NUJS teacher allegedly slaps student late for exam; Law school to inquire

NUJS: Now with counsellor
NUJS: Now with counsellor
College promises formal inquiry that will not ‘suppress anything’.

NUJS to inquire into alleged slapping
NUJS to inquire into alleged slapping

An NUJS Kolkata student was allegedly physically assaulted on Tuesday by a faculty member at the law school after the student argued for permission to write an exam despite arriving late to the exam hall.

According to accounts from two students amongst the 100 in the exam hall at the time, the alleged victim was physically dragged out of the exam room by the arm and “slapped repeatedly”.

NUJS vice chancellor Ishwara Bhatt commented that the student was allowed to take the exam after the alleged incident. “It is an internal matter […]. Disciplinary action will be taken [against the parties involved] on the basis of inquiry. The process has started. I cannot say […] in clear terms because [the inquiry] is yet to start. [The inquiry] will be done in a formal manner; there won’t be any suppression or anything.”

Bhatt told Legally India that neither the student nor the university would file a criminal complaint against the faculty.

The concerned student and the accused faculty declined to comment.

NUJS had appointed a student psychotherapist to help students of the law school cope with pressure in September 2012, after the death of a final year student of the college in what was presumed suicide at the time.

Comments

News 2 May 2013, 09:57
+15 -11
Now random slaps make news??????????? at least tell who the teacher is.
go read somplace else 3 May 2013, 12:20
+4 -2
If u think this is random...well, I truly feel sorry for you...!! I jst hope this comment is not coming someone who has an iota of knowledge about legal rights and duties.
Class of 2013, NUJS 2 May 2013, 10:03
+35 -17
And pray what is the LINK between this alleged incident and the passing away of one of our classmates apart from them being juicy bits you guys like to prey on as vultures?
LI disappointing 2 May 2013, 11:20
+16 -17
This is truly disappointing. LI does this randomn linking of news which is so offensive. This is another juicy gossipy story that has no relevance to the legal community. You are just page 3 news! Sickening LI! Please also start reporting stories when teachers shout at students!!!!
Anonymous 2 May 2013, 18:08
+14 -5
I find it offensive that you presume that a case of a teacher thrashing a student is not worthy of reporting - how desensitized have you become?
LI disappointing 3 May 2013, 04:08
+3 -3
You actually think linking it with the suicide story was proper!!!!
You Disappoint not LI 2 May 2013, 23:32
+2 -2
I bet you would have found it interesting if this incident had not happened in your University but somewhere else?
Where is Lawctopus? 2 May 2013, 23:34
+5 -1
Just because this happened in NUJS, Lawctopus - Tanuj is not going to share this news, lets leave make a story?
Please do let this comment get posted, LI.
0-0 2 May 2013, 10:03
+2 -0
This "faculty" should be [...] if this is true.. shocking!
Guest 2 May 2013, 10:13
+21 -0
this faculty member had once gleefully boasted during the course of conducting a project viva that "she has made a list of 20 students she will fail." It seems that more than the students the concerned faculty is in need of counselling. However, in all fairness, such sadism is restricted to only the concerned faculty in the instant matter, and this incident should not be used to judge NUJS faculty in general.
A 2 May 2013, 10:45
+17 -4
the proper usage is 'faculty concerned' because there are no concerned faculty :-p
JumpingJapang 2 May 2013, 11:10
+0 -6
[quote name="A"]the proper usage is 'faculty concerned' because there are no concerned faculty :-p[/quote]
Unless the lack of concerned faculty results in such improper usage
Guest 2 May 2013, 11:29
+2 -3
thank you, I stand corrected :)
pi 2 May 2013, 10:49
+10 -2
the teacher always had a sadistic bent, i recall one instance where a student who had failed a year was sleeping at the back of the class, other teachers would have sent him to wash his face or something to that effect, this teacher call him to the front of the class and says well tell your juniors what did u learn from this class.
Guest 2 May 2013, 10:59
+44 -4
lovely reporting of the slapgate, Kian!
Fair 2 May 2013, 11:36
+2 -1
Thank you Guest!
Change topic 2 May 2013, 11:12
+2 -3
Change the topic to faulty faculty. :)
Confused Zeus Says . . . 2 May 2013, 11:38
+22 -4
The VC allowed the student to take the exam after the incident. Now, THAT was a slap on the teacher's face.
JF Nafar 2 May 2013, 11:42
+10 -1
I am surprised at the benevolence and graciousness shown by the student concerned in choosing not to file an F.I.R in the matter. It indicates a deep faith in the capacity of the institution to address the matter adequately through an internal disciplinary proceeding. One sincerely hopes that this faith is upheld by the administration. A swift and strict response will go a long way in mitigating the damage done to the fabric of the university by this incident.

