uthao jo Kian baant raha hai.
Guest 10 Jul 2020, 07:28
+2 -1
You can still make lives difficult for those people so that they leave themselves. Example: [...] from NLSIU.
Guest 7 Jul 2020, 17:29
+29 -2
There are two big Ford Foundation projects worth crores of rupees. As per the govt regulation 30% of the project's worth must go to the institution. How much did the institution get??
Guest 17 Jul 2020, 17:33
Troll
+8 -0
U really think they are going to furnish any details?? Come on!
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 00:49
Troll
+30 -37
She may be a learned teacher, but she is extremely leftist to the point of being ridiculous. This has caused some amount of harm to NALSAR, as students are being indoctrinated in one one type of ideology. This was seen by the Sadhguru incident, where even the National Anthem was mocked and people clapped after someone said drug use should be legal. Students should be exposed to all types of ideologies, especially considering that India has progressed most under centre-right leaders like Vajpayee and Narasimha Rao, while the Nehru family ruined the country.
lmao 8 Jul 2020, 07:20
+14 -6
Aww, did Jaggi Sadhguru text you back sweetie?
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 13:40
+18 -0
U just hit the bull's eye bro.
Guest 18 Jul 2020, 06:54
+7 -1
Whatever comments show up on this platform, it doesn't matter. They would carry on unperturbed as they know that there's no check on them. Sad but that's the way it is!!
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 01:13
+9 -0
For kids too young to remember, basically Dhanda was Olenna Tyrell, Veer Singh was Joffrey, Kian was Petyr Baelish-cum-Varys, and the Nalsar students were Kian's "little birds".

https://www.legallyindia.com/201202052549/Analysis/nalsargate-the-inside-story-of-an-institution-and-a-secret-report
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 01:34
+4 -5
@Guest 8: You may be correct that her publication record is not as impressive as one may expect, plus all her books listed are edited ones, not authored ones. But you are wrong when you mention Andhra Law Times as the best journal she has published in. She has published in JILI and intentional journals like the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry and International Journal of Law in Context. But this nowhere comparable to someone like Upendra Baxi or BS Chimni, especially Chimni.

https://www.nalsar.ac.in/amita-dhanda
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 04:56
+16 -10
One cannot always compare academics in that manner. It is no big secret that Dhanda focuses a lot on classroom teaching and admin matters at NALSAR, whereas Chimni et al are primarily engaged in research. We need both the types for an institution to flourish.
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 06:49
+1 -2
Chimni has only taught research students at JNU and never did any admin work except his stint at NUJS VC. Even there, he left NUJS before his term and returned to JNU as he was not getting enough time for research. In contrast, someone like Madhava Menon could hardly publish because he was always busy with admin work. Dhanda was not as busy Menon, but still had much less time than Chimni.
Guest 17 Jul 2020, 17:30
+8 -0
You are right, there's no comparison for the "omniscient" one; she knows everything!
Guest 20 Jul 2020, 06:31
+2 -0
Despite being in ILI for about 20 years, where research is the only activity, to state that she's only a teacher would not be correct.
Guest 20 Jul 2020, 13:59
+1 -0
Mata ji in ILI??
Guest 8 Jul 2020, 06:57
+27 -14
I am a staunch critic of Amita Dhanda. She accused Veer Singh of sexual harassment for merely saying that she wants a stenographer and peon for her personal use. How can this be sexual harassment? This is a misuse of women's rights and feminism. Veer Singh was rightly exonerated and should have instead sued her for defamation. Also, why does Dhanda need a stenographer and peon? Can her woke fans defend this?

https://www.legallyindia.com/lawschools/committee-absolves-ex-nalsar-vc-veer-singh-of-dhanda-sexual-harassment-20120417-2748

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Nalsar-VCamprsquos-email-to-dean-triggered-row/articleshow/11286444.cms
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 13:38
+22 -2
Any objective person would disagree with her.
Guest 17 Jul 2020, 17:27
+7 -0
Totally agree.
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 13:51
+18 -1
Now imagine, these folks teach and talk of "JUSTICE" in the justice city. Very impressive!
Guest 17 Jul 2020, 17:28
+8 -0
Their "intentions" are more impressive!!
Guest 18 Jul 2020, 06:51
+9 -0
There's just one intention....of course the blanks can easily be filled.
Guest 17 Jul 2020, 17:29
+6 -0
Odious.
Guest 9 Jul 2020, 01:49
+4 -15
Subjects like law and feminism, law and poverty etc have very little actual law involved. Real law means studying difficult statutes and doing case analysis, rather reading left-wing sociologists.
Haha 9 Jul 2020, 10:41
+6 -3
Someone clearly saw their gpa drop because of the more rigorous classes. Learning statutes and cases should’nt be seen as “difficult” by even a decently trained and smart law student.
Guest 10 Jul 2020, 04:48
+4 -0
She also teaches, or used to, Interpretation of Statutes and Administrative Law. As far as I remember, those were the high point of my academic interaction at NALSAR and also involve a deep understanding of law.

Further, Law and Poverty - which is also something she taught us - requires one to know, understand and present a vast variety of examples from the legal field and its inner poverty and perpetuation of outward poverty.

That said, [...] administrator. As arbitrary as the next person. Kind of like Sudhir sounds to the outsider on these forums.
Guest123 12 Jul 2020, 02:50
+8 -9
Dhanda was the best professor we had. She demanded the best of her students and brought much needed academic rigor to the institution. A generation of students owes her the debt of gratitude. More power to her!
Guest 18 Jul 2020, 06:50
+5 -0
Come on. It's anything but rigor.
Guest 18 Jul 2020, 07:27
+13 -1
Sorry, she was pretty nice to some students, but as a teacher, she is below average. She wants all the students to start at her level. That's not how teachers should behave with undergrads facing new subjects for the first time. As a result, a sizable number of students start hating her papers. Nor does she really encourage questions in her classes. I've got nothing against her as a person. I'm sure she's contributed a lot to NALSAR's success too. She can only teach students beyond a certain level.
not lizzie 12 Jul 2020, 09:09
+2 -3
liberal is often more interesting and fun to the young who have freshly got out of the lives regulated at home. it is also for them new as a world view as icse cbse and all do not have this angle.

as long as she did not in some ways penalise people who disagreed and encouraged a healthy dialogue it is good. as long as she taught in a non-fizzie way (not a silly tirade)- it is after all as a responsibility teaching (with its ethos of multiple credible references and method) and not just.. speaking. a lot.