NUJS bans student from rep’ing college after alleged ragging

NUJS: Dealing with rags
NUJS: Dealing with rags
Exclusive: NUJS Kolkata banned a third-year student from representing the college in external activities this academic year, after a first-year student alleged he was ragged by his senior.

It is understood that the first-year student and his parents had complained in July, just after the start of the academic year, claiming that the senior had pressured the junior into bringing him food and making unnecessary speeches.

On receiving the junior’s complaint, an inquiry was started by NUJS vice chancellor professor Ishwara Bhat and three faculty members. However, in August the junior withdrew his complaint after the senior apologised to him in writing.

The inquiry committee nevertheless continued its investigation of the incident and decided to take exemplary measures against the student, confirmed Bhat.

Bhat commented: “It was not a serious case. Only one student was subjected to this [punishment]. Actually that is the mildest punishment we are prescribing. It is possible to impose a very severe punishment, so many other things could’ve been done but they did it as a kind of positive interaction so we decided this.”

Last month Legally India wrote about the prevalence of ragging, which is often garbed as “positive interaction”, in law schools.

Allegations of an incident of ragging at NUJS were first made in July this year on Legally India’s forums.

Earlier this month NUJS appointed a student counsellor.

Comments

good 21 Sept 2012, 14:15
+5 -2
"It is possible to impose a very severe punishment, so many other things could’ve been done but they did it as a kind of positive interaction so we decided this"
What is positive interaction??? Ragging is ragging. there are strict laws against ragging and the law makes no exception for "positive interaction"
Dengu 21 Sept 2012, 14:36
+3 -1
Seconded bhaiaya!
K 21 Sept 2012, 14:53
+5 -2
You call this punishment? The guy is an adult. He should be named, shamed and expelled or the VC should resign. As it is the VC has broken the law by not expelling him.
Manmohan Singh 21 Sept 2012, 15:16
+10 -1
For the sake of humanity, the guy asked the junior to get him food from the shack just outside NUJS campus and you want him empelled from the college?

Whatever happened to reasonability and logic.
Anthony 21 Sept 2012, 18:06
+8 -1
'That guy' asked him to get food THAT prompted the junior to file a complaint against him for ragging. So you can imagine the way he was treated when he refused or even the way in which he was told to complete the task.
Anon 21 Sept 2012, 17:40
+5 -0
And this is news? Slow news day, LI?
Dear Anon 21 Sept 2012, 23:44
+6 -1
This definitely IS news. Ragging in a law school and the punishment prescribed. NUJS is hitting new lows with new incidents almost daily.They claim themselves to be the best, but that was past, the efforts of the hardworking seniors that these stugents keep bragging and singing under the glorious sun as they have their "positive interaction". This years placements were also poor and NUJS is just slipping down in terms of quality of their students in comparison to their past batches.

PS- Dear Anon, I am pretty sure your someone from NUJS itself and you cannot digest this new article. Oops..or may be your a junior who is made to write this on behalf of a senior on the pretext of "positive interaction". lol
Frustrated Noojie 21 Sept 2012, 20:25
+7 -0
I think this has to do with the prevalence of extreme filth in the hostels and having to wash your own plates. It is indeed character building. I love to do it all the time. In fact I offer to do it for most of my seniors. Also I am planning on opening this new start-up which shall teach people how to clean their seniors' egos.

Till then all hail some brilliant bloggers from this college who enticed me to join this college over a much better one.
smarty 22 Sept 2012, 04:41
+3 -0
First the VC whitewashed that unfortunate incident of a student dying and now this. This VC is the worst ever. And now he sn inducting political aides of Mamata Banerjee in the governing body, as recently reported in the press.
Don 22 Sept 2012, 09:05
+2 -0
Prof. Bhat has not inducted the aformentioned lady in the Executive Council, under the WBNUJS Act, state government has the discretion to put its representative. Please know your facts before commenting.
The Truth 22 Sept 2012, 09:10
+0 -0
And just for the information, that student has brought laurels to NUJS in the mooting arena and has founded a very popular society in the university. So if that gentleman is banned from doing what he does best just because of that "alleged" ragging, it is rather sad and very unfortunate to say the least.


And what he did? He told him to get food? THIS IS INSANE!