P.S: Kian, in all fairness, i hope you realise that oblique references to irrelevant incidents (psychotherapy and suicides) dilute the credibility of an otherwise incisive piece of journalism. I hope you will continue to ensure adequate follow-up publicity with a view to promote a just and transparent inquiry into this matter.
bemused 2 May 2013, 12:42
+11 -19
pray what the teacher concerned could do if a student late by regulations comes and insists on taking the exams ? the VC would have terminated her services if she breached the regulations by admitting her.
duh-mused 2 May 2013, 13:14
+12 -3
uh, perhaps politely refuse permission by citing the "regulation"?

the fact that she was allowed to give the paper by the admin should be sufficient to decimate your idle armchair conjecture about the regulation?

spare a thought for the poor girl who got (wo)man-handled before the entire student body giving the exam.

slapped. thrice. on the face.
Irrelevant 2 May 2013, 15:15
+8 -5
She could have refused. She could have called security. She could have called the VC. She sure had no right to attack the student. And this issue is not restricted to NUJS alone. Other NLUs have also faced such incidents, they just go unreported. (I have been involved in one such incident).
Guest 2 May 2013, 12:55
+10 -9
i completely agree with others [...] but she is a stud [...] teacher! i wish I had worked hard in my 1st year...if u are upto her level, ur [...] foundation will be rock-solid
Nujs Ki Batman 2 May 2013, 12:55
+15 -5
We know who the teacher is .. Student should file FIR against teacher .. So that such incident is not repeated again..
Let not the university protect the party .. Even Alumni should step in and protect student rights ..
This is not a joke .. 23 24 year old kids getting slapped can have serious psychological repucussions .. Be very careful .. Treat this delicately with caution
Dark Force 2 May 2013, 13:01
+16 -1
There is a storm coming .. Batten down the hatches .. Only the righteous will be saved...
JF Nafar 2 May 2013, 13:15
+3 -3
@ bemused - Without challenging the assumptions you make as to the perils of termination, I ask you, was the method adopted to enforce this norm the best response imaginable? Does it behove anyone, let alone a professor of law, to resort physical violence as a means of enforcing an administrative regulation?

Indeed, regulations must be enforced strictly but resorting to such methods is like using a jackhammer to drill a 1/2 inch hole in a glass pane.
noojie-eyewitness 2 May 2013, 13:27
+7 -4
Name of the teacher in question is [...]. The other faculty member invigilating the exam, [...], held the student's arms while [...] slapped her across her face 3 times.

The disturbing part about the entire incident was that none of the faculty members or college admin condemn the incident and the authorities did not consider the matter serious enough and laughed it off when students first complained.
bucky: the Sall 2 May 2013, 18:43
+10 -18
I think the student was at fault for not reporting to the examination hall on time. University is an institution which has to maintain a minimum standard of superior education. It's a simple case of a kettle calling pot black. She was late for the exam and the rules are same for all and the teacher was doing her job.

P.S.: all the guys who are hooting for the student can buck my sall two times each..

Peace out..
advocate 2 May 2013, 13:47
+16 -32
Why the student came late to the exam hall? Is examination a joke? Why the student entered into argument with the faculty? He/She could have requested to the faculty in a humble way. Generally faculty members/invigilators allow late-comers unless it is too late. 5/10 min. late is always excused. But if a student comes 20-30 min or 1 hour late, better he/she should be shown the door. The faculty was simply doing his/her duty. I can not believe the faculty can slap without provocation or without student's unreasonable demand to appear in the exam despite him/her being at fault. However, the faculty is wrong. He/she is at fault for using force, for being overpowered by anger. He/she should be reprimanded by the VC.
Shreya 2 May 2013, 17:43
+8 -4
This is classic blaming the victim! Thought it happened only in sexual offences :|
Times New Indian 2 May 2013, 18:50
+3 -6
[quote name="advocate"]Why the student came late to the exam hall? Is examination a joke? Why the student entered into argument with the faculty? He/She could have requested to the faculty in a humble way. Generally faculty members/invigilators allow late-comers unless it is too late. 5/10 min. late is always excused. But if a student comes 20-30 min or 1 hour late, better he/she should be shown the door. The faculty was simply doing his/her duty. I can not believe the faculty can slap without provocation or without student's unreasonable demand to appear in the exam despite him/her being at fault. However, the faculty is wrong. He/she is at fault for using force, for being overpowered by anger. He/she should be reprimanded by the VC.[/quote]

Are you serious?
barbad lafanga 2 May 2013, 18:57
+0 -2
[quote name="LI Fan"]@AJ - and what about you? Did you name yourself?[/quote]
[quote name="Times New Indian"][quote name="advocate"]Why the student came late to the exam hall? Is examination a joke? Why the student entered into argument with the faculty? He/She could have requested to the faculty in a humble way. Generally faculty members/invigilators allow late-comers unless it is too late. 5/10 min. late is always excused. But if a student comes 20-30 min or 1 hour late, better he/she should be shown the door. The faculty was simply doing his/her duty. I can not believe the faculty can slap without provocation or without student's unreasonable demand to appear in the exam despite him/her being at fault. However, the faculty is wrong. He/she is at fault for using force, for being overpowered by anger. He/she should be reprimanded by the VC.[/quote]

Are you serious?[/quote]
I believe you meant "Why so Serious"?
Well wisher of NUJS 12 May 2013, 14:41
+0 -0
In Year 2008 around Sept - Oct one of the student in NUJS did not come for the exam. Why did the Fcaulty Member who is also the EC member called the student to appear in the exam. Later after the exam period was over the student was taken the Faculty Member in his room and made the student write the exam.
Who will investigate this matter ? Why the same slap was not given to the stident? What was the benefit the Faculty Member get from the said student ?


[quote name="barbad lafanga"][quote name="LI Fan"]@AJ - and what about you? Did you name yourself?[/quote]
[quote name="Times New Indian"][quote name="advocate"]Why the student came late to the exam hall? Is examination a joke? Why the student entered into argument with the faculty? He/She could have requested to the faculty in a humble way. Generally faculty members/invigilators allow late-comers unless it is too late. 5/10 min. late is always excused. But if a student comes 20-30 min or 1 hour late, better he/she should be shown the door. The faculty was simply doing his/her duty. I can not believe the faculty can slap without provocation or without student's unreasonable demand to appear in the exam despite him/her being at fault. However, the faculty is wrong. He/she is at fault for using force, for being overpowered by anger. He/she should be reprimanded by the VC.[/quote]

Are you serious?[/quote]
I believe you meant "Why so Serious"?[/quote]


[quote name="JF Nafar"]I am surprised at the benevolence and graciousness shown by the student concerned in choosing not to file an F.I.R in the matter. It indicates a deep faith in the capacity of the institution to address the matter adequately through an internal disciplinary proceeding. One sincerely hopes that this faith is upheld by the administration. A swift and strict response will go a long way in mitigating the damage done to the fabric of the university by this incident.

P.S: Kian, in all fairness, i hope you realise that oblique references to irrelevant incidents (psychotherapy and suicides) dilute the credibility of an otherwise incisive piece of journalism. I hope you will continue to ensure adequate follow-up publicity with a view to promote a just and transparent inquiry into this matter.[/quote]
The Shield 3 May 2013, 04:56
+12 -2
Let us be very clear. We will answer all your "why(s)" ? Tomorrow when we find out that you have come late for your court appearance, we will also get you slapped.. That will be our duty...

You have been replied to by The Shield
TheDarkKnight 3 May 2013, 13:47
+1 -1
She was two minutes late....
The Shield 2 May 2013, 14:25
+21 -4
Let us be very clear on one thing.. A student was held down and slapped by a faculty member. This amounts to corporal punishment. Whatever be the cause, this is an assault.. it will be treated like that. Consider a hypothetical if the student's eardrum had ruptured. What then ?

Let us be very clear. We will not let this incident die down. If there is any hint of a cover up, any hint.. there will be very serious fallout.. Nobody is allowed to take the law in their own hands.

let all parties sort the problem out legally. Teacher must be brought to task and apology must be given publicly and with humility. Else teacher must be dismissed. Please know that we have people within the system who will let us know exactly what is going on.

Let this matter be solved peacefully before it blows into something that no wants. Solve this amicably while you still can.
bemused 2 May 2013, 15:09
+6 -15
i never knew that causing hurt was a cognizable offence. the reason why students are prevented from entering the examination hall after a certain period is that the secrecy involved question paper is dispensed with after its distribution in the examination hall. there is an assumption that the student concerned has already used foul means, which when backed by the persistence in entering the hall even when entry is denied, which amounts to trespass of a public property ( a cognizable offence in itself), gives a right to action - recognised by law that, though be proportional, need not be mathmatically so. the teacher was only enforcing, though got a bit agitated in doing so, what the silent majority thought ought to be done with the voluble fashionably vagrant minority. its for the good of the student that no ifr was lodged as then she would have been in soup.
Not bemused 2 May 2013, 15:28
+12 -2
All your arguments fall flat because the VC allowed the student to write the exam and hence there appears no prima facie breach of any exam regulations!
The teacher if she was of the opinion that there was a breach of regulations should have informed the VC or Registrar ( I guess these guys exist for a reason) who would then make the determination regarding the regulations and may choose to evict the student.
Exam Invigilator is not authorised to use physical force in any event.
NUJS has enough ex-military security guards to follow the instructions of the Registrar, if needed.
reign of terror 2 May 2013, 14:32
+20 -5
Seems like the college is going from bad too worse.. We are watching... Suitable intervention will be made...
heat seeker 2 May 2013, 18:45
+16 -13
[quote name="reign of terror"]Seems like the college is going from bad too worse.. We are watching... Suitable intervention will be made...[/quote]
only if a pharmacist had made a suitable intervention before you were born.
Father in Law of Heat Seeker 3 May 2013, 05:05
+2 -0
Maybe he did not intervene because he was busy somewhere else.. like seeking heat in someone's house ?