And the Registrar and the VC are the biggest studs that this university has ever experienced. I must say!
S 22 Sept 2012, 12:11
+7 -0
a) Because he has got laurels for the College, the person must be allowed to rag?
b) Do you think that the only thing this person did was to ask in a very nice tone - 'please get me food from the stall outside, here is the money?' If the junior went to the extent of reporting, does it not strike you that there was a lot more than polite talking/ light banter?
Reply to S 22 Sept 2012, 20:44
+0 -0
a)Do you get the logic? I am explaining his past history...and this is not ragging..its "alleged ragging".So Mr.S, please refrain from blabbering while you pass off those unnecessary comments!

b) Yes, that was the only polite thing he did...just to put rest to your presumptions. Have I made myself clear?
MS 23 Sept 2012, 06:24
+0 -0
Yes, I do believe that nothing more than polite talking/light banter happened in this case. You must understand that no body has the time to pick up fights with juniors just in case they refuse to go and get them food. You can simply just knock on the next door and you'll find juniors who are more than willing to do it.

Too much is being made out of nothing. Really, nothing.
Nothing but the Truth! 24 Sept 2012, 12:24
+2 -0
Actually, the original charges were considerably more serious, including that of hitting juniors with rods etc., obviously Legally India hasn't got the entire picture. And irrespective of whether a student wins "laurels" in mooting and founds umpteen societies, those ought not have any bearing on the punishment he receives for any offences committed. And simply because LI reports it as "alleged", that does not mean that the offence was not proven. It's only AFTER an offence is proven that punishment is dealt out.
[quote name="The Truth"]And just for the information, that student has brought laurels to NUJS in the mooting arena and has founded a very popular society in the university. So if that gentleman is banned from doing what he does best just because of that "alleged" ragging, it is rather sad and very unfortunate to say the least.


And what he did? He told him to get food? THIS IS INSANE!

And the Registrar and the VC are the biggest studs that this university has ever experienced. I must say![/quote]
Reply to Nothing but Truth 28 Sept 2012, 13:04
+0 -0
I think you are pretty much jealous of his success. This third year senior of mine is perhaps one of the most focussed people in NUJS. I look up to him and your reply is nothing but sprouting your jealous attitude. I can do nothing but feel sorry for you.

Go do something in your life!
FYI 22 Sept 2012, 10:05
+1 -0
LI pls get your facts right. The picture portrayed in the story is not exactly an accurate one.
Apoorv 22 Sept 2012, 11:32
+0 -0
Hi Kian,

Do you think these kind of stories make your website interesting? A very good example of misleading and preposterous media reports!
NOOJIE 22 Sept 2012, 11:36
+0 -0
Hahaha..this is both funny and sad. Is asking a first year student a case of "alleged ragging"? I still do it and i do that in NUJS. Go book me for ragging!
Ishaan Kashyap 22 Sept 2012, 15:26
+0 -0
Please disregard the earlier comment, it was not made by me but someone impersonating me.
As for that someone 'dude, get a life and be at least bold enough to use your own name'
The Bong 22 Sept 2012, 16:35
+0 -0
It is really sad that the university authorities are 'banning' people from taking part in the extra curricular activities for the "alleged" ragging. And Kian, this is just very timid journalism, i must say. Get your facts right before you publish these stories.
Faculty Member, NUJS 22 Sept 2012, 16:51
+0 -0
Hi Kian,

This is concerning NUJS student's involvement in the ragging case. I think you should refrain from publishing these kind of stories. As far as I know, this senior student is very good in academics and has always been in good books of our fellow faculty members. I ask you-Is it the right form of journalism? Should you present only one side of the story? I have been personally involved in this whole episode and i know exactly what happened there. This senior students has an exemplary record. So I opine that you should present the other side of the story too. Otherwise, it is nothing but bad journalism.

Also, facts are wrong. This same order of punishment has come out against TWO third year students and TWO fifth year students. So please check before publishing these factually incorrect reports.

best,
Faculty Member, NUJS.
S 23 Sept 2012, 01:40
+2 -0
Dear Faculty Member,

I repeat - does having an exemplary academic record give you the 'permission slip' for ragging juniors?