[quote name="heat seeker"][quote name="reign of terror"]Seems like the college is going from bad too worse.. We are watching... Suitable intervention will be made...[/quote]
only if a pharmacist had made a suitable intervention before you were born.[/quote]
reign of terror 3 May 2013, 08:41
+14 -0
given your present situation, no intervention will be necessary to prevent a birth of progeny
Not bemused 2 May 2013, 14:43
+16 -2
No apology will suffice. The teacher should be dismissed or atleast suspended for a semester.
Do remember that for the smallest of transgressions of the students, the admin was prompt to dole out suspensions! This is a criminal use of force by a representative of the university and should be dealt with seriously. The University's reputation is at stake here. Seriously, if this is the attitude of the teacher, how can one even have a healthy academic discussion with her without being mortally afraid? Do you think that the students who are witnesses would come forward if this person is allowed to continue. Even the 5th years are scared because this teacher has flunked a lot of them and they have repeat papers.
Dark Force 2 May 2013, 15:58
+5 -2
Make no mistake.. We are one in this .. We are all watching this very carefully ..
reign of terror 2 May 2013, 17:41
+15 -3
What is the Student Juridical Association doing? student body should act to boycott classes of concerned teacher and petition the VC for immediate action, else unleash sustained class struggle against the tyrannical administration- we are watching SJA, time to step up
The Shield 3 May 2013, 05:00
+14 -2
The SJA is a toothless organization which lacks the will to stand up and fight... Gone are the days when the word of the SJA was heeded and the faculty respected them. The fight must be taken to the faculty one by one... If the SJA does not protest, tomorrow there may a case of more serious physical intimidation ... then you will regret...
SJA.. stand up for the students who have elected you... Show them that the students will not be trampled upon..
History is on your side... Fear Not, we have seen such struggles.. we have fought tooth and nail... we have been victorious...

We are with you...
AnotherstudentofNUJS 4 May 2013, 05:09
+4 -1
[quote name="The Shield"]The SJA is a toothless organization which lacks the will to stand up and fight... Gone are the days when the word of the SJA was heeded and the faculty respected them. The fight must be taken to the faculty one by one... If the SJA does not protest, tomorrow there may a case of more serious physical intimidation ... then you will regret...
SJA.. stand up for the students who have elected you... Show them that the students will not be trampled upon..
History is on your side... Fear Not, we have seen such struggles.. we have fought tooth and nail... we have been victorious...

We are with you...[/quote]
Do remember that this event happened on the last day of college, when almost 80% of the college already left. its difficult to organise a protest when the students are spread over the country. There will definitely be a protest as soon as everybody is back
FYI 6 May 2013, 10:40
+2 -0
Elected office-bearers? There has been no election in the SJA for the past two years and there have been incompetent office-bearers and their stooges being reappointed.
Reign of Terror 7 May 2013, 14:57
+6 -0
No elections indeed? What happened to the Constitution? Who appoints stooges? What is the conscious student body doing? Is there no one left with a backbone?
The Shield 8 May 2013, 08:33
+3 -2
Constitution of NUJS is a joke.. Everyone knows how that Constitution was drafted.. No one cares about the constitution. It is all about getting your stooges in to handle key posts..

There was never a conscious student body. All independent minds have been supressed... All students are slaves to their academic masters..

SJA needs warriors .... Soldiers of Menon as there once existed in that college... The glorious days when justice was dispensed without fear. Where the black hand of the Reign ruled the walls...

The place needs a cleansing, a clinical revolution ... A movement that will instill pride in every student ....

The Shield has seen this... The Shield is with you... Arise.. Awake...

Stop not till you are free of your shackles...
kianganz 8 May 2013, 08:37
+1 -0
At the risk of stating what everyone probably knows: Bruce Wayne is The Shield, right? :)
The Shield 9 May 2013, 04:33
+5 -0
The Shield gives strength to the unheard student... It is not constricted to one individual, rather is a collection of entities working together...

The Shield appears when there is a disturbance in the force.. and disappears when the crease is lifted..

You have been replied to by the Shield...
Reign of Terror 9 May 2013, 09:01
+4 -0
The reign will return, the reign will not fade away...
Viligant Student 3 May 2013, 15:33
+4 -2
[quote name="reign of terror"]What is the Student Juridical Association doing? student body should act to boycott classes of concerned teacher and petition the VC for immediate action, else unleash sustained class struggle against the tyrannical administration- we are watching SJA, time to step up[/quote]

SJA in NUJS is a big joke. It just knows how to launder money. Its totally defunct! Not ONE general body meeting has been held in the last THREE years!
AnotherstudentofNUJS 4 May 2013, 05:07
+0 -1
[quote name="Viligant Student"][quote name="reign of terror"]What is the Student Juridical Association doing? student body should act to boycott classes of concerned teacher and petition the VC for immediate action, else unleash sustained class struggle against the tyrannical administration- we are watching SJA, time to step up[/quote]

SJA in NUJS is a big joke. It just knows how to launder money. Its totally defunct! Not ONE general body meeting has been held in the last THREE years![/quote]

Please know your facts before making such comments. there is a difference between the SJA and the Adminstration. the SJA is a student run organisation merely for running the societies, it does NOT make any money. So, your "money laundering" comment falls. Moreover, there were two GB meetings last year. :)
FYI 6 May 2013, 10:41
+0 -0
Which two meetings are you talking about? If there is no accountability and no statement of expenditure published how do you think the students will take it at face value that there was no money-laundered?
Viligant Student 8 May 2013, 05:56
+1 -0
[quote name="FYI"]Which two meetings are you talking about? If there is no accountability and no statement of expenditure published how do you think the students will take it at face value that there was no money-laundered?[/quote]
[quote name="AnotherstudentofNUJS"][quote name="Viligant Student"][quote name="reign of terror"]What is the Student Juridical Association doing? student body should act to boycott classes of concerned teacher and petition the VC for immediate action, else unleash sustained class struggle against the tyrannical administration- we are watching SJA, time to step up[/quote]

SJA in NUJS is a big joke. It just knows how to launder money. Its totally defunct! Not ONE general body meeting has been held in the last THREE years![/quote]

Please know your facts before making such comments. there is a difference between the SJA and the Adminstration. the SJA is a student run organisation merely for running the societies, it does NOT make any money. So, your "money laundering" comment falls. Moreover, there were two GB meetings last year. :)[/quote]

I think you confused the Annual Day celebrations and Invicta opening ceremony with the TWO GB meetings. And if SJA doesnt deal with money then how come it allocates funds to the various committees and societies?
#shadowWarrior 2 May 2013, 16:28
+6 -3
To all those who are watching above, there is need for vigilance but be restrained... it is good that there is support but we need them to solve this first within themselves. Hopefully this will be resolved peacefully and all will be fine. If it isn't , we know you are there and all of us should be proactive in bringing this tomfoolery to the end and intervene to restore sanity to this college.

AS always , the shadow sees all... the shadow is waiting..
Observer 2 May 2013, 16:37
+13 -14
I just dont see why this should be covered on LI. Is this newsworthy at all? Only reason why it is published by LI is to garner more hits and get people to gossip (which is evident by the number of comments!). its weird that issues in relation to malpractices by the AG get 2-3 comments, where as some randomn nonsense like this gets so much attention. Kian clearly has the pulse on what news sells.

This is of course a serious matter for the teacher and students of NUJS. But how does this concern other law students or colleges? Does it reveal any particular trend? Does it highlight any over arching issue? This news is highlighted only to sensationalise. Clearly, some disgruntled NUJS students thought this is a good way to get back at the teacher - while the poor student is a scapegoat.

And then LI milks it by linking the suicide story and making it seem like NUJS is a breeding ground for all such issues!! Shame on you LI! SHAME!
AJ 2 May 2013, 16:39
+3 -7
Shame on you LI. You don't even have teh balls to name the teacher. When it is other NLUs you don't hesitate to publish the most slanderous allegations and name people. Why the hesitation?

As for [...], time for him to leave. Things are going from bad to worse.
LI Fan 2 May 2013, 18:06
+5 -1
@AJ - and what about you? Did you name yourself?
@LI Fan 3 May 2013, 10:52
+0 -0
[quote name="LI Fan"]@AJ - and what about you? Did you name yourself?[/quote]
Actually Aj is a complete name in itself
name d teach. 2 May 2013, 18:10
+3 -2
the point every one seems to be missing is that a 'teacher' slapped a student.

it really does matter, the message which is sent out

would be it be just for a teacher to resort to physical violence if they have a reason to it justify it later on?

i hope not and believe most of the people here would agree.

moreover, this incident, justifies the need as to why the faculty should undergo a mandatory psychiatric evaluation from time to time.

HAD IT ONLY BEEN JADAVPUR UNI... we would have had reasons to sympathize with the faculty concerned by now
Disturbing 2 May 2013, 18:15
+4 -5
This alleged monster of professor would not have dared to repeatedly slap and assault a guy... where will this country go if even the most educated women-and-law degree holders take out their anger and frustration on other women like that.

Talk about violence on women!.. this country in general needs a serious shaking up man/ woman or chhaka..
Lawschoolite 2 May 2013, 18:32
+4 -3
i overslept once and ended up coming late to an exam. The teacher didn't bat an eyelid and I was penalised adequately as I had lesser time.

Not allowing a student in because she was late is nothing short of stupid.
Cheater 2 May 2013, 19:19
+2 -0
[quote name="Lawschoolite"]i overslept once and ended up coming late to an exam. The teacher didn't bat an eyelid and I was penalised adequately as I had lesser time.