Also, while I finished law school a long time ago, I can assure you that no junior complains in writing if the only thing asked for in 'harmless interaction' is getting food, in a decent enough manner... My view-point:
a) LI is definitely the forum to discuss the serious issues of ragging and student suicides;
b) One side of story - in fact, I think LI is presenting an unfair picture because the 'ragging' act has been only discussed to the extent of getting food !!
c) Wrong facts - the fact that at least 4 students have been punished means that there are a 'lot' of 'harmless interactions' ... would you care to put out the facts here (no names needed) of were all asking only for food?
shame on you 23 Sept 2012, 04:24
+1 -0
I don't know if you really are a faculty member but it is shocking that you are advocating censorshp of such an important story. I don't think Kian would have published this story without proper verification. And the fact that he has got some sort of punishment shows he is prima facie guilty. I completely agree with some of the above comments saying that just because a student scores good marks does not mean he should be forgiven if he rags. You say that this student is in the "good books" of the faculty. So if someone licks the boots of the teachers he can do whatever he wants?

[quote name="Faculty Member, NUJS"]Hi Kian,

This is concerning NUJS student's involvement in the ragging case. I think you should refrain from publishing these kind of stories. As far as I know, this senior student is very good in academics and has always been in good books of our fellow faculty members. I ask you-Is it the right form of journalism? Should you present only one side of the story? I have been personally involved in this whole episode and i know exactly what happened there. This senior students has an exemplary record. So I opine that you should present the other side of the story too. Otherwise, it is nothing but bad journalism.

Also, facts are wrong. This same order of punishment has come out against TWO third year students and TWO fifth year students. So please check before publishing these factually incorrect reports.

best,
Faculty Member, NUJS.[/quote]
Faculty Member, NUJS 23 Sept 2012, 06:15
+0 -0
Dear S,

If you dont evem know the difference censorship and correct reporting, it just shows the falling standards of the general awareness. I dont wish ti argue against ignorant people.

best,
Faculty Member, NUJS.
S 23 Sept 2012, 10:30
+0 -0
Faculty member - It was NOT me who asked for censorship.
Whether you want to argue or not is your choice ... but if you do respond, take time to respond to my comments -against my nickname.

Best,
S
Bold reporting 22 Sept 2012, 19:52
+0 -0
I think Kian should worry for his life now...
RESIGN RESIGN RESIGN! 22 Sept 2012, 20:07
+0 -0
I think the whole student body is aggrieved at the handling of various cases.

1. Wasim Iqbal case- The way Registrar handled it was really bad..who does he think he is? He thinks that he can say whatever he wants to? We are thinking of writing a complaint to Mamata Banerjee..

2. The ragging case-"Exemplary punishment"- What about when [...] You talk about rules? Eh please! Let's not allow us to wash your dirty linen in public?

3. [...] Where did the rules go,sir?

So, this is mal-administration and needs to be checked. These two people are ruining our college..and dare you say anything useless against our dear batchmate who's won accolades for your university!

Shame on the administration! [...]
guest 23 Sept 2012, 04:32
+0 -0
I would request LI to file an RTI and ascertain the facts of this incident and other ragging incidents at NLSIU, NALSAR etc in the past 10 years. This should not be a on-off sensationalist story but the media must make a concerted effor to tackle ragging. Someone should highlight this incident to anti-ragging activists and demand explanations from the VC and Registrar. [...]
le 23 Sept 2012, 10:06
+0 -0
there is nothing called alleged ragging, it is an absolute liability offence where there can be only one punishment - expulsion. If the report is to be believed the senior asked the junior to fetch him some food. If the junior thinks that this is ragging then it is ragging as defined under the UGC guideline. Till recently I was part of a NLU and i have seen the deplorable manner in which seniors treat juniors in mess hall. however one has to also remember that punishment has to be proportional, in case there was only one off incident of 'request' from senior to junior then expulsion could be too heavy a price, however if there was repeated incidents then it needs to be dealt more severely than mere suspension from activities. And previous good character should count nothing in cases of 'alleged ragging'. Thus to sum up, depending on the ground situation the authorities have to take decisions, but it should not look as if the offender has been let off too lightly.
Decide 23 Sept 2012, 12:57
+0 -0
It is an absolute liability offence where there can be only one punishment - explusion
However, one has to remember that the punishment has to be proportional

Which one is it?
and how many incidents are sufficient for you to expel the guy?
Reply to decide 23 Sept 2012, 13:10
+0 -0
Hi Decide,

You please decide what do you want to convey.
Sue 23 Sept 2012, 13:20
+1 -0
I think there are heavy deliberations going on to sue Kian for malicious reporting..
Crazy_NUJS 23 Sept 2012, 13:31
+0 -0
Should and will be done.
lololol 23 Sept 2012, 14:00
+0 -0
That's hilarious, if true. What cause of action is that exactly?