Not allowing a student in because she was late is nothing short of stupid.[/quote]
Ever thought of reason behind such a practice? Because there are enough geniuses who might do that intentionally in order to get the hint of questions, considering you are allowed to leave after first fifteen minutes.
Repeater 3 May 2013, 08:39
+4 -1
I dont think the question is whether someone should be late to an exam. I think if the University merely banned the student from sitting for the exam, there would be this hue and cry. Its the physical assault which is despicable and unwarranted.
Lawschoolite 6 May 2013, 03:17
+2 -2
That just seems like a colossal waste of time. There is already so much time pressure especially for the open book exams, Most people who would try this would most likely fail.
Kudos to NUJS students 2 May 2013, 18:34
+9 -11
Kudos to NUJS students for taking the bull by the horns!

This is something only NUJS and NLS can boast of: [b]a liberal culture, an empowered student body.[/b]

A [b]liberal culture[/b] which actually promotes and doesn't hinder student's dealing proactively with the admin. And an [b]empowered student body [/b]which is powerful enough to take such an action against the university.
azad parinda 2 May 2013, 18:59
+6 -1
[quote name="Kudos to NUJS students"]Kudos to NUJS students for taking the bull by the horns!

This is something only NUJS and NLS can boast of: [b]a liberal culture, an empowered student body.[/b]

A [b]liberal culture[/b] which actually promotes and doesn't hinder student's dealing proactively with the admin. And an [b]empowered student body [/b]which is powerful enough to take such an action against the university.[/quote]
such a troll you are.
Err 3 May 2013, 05:12
+4 -2
[quote name="Kudos to NUJS students"]Kudos to NUJS students for taking the bull by the horns!

This is something only NUJS and NLS can boast of: [b]a liberal culture, an empowered student body.[/b]

A [b]liberal culture[/b] which actually promotes and doesn't hinder student's dealing proactively with the admin. And an [b]empowered student body [/b]which is powerful enough to take such an action against the university.[/quote]

Empowered student body? I am from NUJS and the student body is doing nothing here. Everyone is busy getting on with their own lives. What liberalism? What empowerment? Please stop all this chest-beating on public forums while the foundations of a university rot. Hubris is not going to get us anywhere as long as we don't want to look at status quo in its entirety. Adn BTW your attempt to exclude Nalsar from the list of liberal, empowered campuses smacks of despicable opportunism.
reign of terror 3 May 2013, 08:37
+5 -1
student body must rise, else it will flounder and be taken over by individuals with the right views and objectives ... tyranny shall not be tolerated....
Lawschoolite 2 May 2013, 18:35
+1 -7
In every sense this is newsworthy! Noojies are cowering to protect their institution only when they themselves are the target.
A person got attacked by one of their own. This is a serious issue and something should be done about it!
Guest 2 May 2013, 18:49
+5 -2
Hope sreesanth doesn't go on a twitter rant about this!
N 2 May 2013, 19:13
+20 -1
I'm at a semester exchange in the USA. The school I'm at right now is known to be extremely high strung. Even so, the professors here are so understanding. They treat students like adults. Missed a test? "Drop in any time in my office and pick it up to take it". Can't make it to class because you're on an extended Spring Break? "Ok have fun, and do check out _____ event!" Didn't submit my draft because I was absent when you announced it? "Oh, let's meet tomorrow to discuss whatever you've worked on yet then". I am appalled at the sort of school- teacher like behaviour these professors of law indulge in! Even in my own law school if a student is late, he may be allowed to sit for the exam after he just goes and checks in with the Dean of Academics, and based on the Dean's discretion, at the most he may be docked some time off the exam. This is ridiculous! Indian law students deserve better. And this 'Guru can do anything" mentality has to go! That's why law schools need to employ professors who do not subscribe to old school teaching methodologies. And I don't mean "young" professors. Professor Parmanand Singh taught me Constitutional Law, and he was way less high strung than one of my young female professors according to whom, if she had a child like this particular student who couldn't turn in his assignment, she would lock him up in his room until he did it. Really? If I had a mother like you, you'd be in jail for abuse.
Abc 2 May 2013, 20:49
+3 -1
This professor has always had a vindictive bent. I wonder what she stands to gain. For all that say "if you are up to her level, you will have a solid base" speak on a flawed premise. First, the university does employ professors to only cater to those students who are "up to her her level". The teachers' success is measured by how many students he/she can "bring upto his/her level." Second, there is no guarantee with this teacher that she will judge "her level" in a non arbitrary manner. Indeed the brightest students have failed to rise to such a "level". Moreover, assuming arguendo that she is the best teacher, one at a completely different "level", one fails to see how that ever could justify physically assaulting a student.
def 3 May 2013, 08:36
+5 -1
actually it would not take much to reach the concerned teacher's level
Guest 3 May 2013, 03:28
+2 -1
How about a question in CLAT on similar facts?
NUJS Student 4 May 2013, 05:31
+2 -2
She might just make it a question in one of her own test papers. Last year they didn't let her flunk all the students who didn't meet her standards, so this year, we got a question based on that fact situation, asking us what recourse such a teacher would have, considering she was given the freedom to set whatever examination standards and criteria she desired in her employment contract.
Second Year 4 May 2013, 07:24
+0 -11
That was our batch and we got a similar question in the second semester itself. However irrelevant it might be, she is a brilliant teacher. It is sad to see someone so brilliant and sincere doing such a shameful act.
Even though she has been one of the best faculties in college, I reiterate, nothing gives her right to behave in such manner.
Bleh 6 May 2013, 04:39
+10 -4
Dear Second Year

If you think she is a "brilliant teacher" I suggest you choose an alternate profession before its too late

Sincerely

Bleh
LI, get a life! 7 May 2013, 06:45
+0 -7
Dear Bleh,

You wouldn't know if you sleep through her lectures.

Sincerely

Double bleh
Dark Force 7 May 2013, 10:35
+4 -0
We have determined "LI, get a life" could be a malicious troll ..

He shall not be allowed to thwart the forces who support the benefit of good, hardworking students who are attacked by the institution.. Justice will prevail

Arise...
Guest 3 May 2013, 03:50
+0 -0
Similar thing happened in HNLU. A teacher caught a student by collar and pulled him towards him when the student could not understand his order to sit properly (meaning in attentive position) while he was talking to the teacher about an issue relating to why he does not want to sit for exam.
PR 3 May 2013, 04:27
+4 -1
I am not aware of the entire facts but you CANNOT and SHOULD not slap a college student and certainly not a law student for a fault which is so minor. The teacher seems to have a grudge against students (demented one!) and has touched a new low by slapping someone thrice. Should be removed effective immediately for bringing shame to NUJS. I am assuming that the teacher may have been provoked but even so, no amount of provocation can compell you to do an act of this nature.
FYI 3 May 2013, 05:16
+5 -2
Kian, why don't you name the faculty concerned? Naming and shaming of culprits is important. I understand not naming the victim student who was in the final year and about to graduate, but what is the reason for not naming the faculty member involved?
Agree - LI pls act 3 May 2013, 07:32
+1 -3
Please publish name of faculty. If you report a story like this, you should name the faculty against whom the "allegation" has been made. We all understand that the faculty of innocent till proven guilty! And most media sources would publish the name, right?

At least let us know why you are not publishing the name.
Mogambo 3 May 2013, 06:07
+10 -2
We should open up to foreign firms so stop menaces like this.
Beware of Greeks 3 May 2013, 06:50
+25 -1
Before someone else says it. HOW CAN SHE SLAP????
Guest 3 May 2013, 07:34
+2 -1
Best comment ! That video was dammn funny.
Prachishrivastava 3 May 2013, 10:16
+7 -7
Thanks for your comments.

The link at the bottom was not to a story about a suicide but to a story about a counselor being introduced on campus to help students deal with excessive academic pressure or stress.

As such, it is related to the culture of a college and the initiatives the administration has taken.

In terms of reporting without naming names: we thought the most important part of the story would stand just as well without any names.

Also, Until there has been a bit more time for facts to crystallise (re a formal inquiry), for the college to take action, if any, etc, we figured it more important to publish the events themselves, rather than naming and shaming individuals on either side.

Best wishes,
Prachi
hawk 3 May 2013, 14:41
+7 -3
Hey Prachi why don't you have the guts to name the teacher? When the alleged caste incident at GNLU happened you had no hesitation in naming the senior most person. Similarly you have named the top most person at Nalsar. Different rules for different schools.

[quote name="Prachishrivastava"]Thanks for your comments.

The link at the bottom was not to a story about a suicide but to a story about a counselor being introduced on campus to help students deal with excessive academic pressure or stress.

As such, it is related to the culture of a college and the initiatives the administration has taken.

In terms of reporting without naming names: we thought the most important part of the story would stand just as well without any names.

Also, Until there has been a bit more time for facts to crystallise (re a formal inquiry), for the college to take action, if any, etc, we figured it more important to publish the events themselves, rather than naming and shaming individuals on either side.