NUJS needs to brush up on its teaching of media law.
Dear Anon 23 Sept 2012, 15:52
+0 -0
[quote name="lololol"]That's hilarious, if true. What cause of action is that exactly?

NUJS needs to brush up on its teaching of media law.[/quote]

Second that! I do not know what was Kians fault in reporting ragging and that too in a law school. All the ones arguing against might just be his friends or the friends are right now "allegedly ragging" juniors to post such comments. lol I think NUJS really needs to brush up their students IQ and awareness of law. This again shows the falling and degrading standards of NUJS. Brush up media law? I am pretty sure the NUJS students are ordering food from juniors RIGHT NOW! lol..
It's good.. The future "pass-outs" of NUJS would make good waiters if not lawyers. They are already seeking an alternative path after pathetic placements this year and are training their juniors for the same. Oops... I now know why the whole act was "alleged ragging". It was in fact future training. ;)
Noojie 23 Sept 2012, 20:47
+0 -0
[quote name="Dear Anon"][quote name="lololol"]That's hilarious, if true. What cause of action is that exactly?

NUJS needs to brush up on its teaching of media law.[/quote]

Second that! I do not know what was Kians fault in reporting ragging and that too in a law school. All the ones arguing against might just be his friends or the friends are right now "allegedly ragging" juniors to post such comments. lol I think NUJS really needs to brush up their students IQ and awareness of law. This again shows the falling and degrading standards of NUJS. Brush up media law? I am pretty sure the NUJS students are ordering food from juniors RIGHT NOW! lol..
It's good.. The future "pass-outs" of NUJS would make good waiters if not lawyers. They are already seeking an alternative path after pathetic placements this year and are training their juniors for the same. Oops... I now know why the whole act was "alleged ragging". It was in fact future training. ;)[/quote]

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-Albert Einstein
Dear Anon 24 Sept 2012, 10:59
+1 -0
There goes the Noojie.. he pretty damn sure of HIS stupidity.. LOL..
Faculty Member, NUJS 23 Sept 2012, 17:07
+0 -0
Hi Kian,

I think you haven't yet replied to my previous comment. I really think you should investigate the whole matter again and contact the right people in the administration to let you know the veracity of the facts. Hearsays don't really make stories. Apart from this brilliant third year student who has been unfortunately targeted, there were other third years and fifth years who have been involved and punished. So, if at all, you have to report this...you should really investigate the matter thoroughly and rectify this report.

Regards,
Faculty Member, NUJS.
kianganz 23 Sept 2012, 17:17
+2 -0
Hi Faculty Member,

Thanks for your comment - yes, we are investigating further and may publish an update if appropriate.

Best regards,
Kian
Administrative Official 24 Sept 2012, 12:28
+1 -0
Dear "Faculty Member",
At least use Anon while saying such things instead of trying to pose as a faculty member before saying such things! "Brilliant third year student" indeed! :D
[quote name="Faculty Member, NUJS"]Hi Kian,

I think you haven't yet replied to my previous comment. I really think you should investigate the whole matter again and contact the right people in the administration to let you know the veracity of the facts. Hearsays don't really make stories. Apart from this brilliant third year student who has been unfortunately targeted, there were other third years and fifth years who have been involved and punished. So, if at all, you have to report this...you should really investigate the matter thoroughly and rectify this report.

Regards,
Faculty Member, NUJS.[/quote]
Well wisher of NUJS 24 Sept 2012, 14:05
+2 -0
To All the Readers of LI

It is good to have the FACULTY MEMBER, NUJS as a GUEST to put down his comments.

One question to the FACULTY MEMBER ---

Why you had been silent when glaring illegalities were happening in NUJS?

Are you a FACULTY MEMBER in NUJS to protect LEGAL EDUCATION or to protect ILLEGAL EDUCATION?

Why don't you come forward with a WHITE PAPER on the matter that has happened in NUJS during Prof. M.P. Singh as VC?

Don't say that you don't know anything.

Be honest to yourself and your LEGAL EDUCATION.
Anon 24 Sept 2012, 18:41
+0 -0
Please don't unnecessarily bring this issue here. It was just a matter of asking somebody to get food. That's the only offense what he has been found guilty of.
I know for a fact that even two fifth years have been banned and then there's another third year who has been expelled from the hostel. Are these harsh punishments even called for? That too when both the victim and the accused persons have kissed and made up? Why is the administration encouraging hostility in the hostel?
Are you serious? 24 Sept 2012, 19:12
+1 -0
Are you serious!

Kian, come up with the expulsion part of it. Let them see what you have to pay for ragging. Why hasn't Legally India come out with the expulsion part of it? That is called punishment. Kian, please appreciate NUJS for expelling a student and taking a strict action.
Cena 24 Sept 2012, 23:25
+0 -0
Well done NUJS :D The story should be brought forward.
FYI 25 Sept 2012, 13:09
+0 -0
There has not been any expulsion order regarding the incident.
Old NUJS hand 25 Sept 2012, 00:40
+3 -0
As a student of one of the first batches of NUJS (when legendary Prof Madhava Menon was around), I find it disgusting that such an incident has occurred and even more that some students and perhaps faculty are trying to defend this. Over the years it has seemed more ad more that the work we put in into building up a friendly atmosphere in NUJS (go compare with NLS) is down the drain.

Working 14,000 km from Kolkata I was not at the scene of the incident. But obviously something did happen, and it obviously affected the junior student sufficiently for him to go complain. And certainly the university did conduct an investigation and obviously there must have been some degree of truth to what he alleged for such action to be meted out. I know how administrations run, given a choice they will prefer not having negative publicity. So I don't believe for a moment that it was "harmless talk" or "Casual teasing"or any shit like that.

Ragging is a serious problem (not only in NUJS) and universities must show zero tolerance of anything approaching it. During my LL.M., I observed that the JD class seniors were extra careful not to pick on the freshmen and even some incidents like forcing a song or a drink could result in suspension. Further, I think the message to go light on punishment on account of mooting record, etc. is utter hogwash. No student can expect leniency due to these factors and moot courts are not a substitute for character building. Seems to me this guy got off lightly; Prof Menon would have suspended him from hostel, possibly barred him for a longer term and threatened (thought not carried out) expulsion.

Lastly, I don't know which faculty member would be silly enough to ask for censorship, if at all it is a faculty member. He or she should instead work towards building up a culture of trust in the university. Oh for the good old days!
Faculty Member, NUJS 25 Sept 2012, 10:00
+0 -0
Dear Old NUJS Hand,

I am commenting on this as I have been closely involved in the investigations. I know the system more than you and I also know that how administration in NUJS is being run. Shabby and undemocratic as ever. And for you, who has no involvement or doesn't know the alpha beta of whatever has happened here, please refrain from making unnecessary comments.
another old NUJS hand 27 Sept 2012, 12:24
+1 -0
It looks like Faculty Member NuJS is still the same type of dorks and clowns they used to have 12 years ago when the college started.

People who were biased, frustated, inert and thinking that just because they were so called faculty, they were the epitome of gentlemen / ladies..

Please stop this mess and resign and go into exile if you have any shame
Old NUJS Hand 28 Sept 2012, 01:02
+2 -0
If you really are a faculty member than NUJS has kept up its hallowed tradition of appointing some of the most incapable faculty there is. Just hiring one Shamnad Basheer doesnnt make up for all the deadwood thats being gathering dust in the faculty list all these years. Mostly folks with no alternative, who came to do a 2nd class LLM or MPhil and stayed back for want of a better option. ROFL

I am a strong believer that there should be not the slightest chance of ragging. And if that means being a bit extra strict, so be it. Of late the unhealthy NLSIU type culture has pervaded into NUJS and that needs to be nipped in the bud.

It doesnt take an einstein to figure that there was definitely some incident for the admin to react in this manner.
another old NUJS hand 28 Sept 2012, 08:40
+1 -0
I believe that the faculty is / continues to be so bad that people refuse to acknowledge them in public.. Also, heard that some years ago, two faculty members were caught doing the act (in a fully compromising position) behind cupboards in an empty room...

haha hahah.. and people thought in law schools only students are captured like so.. noojie faculty excels in all respects ...
Old NUJS man 28 Sept 2012, 11:13
+0 -0
Haha I totally agree. Try this. Go to www.nujs.edu and check out the faculty list of law faculty. Half of those guys and girls were pathetic scared masters and mphil students when were around. Since we left they've parked their butts in nujs for good and god only knows what gibberish they impart. Ironically these losers who wouldn't last a day in the REAL world outside are lording it over an going for exchange programs and such. Yea man, biggest mistake of my like is choosing to work for my living in a good firm.
another old nujs hand 1 Oct 2012, 05:20
+0 -0
In our times, these so called llm students were pinned to the wall looking like blank ducks every time they opened their mouth. believe half our entertainment was putting these pseudos and the rest of the trashy faculty in their places.