Best wishes,
Prachi[/quote]
With Love!!! 3 May 2013, 16:57
+4 -1
You all shall not pass!!!
NUJS Student 4 May 2013, 05:56
+4 -4
Well, all I'll say is that if the student is not pressing charges, it must be for a reason. If a teacher were to slap me like that, I'd go hammer and tong after her. I don't see why everybody else is getting so excited when they don't have a clear idea of the facts or background. I am sure that either he has been given some sort of assurance by the VC, or there was some background to the incident. Apart from that, like the VC said, it is an internal matter and it will be handled internally. If some great injustice is done, I am sure the aggrieved party will take action. After all, he is not an uneducated guttersnipe. He is a law student in what is easily the second or third most sought after law school in the country. He has batchmates who won't let him take any unrighteousness lying down. So, please be sensible and hold your horses until the inquiry is complete at the very least.
reign of terror 4 May 2013, 09:38
+6 -0
The reason why a student would not do that is because of the consistent harassment she will face from the faculty and the administration for the rest of her law school days- is that too difficult to appreciate- the inquiry is all hogwash- the students themselves must rise and take action
The Shield 6 May 2013, 04:31
+6 -1
NUJS has a culture of harassing and fiddling with students who rise up against the faculty. This has been happening since its inception in 2000. Even these internal enquiries are hogwash which were started in the early 2000(s) and continue to do so. There is even a section of non teaching staff who are in the pockets of the faculty and make life difficult for students by passing snide remarks etc.
also, there could be other angles to the story (faculty having political connections etc) so that enquiry is hushed down.
All we know as of now is that if the SJA and the students do not take action as required, these things will happen again. The next time it will be more serious. The mentality of the faculty from the very beginning in NUJS has been to get after the students and constrict them. There are enough instance of these on record.

The watch is being kept. We are getting our reports internally from the system. We will make suitable intervention if required including naming and shaming in public fora...
Intimidation 6 May 2013, 14:14
+6 -0
"Bhatt told Legally India that neither the student nor the university would file a criminal complaint against the faculty."

Shows that intimidation has already happened....
Well wisher of NUJS 12 May 2013, 14:50
+1 -0
[quote name="Intimidation"]"Bhatt told Legally India that neither the student nor the university would file a criminal complaint against the faculty."

Shows that intimidation has already happened....[/quote]

Bhatt has to reply more to the Nation
rockstar 4 May 2013, 14:03
+11 -1
A truly shameful incident. If this happened in the West, the prof concerned would have been dismissed and jailed. The VC must resign for inaction.

As for those wishing to know the prof's name, go to nujs.edu, click on "Faculty", and spot the person with the least impressive qualifications.
0-0 6 May 2013, 10:21
+1 -0
[quote name="rockstar"]A truly shameful incident. If this happened in the West, the prof concerned would have been dismissed and jailed. The VC must resign for inaction.

As for those wishing to know the prof's name, go to nujs.edu, click on "Faculty", and spot the person with the least impressive qualifications.[/quote]
more clues please... not able to figure
Guest 6 May 2013, 13:40
+3 -0
Refer to comment no. 6
studboy 6 May 2013, 14:41
+2 -0
Maybe you should watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-2CnRuk6Nk
LI, get a life! 7 May 2013, 06:35
+0 -8
Much ado about nothing. If the college administration and the concerned student has decided not to file a criminal plaint, who are we to make a noise about it. As it is NUJS has lost many good faculty members in the past one year or so. It can't afford to lose the professor involved in this incident.

And what's with linking this incident with the suicide? This is an obvious slide into yellow journalism. Try and find better stories.
Dark Force 7 May 2013, 07:03
+6 -0
at above, this kind of attitude support violence against women, violence in workplace, beat up their kids etc.. the parties may not make noise because of internal pressure and faculty trying to make herself to be Gi Jane.. It is our duty to highlight these issues so that hue and cry is made and incidents are not repeated... If your daughter was collared and slapped, wonder whether you would be so nonchalant about it..

maybe, you are a faculty troll.... in which case, suitable intervention will be made...
SJA is to blame 7 May 2013, 09:21
+6 -0
SJA = Spineless Jokers Association
Times New Indian 7 May 2013, 10:25
+0 -0
I hear that the maternal instincts of the teacher had kicked in and the college had requested the students to forgive her on humanitarian grounds.
Nujs ki Batman 8 May 2013, 04:23
+0 -0
Reliably learnt that both VC and Registrar asked student to think of teacher as elder sister and not take the matter further..

if elder sisters start slapping the lights out of their siblings, young lings have ,much to fear..
Nujs ka ironman 8 May 2013, 05:31
+1 -0
bullshit [quote name="Times New Indian"]I hear that the maternal instincts of the teacher had kicked in and the college had requested the students to forgive her on humanitarian grounds.[/quote]
Bullshit.. "maternal instincts".. more like caveman instincts.
Slapping Sharda 8 May 2013, 15:16
+3 -0
Who is this lady? Woman rather. Name her. Publishing a fact is a defence to defamation. How unsexy for a 20 year old guy to be slapped like this for coming late. He will never be hot again. Sad.
Ghamandilal 9 May 2013, 08:48
+1 -0
The slappee is a female
troll 9 May 2013, 14:15
+4 -0
the inquiry committee has submitted its report and has said that the slapgate is just a figment of imagination. in other news didi said its the joint conspiracy between cpm and kian to malign the name of nujs. she said that she has full confidence on police to arrest the malicious elements when they visit bengal. she said 'ora maobadi' (they are maoists).
Well wisher of NUJS 12 May 2013, 14:50
+0 -1
All the story of NUJS will be exposed soon