it is a miracle that we survived despite the shitty faculty, the administration, the registrar and even the bloody red qualis that used to hang around the joint..

admin should get a life and kick some sense into these chappies. Otherwise, even the potholes will have a brighter future than these folk
New NUJS Hand 25 Sept 2012, 10:03
+0 -0
Hey Old NUJS Hand,

You are old and be contended that. You really do not have friggin' idea of what's going on NUJS. Its hell as ever. The administration is going berserk. So, leave that utopian idea that 'something must have happened and so on'. Nothing did really happen.
FUSSY 25 Sept 2012, 12:20
+1 -0
It's just making nothing out of the issue. What? That guy just sent somebody to get food and this spineless junior has complained against him? Tch tch...shame on the junta of NUJS. They cry it to the media! What has happened to NUJS since we passed out? Stupid juniors, rather! These kind of juniors should be really shown the way how to behave.
Well wisher of NUJS 25 Sept 2012, 13:07
+0 -0
It is appears from the reporting of LI that an inquiry was started by NUJS vice chancellor Professor Ishwara Bhat on the above matter.

One fails to understand why Professor Ishwara Bhat is not moving forward on the all the illegalities that has happened in NUJS during Prof. M.P. Singh as VC. Is he trying to protect Prof. M.P. Singh?
Another Well wisher 25 Sept 2012, 14:07
+0 -0
All hail Prof MP Singh. The whole of NUJS loves him!
Well wisher 2 25 Sept 2012, 17:27
+10 -0
yeah, hail Professor MP Singh for:

allowing people to booze inside hostel,
turning a blind eye to doping,
allowing students to take exams despite lack of attendance, allowing students to copy in the exams
promoting students to fifth year despite 16 backlogs
awarding gold medal to a student who passed a paper in his second attempt
allowing ragging to go on despite complains
for all the wonderful infrastructure available in academic block and the hostels
passing students who have 35 marks in a subject by transferring marks from a subject he has passed
for evaluating students projects based on moot memorials and law review articles that are totally unrelated to that subject
Old NUJS hand 25 Sept 2012, 21:13
+5 -0
I think it is impossible to be a great VC without cutting some corners on fairness and equity. Prof Menon was undoubtedly a class apart but he also took several seemingly arbitrary decisions that eventually helped nujs in the long run at the cost of discontent in the short term. For example -

- vastly exaggerating the infrastructure, esp in the early days
- permitting a well known kleptomaniac who showed some moot court promise to stay (and not expel him) (bizarrely he expelled another non-mooting student on the same ground)
- selecting students for international exchange programs without any scientific basis
- pretty much stifling healthy debates over important administrative decisions
- again, being overly generous granting attendance waivers for students on a discretionary basis

Whats the point of this? That decisions like these, guided by gut feeling and arbitrariness can and do help in quick and effective decision making but can be very frustrating for students, especially those who who work hard and play by the rules.
Well wisher 2 26 Sept 2012, 16:13
+5 -0
Absolutely, one who puts in all the hard work is left wondering what is it that she/he has to do to remain at the top of the batch.

In fact the culture of arbitrary decision making and favoritism has become so entrenched in the system that some idiots tend to think that it is a matter of right that they should pass in all the exams even if they have written whole lot of crap! One such idiot announced that he cannot believe how 16 out of 18 students appearing in the repeat exam failed despite taking up the exam (Occasion being the condolence meeting in NUJS). Bloody opportunist!

Hope someone investigates how some law school students are promoted and awarded degrees!
Warrants greater dialogue 30 Sept 2012, 13:52
+0 -0
Why has this conversation come to an abrupt end. We were discussing some serious issues before it got derailed by some idiots. What is crucial is the atmosphere in the hostels after this admin action. Is ostracization the new norm?
Exactly 30 Sept 2012, 15:29
+0 -0
Seriously, I think he's right. Infact, the victim has been immensely ostracized in the instant case instead of the ragger! The admin should understand the fact that this makes the victims vulnerable to these kinds of punishments without any fault of theirs.
Well wisher of NUJS 30 Sept 2012, 16:26
+0 -0
None of the issues of NUJS will be derailed. All issues are to be raised and addressed by the AUTHORITY of NUJS. They cannot just remain silent.
FYI 9 Oct 2012, 09:47
+0 -0
the decision of the university has resulted in ostracization and isolation of the accused. Be sure that no incident even close to ragging will now be committed in NUJS.